Lion of the Blogosphere

Gay Islamic guido, part 2

New York Post article about the ex-wife’s interview with Brazilian TV:

Her fiancé, Marco Dias, speaking in Portuguese on her behalf, said Yusufiy believed that Mateen had “gay tendencies” and that his father had called him gay in front of her. Dias also claimed “the FBI asked her not to tell this to the American media.”

Big question: why did the FBI ask her not to tell the gay stuff to American media?

I believe he attempted to atone for his sinful (as he believed it, and according to Sharia law) homosexuality by committing jihad.

* * *

Garr writes in a comment:

Yes, in Bay Ridge the Muslim men have adopted the guido style (as have the Chinese, Ukrainians/Russians, and Ukrainian/Russian/Bokharan Jews). It’s interesting how compelling this style is.

* * *

Meanwhile, in Paris, there was another ISIS murder, of a policeman and his “partner.” (All of the news reports say his “partner” was killed, I have no idea what that means.) The killings were done with a knife.

I disagree with Trump’s assessment of guns. If it were as easy to buy a gun in France as it is in the United States, there would be weekly ISIS massacres in France. In the United States, we just have the good fortune that there are fewer Muslims and they are not as radicalized as they are in France. France allowed their country to become 10% Muslim and now they are paying the consequences. And Obama and Hillary want to make the United States more like France by letting millions more Muslims move here. That’s why it’s so important to vote for Trump.

Written by Lion of the Blogosphere

June 14, 2016 at 9:20 am

Posted in News

63 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. “It’s interesting how compelling this style is.” chicks did guidos


    June 14, 2016 at 9:48 am

    • They certainly did.


      June 14, 2016 at 2:32 pm

  2. slithy toves

    June 14, 2016 at 9:48 am

    • He’s actually making a positive contribution.

      Mike Street Station

      June 14, 2016 at 10:27 am

      • I wonder how these 22 people feel about having been sired by someone they’ll never know. It’s always easy to claim that this is not a big deal. But then few of the people who feel this way had a similar situation. The best way to make a contribution is to marry, have children, and encourage others to do the same. I have not been successful at doing this in my own personal life. But I don’t think the answer to a low birthrate is to create “designer children.” No woman is “entitled” to a child. No man is “entitled” to be a father or a sperm donor. The acceptance of this bizarre practice of creating children without two married biological parents is only proof of how far gone American society is. It coincides with declining birthrates, the acceptance of abortion, increasing divorce rates, and having children outside of marriage. That alone is reason to suspect it.

        Nothing personal against you, Mike. You’ve been nice to me in the past and I appreciate it. But I speak from experience. The further we get from the “married biological Mom and Dad and kids” type of family, the worse it will be for children overall. Most women are not going to have a 6 figure salary and multiple “support networks” to compensate for the presence of a father in her child’s life.


        June 14, 2016 at 11:57 am

      • I don’t disagree with anything you said Maryk. All things being equal, the “married biological Mom and Dad and kids” seems to be the optimal family type. I’ve known plenty of kids and adults who were either adopted or from broken homes and the result is…suboptimal. They seem to deal with all kinds of issues throughout their lives. And yes, American society is going to hell in a handbasket (said as I wave my cane to get those kids out of my yard!) but there is nothing that’s going to fix that. For better or worse, society is going to get more fractured with fewer “normal” families as you and I would think of them. But like the coyote going over the cliff with his legs in a furious helicopter whirling, just before he realizes his predicament and holds out a sign that says “Uh Oh;” it’s already too late.

        So given that, I would rather a math professor without mental issues father tons of kids rather than a mentally ill homeless person selling his sperm to buy booze ( the usual customers of those places, not Aryan medical students like they would have you believe).

        Mike Street Station

        June 14, 2016 at 1:43 pm

      • Maryk,

        It’s unconscionable. Intentionally bringing kids into the world who do not know their biological parents should be illegal.

        Problem easily solved by demanding child support from sperm donors.


        June 14, 2016 at 2:36 pm

      • “He’s actually making a positive contribution.”

        Only if you focus solely on IQ. This dude is meshuga and he’s creating a little army of kids with massive personality defects.


        June 14, 2016 at 3:27 pm

      • I disagree. The Russian girl that I’d recommended for Lion a while back had 3 kids with her husband and then after she got divorced 2 more from the spearm donors. She got to select high quality Jewish donors herself, she saw their whole case with pics, biography, occupation. So she chose some smart cookies and had more intelligent kids than from her marriage. I think spearm donors are a good option for some people. I think it’s better this way, or just sleep with a smart guy and get pregnant, then not to have kids at all.

        Incidentally, spearm donors make good money. Lion, if you pass the age limit, this may be a career path for you. That girl paid like $15,000 for each kid, IIRC.

        Maryk, it’s a good option. You have to fulfill your obligation to your race, or you are lending a hand to the freekazoids that are overruning America and the world.


        June 14, 2016 at 3:40 pm

      • “Incidentally, spearm donors make good money”

        So do bank robbers. It’s still wrong. As for your “obligation to your race” if you care about your race you marry and have children. Sperm donors don’t care about their race. How can you care about your race (an abstraction) when you don’t care about individual children you’ve sired? What these men mean is that they want the easy part of civilization (the power of knowing that their genes were passed on) without the difficult part (actually rearing or supporting children.) America has enough men acting like overbrown teenagers. Real men either marry and have kids or don’t marry and leave procreating to others.

        Incidentally, if we say that civilizations need to breed to survive, OK. How about married people from stable backgrounds having larger numbers of children – funded either by the state or private organizations? I’m not happy with the idea of social engineering, but it’s better than what we have now (procreation largely from irresponsible people) or the pipe dream that some imagine (out of wedlock and fatherless children creating and sustaining a civilization.) We need fewer Murphy Browns and more Mitt and Ann Romneys.


        June 14, 2016 at 9:40 pm

      • @Yakov

        1) It is sperm, not spearm.

        2) I’m sure the only way she could afford numbers 4 and 5 is with the money from her ex.

        3) I’m not doubting what she paid, but VERY little of that goes to the donor.


        June 14, 2016 at 9:55 pm

      • Yakov — Normally I’d agree with you on this. But clicking the article, the only photos they show of recipients were black lesbians. Also, it says several of them sued for child support. And now they get half his salary. So, in his case, sperm donation was a fucking disaster. Pardon the pun. If he has no more sense than that then someone should castrate his ass.


        June 15, 2016 at 4:20 am

      • I was speaking from the point of view of the woman, not the man. I think in today’s world it’s a good option for a lot of women.


        The girl got no alimony from her ex. She earns fine and wouldn’t waste her time pursuing him in courts. I wouldn’t recommend anybody but top of the line for Lion. She is a great person and very good looking too. A little nutty, but tons of fun.


        June 15, 2016 at 12:16 pm

    • Ari Nagel has crazy eyes, but his legacy shall live on with “Kanisha Butler and Aarore”, “Shaniece Cromer [and] Taraji”, “Tiffany Harrison [and] daughter Zoe … joined by wife Yvonne” and others who prefer not to be named from several countries.

      Typically enough, “The first five women he worked with successfully sued him for child support, and nearly half of his paycheck is garnished for his offspring.”


      June 14, 2016 at 11:00 am

    • Somewhat strange how many black lesbian couples wanted a white sperm donor.


      June 14, 2016 at 4:02 pm

      • Not really. Nits make lice…


        June 14, 2016 at 7:54 pm

      • “Not really. Nits make lice…”

        Yeah, you’re preaching to the choir. Perhaps I should have said the phenomenon (should it even exist) was surprising to me.

        Considering the dearth of people who recognize HBD, a better explanation might be that they are lesbians who have an intense dislike for the type of males they know best. White lesbians hate straight white males; black lesbians hate straight black males.


        June 17, 2016 at 2:02 pm

    • These sperm donors are cuckolding society.

      No one man deserves that many children (his dna/self being propogated/ultimate evolutionary imperative) without having to pay a dime.

      These bastards found a loophole and won. And they always act like they do it for the joy it gives the mother. Bull! They love the idea of having knocked up dozens of women and not investing anything.


      June 14, 2016 at 4:38 pm

      • Actually 5 of the women have sued him for child support and half his pay cheque goes to that.


        June 14, 2016 at 8:06 pm

      • Also since sex gives people way more joy than parenthood, having sex without procreation is much more of a loophole than having procreation without sex.


        June 14, 2016 at 11:09 pm

    • Sperm donation should be banned unless the kids has the right to know exactly who is their father and contact him. I don’t understand how you can bring kids to the world while intentionally denying a father from them, it’s cruel and unethical.


      June 14, 2016 at 7:54 pm

      • But it’s not cruel and unethical as long as the kids get to know the donor’s name and merely contact him? What if he considers himself only a donor and has no interest in even being a friend to the child, let alone a father? The problem with sperm donation is that it deprives a child of a biological father, not that it prevents him from meeting the donor in person. Why should one child have a real father while another settles for merely meeting the person who should have been his father but refused to do so? Talk about an inequality!


        June 14, 2016 at 9:30 pm

      • Don’t make a big deal out of nothing. Tons of people grew up not knowing their father. If you have a father like JS, it’s better not to know him. I mean, what does JS have to offer? Nothing. All he can do is just dising people who are the salt of the earth and dising America. I hope he doesn’t get the idea of becoming a sperm donor.


        June 15, 2016 at 1:42 am

      • Agreed.

        And sperm donors should also get the right to stipulate that their sperm only is useful to women with financial assets (to reduce their risk of one day bring hit for support).

        Kids ought to know their father and it shouldn’t be so easy for women to bypass men.


        June 16, 2016 at 11:32 am

  3. 1) The woman who has been killed was the wife of the policeman. In France, we use the term “compagne” wich is neutrol when you don’t know if the people are maried or just living together. No gay , no religion connotation to this term.
    PS : if it has been a gay policemen, the would have said his “compagnon”.

    2) We don’ t know how many muslim we have in France because it is forbidden by law to make racial statistics. But there is a illness, Drepanocytose, which affect only people with black blood (black people and arabic mainly) and they are tested at birth . So the figure give you the statistics of people with african origin . It has grown from 10% in 90′ to 32% nowadays. It’s 67% in Paris region (11 million people). People wanted that everyone be tested to hide the figure but it would be too expensive, because the illness affect less than one people among thousand only among african people …. But in french caribean, we test everybody, the figure is not included in national statistics ….

    Bruno from Paris

    June 14, 2016 at 10:41 am

  4. The children of the couple (the officer and his wife, wich was an administrative police secretary) 3 yo has seen all the killing because he was in the house with the terrorist ….

    Bruno from Paris

    June 14, 2016 at 10:43 am

  5. Apparently, he’d attended the nightclub before. That could equal homo or it could mean he was casing the joint. Apparently he also cased Disney World.

    Of course, if he was gay then it’s clear that the Islamic influences in his life, starting wth his father, motivated him to do this. Honor killings are commanded.


    June 14, 2016 at 10:45 am

  6. It’s sort of funny that the father never denied the son did it, like the Tsarnaev mother did. But he’s adamant that the gay stuff is false.


    June 14, 2016 at 10:54 am

  7. The French policeman and partner had a three year old kid, who was taken hostage but wasn’t killed.

    Note that a great deal of Euro tolerance for muslims relies on media/official obfuscation or outright suppression of what’s happening. Strangely familiar to some readers here, I’m sure.


    June 14, 2016 at 11:10 am

  8. The reason the FBI told her not to talk about her ex-husband’s gayness is because that would ruin the narrative. The FBI is a prime shaper of the narrative. Did you see Coney’s press conference? What a complete incompetent.

    Another thing that sets him off is that the United States killed one of the top Taliban mullahs in a drone Strike last week.

    Mateen was a total clusterfuck. Also gay.


    June 14, 2016 at 11:30 am

    • How does it ruin the narrative? It makes islamic homophobia the cause of everything. And islamic homophobia, along with treatment of women and religious minorities, are the things leftists feel most comfortable criticizing the religion for.


      June 14, 2016 at 11:31 pm

    • I didn’t put that right. If the problem is Islamic homophobia than liberals can say that they’re on the right side of the issue and that republicanism is essentially just a milder form of the shooters ideology. If it were motivated just by a hatred of America than that would make Democrats look worse because they don’t like America as much as Republicans do so it would tar Democrats the same way Republicans are tarred by a homophobic motive.

      PS I don’t like the term homophobic but am too lazy to replace it with antigay.


      June 14, 2016 at 11:36 pm

  9. What we have seen is that young Muslim men in USA have the same problems young men from all religions have. Demanding parents, poor job prospects, bad relationships, and in this case an issue with their own sexual identity. For whatever reason Muslim men are more likely to respond to their problems by unleashing terror on the society they live in (by a factor of 20).

    These Muslims come overwhelmingly from Arab countries, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Therefore Muslims from these countries should heavily vetted if not banned from entering the USA.

    Even if we ban further immigration from these countries today the American Muslims community is going to grow larger. 10% of NYC school children are Muslim. They will become adults, develop grievances, and based on historical patterns, act out on these grievances through religious terrorism.

    Therefore it is no longer practical to have loose gun laws in USA. Assault weapons must be banned and hand guns must be obtained through permits. It would have been nice to live in a country where we wouldn’t have these problems but we chose bad policies and its too late to reverse them.


    June 14, 2016 at 11:30 am

    • “For whatever reason Muslim men are more likely to respond to their problems by unleashing terror on the society they live in (by a factor of 20).”

      Dying while committing jihad is a religiously sanctioned way to give meaning to their otherwise pathetic lives and automatically enter Paradise.

    • “Even if we ban further immigration from these countries today the American Muslims community is going to grow larger.”

      That’s true, but there is really nothing that can be done about that. Our options are left to stopping the problem from getting larger, therefore stopping immigration from “problem” countries. If you’re in a hole, stop digging.

      And we’re in a deep hole.

      Mike Street Station

      June 14, 2016 at 1:48 pm

      • There is absolutely something that can be done about that. We can and should make it so hostile to them that they self-deport.


        June 14, 2016 at 3:26 pm

      • The radicals actually were self-deporting to move to Syria to fight (and likely die) for ISIS, but our stupid policy was to make that illegal.

        Lion of the Blogosphere

        June 14, 2016 at 4:04 pm

      • You can also pay people to renounce their citizenship. You’d get all sorts of people who are alienated and/or economically unsuccessful that way.


        June 14, 2016 at 11:32 pm

    • “For whatever reason Muslim men are more likely to respond to their problems by unleashing terror on the society they live in (by a factor of 20).”

      Every Muslim is one personal crisis and a correct reading of the Koran from going Full Jihad.


      June 14, 2016 at 2:39 pm

  10. Lion, the point is that firearms are cool and fun to own and don’t really allow for all that many deaths in mass shootings, while some of them, like hand guns, probably prevent a lot of crime. We need to be careful about who we let in so that we can continue to enjoy firearms.

    Economic Sophisms

    June 14, 2016 at 11:34 am

    • Diversity means you can’t have nice things, like firearms.

      Mike Street Station

      June 14, 2016 at 1:46 pm

      • Or Western civilization.

        Oswald Spengler

        June 14, 2016 at 3:05 pm

      • On the other hand, diversity means one might need a firearm to defend oneself.

        If I ever own a house, I’ll consider getting one. I don’t think they work in an apartment, because if someone comes in you don’t have enough time to get it ready. Once they’re in the door they’d be practically standing by your bed.


        June 14, 2016 at 3:29 pm

    • But the vast majority of shootings aren’t mass ones. It’s stupid to give so much emphasis to them. And handguns are actually the most likely to be involved in shootings. That would be the first type of gun to restrict ownership of. You can defend your house with a long gun. You need a handgun to take a gun outside your house easily or surreptitiously. That’s what needs to be restricted.

      Certainly immigrants don’t help but there are plenty of pre 1965 populations (and not just blacks) that can’t handle guns. The white american murder rate is significantly higher than the western European one. Far too many people assume that just because, say, educational performance evens out across countries when adjusted for race that American whites are somehow the equal of european ones in every way.

      But you’re right that guns are ultimately like drugs and alcohol: at the end of the day people just like them.


      June 14, 2016 at 11:28 pm

  11. “France allowed their country to become 10% Muslim.”

    Whenever you see an official statistic about non-white populations in white nations, you can probably easily double it and still be behind the reality.


    June 14, 2016 at 3:29 pm

  12. The Muslims are totaly disgusting. In addition to practicing buggery they also practice beastiality. My Tajik tells me that in his village everyone had intercourse with donkeys. To cure back ache you had intercourse with a black donkey. He realy beleives it. Other color donkeys were supposed to be a remedy for different ailments. What a stupid country to let in these freekazoids. Trump has got to put an end to this!


    June 14, 2016 at 3:45 pm

    • STFU and GTFO — your incessant non-sense on this blog is not tolerated. You love your Tajik, because he’s a hardworking prole from Central Asia. Admit it!


      June 14, 2016 at 4:46 pm

    • After the transgender revolution is complete, it will be followed by the pederast rights movement and will conclude with the liberation of those who practice bestiality. Anyone who voices the slightest opposition to these enlightened movements is hateful, intolerant and fascistic and stands in the way of human advancement.

      Lewis Medlock

      June 14, 2016 at 5:00 pm

    • 100 years ago you could have found Sicilian, Andalusian or Russian villages with similar crazy beliefs. Bestiality has nothing to do with Islam, and a lot to do with being an ignorant peasant. We probably should focus less on the nominal beliefs of Islam, and more on keeping people from medieval places like Afghanistan, rural Pakistan, Central Asia and rural North Africa out of our 21st century society.

      Peter Akuleyev

      June 15, 2016 at 4:47 am

  13. Why did Mateen attack the Pulse on Latin Night?

    What was that night different from all other nights?


    June 14, 2016 at 4:04 pm

    • He found gay Latinos sexier than gay whites?

      Lion of the Blogosphere

      June 14, 2016 at 4:06 pm

      • I think he had some kind of “thing” for them. Racial fetishism is common among gays. White guys who like Asians are called rice kings, and so on.

        BTW, I think that this:

        had something to do with it. We don’t take notice of such things but they obsess about it. Also his wife’s FB page had a superimposed flag of “Palestine” on their banner pic.


        June 14, 2016 at 5:57 pm

      • The sensuality and sexiness of Hispanics, for a Muslim to be attracted to them, well, he’s looking into his own Islamic culture as the catalyst. Catholic Spain was very much influenced by its Islamic Counterpart.

        America hillybillies and Jews who live in Florida are of course, boring and prudish, when you compare them to the Hispanics who reside there. Many plain jane White American women “intermarry” with White Hispanics in Florida, because of this reason.


        June 14, 2016 at 7:00 pm

      • I’m looking at these pictures from the NY Post:

        These individuals could easily be José from Puerto Rico, and Jocelyn from Peru with Japanese ancestry. They could be the neighbors of George Zimmerman, another Peruvian. And Orlando is Zim’s hometown.

        Another conspiracy theory hoax, if one is skeptical.

        Omar’s 2nd wife who is “Palestinian”, looks eerily, Puerto Rican.

        Florida needs to secede as the New Caribbean Hispanyolah.

        We minus well be living in a Twilight Zone, at this point!


        June 14, 2016 at 9:30 pm

      • You’ve repeatedly badmouthed Americans while promoting muslims and hispanics. That’s what they really are — foreigners with US passports. Now you advocate giving foreigners a state. You sound like La Raza. They would only turn it into the same 3rd world they came from then try to sneak into the remaining 49 states. Wash. Rinse. And repeat.

        No. We shouldn’t cede a state. We should deport the foreigners. Census data shows most of them are on welfare. Our economy, government and quality of life would all greatly improve without them dragging us down.


        June 15, 2016 at 4:12 am

      • Florida is heavily Hispanic. What are you going to do about it?

        Are you going to tell Marco Rubio that Florida is a white bread state, and he needs to pass referendums to stop Hispanics from going there? Perhaps they need to vet Muslims down there too, after this shooting.

        Most of Lion’s readers (and people in general) could care less of Florida, like they do with Alaska, with the exception of Mr. Erekshun.

        Omar Mateen is really Omar Martinez. And Omar is also a Spanish Name. Is he really someone who has roots in Afghanistan? C’mon.

        You’ve been fooled!


        June 15, 2016 at 9:01 am

      • JS — Stop posing and admit you’re a NAM.


        June 15, 2016 at 11:42 am

    • I think it was that bowl of guacamole


      June 14, 2016 at 10:02 pm

  14. I believe he attempted to atone for his sinful (as he believed it, and according to Sharia law) homosexuality by committing jihad.

    Islam teaches that homos should be executed and go to hell. They don’t believe a homo can even be muslim. Therefore, the only way for a homo raised in Islam to get to paradise is to be a martyr, to die killing the infidel. Dying while killing infidels guarantees them a ticket to paradise. I wouldn’t be surprised if imams convinced him to do it to save his soul. I wouldn’t be surprised if his own parents did. After all, they’ll even kill their own daughter for being raped to erase the humiliation. So that’s the mentality we’re dealing with.


    June 14, 2016 at 4:40 pm

  15. This isn’t new. The Festrunk brothers were on SNL in 1977.


    June 14, 2016 at 5:24 pm

  16. Does it matter that guidoness (or low prole) culture transcends all races and religions? Proles mimic other proles. One thing that they have in common is their masculine, flamboyant and loud status signaling. Then you have the frat boys, who are also prolish, but in a different realm. Their prole culture is found in the professional/white collar world. One call them high proles.


    June 14, 2016 at 5:41 pm

  17. Is Sasha Baron Cohen’s “Ali G” character a British version of the Islamic guido?


    June 14, 2016 at 6:28 pm

  18. Of course he was gay, he’s Afghan. Afghans gonna Afghan. He probably screwed men, women, and goats too.

    And this is why the shooting really was terror related (and not just anti gay or whatever).


    June 16, 2016 at 11:35 am

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: