Lion of the Blogosphere

Rubio co-sponsored in-state tuition for illegal aliens

I did some research on the internet. Ted Cruz was right. In 2004, Marco Rubio co-sponsored a bill that would give illegal aliens in-state tuition (if they graduated from a Florida high school).

Thus we see that Rubio is a willing participant in the liberal strategy to slowly legalize illegal aliens. Illegal aliens should be deported and not be given discounted college tuition and other rewards (paid for by citizen taxpayers) for breaking our laws.

Written by Lion of the Blogosphere

February 14, 2016 at 2:13 pm

Posted in Immigration

37 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. ‘Illegal aliens should be deported and not be given discounted college tuition and other rewards (paid for by citizen taxpayers) for breaking our laws.’

    If there were 15 million illegal white Europeans, would you be for their deportation? I certainly wouldn’t. How about a couple of million Jews? Not me, no way! So I don’t think it’s the law, it’s just that this low IQ immigration is bad for America and that is what the argument is really about, not keeping within the letter of the law. I don’t think any sane person would want to deport 15 million white Europeans from this country. In fact, I think many would gladly break laws to get them in.

    For example, if I didn’t have too much to lose, I would marry a white European to get them US papers for a good compensation, but I wouldn’t do it for Muslims or Africans. You can argue that one more Muslim or African don’t make a difference, but I just wouldn’t do it, no way. I think it’s a good thing to increase America’s white population, regardless of the law. In Jewish jurisprudence there is a concept of breaking the law in order to maintain the legal system (ביטול תורה לצורך קיומה). This is such a case, or at least this what I think.


    February 14, 2016 at 3:32 pm

    • I would deport them if they were here illegally just because they broke the law. But I would have legal immigration be 100% white applicants only.

      The Undiscovered Jew

      February 14, 2016 at 5:53 pm

    • Well that’s kind of irrelevant since there are never going to be 15 million white European illegals. That doesn’t really describe the populations that are on the move.

      Mike Street Station

      February 14, 2016 at 5:55 pm

      • If America wants, it can get a few million Russian and Ukrainian immigrants. I think this is a good idea.


        February 14, 2016 at 7:10 pm

      • “If America wants, it can get a few million Russian and Ukrainian immigrants. I think this is a good idea.”

        Beware of crossing the Hajnal line…


        February 15, 2016 at 10:12 am

      • I’m not sure we need a few million Russians and Ukrainians. Maybe some hot chicks and engineers?

        Mike Street Station

        February 15, 2016 at 10:43 am

      • Don’t speak too quickly. If Europe falls apart….


        February 15, 2016 at 1:17 pm

    • Only Muslim, if the woman is a hot Moroccan chic. Some Iranian women are attractive, and that’s because they’re a product of a White parent, who is usually the father.

      Are you not bringing home a Central Asian girl from Bukhara?


      February 14, 2016 at 6:06 pm

      • * usually the mother


        February 14, 2016 at 6:07 pm

    • There’s around 400,000 dirt poor White South Africans (10% of SA whites) who are in dire straits and likely can’t move up in the economic ranks because affirmative action is very aggressive and set asides are only for blacks there. I’d rather see them at the front of the line to move here as “political refugees” if the US is going to be the dumping ground for all of the world’s penniless problem peoples.


      February 14, 2016 at 6:32 pm

      • Never gonna happen, dat raycist.


        February 14, 2016 at 8:11 pm

      • “Never gonna happen”

        It would still be good to talk about, just to F up the narrative.


        February 14, 2016 at 8:29 pm

      • Hey, this is a great idea. Can totally happen with Trump.


        February 14, 2016 at 10:50 pm

      • There are loads and loads of dysfunctional white trash throughout the world. I don’t know much about South Africa but I’m confident that’s what you’d be getting by throwing open the doors to people from eastern europe.

        Lloyd Llewellyn

        February 14, 2016 at 11:50 pm

    • During World War II, Congress repealed the racist Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 as a show of friendship toward our Chinese ally in fighting the Japanese. Once the hated act was repealed, Congress created a quota for Chinese immigration. The quota was 105 Chinese immigrants a year.

      Mark Caplan

      February 15, 2016 at 11:17 am

  2. Looks like Rubio is already vocally opposing Obama being allowed to appoint a SCOTUS replacement. He’s also stating this “his” Supreme Court would roll back marriage equality, showing just how incredibly stupid he is to make that irrelevant and divisive topic into an issue during his Presidential run.


    February 14, 2016 at 3:41 pm

    • Right, there is no reason to roll back marriage ‘equality’ since marriage ‘equality’ was never established in the first place. Rather, gay ‘marriage’ is destined to remain a third rate imitation lacking the most essential elements, including reproduction, the biological prime directive. No amount of laws can fix that defect.


      February 14, 2016 at 8:27 pm

      • Gay marriage is a “marriage” the same way a corporation is a “person.” It’s just a legal concept.


        February 14, 2016 at 10:25 pm

  3. There’s a poster on the American Conservative site who always says of immigration restrictions that they are solely motivated by racism. Which is, of course, evil. So, there should never be immigration restrictions. See, there really isn’t a problem that can’t be reduced to racism.


    February 14, 2016 at 5:37 pm

  4. All the candidates are demanding the Senate not vote on a replacement.

    Trump for his part should threaten to kick McConnell’s ass if he even hints of bringing up for a vote whatever lunatic Obama nominates.

    The Undiscovered Jew

    February 14, 2016 at 5:55 pm

  5. Over at the Conservative Treehouse, there is an interesting discovery:

    Rubio received the following graphic at exactly the time he was questioned about immigration:

    This is clear manipulation since nobody else got any graphic. They were ready with a special graphic only for Rubio to line up exactly with the question being asked. This graphic clearly serves to mislead. The wall thing is particularly ridiculous since the only reason he mentions it is to mimic Trump.


    February 14, 2016 at 8:16 pm

    • And the wall is only 700 miles. The border is over 1400 miles.


      February 15, 2016 at 12:04 pm

    • Thanks for mentioning CTH. That’s the only other place where I stay for quite a while every day.


      February 15, 2016 at 3:07 pm

  6. Cruz is just as bad on immigration as Rubio is. He supported a bill to increase the H1B cap 500 % and expand legal immigration. He also wanted to allow illegals to stay and give them legal status.

    In the meantime, it would cost taxpayers half a billion year in benefits while ensuring that Democrats dominate politics in the future. But it would make the GOPe happy because they’d have the cheap labor.


    February 14, 2016 at 8:17 pm

    • The idea that we would legalize and forever deny citizenship is absurd and Cruz should have known this (probably did know this and didn’t care). After a few years political pressure would build and citizenship would be granted as sure as the sun rises in the east.

      It’s amazing to me that Cruz’s defense for saying he wanted to immigration reform to pass was so he could fool the leadership into accepting his amendment to take citizenship off the table which would somehow kill the bill. (That didn’t happen, the bill passed anyway.) But Cruz didn’t just say he wanted the reform to pass during the Senate debate, he said it in interviews and on television over a period of months. And his supporters believe this nonsense! In any case, the fool was Cruz because as I said, citizenship for these people was a 100% certainty after legalization, even if it took some years to come about.

      Andrew E.

      February 14, 2016 at 9:53 pm

    • Cruz is almost as bad as Obama, who lies every time he opens his mouth.


      February 15, 2016 at 3:09 pm

  7. Of course it’s about race. Hell, it should be about race! Race is a very real and very important thing!

    America was founded and identified as a white country till the 60s. And that fact didnt make it nazi germany.

    Hell, its the third world r-selected peiple who feel entitled to break into the country and steal whiteys money who are far more racially chauvinistic.


    February 14, 2016 at 10:03 pm

    • The waves of southern and eastern european as well as catholic migration also represented a significant change to the ethnic balance of the country and was also met with a great deal of resistance. The idea of a generic white christian american identity is a post war thing and in no way goes back to the founding.

      Lloyd Llewellyn

      February 14, 2016 at 11:52 pm

      • John Jay, writing in 1787 in The Federalist Papers: “Providence has been pleased to give this one connected country to one united people, a people descended from the same ancestors, speaking the same language, professing the same religion, attached to the same principles of government, very similar in their manners and customs …” This was an explicitly and consciously white European country from founding. All laws and customs reflected this. This is inarguable.

        The point is well-taken about the resistance to the Great Waves of immigrants of in the late 19th/early 20th century. However, there are three big differences from today:

        1) The classic Great Wave numbers were miniscule, controlled, and LEGAL compared to the endless ILLEGAL influx of today.

        2) These immigrants were expected and forced to assimilate. No welfare, no ESL classes. And they weren’t coming in droves from a neighbor nation that feels it was robbed of territory.

        3) They weren’t Muslims, Mexicans, Somalis, etc. Eastern and Southern Europeans are still EUROPEAN. What’s coming in today is a whole ‘nother ballgame. Irreconcilably alien and hostile.


        February 15, 2016 at 3:26 am

      • The waves of southern and eastern European immigration was enormously deleterious to the country. It was right to oppose it then and it is even more right to oppose the non-white immigration now.


        February 15, 2016 at 12:09 pm

      • Yes…you have to realize that a huge number of these early white settlers were pounded into becoming an assimilated mass. Most went home and the modern Italian and Irish population you see today was a result of winnowing and sifting away the trash that kept washing up on the shores of America.

        It’s not anything like today where immigration is the physical expression of hatred towards whites.


        February 15, 2016 at 12:13 pm

      • I’m very anti immigration but it’s ignorant to suggest that there was some unbroken conception of Americanness that stretches back to the beginning of the country. It’s just something that was retconned back onto history after World War II to make everyone feel good about the irish, jews, italians, etc.

        If the current waves of immigrants ever become assimilated you can expect people to promote the same lie but with some new even more expansive definition. Probably something along the lines of proposition nation idea that you hear about all the time. It will be true in the sense that it is a notion of Americanness that described the entire history of the nation but utterly false in the sense that it was never actually widely accepted in the past.

        You hear on VDARE all the time about the “historic american nation”. It just makes the people talking like that look ignorant. White Christians rioted, and killed other white Christians of different national origins and faiths and burnt down their churches. Different groups were played against one another by industrialists who sought ought not just a steady supply of labor but divided and diverse work force. One interesting difference is that, from what I can tell, there wasn’t the same kind of support for immigration from the cultural elite.

        Lloyd Llewellyn

        February 15, 2016 at 1:16 pm

      • Greek Orthodox Immigrants became quite successful economically, and were able to assimilate into the American ethos effectively and quickly, than let’s say Southern Italian Catholics or Jews. Educational-wise, they hold the most PhDs of all the ethnic groups, relative to their respective population.

        Greeks are like East Asians, but of course, they make better personalities for a White Euro-Centric society.

        Similarly, the same could be said of Armenian and Lebanese Christians.


        February 15, 2016 at 1:52 pm

      • The waves of southern and eastern European immigration was enormously deleterious to the country.

        Interestingly, Spaniards did not immigrate to the United States in any significant numbers. I don’t blame them.

        This being said, I’ll take an Iberian García over a Polish Grzyzewska, any day!


        February 15, 2016 at 2:20 pm

  8. Meh. If the kid has been in the state for at least a year – which he probably has, if he graduated from a Florida high school – then I have no problem with charging him in-state tuition. He is thus meeting essentially the same requirement for in-state tuition as a legal American citizen.

    Of course the ideal solution is the problem is moot because the illegals and their spawn have been deported.


    February 15, 2016 at 7:19 am

  9. I think it was good for Trump that both Rubio & Cruz began arguing En Espanol. I felt an immediate, “oh noes!” in GOPe.


    February 15, 2016 at 1:19 pm

  10. Those H1B visa’s are a scam, I just spent most of my weekend in the local hospital with my brother who had a knee replacement. I suggest that anyone who wishes to see diversity in action visit a hospital where they will see approximately 80% of the staff here on these visa’s. This doesn’t mean that they are bad technicians and nurses but they do take jobs from many Americans.


    February 15, 2016 at 4:20 pm

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: