Lion of the Blogosphere

Photographing the rich

Here’s an interesting excerpt from a recent web/blog article about Robert Frank (that’s Robert Frank the photographer from last century and not the economist from Cornell or the journalist who used to write for the Wall Street Journal and who now works for CNBC):

One of the most poignant themes that Frank pursued in “The Americans” was the disparity of wealth in America, as well as the blatant racism. One of the subject matters that hadn’t been explored much during his period was the rich. He didn’t want to just photograph the poor and the middle class – as he wanted to paint a fuller-picture of the American socio-economic classes.

However the difficulty he found in photographing “the richer people, the upper class people” was that they were more difficult to find and photograph. Whereas the poor and the middle class would often be out in the open, the rich would be more secluded, behind closed doors. To locate and photograph the rich, he focused on finding them at movie premieres and balls where the wealthy were abundant.

Frank deserves credit for wanting to photograph the rich, who are the most important social class in the country. For some reason, most sociologists are more interested in studying the poor than studying the rich, yet there’s a lot more to be learned from the rich.

Frank seems to be describing what Paul Fussell called the “out-of-sight” rich, so called because they in live remote places and estates that are invisible from the road.

I don’t know about the 1950s, but there are a lot of in-sight rich people in today’s Manhattan. They walk out onto the streets just like everyone else. The problem is that, when they do, they usually don’t look very different from a regular upper middle class person (or a “bobo” to use the term favored by David Brooks), so you don’t even know that you are looking at a rich person.

It’s hard to tell apart regular bobos from the truly rich, but what they share in common that’s not shared by New York City’s poor is that they don’t just hang out. If you walk through a poor neighborhood in New York City, you will see poor people just standing around or sitting on stoops doing nothing. The higher class New Yorkers are always doing something or going somewhere when you see them outside of their houses.

Written by Lion of the Blogosphere

January 11, 2013 at 7:00 am

Posted in Bobos

9 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Last time I was walking around in Manhattan, I saw quite a few wealthy people who were dressed nothing like typical SWPL/bobo style. I could tell immediately that these people were much wealthier than usual. For the most part though you are right, it’s hard to tell unless you can spot the differences between a $250 oxford shirt and a $78 one (I can’t).

    anonymous

    January 11, 2013 at 11:10 am

  2. It is wise to hide your wealth if you are rich. Let us face it, wealthy people are minority group. As any minority, you are always vulnerable and have little sympathy from most society. Also upper class travel extensively due to their intellectual curiosity. It is real risk to be kidnapped for ramsom in many developing countries or ghetto criminals. Out of sight or in disguise as minddle class is the best approach.

    IC

    January 11, 2013 at 12:04 pm

  3. Ah, but americans DO photograph The Rich – and have massive interest in them.
    It’s just that they’re celebrities.

    Annie Leibovitz & Richard Avedon (for your Manhattanphiles) made entire volumes of their work. Toss in your Warhol, too.

    All Feudal Manhattan demands its Photo-Courtiers work in The Great Castle.

    Firepower

    January 11, 2013 at 12:12 pm

  4. Believe it or not, the golf course beyond my backyard has never been photographed – you can’t find a pic of any of the holes anywhere – because the Top Out of Sight members want to be as anonymous as possible. I wonder what would happen if I snuck out there some summer night for a few clicks and uploaded them to Youtube. Once when I took a shortcut through there I came upon a golfer walking with two malamutes.

    walter condley

    January 11, 2013 at 3:22 pm

    • Which course?

      Steve Sailer

      January 11, 2013 at 5:09 pm

      • Wasn’t there a guy a few years ago that just walked onto a lot of the top private clubs and played and nobody even questioned him? I think these were some of the most exclusive clubs.

        Twain

        January 11, 2013 at 10:45 pm

  5. The blogger wrote “One of the most poignant themes that Frank pursued in “The Americans” was the disparity of wealth in America, as well as the blatant racism.” Bloss Unsinn! Frank’s crisscrossing of the country was in pursuit of the soul of America, like the Simon & Garfunkel song. What an absurd banalisation of his noble project!

    Mike Eisenstadt

    January 11, 2013 at 3:38 pm

    • Robert Frank was the cinematographer of Pull
      My Daisy! which is a discussion among Kerouac
      and other Beats about poetology. X ing America
      is our great adventure. hip foreigners did it and
      still do.

      Mike Eisenstadt

      January 12, 2013 at 5:29 am

  6. There are a million photographers at movie premieres and charity balls.

    On the other hand, there is no real photograph online of the private library Bill Gates built for his mother. The President’s mother-in-law, who lives in the White House, walks the streets of Washington D.C. unrecognized. Rich and famous people these days are skilled at being visible when they want to be visible and not being visible when they want their privacy.

    Steve Sailer

    January 11, 2013 at 5:14 pm


Comments are closed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 65 other followers

%d bloggers like this: