Lion of the Blogosphere

NY Times race map

This map is pretty useful. It let’s you easily see the location of bad neighborhoods throughout the United States. You can also see that there are more amber dots (Hispanics) in the Hamptons than you’d expect: that’s because rich people need to have Hispanics living nearby to clean their houses and take care of their lawns.

You can also see an Asian corridor alongside the Amtrak Northeast Corridor between Trenton and Manhattan. I never realized that there was such a corridor until viewing the map, but now it explains why there are always so many Indians on the New Jersey Transit Northeast Corridor trains. (Indians from India count as Asian for this purpose.)

Written by Lion of the Blogosphere

December 16, 2015 at 9:10 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

44 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. You must have missed Joel Stein’s essay about Edison, NJ:,9171,1999416,00.html

    Dave Pinsen

    December 16, 2015 at 9:18 pm

    • Poor Joel god lot of flack for that. He was trying to be funny but it didn’t work. Good thing for joe it wasn’t another minority that ruined his town.


      December 16, 2015 at 10:14 pm

    • After reading this essay I concluded that Mr. Stein’s work can be avoided in the future. Nothing new here. Typical liberal phony going after white ethnic groups we are allowed to insult (IAs) and then claiming his stomach aches from sadness over knowing that people found his piece offensive. I hope that America will twice elect President Ted Cruz and upset Mr. Stein even more!


      December 16, 2015 at 11:38 pm

      • IAs to the Republicans are blacks to the Democrats. A constituent that is credulous, overly defensive of their nebulous ideologies, and makes a great voting bloc for its respective party affiliation.

        Republicans dislike blacks, like Democrats dislike White ethnics such as Italians.


        December 17, 2015 at 12:15 pm

      • I have never seen any liberal dislike for ethnic whites other than the Stein piece.

        Otis the Sweaty

        December 17, 2015 at 12:20 pm

      • Lion isn’t so fond of his fellow goodfellas out in Guido Island. Does that count?


        December 17, 2015 at 2:18 pm

  2. You can also see that there are more amber dots (Hispanics)

    Racism: Amber is brown(ish). And racism in the New York Times no less.

    The Undiscovered Jew

    December 16, 2015 at 9:33 pm

  3. Wow, there’s still a tremendous amount of prime Brooklyn real estate being ruined by blacks. Though I bet even since 2010 a lot of the border areas are a lot whiter than they were then. Whites are pushing into Bed Stuy, Bushwick and other ghettos. It would be interesting for someone to do a study calculating how much real estate wealth could be generated if all the blacks in Brooklyn left for Atlanta. But that’s a study nobody would dare do.


    December 16, 2015 at 10:22 pm

    • The white area in Crown Heights are Lubavitch Hasidim.

      Lion of the Blogosphere

      December 16, 2015 at 10:49 pm

      • Many White gentiles are gentrifying Crown Heights. It’s becoming a Williamsburg.


        December 17, 2015 at 11:39 am

      • Not yet. And under De Blasio may never happen.

        Lion of the Blogosphere

        December 17, 2015 at 11:42 am

      • @Lion – it is. Easter Parkway is ideal for biking and running. One of my clients is looking for a 500K condo in the area. She and her husband are interior designers on UWS.


        December 17, 2015 at 1:07 pm

      • I know that SWPLs have been moving there, but the neighborhood has a very long way to go, it’s still a bad neighborhood. The SWPLs are going to get mugged a lot more now that De Blasio put an end to stop-and-frisk.

        Lion of the Blogosphere

        December 17, 2015 at 1:43 pm

      • The powers to be have invested billions of dollars based on the assumption the gentrification continues. if De Blasio doesn’t shape up he will be escorted out of the mayor’s house in 2017.


        December 17, 2015 at 2:22 pm

      • The same goes for East Williamsburg and Bushwick. Many gentrifiers are living there, but it’s less safe than Williamsburg proper.


        December 17, 2015 at 2:24 pm

      • Brooklyn is a crappy borough throughout, in terms of its demographics. You have NAMs surrounding SWPLs in their isolated oasis, who don’t live any place near ethnic proles in Southern Brooklyn.

        Queens has a mixed prole/SWPL environment. But from a deranged SWPL standpoint, Queens is seen as less desirable, due its less attractive housing stock.

        20 years ago, no SWPL would want to move into Park Slope with their abandoned brownstones, because it was dangerous. The city was happy to pay people to live there, yet most people didn’t think it was a good idea. But SWPLs today would put up with dangerous neighborhoods that border safe SWPLhoods, and get charged unreasonably in rent.


        December 17, 2015 at 2:33 pm

      • JS, you can’t get me down today. I just heard the good news that one of my IA relatives has moved to Gerritsen Beach. This means that I now have both friends and family in that area, which would be great since I’m aiming to live there. It may be that because that neighborhood is just about the only decent affordable white area left in Brooklyn we’ll see an influx of IAs there – the ones that want to remain in Brooklyn, that is. As of now GB is mostly Irish, but may be facing a “guidification” (I hate the term, but can’t think of anything better) But whatever. Since I’m both Irish and Italian, I win either way!

        An aside: I just saw that there is a funeral parlor in Carroll Gardens called (I kid you not) “Guido Funeral Home.” The poor family that owns the place! Why don’t they just change the name to “Carroll Gardens Funeral Home” or something similar?


        December 17, 2015 at 11:58 pm

      • I don’t recommend Gerritsen Beach, very long commute to Manhattan, you might as well be living in Long Island. Take Great Neck for example: fewer guidos there, and quick ride on the LIRR to midtown.

        Lion of the Blogosphere

        December 18, 2015 at 8:30 am

    • Some years ago Trump offered to buy all of the housing projects in NYC from the city. He was turned down. It would have been a really good idea. There is a lot of prime real estate in NYC being occupied by housing projects.


      December 17, 2015 at 6:57 am

      • Demopolitician liberals need housing project areas to garner votes. Therefore, they would never allow a wholesale onslaught of forcing NAMs out of them.


        December 17, 2015 at 11:42 am

      • Here’s a picture of our NY politicos standing in front of a few NYCHA buildings (housing projects).

        This is modern day slavery with slave masters in a plantation economy at its finest . NYC has a “plantation” economy. Not just wealthy Whites hiring Hispanic workers, but liberalcrats who need them to garner votes and siphon money from BS welfare programs.


        December 17, 2015 at 11:50 am

      • Wealthy Whites hire Mestizo Hispanics as workers. Liberalcrats use Mulatto and Caribbean Hispanics as a demolition crew, who need welfare and free subsistence at the expense of the White middle class. blacks make the best demolitioners, but in Manhattan, I suspect leftist bureaucrats want to see a gradual process of decay, instead of an overnight destruction of neighborhoods.


        December 17, 2015 at 11:59 am

      • Demopolitician liberals need housing project areas to garner votes. Therefore, they would never allow a wholesale onslaught of forcing NAMs out of them.

        Lol wut? Look at Chicago and DC.

        Otis the Sweaty

        December 17, 2015 at 12:21 pm

      • The housing projects in Manhattan are mostly of Caribbean Hispanic tenants (known to be notorious drug dealers like most Hispanic miscreants and they’re slow to destroy their environs, unlike blacks).

        Relatively comparing, NYCHA buildings throughout the city are nothing like their Chicago slumdumps, which were entirely under the control of gangs and other miscreants, who are now dispersed throughout the city, instead of being concentrated in one area, after their demise of their neighborhoods.


        December 17, 2015 at 2:13 pm

      • A few housing projects are actually pleasant. This includes the Russian Jewish ones on South Brooklyn, the Chinese ones in LES, and the old hippy ones in Chelsea. Queens has a few projects dominated by Caribbean Blacks who are good neighbors.


        December 17, 2015 at 3:02 pm

      • Wealthy Tycoons like Trump, who offer to pay NAMs to leave the housing projects, do not pay enough even for low impulse control miscreants to take the money and move. Paying a family less than 100K to leave NYCHA and NYC altogether, where they have no place to go, and no low skilled work to be found to supplement their welfare subsistence, doesn’t entice anyone, not even low IQ dumbbells.

        How stupid can our wealthy elites be? Or perhaps, being stingy is what cloud their thoughts!

        This being said, quite a number of NYCHA complexes are in transition mode, where private developers are taking over, but undesirable tenants remain on subsidized rent. Now, what is the reason behind this? Political entrenched elites who are also stingy and shortsighted.


        December 18, 2015 at 10:43 am

      • It’s quite fascinating to know that most of the housing projects in Manhattan have a majority Hispanic demographic. This was not the case 20 years ago, where blacks were also a main demographic.

        It’s also quite fascinating to know many of the Hispanic tenants, have homes in Florida, even Puerto Rico/Dominican Republic, while living on cheap rent. Drug dealing goes unhampered and law enforcement is reluctant to reign in. Who will replace them if they are arrested? I sense underhanded tactics and corruption, where money under the table is what determines tenant selection. Furthermore, blacks have a reputation for being complete deadbeats when it comes to paying bills, more so than Latinos.


        December 18, 2015 at 10:55 am

    • Our family lived in Park Slope in the 1980s,we moved to Forest Hills, Queens as we became financially better off. Better people, better schools, big houses and verdant streets. No one at that expected Park Slope to become more expensive than Forest Hills.


      December 17, 2015 at 3:04 pm

      • Except for Forest Hills Gardens, Forest Hills remains inexpensive as it’s populated with old Jewish grandmothers, making the neighborhood depressing for younger people.

        Lion of the Blogosphere

        December 17, 2015 at 3:06 pm

      • Definitely not a cool SWPL neighborhood but its still great for raising families. Old Jewish grandmothers make great neighbors.


        December 17, 2015 at 5:35 pm

      • The only SWPL friendly area of Queens is perhaps Astoria and LIC, which are closer to Manhattan. However, these neighborhoods are far from being a catch for Manhattanites who want a bigger living space. The homes in Queens are mostly unappealing, when comparing them to the Brownstones and quaint walkups of Brooklyn.


        December 18, 2015 at 10:59 am

      • Astoria is full of guidos. Greeks can be guidos too. And the architecture sucks.

        LIC has too many Indians. Foul odors emanate from their apartments.

        Lion of the Blogosphere

        December 18, 2015 at 11:13 am

      • Correct, but SWPLs do live in Astoria, because it’s the only part of Queens closest to Manhattan. SWPLs don’t mind guidos, as long as they churn out good food/drinks for their enjoyment. Staten Island doesn’t attract SWPLs, because it’s too far away.


        December 18, 2015 at 11:21 am

  4. All white people should have Hispanics living nearby to take care of their houses and clean their lawns, that is why we need more immigration. And if we can’t get Hispanics, Arabs, who sort of look like Hispanics, should be OK.

    Demographic maps, when they come out, are interesting. I used to commute to work using the 4/5 subway line in Manhattan. Around 2006-7 the trains got super-crowded, which was reported in some mainstream publications, but also super-crowded with low class African-Americans, to the extent that I actually saw a lady sitting opposite me lit up a crack pipe on the when I was on the way home from work. I found out later that while the city on the whole had a reduced percentage of Blacks, the neighborhoods with an increased percentage were all in the Bronx along the northern border of the city, where the 4/5/6 trains start their run. It would have been helpful for me if this had been reported, instead of having to figure it out.


    December 16, 2015 at 11:20 pm

  5. Los Angeles seems to be mostly Hispanic. Asians seem to live amongst whites but not blacks so much.


    December 17, 2015 at 3:13 am

  6. Interesting to see that blacks have actually carved out a pretty significant geographical swath of Boston for themselves, but have almost no presence in the rest of the metro area. The ratio of professional educated blacks to whites seems much lower in Boston than in New York or Philadelphia. In many years working in the financial sector in Boston I met maybe two or three blacks in a professional capacity.

    Peter Akuleyev

    December 17, 2015 at 7:23 am

  7. “New government rules will require all cities and towns receiving federal housing funds to assess patterns of segregation”

    This is a part of the Democrat plan of discreet social engineering that is already underway under the Obama Administration but has largely been ignored by the mainstream media. The goal is to push more low income NAMs out of the cities and into lower middle class suburbs via Section 8 development. Ron Unz had an excellent article that analyzed this. His theory is that this is nothing more than a cynical ploy by affluent, white liberals to throw blacks out of their beloved cities in order to accelerate gentrification and increase their own property values. The biggest losers of course will be Republican voting downscale whites who will have to deal with criminal NAMs moving in to their neighborhoods and ruining their already struggling school systems. Just one more flashpoint toward the coming balkanization of these United States.


    December 17, 2015 at 10:06 am

    • Part of the scoring that gov uses for determining suitability of Section 8-ing neighborhoods is availability of public transportation.

      If you are in a suburban community, and nice SWPLs from downtown start offering you a “light rail” station or “bus rapid transit” in your area, tell them to go jump in a lake.


      December 17, 2015 at 10:53 am

    • Housing projects remain in NYC, because SWPLs need NAM servants to work at the low skilled, low paying corporate retail jobs that serve them. By knocking them down, who will fill the void?

      The NAM server at a Manhattan Chipotle is most likely to live in subsidized housing.


      December 18, 2015 at 10:47 am

  8. India is part of Asia.


    December 17, 2015 at 10:29 pm

  9. MaryK — Whatever floats your boat? Proles, especially the White ethnic types in NYC, are happy to live in a neighborhood that has a single diner, pizzeria, pub and a deli that serves their needs, as long as the amenities are good and blacks are nowhere to be found in the nearby vicinity.


    December 18, 2015 at 11:16 am

    • Unlike SWPLs/Hipsters who need all sorts of eateries, pet stores, specialty shops and cafes.


      December 18, 2015 at 11:18 am

    • When it comes to blacks the only problem is safety. On the personal level I have no problem with blacks or Hispanics. As to proles being happy with one pizzeria, one diner, etc… it isn’t a question of being happy with it but settling for this rather than moving to a suburb where you can’t realistically walk around and you need a car. I’ve spent nearly all my life in a section of Brooklyn with numerous subways and several major avenues within walking distance, so I’ve always had tons of stores/shops 1-3 blocks away. That won’t be the case in Gerritsen Beach/Marine Park, but it still beats having to spend 7K a year to maintain a car.

      I lost most of my extended family in the 1970s when the moved to various suburbs. I’ve been bitterly anti-suburban ever since. To this day it still astonishes me that people associate suburbs with families and urban life with being single and childless. But not every culture maintained the urban ethnic neighborhood as long as IAs did.


      December 18, 2015 at 12:43 pm

      • IAs don’t seem to mind Hispanics all that much, as long as they don’t start trouble. Years ago, an Italian American Sociologist (I guess they do exist) by the name of Michael Barone, made a point that Hispanics are the new guidos. Given Snooki and part Puerto Rican/Italian Ronnie Ortiz are part of the Jersey Shore cast, he might have a point.


        December 18, 2015 at 2:00 pm

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: