Lion of the Blogosphere

CNN NH poll


Trump remains steady at 29%.

Rubio has surged to second place at 18%.

If these numbers hold through the primary, the GOPe will exert strong pressure on everyone who is not Rubio to withdraw.

This was a live-interview poll, which Trump does poorly on. The prediction is that he will overperform the poll.

No one, in recent memory, has ever won the Republican nomination after failing to win either Iowa or New Hampshire.

Written by Lion of the Blogosphere

February 4, 2016 at 9:25 pm

Posted in Politics

58 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Lion,

    They say Trump is running on basically the same platform as Pat Buchanan did in the 90s. If Trump weren’t running, and Buchanan was instead, do you think you’d support Buchanan for president? Assuming Buchanan were doing just as well as Trump is now in the polls and everything.


    February 4, 2016 at 11:42 pm

  2. Regardless of what happens in New Hampshire, I think South Carolina and the rest of the south belong to Trump. But still, what a terrible blow it would be if one of the Cubanos were to win New Hampshire. Both Cruz and Rubio are both about 5’6 as well. Who ever heard of a short president?


    February 5, 2016 at 12:06 am

    • James Madison. But I take your point in the age of mass elections and media.

      Herb Dregs

      February 5, 2016 at 3:24 am

    • Both Cruz and Rubio are both about 5’6 as well. Who ever heard of a short president?

      That’s about Michael Bloomberg territory and neither is that short. That’s shorter than 5’8″ Rand Paul.


      February 5, 2016 at 11:45 am

  3. I thought Trump missed a great opportunity yesterday when Cruz suggested he’s unstable and might nuke Denmark. Trump should have said something like, “at this juncture, my team is confident that conventional weapons will be sufficient to take care of the Danes.”

    Quoted at CH

    February 5, 2016 at 12:23 am

    • Yeah, it’s specifically Trump who would get the country into some military mess. Not Rubio, ¡Jeb!, Carly, Cruz, Kasich or the rest. Trump’s dangerous policies of disengagement and de-escalation will surely mean the US nukes Denmark sometime soon.


      February 5, 2016 at 11:43 am

  4. Rubio’s problem is that he wants to be Batman but he looks like Robin.


    February 5, 2016 at 12:49 am

    • In a completely gay context too.


      February 5, 2016 at 11:44 am

      • The ambiguously gay candidate?


        February 5, 2016 at 1:25 pm

    • He looks more like Pinnochio to me. Just with big ears instead of nose.


      February 5, 2016 at 12:42 pm

  5. This will be a delicate time for Trump, as opponents combine behind another candidate with the other candidates dropping out.


    February 5, 2016 at 3:48 am

  6. Cruz has no chance of winning the nom so write him off, but Rubio was always going to be dangerous because the establishment will eventually rally around him, it’s just a matter of when.

    Trump’s awful ground game and reliance on newer voters means that he should underperform his polls by around 2%. So Trump should garner around 27% of the vote.

    8% are undecided. History shows that the leading establishment candidate gets the undecided vote. So Rubio 26%. Problem is that some percentage of the Christie/Kaisich/Jeb/Carly vote, currently 30%, is going to break for Rubio at the last minute. If even a 10th of them go for Rubio, and I suspect it will be closer to a 3rd, Rubio wins.

    Updated prediction: Trump 27, Rubio 35. The other establishment candidates all drop out and the media narrative declares the race belongs to Rubio until Trump wins SC big, throwing the race back into turmoil.

    Otis the Sweaty

    February 5, 2016 at 7:28 am

    • “Trump’s awful ground game and reliance on newer voters means that he should underperform his polls by around 2%. ”

      That’s what Lion said about Iowa and it didn’t work out. Lion has been talking this underperform stuff and it’s bullshit. Trump underperformed at the caucuses. If he loses New England he will lose his swagger totally and swagger is integral to his game.

      An alpha without swagger is not an alpha. I truly hate to say this but Jeb might be the last man standing.


      February 5, 2016 at 12:07 pm

  7. Off topic (but not much): I’ve just set up this aggregator for Alt Right webpages, allowing you to check the most recent updates in almost 100 Alt Right aggregated sites and blogs without having go to visit them individually, which is both convenient and time-saving: Give it a look guys and if you like it, feel free to bookmark it and spread the word.


    February 5, 2016 at 8:57 am

    • Do you really need a picture of Hitler on the homepage?

      Mike Street Station

      February 5, 2016 at 10:36 am

      • Indeed that’s pretty crappy marketing.

        A serene landscape without Nazi-like symbols (perhaps a Thomas Kinkade painting) would be much better.

        Lion of the Blogosphere

        February 5, 2016 at 10:55 am

      • Agree. Excellent site, but ditch the Hitler image. You aren’t doing yourself any favors. The important part about such sites is gaining new recruits to the Red Pill cause. Don’t stop them before they even start. Hell, for right now you should have Trump on there.


        February 5, 2016 at 11:30 am

      • Hitler was proved to be a loser at the end. WNs should dissociate from him.

        Francisco Franco’s assault on Liberals during the Spanish Civil War, and Benito Mussolini’s vision of a wealthy Southern Italy, are worthy of admiration. But many proles are too stupid to read Southern European history on their own.


        February 5, 2016 at 12:05 pm

      • Yes, he needed a picture of Hitler, because he is their Fuhrer. Thank you, Lawrence1978, for being honest about your movement.
        @Lion, it’s not crappy marketing. It’s the truth. These guys are treasonous sleazebags. It’s very unfortunate the Trump has become associated with them.


        February 5, 2016 at 12:11 pm

      • “Do you really need a picture of Hitler on the homepage?”

        If you read the list of sites on the homepage, a picture of the fuhrer is quite appropriate. My guess is that most of the readers of the sites on the aggregator would regard Henry Ford as a philo-semite.

        Lewis Medlock

        February 5, 2016 at 12:46 pm

      • Hitler was proved to be a loser at the end.

        The same apologists for Hitler like this fellow and Buchanan are also pro-Putin Slavophiles who drool over Polish and Russian models, despite their hero’s plans to exterminate/expel most of Slavic Europe. They also blame Jews for the anti-Slavic Holodomor, which was caused at a time when Stalin had total control over the Soviet Union.

        Slav extermination is wonderful when Hitler does it, but not when Georgians do:

        Generalplan Ost envisaged differing percentages of the various conquered nations undergoing Germanization (for example, 50% of Czechs, 35% of Ukrainians and 25% of Belarusians), extermination, expulsion and other fates, the net effect of which would be to ensure that the conquered territories would be Germanized. In ten years’ time, the plan effectively called for the extermination, expulsion, Germanization or enslavement of most or all East and West Slavs living behind the front lines in Europe. The “Small Plan” was to be put into practice as the Germans conquered the areas to the east of their pre-war borders. In this way the plan for Poland was drawn up at the end of November 1939 and is probably responsible for much of the World War II expulsion of Poles by Germany (first to colonial district of the General Government and, from 1942 also to Polenlager).[15] After the war, under the “Big Plan”, Generalplan Ost foresaw the removal of 45 million non-Germanizable people from Central and Eastern Europe, of whom 31 million were “racially undesirable”, 100% of Jews, Poles (85%), Belorussians (75%) and Ukrainians (65%), to West Siberia,[6] and about 14 millions were to remain, but were to be treated as slaves.[8] In their place, up to 8-10 million Germans would be settled in an extended “living space” (Lebensraum). Because the number of Germans appeared to be insufficient to populate the vast territories of Central and Eastern Europe, the peoples judged to lie racially between the Germans and the Russians (Mittelschicht), namely, Latvians and even Czechs, were also supposed to be resettled there.[16]

        The Undiscovered Jew

        February 5, 2016 at 7:55 pm


        The Plan considered that there were a large number of such elements among the Baltic nations. Erhard Wetzel felt that thought should be given to a possible Germanization of the whole of the Estonian nation and a sizable proportion of the Latvians. On the other hand, the Lithuanians seemed less desirable since they contained too great an admixture of Slav blood. Himmler’s view was that “almost the whole of the Lithuanian nation would have to be deported to the East”.[12]

        The Undiscovered Jew

        February 5, 2016 at 7:59 pm

      • In 1941 it was decided to destroy the Polish nation completely and the German leadership decided that in 10 to 20 years the Polish state under German occupation was to be fully cleared of any ethnic Poles and settled by German colonists.[18] A majority of them, now deprived of their leaders and most of their intelligentsia (through human losses, destruction of culture, the ban on education above the absolutely basic level, and kidnapping of children for Germanization), would have to be deported to regions in the East and scattered over as wide an area of Western Siberia as possible. According to the plan this would result in their assimilation by the local populations, which would cause the Poles to vanish as a nation.[16] By 1952, only about 3–4 million non-Germanized Poles (all of them peasants) were to be left residing in the former Poland. Those of them who would still not Germanize were to be forbidden to marry, the existing ban on any medical help to Poles in Germany would be extended, and eventually Poles would cease to exist. Experiments in mass sterilization in concentration camps may also have been intended for use on the populations.[19] The Wehrbauer, or soldier-peasants, would be settled in a fortified line to prevent civilization reanimating beyond the Ural Mountains and threatening Germany.[20] “Tough peasant races” would serve as a bulwark against attack.[21]

        The Undiscovered Jew

        February 5, 2016 at 8:01 pm

      • Indeed that’s pretty crappy marketing.

        The Hitler brand is tarnished even as a ‘white supremacist’ – he was going to destroy some of the blondest European ethnicities if he won the war.

        With three to four thousand years of European history can’t you people find a less objectionable white leader to idolize. How about Caesar? Napoleon?

        The Undiscovered Jew

        February 5, 2016 at 8:38 pm

      • @Lewis Medlock,
        “My guess is that most of the readers of the sites on the aggregator would regard Henry Ford as a philo-semite.”
        Compared to the rest of the ‘contributors’ to that aggregator, he would be. At least he gave a few Jews jobs. The majority of the rest of the links are hard-core neo-Nazis.


        February 6, 2016 at 1:29 pm

      • @UJ,

        Your citations about E. Europe reminded me of something.

        The alt-right is now a total giddy frenzy over a couple of things: the advent of Trump, and the bravery of Victor Orban (who I admire tremendously, by the way) but about a year ago, they were in a real slump. Do you remember when they got their butts kicked out of Hungary?

        The whole thing is hilarious. The Hungarians have zero interest in American racial issues. They do not care about “white nationalism.” They care about Hungary. Yes, the fact that Hungary is for Hungarians will preserve part of white Europe, but that’s not their intent. And the stupidity of inviting hard core Russian nationalists to rant in Hungary….

        This is what I am talking about. Their crassness, violence, and tone-deaf stupidity is toxic. And oh yeah, they hate me and mine. No common ground, buddy.


        February 6, 2016 at 1:37 pm

      • Gothamette — Many of the individuals at the forefront of Spain’s extremist groups, are in fact Northern Euro losers, who have been fleeing their multiculti societies for less diverse Sourthern Euro countries, where they bring their irrational hatred into their new homes.

        Modern Day Spaniards do not fret about their Islamic and Jewish past as much as the Norwegian, Germanic racialists who settle in Spain, because Norway and Germany, respectively, have been screwed by their politicians who insist their nations must accommodate a large number of non-Europeans. The same applies to our shores, mostly founded by Whites of Northern European ancestry, who do the same when it comes to immigration and diversity.


        February 6, 2016 at 2:56 pm

      • Do you remember when they got their butts kicked out of Hungary?

        Never saw the story until now. Thanks.

        The Undiscovered Jew

        February 6, 2016 at 10:00 pm

      • TUJ,

        You missed one little part in your wiki entry:

        “Nearly all the wartime documentation on Generalplan Ost was deliberately destroyed shortly before Germany’s defeat in May 1945.[6][7] Thus, no copies of the plan have ever been found after the war among the documents in German archives. Apart from Ehlich’s testimony, there are several documents which refer to this plan or are supplements to it. Although no copies of the actual document have survived, most of the plan’s essential elements have been reconstructed from related memos, abstracts and other ancillary documents.[8]”

        So, basically, this plan may have been nothing more than a lurid form of rumor and innuendo.

        Let’s understand this correctly: the same Poles, Latvians, Ukrainians and BeloRussians that the Nazis were going to exterminate, were the same such people who were recruited by the Nazis to act as auxiliaries. Don’t we here so often how the these people joined the Nazis to kill Jews or implement other forms of policy? So, which is it? The Ukrainians contributed 100,000 people to the ranks of Nazi police in the face of the slaughter of their own people. The same is true for many of these SSR regions. That’s basically an army that the Nazis also armed. It takes a lot of self-loathing to do this in the face of people who intend to exterminate you anyway.


        February 8, 2016 at 11:54 am

    • Lion, this is what I’m talking about. The core of the alt right is made up of rabid anti-Semites. Don’t kid yourself. Jews are the real enemy to them.


      February 5, 2016 at 12:09 pm

      • I agree.

        Lion of the Blogosphere

        February 5, 2016 at 12:47 pm

      • The core of the alt right is made up of rabid anti-Semites.

        No it isn’t.

        Jews are the real enemy to them.

        Some clearly are and if a small ethnic group like Norwegian Lutherans or Ecuadorian Catholics had similar disproportionate power and similar agendas they would be a target of suspicion as well.

        The neo-nazi kooks are out there and get alot of attention. But many alt right issues remain legitimate including criticisms of Jewish leftists and globalists.

        The neo-nazi element is unfortunate just as the KKK element in the American nationalist movement is unfortunate. It would be better if the could be gotten rid of but that’s not going to happen.

        And the psycho extreme Orthodox Jews are not exactly the pride of Jews in America or Israel either.

        Plus, we don’t know which ones are actually left wing Trolls/Mobys trying to make the legitimate alt right look bad.

        I agree.

        You would be cause you have certain Jewish paranoia issues.


        February 5, 2016 at 1:33 pm

      • There are leftists who are Jews, and leftists who are gentiles. Blaming all Jews for what a few bad apples do is anti-Semitic. Why not blame all white gentiles?

        Lion of the Blogosphere

        February 5, 2016 at 1:57 pm

      • The core of the alt right is made up of rabid anti-Semites. Don’t kid yourself. Jews are the real enemy to them.

        They’re not worth worrying about. The altright has been completely overrun by retards like Riflepussy and intermarriage has closed off any successful antisemitic movement in America. Even Hitler had to make exceptions because of intermarriage; and the American white trash Wehrmacht isn’t going to be more successful than Nazi Germany on any point.

        The Undiscovered Jew

        February 5, 2016 at 7:43 pm

      • Why not blame all white gentiles?

        Because the entire point of antisemitism is to cover up the fact white gentiles are more to blame for their predicament than Jews.

        The Undiscovered Jew

        February 5, 2016 at 7:45 pm

      • Some clearly are and if a small ethnic group like Norwegian Lutherans

        Rove and Grover Norquist are Scandinavian…

        The Undiscovered Jew

        February 5, 2016 at 8:39 pm

      • @UJ,

        “They’re not worth worrying about.”

        I don’t worry about them. I despise them, and I can’t stand being associated with them in any way. And let’s face it, when you are on the same side as someone on a subject, you are associated with them. That bothers me, bigtime.

        Please face facts. These guys’ twitter feeds and websites ALL come back to one theme, one issue: JewJewJew. “The Eskimos.” It’s all over their websites. I won’t mention the names, not gonna give them the satisfaction (because I think some of them read this site), but I was reading someone twitter feed and he retweeted a typical hardcore anti-Semitic stereotype of the greedy money-hungry Jew. This one recently ranted on and on about something called “World Holocaust Remembrance Day” — as if that had anything to do with the US and our problems — portraying it as this giant Jewish conspiracy to guilt-trip the poor goyim. (BTW, they use words like goyim and “oy vey” constantly, words that no Jew under 60 uses.)

        In fact, I’d never heard of this World Holocaust Remembrance Day, and I don’t give a fuck about it. I’ve got other issues to worry about, like being slashed on the subway by disturbed black men, and societal breakdown caused by immivation. I refuse to coddle up to these scum.

        And no, this isn’t paranoia. Fuck the person who said that. It’s just cold, hard truth. I can’t find common ground with people who are delusional, and who hate me and my family. Even if we happen to agree on a few things. I don’t stand with them, and it’s insane for any Jew to.


        February 6, 2016 at 10:07 am

      • @UJ and Lion,

        Of course, these anti-Semitic retards are blaming the German/Swedish debacle with immivation on the Jooz.

        The Swedish one is hard for them to twist but the German one is easy: it’s all “Holohoax” guilt-tripping!

        Actually, as I’ve been reading, the history of Holocaust education in Germany is much more complicated than their pea brains can appreciate. The H-word was nearly verboten in Germany until the TV show. Then came a flood, a deluge.

        The immivasion was entirely the fault of Erdogan, who openly taunted the Europeans with migration as a weapon. He had a perfect dupe in Merkel. None of this had anything to do with Holocaust guilt.

        I think you are being very short-sighted by saying that they are a non-factor. Kevin McDonald, etc., are fringe figures in the big picture of US politics, but they are not crackpots. Don’t dismiss them that lightly.


        February 6, 2016 at 10:14 am

      • Kevin McDonald, etc., are fringe figures in the big picture of US politics, but they are not crackpots.

        MacDonald is not only a crackpot he’s a pathological liar. He’s been caught numerous times distorting the meaning of his own scholarly resources. He’s arguably a greater liar than Holocaust revisionists since the latter don’t pretend that sources that contradict their theories support them.

        For example, MacDonald referred to a study that supposedly showed Jews demonstrate high rates of authoritarianism. The actual study showed Jews tied Anglicans and Unitarians for the least authoritarian of any religious group, no matter how the studies results were filtered.

        In another case, he refers to a 1983 interview with Michel Foucault on pg 199 of the Culture of Critique where MacDonald claims Foucault was influenced by the Frankfurt School. The actual interview says Foucault and France generally had no knowledge, or very little knowledge of the Frankfurt School, but that Foucault still managed to come up with ‘very similar’ theories as they did. It not only shows MacDonald is a liar, but an idiot for referring to an interview that contradicts his thesis that the Frankfurt School was advancing a Jewish strategy: if Foucault, who was not Jewish, developed ‘very similar’ ideas to the Frankfurt School without knowing they existed, then the latter couldn’t have pursuing an ‘ethnic agenda’ if a non-Jew had the same ideas:

        Kevin MacDonald:

        Altemeyer (1988, 2) defines “right-wing authoritarianism” as involving three central attributes: submission to legitimate authority; aggression toward individuals that is sanctioned by the authorities; adherence to social conventions. Clearly, individuals high on these traits would be ideal members of cohesive human group evolutionary strategies. Indeed, such attributes would define the ideal Jew in traditional societies: submissive to the kehilla authorities, strongly adherent to within – group social conventions such as the observance of Jewish religious law, and characterized by negative attitudes toward gentile society and culture seen as manifestations of an outgroup. Consistent with this formulation, high scorers on the Right-Wing Authoritarianism Scale (RWA) tend to be highly religious; they tend to be the most orthodox members of their denomination; they believe in group cohesiveness, group loyalty, and identify strongly with ingroups

        (Altemeyer 1994, 134; 1996, 84). Without question, traditional Jewish society and contemporary Jewish

        Orthodox and fundamentalist groups are highly authoritarian by any measure. Indeed, Rubenstein (1996) found that Orthodox Jews were higher on RWA than “traditional Jews,” and both of these groups were higher than secular Jews.59

        The real study:

        [A]re “very accepting” subjects equally authoritarian in all religions? Or do different denominations (as argued earlier) produce different levels of authoritarianism even among the strongly committed? If we examine just those subjects who answered the (0-5) “still accept” question with either a “4” or a “5” (that is, they indicated they “nearly completely” or “completely” accepted the religious beliefs taught them in childhood), who do you think were the most authoritarian of all these “true believers”? Fundamentalists (185.1) and Mennonites (185.3) among the students, Mennonites (202.1) and Fundamentalists (208.5) among the parents. The (rarer) United Church members, Anglicans, and Jews who were just as accepting of their religions scored about 25 points lower. True-believing Catholics and Lutherans lay somewhere in between. 61

        So not only are Jews among the least authoritarian of religious groups, according to Altemeyer highly religious Jews are among the least authoritarian of the highly religious.

        Reflecting the congruence between the Frankfurt School and contemporary
        postmodernism, the enormously influential postmodernist Michel Foucault
        stated, “If I had known about the Frankfurt School in time, I would have been
        saved a great deal of work. I would not have said a certain amount of nonsense
        and would not have taken so many false trails trying not to get lost, when the
        Frankfurt School had already cleared the way” (in Wiggershaus 1994, 4).
        Whereas the strategy of the Frankfurt School was to deconstruct universalist,
        scientific thinking by the use of “critical reason,” postmodernism has opted for
        complete relativism and the lack of objective standards of any kind in the
        interests of preventing any general theories of society or universally valid
        philosophical or moral systems (Norris 1993, 287ff). 145

        Contemporary postmodernism and multiculturalist ideology (see, e.g., Gless
        & Hermstein Smith 1992) have adopted several central pillars of the Frankfurt

        Now, the striking thing is that France knew absolutely nothing – or only vaguely, only very indirectly – about the current of Weberian thought. Critical Theory was hardly known in France and the Frankfurt School was practically unheard of. This, by the way, raises a minor historical problem which fascinates me and which I have not been able to resolve at all. It is common knowledge that many representatives of the Frankfurt School came to Paris in 1935, seeking refuge, and left very hastily, sickened presumably – some even said as much – but saddened anyhow not to have found more of an echo. Then came 1940, but they had already left for England and the U.S., where they were actually much better received. The understanding that might have been established between the Frankfurt School and French philosophical thought – by way of the history of science and therefore the question of the history of rationality – never occurred. And when I was a student, I can assure you that I never once heard the name ofthe Frankfurt School mentioned by any of my professors.

        FOUCAULT: Now, obviously, if I had been familiar with the Frankfurt School, if I had been aware of it at the time, I would not have said a number of stupid things that I did say and I would have avoided many of the detours which I made while trying to pursue my own humble path – when, meanwhile, avenues had been opened up by the Frankfurt School. It is a strange case of non-penetration between two very similar types of thinking which is explained, perhaps, by that very similarity. Nothing hides the fact of a problem in common better than two similar ways of approaching it.

        The Undiscovered Jew

        February 6, 2016 at 10:48 am

      • I haven’t investigated Holocaust denialist claims that deeply, but from I can tell it seems that even they aren’t foolish enough to misquote research that contradicts their ideas. They usually argue something along the lines of technical problems they dreamed up that made the Holocaust fake, or exaggerated (the showers couldn’t have been configured to release gas, more Jews died of disease, etc) or quote questionable research. But they don’t use standard Holocaust research and claim it as proof that the Holocaust did not happen.

        MacDonald, however, really is that stupid: Foucault said he was influenced by the Frankfurt School; except he said explicitly he had never heard of it until much latter in his career when he had already developed ‘very similar ideas’.

        A real genius MacDonald is.

        The Undiscovered Jew

        February 6, 2016 at 10:54 am

      • @UJ,

        “MacDonald is not only a crackpot he’s a pathological liar. ”

        You can be a pathological liar, but not a crackpot. IMO, McDonald is a dangerous ideologue, and a sociopath, but not a crackpot.

        And you don’t have to convince ME that he’s the scum of the earth. It’s his groupies on the alt-right that need to be convinced, and they won’t be, and he has many of them. Look into it.

        Lastly, it’s not the low-class riff-raff who infest the alt-right that really worry me, it’s the fact that a lot of well-meaning people who are sick to death of the PC shit, immigration, crime, etc., who are scared off by these assholes. Believe it or not, UJ, most Americans aren’t living lives of abject misery (yet). They are surviving. Things could be better but they have decent lives. And when they look at Trump and see the neo-Nazis who admire him, they get turned off. Can you blame them?


        February 6, 2016 at 1:27 pm

  8. “No one, in recent memory, has ever won the Republican nomination after failing to win either Iowa or New Hampshire.”

    You shouldn’t rely on historical trends when Trump has bucked so many trends already. Nate Silver expected Trump’s campaign to collapse before the primaries like so many candidates in 2012. It didn’t happen.


    February 5, 2016 at 11:12 am

  9. “OK maybe that’s an imperfect analogy but most people thought Buchanan was a Cassandra and now we know he was correct. ”

    This is pedantic, but Cassandra was correct in every one of her predictions. This was a big part of the point of the story.

    People who are supposed to be educated get this wrong all the time and it never fails to drive me up the wall.


    February 5, 2016 at 11:22 am

    • Ed is right but nobody listens to him.


      February 5, 2016 at 11:46 am

    • NOW we know he’s correct. I think Cassandra was used correctly. That is, if you believe Buchanan was correct, as I do.

      Mike Street Station

      February 5, 2016 at 1:10 pm

  10. “Rubio has surged to second place at 18%.”

    There really is no creature on earth stupider than a GOPe style Republican.


    February 5, 2016 at 11:26 am

    • They aren’t stupid. Rubio has surged because those who were flirting with the GOPe no hopers are now taking a second look at Rubio after IA. If you want to stop Trump, and most NH Republicans do, then voting for Rubio is the only move.

      Now the people who are still going to vote for Christie, Jeb, Carly and Kaisich, they are stupid.

      Otis the Sweaty

      February 5, 2016 at 11:46 am

      • “If you want to stop Trump, and most NH Republicans do”

        Yes, that is precisely WHY they are stupid. Dumb white people always voting against their own interests.


        February 5, 2016 at 12:32 pm

  11. What you will see is a break up among whites, down the line between cuck and non cuck. There is really no difference between Jeb voters and Hillary voters, and with enough economic pressure, Bernie voters will flee to the Trump side. A Bernie voter is simply a Trump voter with a job and an education.

    Jeb/Hillary/everyone else voters are Sweden School Cucks who likely can’t be saved.


    February 5, 2016 at 2:22 pm

  12. Lion, TUJ and others need to understand something very important: all anti-Leftist positions eventually become anti-Semitic. Jewish oligarchs will arrange this as the case, as even some silicon-valley venture capital firms called the attack on Wall Street “anti-Semitic.”

    It is true that Leftism is not an exclusively Jewish phenomenon. Gentile Leftists outnumber Jews by very, very wide margins. The problem is in the percentages. If you were to snap your fingers and turn every Leftist into a pillar of salt, how would this work out in percentages? Well, that’s roughly half of the Gentiles, but it’s over 80% of the Jews. As anti-leftism gains traction when the mounting failures of leftism become more and more apparent, there will be a rallying call of Jewish oligarchs and others who will attempt to save leftism by labeling all anti-leftist positions as anti-Semitic. What are you guys going to say then?

    The reality is that all of the positions that we support on immigration, trade, banking, industrial policy, government roles, will eventually be regarded as anti-Semitic, in order to save the other side from the dustbin of history. Then what?

    In an ocean of lies, the most well-constructed are the ones that win. Once everything the alt-right believes becomes defacto anti-semitism, the only way out of it is the stuff Kevin MacDonald and others write. That is the madness of the situation and I don’t see it changing.


    February 8, 2016 at 12:40 pm

    • Regular Jews are more conservative than people think they are. For example, we have pointed out over and over again that the average Jew is more opposed to immigration than the elites of either party.

      Lion of the Blogosphere

      February 8, 2016 at 1:44 pm

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: