Lion of the Blogosphere

Swastika at HBCU

Strong probability that this swastika vandalism was perpetrated by a black person.

Written by Lion of the Blogosphere

November 13, 2015 at 1:08 pm

Posted in Education

35 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. But didn’t you just argue that only neo-Nazis are capable of drawing swastikas? Perhaps some stormfronter sneaked into this black college and drew it so as to sow fear in the hearts of black Jews who may or may not study there?

    JK

    November 13, 2015 at 1:25 pm

    • No, I didn’t argue that. You’re intentionally trying not to understand my posts.

      Lion of the Blogosphere

      November 13, 2015 at 2:31 pm

    • No, I didn’t argue that.

      Perhaps, but you still have no excuse for not knowing American antisemites are too stupid to wipe their own ass; a fecal swastika was well beyond their cognitive abilities. The task instead had to be left to a black.

      The Undiscovered Jew

      November 13, 2015 at 6:14 pm

  2. So fake swastikas are now replacing the fake “I saw a guy in white robes” stories. Maybe this is the intersection of rich Liberal Jewish donors to Black Lives Matter, and the BLM crowd giving them some love by using the all-purpose hate icon.

    http://www.politico.com/story/2015/11/major-donors-consider-funding-black-lives-matter-215814

    Political theater is really heating up these days.

    PS and OT: Up to Episode 4 of “Dark Matter.” It’s getting a lot better. Thanks for the show tip!

    peterike

    November 13, 2015 at 1:41 pm

    • “Political theater is really heating up these days.”

      Bingo. Like so many other facets of American life these days the instruments of control are getting more complicated and nuanced. The real meshes with the fake as much as the fake meshes with the real. The game of “my victim group is more hated than your victim group” is farcical on purpose.

      You're the butt of the joke

      November 13, 2015 at 2:43 pm

  3. shocking.

    rivelino

    November 13, 2015 at 2:35 pm

  4. That’s all kinds of irony there. So many layers.

    ibejeph

    November 13, 2015 at 2:45 pm

  5. Yeah, just doing the job skinheads won’t do.

    I mean these folks desperately need “enemies” to blame for their failures and divert attention from them.

    not too late

    November 13, 2015 at 3:16 pm

  6. This is cultural appropriation of the worst kind. Blacks are stealing the Jews’ boogeyman.

    destructure

    November 13, 2015 at 3:18 pm

    • “Blacks are stealing the Jews’ boogeyman.”

      Stop it. You’re furthering the racist stereotype that blacks are criminal and often stealing things.

      Otherwise LOL.

      Thin-Skinned Masta-Beta

      November 13, 2015 at 4:05 pm

    • Blacks are stealing the Jews’ boogeyman.

      At least that boogeyman is based on a real crime, by real criminals, within living memory.

      The internet neonazi is reduced to fake Jewish crimes they cooked up out of thin air, such as the 1965 immigration act; Norbert Schlei and Emmanuel Cellar have been slandered.

      The Undiscovered Jew

      November 13, 2015 at 6:18 pm

    • We have a winner!

      Curle

      November 13, 2015 at 8:22 pm

  7. Do not be paranoid. It is exactly Sanskrit swastika that is painted on Bowie State Building. Dots and fancy ends and overall angle do not look like Nazi symbolism at all. Those students that condemn it are most likely not even aware of Sanskrit or what India is. On the other hand, media propagandists are and do it intentionally. And you: I did not see it, but I condemn…

    MyTwoCents

    November 13, 2015 at 5:01 pm

  8. If I had to guess, it was probably some white guy who feel tired by all the PC-ness and acted out in the spur of the moment by smearing this on the wall. It should have been washed down by the janitor and that be the end of that. I don’t think this should disrupt campus life for thousands of people for weeks.

    Jimi

    November 13, 2015 at 5:26 pm

    • “I don’t think this should disrupt campus life for thousands of people for weeks.”

      I didn’t say that it should, but I also don’t think there’s much of a distinction between “acting out” and being anti-Semitic. The guy who “acted out” could have done so in a myriad of ways, he chose to do so in a manner that he would know to be offensive to Jews.

      Lion of the Blogosphere

      November 13, 2015 at 5:40 pm

      • But there’s nothing more politically incorrect than offending Jews.

        You can get away with offending other groups. Donald Trump says Mexico is sending America its rapists and implies Obama was born in Kenya, and he’s almost the President & invited to host Saturday Night Live.

        By contrast, Helen Thomas said Jews should “get the hell out of Palestine” and was fired from White House reporting jobs she held for 57 years and condemned by the Obama administration.

        Rick Sanchez said only that Jews are not oppressed and was fired from CNN.

        Jews are definitely the third rail in the American media.

        pumpkinperson

        November 13, 2015 at 6:49 pm

      • Isn’t the very nature of ‘acting out’ to be offensive? To challenge some sort of perceived authority in a manner the authority will resent?

        Curle

        November 13, 2015 at 8:59 pm

      • Jews are definitely the third rail in the American media.

        Not so, Buchanan made a tidy media career for himself, Jewish IQ has been discussed since the Bell Curve.

        More importantly, I have never seen anyone who wanted to discuss Jewish influence not lie by, for example, inflating the percentage of Jews in the media (historically 20-25%) by cheating through counting half-Jews like Pinch Sulzberger (who culturally was actually raised as a liberal Episcopalian).

        Tell me why we’re supposed to have any sympathy for antisemites who fabricated the history of Jewish immigraiton lobbying – all of the Western European nationalist parties who will benefit from the Paris attacks have purged their organizations of antisemites. It’s time for American antisemites to likewise be purged for actions such as this:

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_B._MacDonald

        Dr. Barry Mehler, an educator at Ferris State University, cited for example a quote from a 1969 dissertation by Sheldon Morris Neuringer[who?] titled American Jewry and United States immigration policy, 1881-1953 where MacDonald surmised that when Neuringer noted Jewish opposition in 1921 and 1924 to the anti-immigration legislation at the time was due more to it having the “taint of discrimination and anti-Semitism” as opposed to how it would limit Jewish immigration, MacDonald wrote, “…Jewish opposition to the 1921 and 1924 legislation was motivated less by a desire for higher levels of Jewish immigration than by opposition to the implicit theory that America should be dominated by individuals with northern and western European ancestry.” Mehler replied that “It seems to me Mr. MacDonald is misrepresenting Mr. Neuringer in this case and I posted my query hoping that a historian familiar with the literature might have a judgment on MacDonald’s use of the historical data.”[31]

        Lieberman wrote that MacDonald dishonestly made up lines from the work of British Holocaust denier David Irving. Citing Irving’s Uprising, which was published in 1981 for the twenty-fifth anniversary of Hungary’s failed anti-Communist revolution in 1956, MacDonald asserted in the Culture of Critique:

        “The domination of the Hungarian communist Jewish bureaucracy thus appears to have had overtones of sexual and reproductive domination of gentiles in which Jewish males were able to have disproportionate sexual access to gentile females.” Lieberman, who noted that MacDonald is not a historian, debunked those assertions, concluding, “(T)he passage offers not a shred of evidence that, as MacDonald would have it, “Jewish males enjoyed disproportionate sexual access to gentile females.”[34]

        The Undiscovered Jew

        November 14, 2015 at 10:44 am

      • The reason there is no effective American nationalist movement, until Trump (who is pro-Netanyahu, has a Jewish daughter, and two Jewish grandchildren with a third on the way) is because of antisemitism. Whether it’s blaming Jews for a Western immigration crisis we didn’t cause, and for which their primary source of evidence is a pathological liar in the form of Kevin MacDonald, asking for us to ‘”withdraw'” from Israel when we’ve never deployed a single soldier there except for training exercises, they’ve been driving American nationalism off track because they are obsessed with the faulty idea Jews have significantly different motivations than gentiles.

        If Marine Le Pen purged her party of antisemites, it’s long past time for Americans to do the same, especially considering there are enough HBD Jews that would could run it many times more effectively than any antisemite.

        The Undiscovered Jew

        November 14, 2015 at 10:50 am

      • An answer from Monsieur Trudeau over here is required; why are antisemites due any sympathy when their dedicated to lying, among other things, about a Western immigration crisis Jews aren’t responsible for?

        MacDonald’s Jewish history of immigration lobbying from 1880 to 1965 looks quite fraudulent. In a way MacDonald appears more deceptive, and dumber, than holocaust revisionists.

        As far as I know, the latter at least use questionable sources to make their case. I’m not aware of those like David Irving using a historical reference that contradicted their case, and then passing it off as evidence for their own position.

        What’s Trudeau’s explanation for this?

        The Undiscovered Jew

        November 14, 2015 at 4:22 pm

      • Justin, why are Jews supposed to be sympathetic to antisemites when the latter falsely claim Sweden’s media exec, Jonas Bonnier (pictured below), is Jewish? The “Jews control the media” refrain must not be very rich in fact if they have to misrepresent thoroughly Scandinavian men as Yiddin:

        Jonas Bonnier

        The Undiscovered Jew

        November 14, 2015 at 4:36 pm

      • ” I have never seen anyone who wanted to discuss Jewish influence not lie by, for example, inflating the percentage of Jews in the media (historically 20-25%) by cheating through counting half-Jews like Pinch Sulzberger (who culturally was actually raised as a liberal Episcopalian).”

        I’ve seen youtube videos by both MacDonald and Gottfriend. I’ve never read their works, but intend to do so, especially Gottfried. Both make the quite reasonable assertion, especially for an HBD crowd, that Jews punch above their weight because of higher intelligence. And that intelligence translates into influence.

        Such observations are certainly consistent with my ‘lived experiences’ as the Left likes to say. Smart people tend to dominate groups they are in. Intelligence is very, very important in this world. That’s why we make so much of it. I first grasped that Jews were brighter than the average while still young. Nothing from experience has pulled me away from that conclusion. IQ results simply corroborate the impression.

        If one has an ethnocentric group of higher intelligence involved in an effort it stands to reason they will have a bigger impact on that group than otherwise. That they will be de facto, if not de jure, leaders. It is reasonable to surmise that the Jewish influence on those projects where they were heavily involved, civil rights movement, etc. was very significant.

        Curle

        November 14, 2015 at 4:54 pm

      • While Jews have more influence than their 2% of the population (or 4% of the population based on being able to make Aliyah to Israel), they don’t secretly control the world the way anti-Semites say they do.

        And liberal Jews are NOT ethnocentric at all, they support the liberal agenda over their own people in Israel.

        Lion of the Blogosphere

        November 14, 2015 at 6:26 pm

      • It is interesting to see how people go out of their way to please a group that only makes up 1-2% of the American population.

        And it is true that Trump was formerly very pro-Israel and has a Jewish daughter, which makes it surprising that so many white nationalist types are head over heels for Trump. I don’t believe antisemitism necessarily goes against American nationalism; I’m not sure why Undiscovered claims it does…

        ruhkukah

        November 14, 2015 at 5:09 pm

      • I’ve seen youtube videos by both MacDonald and Gottfriend. I’ve never read their works, but intend to do so, especially Gottfried. Both make the quite reasonable assertion, especially for an HBD crowd, that Jews punch above their weight because of higher intelligence.

        Jewish intelligence is not being disputed. Murray, Cochrane and Harpending also discuss it, but don’t

        What’s being disputed is MacDonald’s honesty on other topics like immigration (from Mehler’s quotes, it seems Neuringer was discussing Jewish opposition to the 1924 Act in terms of how it would affect Jews, many of whom wanted to escape persecution, not trying to populate America with nonwhite immigrants as MacDonald asserted). There are examples of him taking quotes of context such as him citing a study showing Jews were very authoritarian, when the actual, verbatim quote from the study concluded Jews were one of the least authoritarian, even when restricted to the most religious?

        Does MacDonald from what you’ve seen seem trustworthy?

        If one has an ethnocentric group

        That’s one of MacDonald’s lies, secular Jews are non-ethnocentric. He has almost no evidence for it in Culture of Critique, and makes no sense based on observed Jewish behavior: If Jewish ethnocentrism led them to liberalism, then Orthodox Jews, who outscore secular Jews on all measures of strength of Jewish identity, would be more liberal than seculars. Instead, the most ethnocentric Jews are one of the most conservative of all white groups.

        Maybe Curle can explain what MacDonald can’t; telling us all why secular Jews have 71% intermarriage rates while right wing Orthodox Jews have intramarriage rates of 98%?

        of higher intelligence involved in an effort it stands to reason they will have a bigger impact on that group than otherwise. That they will be de facto, if not de jure, leaders. It is reasonable to surmise that the Jewish influence on those projects where they were heavily involved, civil rights movement, etc. was very significant.

        This again is a deceptive argument.

        Of course they were disproportionate in various movements. The problem is you and other antisemites are using Jewish overrepresentation to cover up the reality of gentile involvement. Because Jews were 20% of, say, early Communist leaders doesn’t give you the right to equate “disproportionate” with 100% Jewish – which is what’s really meant by the context of antisemitic statements on Jewish overrepresentation. There would have been no civil rights movement to begin with if the Scandinavian/WASP gentile Earl Warren hadn’t been forced to include ‘with all deliberate speed’ into the Brown vs Board rulings.

        Gentile elite are even more guilty than Jewish elites because gentiles end up pursuing liberalism even with only minimal Jewish involvement as we see in France and Sweden.

        The Undiscovered Jew

        November 14, 2015 at 7:04 pm

      • It is interesting to see how people go out of their way to please a group that only makes up 1-2% of the American population.

        Support for Israel among Christians is no more odd than Muslims supporting Mecca, if it came under military threat. Jesus claims divine authority from being the living offspring of the omnipotent Hebrew God, not an Egyptian high priest.

        And it is true that Trump was formerly very pro-Israel and has a Jewish daughter, which makes it surprising that so many white nationalist types are head over heels for Trump.

        Trump is still pro-Israel.

        As for nationalism, philo-semitism makes more historical sense in the historical context of an Anglo nation than the white nationalist idolization of Hitler; he was a German racial supremacist who would have exterminated most of Eastern Europe’s Slavs. Amusingly, white nationalists consider themselves Slavophiles, who, nonetheless, are oblivious to that object of Hitler’s vision when they cheer on Putin or drool over Slavonic supermodels:

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generalplan_Ost
        Generalplan Ost envisaged differing percentages of the various conquered nations undergoing Germanization (for example, 50% of Czechs, 35% of Ukrainians and 25% of Belarusians), extermination, expulsion and other fates, the net effect of which would be to ensure that the conquered territories would be Germanized. In ten years’ time, the plan effectively called for the extermination, expulsion, Germanization or enslavement of most or all East and West Slavs living behind the front lines in Europe. The “Small Plan” was to be put into practice as the Germans conquered the areas to the east of their pre-war borders. In this way the plan for Poland was drawn up at the end of November 1939 and is probably responsible for much of the World War II expulsion of Poles by Germany (first to colonial district of the General Government and, from 1942 also to Polenlager).[14] After the war, under the “Big Plan”, Generalplan Ost foresaw the removal of 45 million non-Germanizable people from Central and Eastern Europe, of whom 31 million were “racially undesirable”, 100% of Jews, Poles (85%), Belorussians (75%) and Ukrainians (65%), to West Siberia,[5] and about 14 millions were to remain, but were to be treated as slaves.[7]

        The Undiscovered Jew

        November 14, 2015 at 7:15 pm

      • “The reason there is no effective American nationalist movement, until Trump (who is pro-Netanyahu, has a Jewish daughter, and two Jewish grandchildren with a third on the way) is because of antisemitism.”

        That’s one of the puzzling things about the Alt right; their antisemitism.They can seem to be sensible on almost everything else but bring up the Jews and it’s all conspiracy theory and nonsense.

        Mike Street Station

        November 16, 2015 at 9:42 am

      • The reason there is no effective American nationalist movement, until Trump (who is pro-Netanyahu, has a Jewish daughter, and two Jewish grandchildren with a third on the way) is because of antisemitism.

        Meanwhile, Trumps’ Jewish Son In Laws are as liberal as you get. TUJ often makes no sense!

        http://therealdeal.com/blog/2015/03/24/kushners-launch-real-estate-investing-startup-cadre-raise-18-3m-in-series-a/

        And these people are your typical liberals that are found in NYC’s high society social scene, in the likes of the Kushners:

        JS

        November 17, 2015 at 2:20 pm

      • Rich people in Northeast, regardless of religion, are liberal.

        Lion of the Blogosphere

        November 17, 2015 at 2:22 pm

      • lower class, secular Jews vote democratic, hence treading liberal, more than other proles.

        JS

        November 17, 2015 at 3:39 pm

      • This is changing. I know secular Jews who support Donald Trump.

        Lion of the Blogosphere

        November 17, 2015 at 3:57 pm

      • supporting Donald Trump doesn’t mean much, when his heirs practice the kind of liberalism that make them vote for him in the 1st place!!!

        JS

        November 17, 2015 at 8:25 pm

  9. I told you the the perp would be black.

    The Undiscovered Jew

    November 13, 2015 at 5:46 pm

    • No it’s not, one of the lines is in the wrong direction. Either it’s a coincidence, or the vandal wanted to paint a swastika but because of low IQ was not able to execute it correctly.

      Lion of the Blogosphere

      November 14, 2015 at 8:05 am


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: