Lion of the Blogosphere

Making a Murderer

Finished watching this very long documentary series. What do you want me to say about it?

Written by Lion of the Blogosphere

January 29, 2016 at 10:09 PM

Posted in Law, Technology

23 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. That it’s evil to defend such a repulsive murderer. The evidence presented was very selective.

    The guy burned a cat alive. That’s enough to fry him. Avery is pure garbage, and it’s sad that he’s not going to be executed.


    January 29, 2016 at 10:26 PM

    • Ditto. Anyone who intentionally harms a cat or dog should be terminated with extreme prejudice. Not just because cruelty to animals is a reliable indicator of future violent sociopathy but because of the heinous nature of the act itself.

      Robert the Wise

      January 30, 2016 at 2:48 PM

  2. The county cops and prosecutors are definitely dirty. There is no doubt in my mind that evidence was planted and that alone should make any decent person disgusted and appalled. What’s more is the pervasive code of silence amongst those with no direct involvement in the fabrication of evidence that stems from a brothers-in-arms mantra among the bureaucrats of law and order. They don’t want to be the one to narc out a colleague who’s just trying to make ensure that an assumed criminal scumbag doesn’t escape justice — even if that means breaking the law.

    Avery’s motivation to perform such an idiotic murder is nonexistent. He’s a hopelessly white trash prole with a shady past, but he didn’t commit this crime. That written confession by his teenage nephew was complete garbage, engineered by a pissant public defender with a diploma mill JD and a subservient relationship with the prosecution. Never trust a man that smiles that much.

    Lastly, trusting a jury of your “peers” with your fate is a total crapshoot.


    January 29, 2016 at 10:58 PM

    • You’re a naive idiot. Cops aren’t perfect, but Avery’s existence should be offensive to everyone with a moral sense. His motivation? He’s sadistic scum. He had told his cellmate that he dreamed about building a torture chamber for a woman, and liked to torture animals.

      This loser had 5 kids, spreading his awful genes. Keeping him away the rest of his life will at least stop him from breeding anymore.


      January 30, 2016 at 7:06 AM

  3. Reading between the lines of the news stories it sounds as if the producers buried all the inconvenient evidence supporting this guy’s conviction. True?


    January 29, 2016 at 10:59 PM

  4. Is Steve Avery prole?


    January 29, 2016 at 11:02 PM

    • If you find yourself doing time, you’re prole.

      E. Rekshun

      January 30, 2016 at 4:24 PM

      • That goes without saying.

        Lion of the Blogosphere

        January 30, 2016 at 4:48 PM

      • So is Michael Milken prole?


        January 30, 2016 at 5:02 PM

      • Ha ha, I was thinking that there’s en exception for Michael Milken.

        Lion of the Blogosphere

        January 30, 2016 at 5:04 PM

      • The majority of inmates in a minimal security prison are non-violent white-collar criminals and tend not to be proles.

        Lewis Medlock

        January 30, 2016 at 6:15 PM

      • @Lewis: The majority of inmates in a minimal security prison are non-violent white-collar criminals and tend not to be proles.

        If so, then their felony convictions and limited employment prospects will turn them into proles by the time they’re released.

        E. Rekshun

        January 31, 2016 at 5:25 AM

  5. Next review this clip of Nixon and Ehrlichman having a conversation about Archie Bunker, Homos and pot. Someone posted this on another site the other day and I find it hilarious. Never thought I’d want to socialize with Nixon, but after this . . .


    January 29, 2016 at 11:05 PM

  6. Preferably nothing, I’m tired of hearing about it.

    Dank Enlightenment

    January 29, 2016 at 11:23 PM

  7. SFG

    January 29, 2016 at 11:29 PM

  8. Nothing. This and Serial reek of journalistic self-justification.


    January 29, 2016 at 11:54 PM

  9. You’re a little late to the game. That thing has been talked to death. The investigation/prosecution was sloppy but he may well have done it, so it really came down to the jury. If you’ve ever been on a jury, you’d know that it was probably two guys arguing, possibly for the sake of arguing, and then finally saying “fuck it let’s go home”, because the other 10 people were sick to death of it and wanted to roast him all along.

    I do feel bad for the quasi-retarded guy though, but admire his ability to get fat on prison cuisine.


    January 29, 2016 at 11:57 PM

  10. I watched about 6 episodes of the series and read several articles about it from all kinds of different perspectives. My takeaway was that Avery did it but that police also planted evidence. Pretty crazy that Avery spent 18 years in prison before all this for a crime he did not commit.

    Several weeks ago I drove through Chilton, the small town in Wisconsin where the trial was held, which was located in a county adjacent to the county where the Halbach murder actually occurred.


    January 30, 2016 at 12:01 AM

  11. Who cares? Lumpenprole 70 IQ white trash with a shady past. Don’t know enough about the case to say one way or the other, other than “oh well”.


    January 30, 2016 at 12:28 AM

  12. I think Steve Avery is innocent, but Adnan Syed is guilty as sin.


    January 30, 2016 at 10:21 AM

  13. Is it fair to assume you watched Making a Murderer through your subscription to Netflix (rather than downloading it illegally through a torrent site)?


    January 30, 2016 at 5:03 PM

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: