Lion of the Blogosphere

Brush with Obama?

I think I walked in between the car’s of Obama’s motorcade while it was stuck in traffic in front of the Sheraton. From my perspective he was just causing a lot of traffic and getting in my way.

Good thing I wasn’t tackled by aggressive Secret Service agents.

* * *

I take that back. Obama was supposed to speak there earlier. Maybe the motorcade belonged to a Clinton, or Mayor DeBlasio, or Governor Cuomo? In any case, if they’re attending a Climate Change summit, maybe they should have bicycled there instead of traveling in a motorcade of black gas-guzzling SUVs.

Written by Lion of the Blogosphere

September 23, 2014 at 6:10 pm

Posted in New York City

77 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. that’s pretty cool to see a motorcade so close. too bad you didn’t take pictures

    grey enlightenment

    September 23, 2014 at 6:34 pm

    • Sheraton at Times Square (the hotel where Obama was speaking about the Clinton Initiative and also Lion’s neck of the woods) is the perfect venue that symbolizes the cognitive dissonance coming from the Left. Just thinking about Times Square and the multi-cult riff raff that loiter in that area and all the foreign tourists who seemingly enjoy their presence in the backdrop of the glittering lights and entertainment, is our modern day Babylon and Roman bread and circus spectacle, all thanks to our liberals in the likes of Obama and his 2 Bill pals, de Blasio and Clinton.

      JS

      September 23, 2014 at 10:30 pm

      • Both obama and clinton are centrist democrats.They are not left.

        Wolf

        September 25, 2014 at 3:10 am

      • We have this discussion before. Democrats symbolizes left wing politics and are generally die hard globalists who believe America extends beyond her borders.

        JS

        September 25, 2014 at 9:55 am

      • “Both obama and clinton are centrist democrats.They are not left.”

        Clinton is a centrist. O. is nothing of the sort. O. was pushing gay ‘marriage’ back in the mid-1990s in his law class when hardly anybody had even heard of it. He ‘flipped’ for the 2008 election before ‘evolving’ to the position he always had. Regarding abortion, he has worked to protect abortion doctors who kill infants after they are accidentally born in the Illinois senate.

        The biggest reason O. seems like a centrist is because he is a political opportunist and moves toward the center in his campaign speeches.

        The biggest tells of his leftism? Notice how he gets wrapped up in things like the Trayvon incident. First he said Trayvon was his son and then he said Trayvon was his younger self. It has nothing to do with anything he is supposed to be doing and yet that stuff is catnip to leftists. He puts the plainly exaggerated campus rape narrative front and center because it is an issue on leftist media (and nowhere else; it certainly wasn’t among the things most Americans were worried about). He demonizes the right at every turn and refuses to work with them, which was emphatically not the case with Clinton.

        Clinton erected welfare to work, while O. removed it by fiat.

        Don’t look at the laws O. passes: those need congressional votes. Look at what he does executively. Notice also how often he has been overturned 9-0 by the Supreme Court, showing the number of times he was more extreme than all 9 of those folks.

        Dan

        September 25, 2014 at 9:55 am

      • “he has worked to protect abortion doctors who kill infants after they are accidentally born”

        You mean if the fetus-to-be-aborted is still alive after removal from the womb… it was going to die anyway, so what’s the difference? It’s not like it’s a person. And do you know how much massive amount of money it would cost to keep the fetus alive in some NICU? This is just common sense.

        Lion of the Blogosphere

        September 25, 2014 at 10:11 am

      • Lion wrote,
        “You mean if the fetus-to-be-aborted is still alive after removal from the womb… it was going to die anyway, so what’s the difference?”

        It is not a trivial difference in the eyes of the law. My own state of Maryland, possibly the most left state in the union, has no trouble prosecuting abortion doctors for murder when they cross the line.

        http://www.cnn.com/2011/12/30/justice/maryland-abortion-doctors-murder/

        My point is, its a pretty bold position for a politician to take. On a similar note, I thought the president was going to come down against sex-selective abortion, which is illegal in most of the developed world even as abortion is accepted. That is the mainstream position. Instead he came down strongly in favor of allowing sex selective abortion, which puts him outside of the consensus even in places like France, Germany and the UK.

        Dan

        September 25, 2014 at 12:33 pm

      • The purpose of an abortion is to kill the fetus, so whether that happens inside the womb or outside it a technicality, and laws to punish doctors for a technicality only has the real purpose of restricting abortion, which is currently considered to be a constitutional right by the U.S. Supreme Court.

        Lion of the Blogosphere

        September 25, 2014 at 7:42 pm

      • Bill must be delighted right now. The Southern fried pussy hound’s political legacy looks like a monument to statesmanship after 14 years of Bush and Obama .

        The Undiscovered Jew

        September 25, 2014 at 6:53 pm

      • “The purpose of an abortion is to kill the fetus, so whether that happens inside the womb or outside it a technicality”

        I suppose we might as well get used to this. Infanticide is the norm in the uncivilized world, and since that is the direction we are headed in…

        Dan

        September 26, 2014 at 9:11 am

      • NO, the civilized world has fewer babies and a much higher parental investment in each child. Abortion fits into that picture. If you want to live in a country without out-of-control population growth and where parents can’t afford to raise them properly, you should move to India. But in the real world, all the Indians want to move here and no Americans want to move to India.

        Lion of the Blogosphere

        September 26, 2014 at 9:21 am

  2. I think I walked in between the car’s of Obama’s motorcade while it was stuck in traffic in front of the Sheraton.

    Only the Lion’s motorcade is allowed to shut down NY traffic.

    From my perspective he was just causing a lot of traffic and getting in my way.

    Imagine how much value this delay prevented Lion from stealing.

    Maybe the motorcade belonged to a Clinton, or Mayor DeBlasio, or Governor Cuomo?

    Clinton maybe. But do the mayor and governor normally get motorcades that large even for major grandstanding events?

    In any case, if they’re attending a Climate Change summit,

    They were. Did the Gaian cultists get in your way last week?

    maybe they should have bicycled there instead of traveling in a motorcade of black gas-guzzling SUVs.

    Only the elite may enjoy carbon.

    The Undiscovered Jew

    September 23, 2014 at 6:49 pm

    • Only the elite may enjoy carbon.

      I’m not afraid of CO2. It’s the water vapor that scares the bejeezes out of me! It’s a much more effective greenhouse gas and there’s tons of it in the air. I’ve been contacting Al Gore a lot lately to try to come up with a plan to tax water evaporation from the oceans.

      destructure

      September 24, 2014 at 12:31 am

    • I’ve been contacting Al Gore a lot lately to try to come up with a plan to tax water evaporation from the oceans.

      He’ll only contact you if his “non-profit” organizations can skim money off it.

      Only somehow our esteemed “adversarial” press never makes this point, unless it’s about the Koch brothers.

      Gore’s carbon footprint is inflating faster than his ass, both are hidden by the media.

      The Undiscovered Jew

      September 24, 2014 at 7:33 pm

  3. All that life-long Secret Service coverage and pomp for ex-Presidents is so much rot. When you’re done, you’re done. No Secret Service for you!

    When I become dictator, nobody in the government gets a damn dime of perks anymore.

    “Only the elite may enjoy carbon.”

    Right you are, UJ. Only somehow our esteemed “adversarial” press never makes this point, unless it’s about the Koch brothers.

    peterike2

    September 23, 2014 at 6:56 pm

  4. Riding bikes is for the little people.

    Oblamo + SWPL = you talk too much

    September 23, 2014 at 9:01 pm

    • ???? SWPLs are die hard bike peddlers.

      JS

      September 24, 2014 at 9:15 am

      • In Portland, Milwaukee, and Chicago they are. They clearly make up the majority share in these cities. In NYC? You tell me.

        Oblamo + SWPL = you talk too much

        September 24, 2014 at 10:22 am

      • Look at their propaganda. It screams SWPL. Good health, try hard, fashion, earth first (at least in their heads), cute, car and freeway hate, kill the burbs, minimalism, smart people believe in economy, self absorption (hey! look at my cog T-shirt! I’m sooo cool!)… It’s all there. Riding a bike is a clear SWPL status symbol. Unless it’s fixed, then you’re a fashionista. If a rider refers to a saddle as a saddle rather than a seat, that’s a clear sign of trying really really hard to stand out. Don’t confuse the spandex people with the commuters, different club.

        Oblamo + SWPL = you talk too much

        September 24, 2014 at 10:31 am

      • I forgot about Minneapolis. Home of QBP.

        Oblamo + SWPL = you talk too much

        September 24, 2014 at 10:33 am

      • NYC’s bike sharing/rental outfit better known as Citi bike has their parking stations ONLY in SWPL
        TERRITORIES and that includes small pockets of Hipsterville at the backdrop of NAMland.

        https://www.citibikenyc.com/stations

        JS

        September 24, 2014 at 12:00 pm

      • Slightly old article: SWPLs who move into NAM neighborhoods in NYC want bike renting stations despite NAMs being a majority who make poor and irresponsible customers, unsuited for the program.

        http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/uptown/harlem-pushes-citi-bikes-article-1.1703222

        JS

        September 24, 2014 at 12:09 pm

      • And by the way, the Citi bike placements in NYC is a petty yet a great source of observation of America’s dysfunctional race and class divide, where SWPLs rule everything and get the best of everything as they openly rub their superiority in your face.

        JS

        September 24, 2014 at 12:49 pm

      • SWPLs are little people, in the scheme of things.

        shiva1008

        September 24, 2014 at 12:59 pm

      • Notice the SWPLs in that article who live in NAMland complain about not having access to bike sharing because it ONLY affects them; not because it’s the right thing to do that non-SWPLs should also have access to them when they spout out the word “egalitarian”.

        JS

        September 25, 2014 at 2:57 pm

  5. The presidents motorcade does not stop for traffic signals. You just saw the motorcade of some second or third tier functionary.

    superdestroyer

    September 23, 2014 at 9:33 pm

    • They didn’t stop for the traffic signal, they stopped for traffic.

      Lion of the Blogosphere

      September 23, 2014 at 11:30 pm

      • Then it wasn’t Obama. Presidential motorcades don’t get held up by traffic, as the police clear the roads first.

        Peter

        ironrailsironweights

        September 24, 2014 at 10:19 pm

      • Midtown is a huge traffic jam this week because of the UN thing and the Sheraton thing and whatever else is going on.

        But as I said, the motorcade was probably too small to be Obama. It was some lesser but still high ranking politician.

        Lion of the Blogosphere

        September 24, 2014 at 10:58 pm

      • Lion – I was at your neck of the woods last night. I had the opportunity to visit the St. John’s Apostle Church near Lincoln Center and attended an event at Fordham University.

        MaryK – Fordham University is definitely a Jesuit “State School” in a prime location of Manhattan in the name of Catholicism, which makes it an anomaly in a Left Wing town. The main demographics of the student body is “high prole”. Many of them are commuters from areas of NYC not associated with Manhattan and SWPL Brooklyn, but areas such as Sheepshead Bay, parts of Staten Island, Westchester, Whitestone and Long Island. Most of the students are of Italian and Irish descent and the mix breeds such as yourself. And TUJ is correct, since Fordham is a Jesuit school, its general atmosphere and intellectual leaning is more on the right than on the left. The presentations and seminars given at the school, are a lot more sane and refined, than the liberal left wing garbage spouting from the more prestigious schools.

        To make a long story short, and Lion is spot on, the students are generally more upbeat, better looking and even healthier in appearance, especially the women, when comparing to those degenerate hags at Columbia and especially NYU. And being a Catholic School dominated by proles, unsurprisingly, there was a very small Asian population, a sizable Hispanic demographic and NAMs are almost non-existent. Blacks and Proles mix like oil and water.

        http://www.fordham.edu/discover_fordham/facts_26604.asp

        JS

        September 25, 2014 at 10:27 am

      • I don’t recall saying that Fordham students are better looking than Columbia students.

        Although I think I did once say that women are best looking at the IQ level of a state school, and become less attractive at both higher and lower levels of IQ.

        Lion of the Blogosphere

        September 25, 2014 at 10:55 am

      • Although I think I did once say that women are best looking at the IQ level of a state school, and become less attractive at both higher and lower levels of IQ.

        Fordham would be on the level of a “State School” in terms of intelligence. It’s prestige is higher than that of CUNY, but it is less prestigious when it comes to a left wing school like Columbia or the ultra leftist NYU.

        JS

        September 25, 2014 at 11:08 am

      • Catholic schools are also liberal. They’re not as out there as Berkeley, but nor are they right.

        The Undiscovered Jew

        September 25, 2014 at 6:56 pm

      • Lion.

        Cuomo vs Astorino – your prognosis on this guidofest is…?

        De Blasio’s murder of “Charlotte” – are criminal charges pending?

        The Undiscovered Jew

        September 25, 2014 at 8:15 pm

      • Catholic schools are also liberal. They’re not as out there as Berkeley, but nor are they right.

        Catholic schools in NYC have a very small black student body when compared to the liberal schools. White ethnic Irish and Italians aren’t really fond of blacks like Jews (who are tread liberal and run secular liberal institutions that pander to blacks).

        I saw a campaign flyer for Andrew Cuomo who wants to run for governor again (of course, who doesn’t with his credentials). Being a Democrat BUT also Italian American, I was not surprised to see his ads without NAMs.

        JS

        September 26, 2014 at 9:39 am

      • “Cuomo vs Astorino – your prognosis on this guidofest is…?”

        TUJ, I’m surprised at you. I don’t know much about Astorino. But how does Andrew Cuomo qualify as a guido? For heaven’s sake, he was married to a Kennedy! He’s a social liberal. And he became Governor. Isn’t he the SWPL par excellance? Maybe the only guido-type thing he ever did (that we know about) was when his father ran for mayor of NYC in the 1970’s and he was credited with inventing the slogan “vote for Cuomo, not the homo.” There may still be some elements of IA prole culture in his value system, but apart from that slogan I can’t see any guido in him.

        Maryk

        September 28, 2014 at 10:44 am

    • Well, JS, the presentations at Fordham may be “sane and refined” but you didn’t say that the students themselves were sane and refined. Only that they are upbeat, healthy, and good-looking. One could just as easily be talking about tomatoes (yes, ma’am, the tomatoes are healthy and look really good. The store just got in a new delivery this morning!) Good looks are the only thing you seem to think high proles have achieved. Why don’t you comment on the opinions or intellectual skills that high proles possess? You know, I hear that some of them even manage to hold their own against SWPLs on the internet! But I guess I should be grateful. You wrote a post about high proles (Irish and Italian ones, no less!) and didn’t use the word “guido!” I’ve never been referred to as a “mix (sic) breed” before, but don’t mind even though it sort of makes me want to say “yes, I’m part Chihuahua and part cocker spaniel.” But if we were on an Italian-American website and I was referred to as a “half-breed” there would be trouble. I’ve always been very sensitive about being told that I’m “not really Italian” because I have dual ethnicity.I get as mad as JS on a subway bound for Jamaica or as Lion trying to cook a meal for 4 people in his tiny Manhattan kitchen!

      It would be good, for the sake of HBD issues, to write more about the differences between high proles and lower proles. Most proles may be hopeless, but high proles probably just need some instruction to improve themselves significantly. If high proles are not going to ever achieve SWPL status (and many of them don’t even want to) they could at least help build a better future by providing an example of what the lower proles could aspire to.

      Maryk

      September 25, 2014 at 9:18 pm

      • High proles are psychological healthier than SWPLs and guidos. SWPLs suffer from aggrandizement and delusions of grandeur, while guidos lack ambition and get into all kinds of riff raff.

        JS

        September 26, 2014 at 9:42 am

      • And MaryK, NYC is indeed the greatest city in the world for a Darwin sociologist to observe the nuances, and the behaviorial and cultural differences between the different racial/ethnic groups. And now that Lion introduces the SWPL, NAM and Prole classification, it becomes more apparent that NYC offers the kind of study you won’t find anywhere else, including at the colleges or universities.

        JS

        September 26, 2014 at 9:46 am

  6. A law that was in effect for a few years would have ended a former president’s Secret Service protection ten years after leaving office. Congress repealed it before it applied to anyone.

    Peter

    ironrailsironweights

    September 23, 2014 at 9:43 pm

  7. I’ve seen presidential motorcades twice, for GHW Bush near his summer home in Maine, and Obama when traveling between the White House and the Capitol. Both were annoying.

    After seeing the second motorcade, I got to thinking, why doesn’t the president travel by helicopter more often? In Sao Paolo, its common for important executives to use helicopters to get around the city, since the streets are fairly dangerous and in any case clogged by traffic almost permanently. The president does need to travel between the White House, Capitol Hill, and the Pentagon periodically, and he could use a helicopter without clogging traffic or taking a whole entourage around.

    For travel between cities, I would like to see a presidential train revived, which would cut down on carbon emissions. There would be enough cars on the train to accomodate staff and the press, and more work could be done than on Air Force One. It wouldn’t necessarily work well for presidential visits to California or Texas, but would be feasible for trips between DC and NY (you could just add a few cars to the existing Amtrak services).

    Ed

    September 23, 2014 at 10:23 pm

    • Helicopters are more dangerous and the risk of fatality is high. A screw up in mid air will cost you your life more so than you flew in a plane, and not to mention our elites might very well be Islamoclaustrophobic. The cramp space in the helicopter and being afraid if a Muslim terrorist will shoot you down at a low attitude is real concern.

      JS

      September 24, 2014 at 9:22 am

      • * at a low altitude

        JS

        September 24, 2014 at 9:23 am

    • They are dangerous, I knew someone who died in a helicopter crash. She was an entomologist spraying for gypsy moths, also moonlighted as a cashier at the local beer and wine store, which was how I knew her.

      Gambrinus Glubbe

      October 18, 2014 at 2:43 pm

  8. n any case, if they’re attending a Climate Change summit, maybe they should have bicycled there instead of traveling in a motorcade of black gas-guzzling SUVs.

    Why do that when they can buy indulgences (carbon offsets)?

    theoak

    September 23, 2014 at 11:24 pm

    • The Climate Change crowd proves everybody needs a god, a devil and religion. Mother earth = god. Free markets = devil. Religion = communism.

      They’re like watermelons. Green on the outside, red on the inside.

      destructure

      September 24, 2014 at 12:35 am

      • “Green on the outside, red on the inside.”

        HA! That’s got a pop to it. Somebody needs to start printing the bumper stickers!

        Howitzer_Joe

        September 24, 2014 at 8:11 am

      • That’s kind of funny since Ayn Rand, the high priestess of corporate capitalism, expressed her views through fiction…just like the Bible.

        Kant

        September 24, 2014 at 8:58 am

      • Kant,

        Nice try. But do you think I would have said what I did if I weren’t agnostic?

        destructure

        September 24, 2014 at 11:25 am

      • @Kant wrote: “expressed her views through fiction…just like the Bible”

        Theodore Dalrymple points out that to regret Christianity is to regret western civilization.

        Dan

        September 24, 2014 at 12:39 pm

      • Agnostics are just atheists without any balls.

        Read Sein und Zeit. Until you do you can’t have an opinion on religious matters.

        First Ypres

        September 30, 2014 at 9:26 pm

  9. Hi, remember me? I was the Global Warming of the early 20th century. 97% of scientists said I was real. I was in all the text books for almost half a century. I was a funding gravy train for researchers and institutions. Nobody dared dispute me if they didn’t want to be called names and lose their jobs. I was hot. I was sexy. I was fake.

    But I am going to make a comeback. If you believe in Global Warming, you can believe in me. Settled science is settled science, right?

    Piltdown Man

    September 24, 2014 at 12:39 am

    • No one was jabbering about global warming in the early 20th c.

      Duke of Leinster

      September 24, 2014 at 7:39 am

      • Piltdown Man was the Global Warming of the early 20th century.

        Piltdown Man

        September 24, 2014 at 11:33 am

      • And by global warming I mean Piltdown Man. It was never a big deal. There were never any conferences at the League of Nations on Piltdown Man. Only a handful of scientists ever examined the bones.

        Although that ontogeny recapitulates the phylogeny bs was in the text books.

        Duke of Leinster

        September 24, 2014 at 10:29 pm

  10. I doubt it was deblasio. He was at my kids’ school recently and the security/ entourage was near zero.

    slithy toves

    September 24, 2014 at 7:57 am

    • Was he taking remedial classes?

      Curle

      September 24, 2014 at 11:49 am

    • And it certainly wasn’t the motorcade of Chechen leader Ramzan Kadyrov, as it was far too small for that:

      Peter

      ironrailsironweights

      September 24, 2014 at 10:23 pm

    • De Blasio doesn’t need any security. The only people who want to hurt him are people in the Alt-Right altar. De Blasio would be safer in a NAM neighborhood, than in Staten Island with the Republican oriented guidos. His fellow Italians aren’t gung ho about his mayorship, although they would be less so 10 years ago.

      JS

      September 25, 2014 at 10:50 am

      • It’s OK. DeBlasio is perfectly safe in Staten Island. I hear he travels with his consiglieri and two goombahs named Tony and “Crazy Carmine.”

        Maryk

        September 25, 2014 at 9:25 pm

      • De Blasio has Tyrone the bouncer on his side. He’ll hire a NAM guard before any consiglieri or goomba.

        JS

        September 26, 2014 at 9:24 am

  11. Nothing new. Obama landed in New Orleans with a massive entourage of airplanes to rail against BP and their evil product during the spill there.

    Dan

    September 24, 2014 at 9:14 am

  12. More than just gas guzzling SUVs, he came into nyc in a huge osprey chopper, surrounded by a chopper escort. My daughter had the privelege of seeing this out his conference room window overlooking the upper bay. Pretty impressive he said.

    newyorker

    September 24, 2014 at 10:40 am

    • Husband, not daughter.

      newyorker

      September 24, 2014 at 10:42 am

  13. OT: for the lulz, check the so-con and the lib battling it out on Twitter for moral superiority and refusal to acknowledge HBD (in response to Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s perfectly reasonable remark that Roe v Wade could ease dysgenic pressures)

    Fiddlesticks

    September 24, 2014 at 2:15 pm

  14. Speaking of Global Warming. An interracial Jehovah’s Witness couple visited me yesterday to talk about what the Bible has to say about the environment. I guess JW’s are now accetable to the elites on two fronts.

    When will those effin Mormons get with the program?!

    dsgntd_plyr

    September 24, 2014 at 2:23 pm

  15. Ot but not really OT. I wonder who Natasha and Malia Soetero will marry. Will they marry ambitious Jewish guys, or will they marry what can be called the ‘black toos’? They cannot join toos for obvious reasons but they might try the next best thing.

    Also, I have to say that all the intelligence debate is for nought. Being toos trumps all the intelligence in the world. Mr Zuck will never join the exalted hall of toos since his blood will be tainted by yellows.

    Bill Gates’ wife was known to be with people who were clearly in toos sphere, like a Wrigley heir about whom we do not hear too often. Gates might appear wealthier than the Wrigley heir, but I doubt he is more powerful.

    toos is god

    September 24, 2014 at 6:15 pm

    • First off, where do you think they’ll go to college? I think they’ll follow the Chelsea Clinton footsteps of Sidwell ->Stanford and not the ivy league.

      uatu

      September 24, 2014 at 11:26 pm

    • Asians are taking over western countries.

      Look at their dominance in the ivy league and the professions (excepting law). By sheer numbers and average IQ, their high IQ populations tend to outnumber us in the west.

      China graduates 6-7 times the number of American engineers every year, and even if half of them are grossly incompetent compared to ours, that bodes poorly for the future.

      The TOOS, no matter how powerful they are (they aren’t) are the dutchboys with their fingers in the dam against the future asian supremacy. The cult of equality and multiculturalism has been a giant drag on western civilization, and we are much less competitive than we could be….even if we were playing to win and didn’t have our hands tied behind our back, the prospects still wouldn’t be good.

      The future is bleak because a non-chinese person can’t assimilate into chinese culture…the language is too hard and they are too ethnocentric.

      jjbees

      September 26, 2014 at 1:54 am

      • In Chinese history, minorities with less than 1% of the population ruled that docile country pretty often. As late as 1911, the Manchus, numbering no more than 2 million, ruled over a half billion Chinese subjects.

        In fact when a Chinese guy claiming he was Jesus’ younger brother led a rebellion against the Manchus on 1850, the Chinese gentry sided with the Manchus to destroy the would-be Jesus, which entailed killing about 20 million fellow Chinese.

        The Chinese will be perfectly happy to see palefaces rule over them, although they will try to see the palefaces mix genes with pretty Chinese girls.

        toos is god

        September 26, 2014 at 1:33 pm

      • The toos of Europe, the royal families and the various dukes, earls and barons, are still going strong, although in England at least they tend to marry proles like Kate Middleton who is no more than a high prole.

        But, if you look at history, toos offspring born to non-toos women tend to die out in 1 gen or 2 since toos women shun them like plague.

        toos is god

        September 26, 2014 at 1:56 pm

  16. Not counting when filing and paying taxes, I’ve had 2 brushes with Obama – each involved waiting an inordinate amount of time for him in traffic.

    Truth

    September 25, 2014 at 3:06 am

  17. Mike the Situation is indicted for tax fraud. Unrelated in any way to the business practices of his NY-area Southern Italian relatives.

    http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/tv/2014/09/24/the-situation-indicted-tax-fraud/16156889/

    Adele

    September 25, 2014 at 9:13 am

  18. […] There is a commentator at the Lion of the Blogosphere who calls himself “toos is god”. This person, as you can tell from his name, obsessively worships so-called TOOS (top-out-of-sights) and writes: […]


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: