Lion of the Blogosphere

Massively hypocritical NY Times Trump article

Very long article in the NYT about how Donald Trump’s private conduct with women.

Why has the NY Times never done an expose on how Clinton treated women? The rape of Juanita Broaddrick would definitely get major coverage in such an article.

Written by Lion of the Blogosphere

May 15, 2016 at 10:08 am

Posted in Politics

82 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. TL;DR but the general gist of the articles and photos is “rich, powerful man surrounds himself with hot women, and hot women are attracted to him”. Totally devastating for Trump, LMAO.

    Tarl

    May 15, 2016 at 10:17 am

    • He is a vulgarian. This was already known.

      Lion of the Turambar

      May 15, 2016 at 11:34 am

      • Meh. If you get what you “know” from a NYT hit piece then you deserve to be deluded.

        Tarl

        May 15, 2016 at 7:28 pm

  2. Nothing voters don’t already know from decades-old tabloids.

    Meanwhile Adelson has thrown his backing and $100 million to Trump:

    Adelson set to give over $100 million to Israel-supporting Trump

    http://www.timesofisrael.com/adelson-set-to-give-over-100-million-to-israel-supporting-trump/

    In meeting last week, Jewish casino magnate reportedly promised unprecedented contribution as GOP front-runner stressed commitment to Jewish state

    The Undiscovered Jew

    May 15, 2016 at 10:38 am

    • The alt-right will have a fit over this.

      gothamette

      May 15, 2016 at 11:19 am

      • There is no alt-right that all thinks the same way. You just want something to hate.

        shiva1008

        May 15, 2016 at 11:43 am

      • We get it, you’re Jewish and you don’t like anti-Semites. Btw this is an alt-right blog idiot.

        shiva1008

        May 15, 2016 at 11:44 am

      • Trump has made a very big deal about the fact that he has, up until this point, been self financing. By his own criteria it’s damning to be taking money from big donors.

        Magnavox

        May 15, 2016 at 11:53 am

      • He doesn’t want to spend a billion dollars of his own money when he can spend other people’s money.

      • The alt-right will have a fit over this.

        I’m sure Trump will care.

        You just want something to hate.

        Gothamette is hateful. I am not.

        By his own criteria it’s damning to be taking money from big donors.

        Somehow there’s a way to turn this into a Dilbert dialogue.

        He doesn’t want to spend a billion dollars of his own money when he can spend other people’s money.

        It’s all part of the magic of electing Trump to see what he would do as president. So far not even he knows but we must vote for him anyway to find out.

        The Undiscovered Jew

        May 15, 2016 at 1:30 pm

      • Trump should’ve spent his own billion. Taking money from Adelstein compromises his independence. I don’t like it.

        Yakov

        May 15, 2016 at 4:42 pm

      • “Gothamette is hateful. I am not.”

        TUJ, every time I write something here, you follow up with something hateful about me personally. My guess is that are a sick pup, with zero personal attachments, and you take out your hostilities on me, a total stranger who happens to be on your side. Dealing with your demons by attacking people on the ‘net, especially fellow Jews who point out the truth about the alt-right, is pretty crazy.

        About the alt-right, I don’t consider this to be a true alt-right blog, because Lion is Jewish. I have stated repeatedly that I won’t link to any of the sites that prove my point so I’m at a disadvantage. All I’ll say is that most of them are two degrees separated from people who call outright for Jews to be exterminated, who think Jews are the cause of all the wars in the world, and who think Jews control the financial system. They regularly publish vicious cartoons of Jews on Twitter, showing hook nosed perverts staring maniacally into the virtual camera, rubbing their greedy hands. They mock Yiddishism and have coined such expressions as “shoah’ed” and so on.

        Pointing this out bothers and embarrasses some people. Tough shit.

        gothamette

        May 15, 2016 at 4:49 pm

      • @TUJ,

        Have you ever on the internet, from behind your screen name, of course, argued with an alt-right anti-Semite? Ever attacked on on a personal level? If so, please provide the URL, I’d love to see it. I don’t think you have. Because I think you are a gutless coward. You only have the courage to attack me on personal level, on someone else’s blog.

        gothamette

        May 15, 2016 at 5:05 pm

      • TUJ, every time I write something here, you follow up with something hateful about me personally.

        I thought I was adding harmless banter. But if you interpret that as ‘hateful’ you’ve led a very sheltered life.

        The Undiscovered Jew

        May 15, 2016 at 7:19 pm

      • How does a guarantee of large financial support from his friend Adelson compromise him? Will Trump now be beholden to hotel and casino interests? Trump is a hotel and casino owner. Will Trump now be beholden to Israel? Trump’s daughter and grandkids are Jewish. Not to mention, such an enthusiastic endorsement by an Israel hawk like Adelson sends a clear message that he’s rock solid on Israel. It also sends a message to the establishment, consultants, pundits, special interests, etc to cut the NeverTrump garbage out. Not only does Adelson’s financial support not hurt Trump, the money itself is actually the least of what Adelson just did for him.

        destructure

        May 15, 2016 at 9:10 pm

      • @destruction

        ‘How does a guarantee of large financial support from his friend Adelson compromise him?’

        In Russian there is a saying: ‘ The one that pays orders the music’.

        Yakov

        May 15, 2016 at 10:17 pm

      • Aaaaand destructure presents the essential issues of this development.

        driveallnight

        May 16, 2016 at 4:24 am

      • I don’t want a president beholden to casino and hotel interests or manhattan real estate interests for that matter. And I don’t want someone rock solid on Israel unless their plan is to move Israel to northern mexico.

        I don’t have to make the argument that it’s compromising to take donations from monied interest because Trump has been making it for me. Even if he’s wrong and money doesn’t damage politics he’s still a hypocrite.

        Magnavox

        May 16, 2016 at 9:30 am

      • “Trump should’ve spent his own billion. Taking money from Adelstein compromises his independence. I don’t like it.”

        I never really thought Trump would finance a general election campaign if he got that far, and now that he has, I have no problem with him relying on traditional sources of funding for the rest of the campaign. He’s made his point and established his brand. I’m just curious why Adelson jumped in. I thought his big issue was amnesty? I’m wondering if he is trying to pull Trump back over to the amnesty side with his influence or if he’s given up on the issue for this election cycle?

        Mike Street Station

        May 16, 2016 at 9:31 am

      • I too was amused to think about the triggered alt-right morons who hate Israel and love Tencent.

        Perturabo

        May 16, 2016 at 10:21 am

      • And I don’t want someone rock solid on Israel unless their plan is to move Israel to northern mexico.

        The anti-Zionists failed to make any headway on immigration, or any other issue, while European nationalists were making political gains by either being friendly to Israel or not addressing the issue at all. If Trump hadn’t run, your ‘nationalist’ candidate would have been Rand Paul or some hopeless third party candidate.

        Kicking deadweight anti-semites to the curb with a Jew-friendly candidate (even if they haven’t noticed his grandchildren and daughter are Jewish, his son-in law wrote his speech to AIPAC, and his friendliness with Netanyahu) is long overdue since they’ve done nothing but hamper the development of a real anti-immigration movement for decades over their obsessive hatred of a nation that has nothing to do with our immigration problems. In fact if you asked Israeli intelligence agents they’d probably be supportive of America remaining a white majority nation.

        And as far as territorial transgressions go (and why do you care about Palestinian territorial ‘rights’?), Israel has little to apologize for compared to the Muslim world which has yet to return Alexandria to the Coptic Christians or Persia to the last remaining Zoroastrians.

        I never really thought Trump would finance a general election campaign if he got that far, and now that he has, I have no problem with him relying on traditional sources of funding for the rest of the campaign.

        I would rather he fundraise than try to win cheap in the general election, which will require hundreds of millions.

        It’s also probably true that he can’t easily liquidate his wealth since much of it is tied up in real estate assets.

        Anyway he is rich enough that he can finance a large portion of the campaign, which means he has the power to turn down help from some donors who want him to alter his agenda too much and look for alternative sources elsewhere.

        The Undiscovered Jew

        May 16, 2016 at 8:02 pm

      • Trump’s rise seems to be emboldening and empowering the anti-Semites. The internet and social media based support for Trump seems to be on average at the least mildly anti-Semitic and anti-Israel. One of their definitions and primary criticisms of “cuckservatives” is that they are Republicans who support Israel.

        Tom

        May 16, 2016 at 11:21 pm

      • One of their definitions and primary criticisms of “cuckservatives” is that they are Republicans who support Israel.

        Which begs the question why they support Trump when he more than meets their own definition of a cuckservative on their defining issue:

        http://www.jewishpress.com/news/breaking-news/jared-kushner-the-man-behind-gop-presidential-candidate-donald-trump/2016/04/05/

        Real estate mogul and newspaper owner Jared Kushner, 35, is already prominent on his own merits, but he’s a guy who also doesn’t mind operating behind the scenes.

        Kushner quietly facilitated closed-door talks with Republican senators last month for his father-in-law, GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump.

        He has also been advising Trump on other matters as well, including issues regarding Israel, according to Trump spokesperson Hope Hicks, quoted by Reuters on the matter.

        Both Kusher and his wife Ivanka are Orthodox Jews. His family has strong ties with Israel, and his father, also prominent in the real estate industry, donated $20 million two years ago to a medical school campus in Jerusalem. The campus is now named after Kushner’s parents.

        Kushner himself is listed in the 2015 AIPAC report as a benefactor on its real estate committee. This means he donated at least $36,000 to the lobbying group.

        Ken Kurson, who worked as a speech writer for former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani and who now works as the editor of Kushner’s New York Observer, told Reuters that he reviewed Trump’s speech before he delivered it at the recent AIPAC convention.

        The Undiscovered Jew

        May 17, 2016 at 6:15 pm

  3. Fair question if it is assumed that the NYT actually holds itself out as something other than the house organ of the ruling class. I’m not so sure they try to hide it but I agree it would be preferable for them to change their name to one more transparent, say The DNC News or Soros News, something like that.

    Curle

    May 15, 2016 at 10:39 am

  4. Trump didn’t do anything criminal, so what’s the problem? Stupid paper. Lion, are you walking around the park like we spoke about?

    Yakov

    May 15, 2016 at 11:13 am

  5. Not only massively hypocritical but massively stupid. It is now open season on Clinton, both of them. Which I don’t like. I question the timing. Why now? I think the real target is Hillary, and not Trump. The Establishment can’t be so stupid as to think that this will hurt Trump. C’mon guys, who benefits? #neverHillary, that’s who.

    I think that Sanders or Biden could beat Trump.

    Re the article, I have to laugh at this quote from the violated maiden:

    “There were about 50 models and 30 men.”

    There were, as if she was narrating a scene from a documentary that she had no part in. She was one of them.

    “There were girls in the pools splashing around.”

    Ahem, see above. “I was in the pool, splashing around,” would be a more accurate way to put it.

    “For some reason Donald seemed a little smitten with me.”

    For some reason? Oh cut the crap, sweetie. You were there to dig a little gold.

    gothamette

    May 15, 2016 at 11:26 am

  6. Liberals simply don’t understand how normal people think.

    My bro is a moderate liberal who has no problem with Trump, although he would never vote for him, and he said that he didn’t understand how any woman could ever vote for Trump.

    For liberals, everything is leftist identity politics. Go to a left wing message board and over and over you will hear liberals say that Trump can’t win because he has alienated blacks, hispanics, gays, young people, muslims and women.

    It’s the women part that is key. The reality is that blacks, hispanics, gays and muslims were already bloc Democrat votes. As for “women”, white women are going to vote for Donald Trump. Maybe not by as much as they voted for Romney but Trump will certainly beat Hillary amongst white women and no serious pollster or political scientist will dispute that.

    But liberals actually think of “women” as a voting bloc, which they are not, never have been and never will be. On DailyKos, they are even saying that they expect white Republican women to vote en masse for Hillary on account of Trump’s sexism.

    Can someone name me a woman more beautiful than Taylor Swift?

    Otis the Sweaty

    May 15, 2016 at 12:07 pm

    • Jewish Amy Weinstein and Guidette Lady Gaga are certainly more beautiful than the Androgynous Taylor Swift.

      JS

      May 15, 2016 at 1:34 pm

      • Errata – I meant Amy Winehouse. Does it matter that it’s Winehouse and not Weinstein?

        JS

        May 15, 2016 at 1:36 pm

      • Lion: What do you think about JS hating on beautiful Taylor Swift? Do you agree with him?

        Otis the Sweaty

        May 15, 2016 at 5:37 pm

      • If she gained a little weight she’d be very pretty.

      • Winehouse _was_ more beautiful. She hasn’t been able to be attractive since 2011.

        Njguy73

        May 15, 2016 at 5:44 pm

      • Yes, Winehouse is dead!!!

        JS

        May 15, 2016 at 7:08 pm

      • Lady Gaga (i.e. Stephanie Germanotta) looks a lot like Liza Minnelli, if you look at her facial features. Taylor Swift is pretty, but not really stunningly beautiful. What gives her that “special” look is paedomorphism. But it remains to be seen how well she’ll age. I’d say Christie Brinkley is better looking than Swift. You’ve got to admit that Brinkley looks amazing for a woman her age. Personally, if I were able to look like any other woman I think it would be the younger Barbara Boxer or Alyssa Milano. Maybe Susan Lucci. I’ve never wanted to look Nordic.

        Maryk

        May 15, 2016 at 8:03 pm

      • MaryK: why do you hate Nordic people?

        Otis the Sweaty

        May 15, 2016 at 9:04 pm

      • Anyone with a tinge of good taste, will tell you none of these women are remotely attractive. Ms. Swift makes a good candidate for a transgender ad.

        JS

        May 15, 2016 at 9:45 pm

      • And I wasn’t responding to MaryK’s comments.

        JS

        May 15, 2016 at 9:46 pm

      • “MaryK: why do you hate Nordic people?”

        What makes you think I hate them? Being half-Irish, I’m part Nordic myself. What I have some resentment toward is the American bias toward Nordicism. There are many Americans who seem to assume that everyone wants to have blond hair and blue eyes, despite the fact that many people who have this coloring are not particularly attractive. My late father was blonde and blue-eyed but was not nearly as good looking as my Italian Mom (who very Mediterranean-looking is often mistaken for a Puerto Rican.) People are entitled to their own views of what’s beautiful. But they shouldn’t act as if their ethnic preferences are shared by everyone. Also, some people prefer Nordic looks because the culture tells them this is what beauty is. If they had grown up hearing that Asian phenotypes were elegant they’d be straightening their hair, dying it black, and using eyeliner to make their eyes look Asian and not Caucasian.

        Sometimes this bias can even work in reverse. An IA author, formerly of Bensonhurst, wrote in one of her essays that as a little girl in the 1950’s she wanted to be an Indian princess. I knew it was a lie. I’m sure I read it correctly as her way of trying to say “I was PC before PC was cool.”

        Maryk

        May 15, 2016 at 11:18 pm

      • It’s hard to judge the attractiveness of celebrities because so much can be done with hair, makeup and lighting to change an ugly duckling into a swan. Then, of course, there’s dieting as Leon points out Swift would look better with a little more weight. Still, I’d say Taylor Swift is a solid 6 or maybe a 7. Whereas Winehouse, Germanotta and Minelli would have struggled to be a 5. None of them are particularly attractive. I was going to say JS and MaryK must be blind but MaryK did mention Christie Brinkley. Who is indeed smoking hot even at 62.

        destructure

        May 16, 2016 at 12:33 am

      • Winehouse? YGBSM. She was hideous. Repulsive face, repulsive hair, repulsive makeup, repulsive tats, dreadful clothes. Yes, it’s a distinctive look – distinctively AWFUL. And then there’s the whole drug-addicted skank thing. Taylor Swift is smoking hot compared to her.

        Tarl

        May 16, 2016 at 9:14 am

      • Winehouse was a woman by birth. Taylor Swift belongs in the realm of a transgender – hermaphrodite.

        JS

        May 16, 2016 at 9:52 pm

      • Many of the “White” Puerto Ricans are of the Mediterranean phenotype.

        I once knew a White Dominican who was a swarthier version of William Shatner.

        It’s quite interesting how Shatner transitioned from a blonde phenotype during his youth, to a darker almost guido like person, during his golden years with the Star Trek movies.

        JS

        May 16, 2016 at 12:44 pm

      • Winehouse was a woman by birth. Taylor Swift belongs in the realm of a transgender – hermaphrodite.

        Both are genetically women.

        Winehouse is by far the uglier one.

        Tarl

        May 17, 2016 at 9:25 am

    • Married white women in particular will vote for Trump. The single moms will vote for “It takes a village” Hillary to get more handouts.

      Jay Fink

      May 15, 2016 at 2:56 pm

    • @Maryk

      Irish are Celtics, I thought. A lot of Jews, like Lion, like blonds. This is weird. It’s the person that’s important, not the color if the hair or the eyes. Jews should be smarter, but they are not.

      Yakov

      May 16, 2016 at 8:58 am

    • “As for “women”, white women are going to vote for Donald Trump. Maybe not by as much as they voted for Romney but Trump will certainly beat Hillary amongst white women and no serious pollster or political scientist will dispute that.

      But liberals actually think of “women” as a voting bloc, which they are not, never have been and never will be. On DailyKos, they are even saying that they expect white Republican women to vote en masse for Hillary on account of Trump’s sexism.”

      Hardly ever is it mentioned, but the Democrats last won white women in 1992. Since then, white women have been a Republican block. Trump is not going to change that. They’ll still be voting Republican. And I think the Democrats know all that, but it provides great talking points for TV.

      Mike Street Station

      May 16, 2016 at 9:37 am

    • Krysten Ritter.

      Curle

      May 16, 2016 at 9:56 am

  7. Not going to even read it. The nyt is gutter journalism and a parody of sjw writing.

    Steve sailers analysis of their writing patterns and the fact that every article has to have a victim of some kind is hilarious. Of course the blacks get wall to wall coverage. Maybe they should just post pictures of their wives taking it from their bucks. It would at least be refreshig for people to see the demented psyches of the people that write this.

    And of course, i would put a lot of money on some of these ‘men’ literally being cuckolds.

    The other comment below about liberals not understanding women is also good. Women follow dominance. Not gamma greivance monkeys.

    THe Philosopher

    May 15, 2016 at 1:11 pm

    • The left has been on a collision course with evolution and biology since the 1960s and the insanity of it all is beginning to catch up with them. My guess is that they won’t back off, but double down and keep pushing their utterly preposterous BS. They believe that when the old angry white male dies off their last wall of resistance will be gone and it’ll be smooth sailing.

      Lewis Medlock

      May 16, 2016 at 1:02 pm

  8. The savior of the NYT and biggest individual shareholder is Mexican, Carlos Slim Helu. The Times dances to their billionaire shareholders and liberal readers. It’s also a fact that rich men like slim women.

    cesqy

    May 15, 2016 at 1:12 pm

    • Yes, All Trump needs to do is to point out that the NYTimes is owned by Carlos Slim, the Mexican crony capitalist.

      Abelard Lindsey

      May 15, 2016 at 4:57 pm

    • Ding Ding!! We have a winner.

      Carlos Slim may as well rename the paper the New York Open Borders for Rapists Times – and i mean that in the economic sense.

      Why do US regulators no longer care about foreign ownership of important national interest companies?

      Then again, nobody smart reads newspapers anymore that isnt closer to alzheimers than birth.

      The Philosopher

      May 15, 2016 at 7:10 pm

      • “Why do US regulators no longer care about foreign ownership of important national interest companies?”

        Because every president since Reagan has been a globalist.

        destructure

        May 16, 2016 at 3:19 am

  9. That NYT article is laughable. Only hard core feminists and brain dead liberals would see anything wrong with Trumps behavior. There is no allegation of sexual assault, virtually no accounts of unwanted touching, it’s all about Trump saying the things that men have been saying to women for years. Note that all the women complaining ended up dating him, so he was such a horrible SOB that they punished him by sleeping with him and letting him spend lots of money on them.

    It’s also a bit silly to complain about his emphasis on looks when you are a contestant in a beauty pageant. I guess you should not be judged on your looks when you are posing in a skimpy bathing suit in competition with other women in bathing suits.

    There were also a lot of complaints by aging women that got fat. And Trump would occasionally point it out. Oh the horror. I guess they didn’t have mirrors to tell them the same things.

    Like virtually all criticism about Trump it’s tone deaf to those that would support him. Every straight guy that reads that article is thinking somewhere in the back of his mind, damn that guy has had a great life. Only the people that are not voting for him anyway (the aging liberal NYT readership) will see this article as a negative.

    charles johnson

    May 15, 2016 at 4:07 pm

  10. Never Trump: Donald Trump will bring Fascism to America.

    Normal Person: Fascism is a good sense of humor (killing PC culture), hot babes, and a beautiful, successful, family?

    dsgntd_plyr

    May 15, 2016 at 4:10 pm

    • I can understand the Left going Full Retard with the Nazi / Fascist thing. They’ve been doing that for decades. But NeverTrump are supposedly Republicans. I guess that shows you how far the “right” has been dragged to the left, if the supposed “right” is adopting the left’s tired old memes.

      Tarl

      May 16, 2016 at 9:17 am

  11. The NYTimes is clearly making stuff up. Would you expect anything different?

    They ran an article saying that Trump used to kiss and fondle the contestants when he first bought the Miss America contest. However, there has been numerous articles over the years about how Trump is germ-phobic and actually goes out of his way to avoid any physical contact with people, including the shaking of hands. This fact does suggest that the NYTimes is making up stories about Trump in order to shill for Hillary.

    Abelard Lindsey

    May 15, 2016 at 4:55 pm

    • One of the women from the story went on Fox and Friends this morning and recanted. She said they took her out of context. In other words, the story is a fraud. Shocker!

      Mike Street Station

      May 16, 2016 at 9:51 am

  12. This was a smear job without any mud to use. Trump is just a happy and healthy (white) MAN and that is not allowed these days.

    If anything, the real mud in there is against Ivanna and her “rape.” It illustrates how rape can (often) be a subjective experience for women. If some broad “feels” you raped her, then by gum I guess you did.

    fakeemail

    May 15, 2016 at 5:37 pm

    • The cops once escorted me out of the stacks of a famous university library because a woman reported that I was ‘scaring” her. I hadn’t spoken to her or approached her. Instead, I was sitting up against a bulkhead about 30 feet away with my eyes closed, because I’d been reading a tax treatise, which I found exhausting. At the time, I looked a lot like Jerry Seinfeld, slender with dark curly locks. Ridiculous.

      Marty

      May 15, 2016 at 11:03 pm

  13. It’s very simple.

    Support reproductive rights, you can grope and fondle and harass and do whatever you want and get off scot-free.

    Don’t support reproductive rights, you’ll get charged with rape for saying “That’s a nice dress.”

    Is everyone clear now?

    Njguy73

    May 15, 2016 at 5:48 pm

  14. Trump comes off in the Times article as a flaming heterosexual. To the Times, that’s deeply unsettling.

    Mark Caplan

    May 15, 2016 at 8:26 pm

    • Someone posted the author’s photo on reddit, I can’t find it.

      Looks like a complete gay hipster leftist.

      Rifleman

      May 15, 2016 at 10:14 pm

      • One of the two Times writers of the Trump hit piece was Michael Barbaro. Here is his byline picture:

        Mark Caplan

        May 16, 2016 at 8:51 am

      • “Looks like a complete gay hipster leftist.”

        What were you expecting, a menacing outlaw biker?

        Lewis Medlock

        May 16, 2016 at 12:47 pm

  15. Lol @ all the haters here bashing Queen Taylor’s looks

    Otis the Sweaty

    May 15, 2016 at 9:11 pm

  16. Brain cleanser:

    Rifleman

    May 15, 2016 at 10:12 pm

  17. Rifleman

    May 15, 2016 at 10:24 pm

  18. “Ben Carson says Donald Trump’s list of possible running mates includes some awfully familiar names for anyone who’s followed the 2016 presidential race: New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, Ohio Gov. John Kasich, Florida Sen. Marco Rubio and former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin.”

    Yikes. If true, this is terrible. Every one of these is a disaster. Christie maybe the least, but every one a disaster. And terribly disappointing. On the other hand, who believes Ben Carson?

    peterike

    May 15, 2016 at 11:44 pm

    • They are all solid choices, with the exception of Sarah Palin.

      • No they aren’t, they are all terrible.

        Trump needs to pick Scott Brown and use him to communicate with Congress.

        He needs to get Bob Graham of Florida as White House chief of staff. Because he’s good and will help with the Florida vote.

        Rifleman

        May 16, 2016 at 3:48 pm

    • Why do you say Christie is the best? He doesn’t seem much different or better than the others. And there’s no real upside to picking him since he’s from Jersey and right next to NYC. Whereas with say Kasich, he can help you win Ohio, which is a critical state.

      Picking Palin would be idiotic. Why the hell is she even being considered? She seriously just needs to go away.

      Tom

      May 16, 2016 at 3:45 pm

      • Christie will do well in Ohio and also in Florida because he appeals to proles from those types of states.

    • Every single one is lousy. Trump will never choose them. He needs his own people. Lion, why is Rubio an excellent choice?

      Yakov

      May 17, 2016 at 8:34 am

      • As I’ve said a zillion times before, historically picking a VP that ran in the primaries but lost have been solid picks.

  19. Otis & JS stinking up the joint with trash-tier commentary again.

    Panther of the Blogocube

    May 16, 2016 at 12:37 am

    • Otty is pro-American, who believes Meriprolestan will become a great country, once his TruCONS are completely erased from the scene. Similarly, the alt-right believes purging of liberals will lead to the same results.

      A country the becomes a 3rd world trash bin, which America, this has become. I believe, it needs a Giuliani cleanup style for anything great to happen. Mr. Trump is not that person.

      JS

      May 16, 2016 at 10:02 am

  20. Did you see where the reporter that made the recording with Trump, er, John Miller, suggested the leak was from Trump himself? Totally blew Megyn Kelly’s mind.

    http://blog.dilbert.com/post/144401966866/the-john-miller-thing#comment-2676977236

    I love it! Trump trolls the MSM like a virtuoso. The MSM is so used to trolling cuckservatives with impunity, their heads explode in cognitive dissonance when the tables get turned.

    It’s like watching a Grandmaster in chess let some novice player think he has the run of the board, then suddenly checkmates him using a piece from the opposite side of the board that hasn’t moved in 12 turns. Or, if sports is your thing, Trump faked them out of their jock.

    Portlander

    May 16, 2016 at 12:58 am

  21. http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/05/16/us/florida-congresswoman-has-personal-stake-in-transgender-debate.html

    Yeah right. Trump is a problem, but a girl that transgenders into a man and marries a man is not a problem. This paper is totally stupid. Sexuality is a biological instinct. There is natural and not natural sexuality and nothing else. Natural sexuality leads to the procreation of an organism and survival of a species. This is as simple as that without getting any religion involved. A society that doesn’t procreate dies. Individuals that do not function as part of a group die. A society that become atomized dies. Historically only nations survived, not mixed multitudes driven by greed and egoism. This is very simple. What are these morons talking about? The Western civilization is self-destructive. From the biological standpoint Trump is an excellent specimen, just perfect. Lion, we need to talk about how survival is only possible as part of belonging to a powerful group. Us versus them, kinda thing. This attitude is what made America great, by the way. When bison roamed the plains and cowboys and Indians hunted them and each other, America was great.

    Yakov

    May 16, 2016 at 7:19 am

  22. The Times article was not only massively hypocritical but massively false. One of the models Trump supposedly demeaned denounced the article as grossly misrepresenting her relationship with Trump.

    “He never made me feel like I was being demeaned in any way. He never offended me in any way. He was very gracious. I saw him around all types of people, all types of women. He was very kind, thoughtful, generous, you know. He was a gentleman.”

    “Former Trump girlfriend hits back at ‘upsetting’ NYT cover story”
    http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/ex-trump-girlfriend-new-york-times-223205

    Mark Caplan

    May 16, 2016 at 8:57 am

  23. http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/ex-trump-girlfriend-new-york-times-223205

    “Actually, it was very upsetting. I was not happy to read it at all,” Brewer Lane said. “Well, because The New York Times told us several times that they would make sure that my story that I was telling came across. They promised several times that they would do it accurately. They told me several times and my manager several times that it would not be a hit piece and that my story would come across the way that I was telling it and honestly, and it absolutely was not.”
    Asked what the reporters got wrong, Brewer Lane said they took her quotes and “put a negative connotation on it.”
    “They spun it to where it appeared negative. I did not have a negative experience with Donald Trump, and I don’t appreciate them making it look like that I was saying that it was a negative experience because it was not,” Brewer Lane said.

    not my name

    May 16, 2016 at 11:39 am

  24. Slightly O/t – Trump devaluing his Westchester Golf Complex as a tax avoidance loophole, might be his undoing.

    JS

    May 16, 2016 at 10:11 pm


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: