Lion of the Blogosphere

A Trump supporter in Staten Island who loves America

House in Staten Island with Trump signs and American flags

As seen, by this blogger, somewhere on Staten Island, the county which Donald Trump won with 82% of the vote. Staten Islanders love Donald Trump.

This Trump supporter also loves America. A lot of tender-loving care went into putting out all of those American flags. It may be prole, but it’s from the heart and it’s people like this who are the backbone of America.

You will never see a Hillary supporter make a display like this. Hillary supporters and liberals don’t love America the way Trump supporters do. Rudy Giuliani got a lot of flak from the usual sources for saying that Obama doesn’t love America, but Giuliani was right. Notice how, after the Orlando massacre, Obama got more angry at Donald Trump than he did at the terrorist. It’s too bad that Giuliani lacked the courage to endorse Trump before the New York primary.

Written by Lion of the Blogosphere

June 18, 2016 at 11:15 am

Posted in Politics

102 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. “You will never see a Hillary supporter make a display like this.” — she will have dozens of crazy bumper stickers all over the back of her Prius though.

    Tarl

    June 18, 2016 at 11:25 am

    • My favorite one goes something like this: “Minds Are Like Parachutes – They Only Function When Open”

      sabril

      June 19, 2016 at 8:31 am

      • And we all know there is nobody more open-minded than a Prius-driving Democrat…

        Tarl

        June 19, 2016 at 11:59 am

      • I like my Prius… The hatchback can hold lots, like two bicycles. It’s super reliable…Green is the color of money too you know.

        What’s more it’d be great one day to be able to tell those kind Arab sheikhs and Russian mafioski friends of ours that they can pump their oil where the sun doesn’t shine.

        If I didn’t live in such an intolerant progressive bluetopia hell where cars with Trump stickers are vandalized, I might consider having some fun with it.

        “Go Vegan: Cannibals find organic grain fed meat delicious.”

        Thin-Skinned Masta-Beta

        June 20, 2016 at 2:07 pm

  2. “it’s people like this who are the backbone of America.”

    Agree 100%.

    Sagi Is My Guru

    June 18, 2016 at 11:27 am

    • Yes, and many of them were fleeced like roasted lambs during 9-11.

      Proles are dumb. But we should leave them alone.

      JS

      June 18, 2016 at 2:01 pm

      • Once a lamb is roasted, I don’t think there’s much point in fleecing it.

        ice hole

        June 19, 2016 at 1:15 am

      • Fleeced = Slaughtered!

        JS

        June 19, 2016 at 1:28 pm

      • I’m disappointed in JS, not because he’s a downer. I’m disappointed that he is inconsistent in delivering some of strong nihilism to challenge our values. Perhaps JS could elaborate on what if anything about America is admirable and worthwhile while not ceasing his criticism of its weaknesses. It’s usually the case that any characteristic is at the same time a weakness and strength.

        Proles can be more tolerable than the insecure striving ones in the middle. Striving proles or lower middles are comical when they try to act higher and rise up, consider those get rich scams and self-help courses they fall for. If you ask me, get-rich-quick and self-improvement is the true American civic religion. Prosperity gospel indeed!

        But rising in class is a losing proposition. Rise too high and you alienate any from where you came… but you’re still to humble to be welcomed by those in the higher station.

        Thin-Skinned Masta-Beta

        June 20, 2016 at 1:59 pm

      • Anything that is admirable about the US, was before our liberals and elites went full assault on the White Middle Class, post 9-11. After that, the country became a cesspool of bad multiculturalism and accelerated 3rd world immigration in a matter of few years, and prole drifting and gentrification of liberal cities perversely went hand in hand at the same time. I blame the Baby Boomers like Clinton and Bush, and then comes Obama as the final end product, which has gotten us into this mess.

        JS

        June 20, 2016 at 8:10 pm

      • There is no redemption, with the exception of prole whites losing their proleness, and SWPLs becoming self aware. This is a tall order.

        JS

        June 20, 2016 at 8:16 pm

  3. Who does he want us to boycott? Walmart? Target? McDonald’s?

    Je suis Omar Mateen

    June 18, 2016 at 12:03 pm

  4. “Notice how, after the Orlando massacre, Obama got more angry at Donald Trump than he did at the terrorist.”

    Indeed. The first speech after the massacre was cold and emotionless, with more rote finger wagging at the NRA. Then you could hear the fire in him when he later tried to confront Trump about sensible immigration policy. It’s clear where his loyalties are emotionally—and it’s not to America or even the gay liberal community.

    Dabbler

    June 18, 2016 at 12:07 pm

    • “It’s clear where his loyalties are emotionally—and it’s not to America or even the gay liberal community.”

      I used to think that the left was against the interests of straight white male Americans and Europeans, but they at least cared, if in a hysterical fashion, about women’s and gay rights. But once you saw SJWs staying silent as night about Rotherham and Cologne, it became clear that the hard leftists really don’t care about women if they’re not being victimized by white men. With the outrageous massacre of gays in Orlando, and Obama’s Spocklike reaction, it’s clear that they don’t care about gays if straight white men aren’t giving them problems.

      In general, SJWs only care about people when they’re victimized in some way by white Americans and Europeans. It’s a really disgusting, twisted worldview: people only have worth when your enemies hurt them.

      Sid

      June 18, 2016 at 5:53 pm

      • Most progressive blacks and many progressive whites conflate discrimination against blacks 50+ years ago with “discrimination” against Muslims today. (There are rare examples, like Bill Maher, who recognize reality)

        To a liberal, perceived discrimination trumps everything. It even disrupts the self-preservation instinct, to the extent that they are able to “not see” the danger in front of their face if it means they might “discriminate” against a Muslim. It even prevents them protecting their own daughters (see Rotherham et al)

        Imagine the cognitive dissonance that permits a man to overlook the rape and sexual exploitation of his own daughter because of his fear of reprisal for “discriminating” against Muslims.

        Just how long before the dam bursts?

        gda

        June 19, 2016 at 1:29 am

      • In general, SJWs only care about people when they’re victimized in some way by white Americans and Europeans.

        Basically true.

        White American/European men/people as their villain so even in Rotherham or Orlando or wherever they will turn it around so their outrage can be maintained against White men, guns, NRA, Republicans, Christians, “the right” etc etc.

        Same with blackliesmatter, they only care about black lives when White men or cops of any race end them.

        Otherwise, they couldn’t care less.

        Rifleman

        June 19, 2016 at 11:09 am

      • If there had never been white men, the world would still be living in teepees and huts and caves.

        And if the white men were ever to depart the scene, the world will be living in them again.

        silberstreak

        June 19, 2016 at 2:18 pm

    • By the way, I don’t watch much news but nevertheless just saw my first ‘concerned muslims afraid about backlash’ segment since Orlando.

      Glengarry

      June 19, 2016 at 1:20 pm

  5. True, Obama is Americophobic, but he does love the newfangled version of America he is concocting of his own image, a hodgepodge nation of color where the sweet sound of the Muslim call for prayer resounds from coast to coast.

    Mark Caplan

    June 18, 2016 at 1:25 pm

  6. A lot of tender-loving care went into putting out all of those American flags. It may be prole

    The design of the American flag is a testament of what the country stands for, when it comes to its aesthetics and beauty. There isn’t any.

    JS

    June 18, 2016 at 2:05 pm

    • Four colors (red, white, blue, and a different white for the stars); lots of geometry; the painter William Merritt Chase; one of the few national flags that is tough enough to serve as a battle flag: the painter Childe Hassam; that cool moment deep into a Fourth of July evening where the fireworkists have done oranges and violets and lilacs against the night sky again and again and then boom, as John Madden would say, there is the red white and blue, night will not overcome, home is the sailor, home from the sea. Makes you feel sorry for most foreigners.

      FOXP2

      June 18, 2016 at 6:01 pm

      • What a great response to JS, thank you. (I didn’t know that the white of the stars was different from the white of the stripes!!)

        It’s a beautiful flag.

        gothamette

        June 19, 2016 at 6:30 am

      • Looking forward to JS getting banned. Cmon Lion, letting shitty commenters run rampant is prole.

        Panther of the Blogocube

        June 19, 2016 at 12:39 pm

      • JS has a point. Stripes have long been associated with convicts and lunatic asylum inmates and are a bizzare choice for a nation’s insignia.

        Mark Caplan

        June 20, 2016 at 10:19 am

    • If I were uber-talented at designing flags for a living I would be proud of having designed the United States flag.

      howitzer daniel

      June 18, 2016 at 6:06 pm

      • There isn’t anything elegant about the American Flag. It seems like a school kid designed it. It’s neither simple nor artistically ornate. Fail!

        JS

        June 18, 2016 at 8:56 pm

      • Shut up JS. The Chinese call the American flag “the flower flag” and they call the US “the pretty country.” U R so ignorant. Get a life.

        gothamette

        June 19, 2016 at 6:40 am

      • The constitution is, or was, a beautiful thing. The flag is only beautiful by association.

        Curle

        June 19, 2016 at 3:59 pm

    • Actually, America has a very nice flag and it stands for great ideas. The flag makes perfect sense. I always had a good feeling about the flag. I wish I could trample JS into the ground, sometimes.

      Yakov

      June 18, 2016 at 9:59 pm

      • I’ll help you. Let’s discuss.

        gothamette

        June 19, 2016 at 6:41 am

      • Relatively comparing, any western nation and even a Latin American one, is much nicer than any 3rd world hole in East Asia.

        JS

        June 19, 2016 at 2:05 pm

    • The best national flag of all time is the Union Jack. The second best is the French Tri-coleur. There is a reason why most European flags copied the idea of three colored stripes. The Imperial Japanese Army flag is pretty great as well. Just as a design, the American flag is decent, but not top 5. It’s too busy. It was a great design when there were 13 colonies, but 50 stars are silly and make the design very unbalanced.

      Peter Akuleyev

      June 19, 2016 at 8:20 am

      • All politics aside, the German Imperial War Ensign (1871-1919) flag is a great flag.

        JS has some mental problems. He has an OCD obsession with “proles” and a strange combination of being anti-American and pro muslim.

        Yet Islam is an obsessively prole religion that attracts only prole converts.

        If he hates proles so much why be sympathetic to islam, the super prole relgion?

        Non proles in the West become agnostics or moderate Buddhists or some kind of ultra WASPy Protestant/Untitarian non religion religion.

        Rifleman

        June 19, 2016 at 11:24 am

      • I’m a fan of the Liberian flag because it’s basically a less busy version of the American flag. The Chilean, Puerto Rican, and Texan flags are also pretty similar. Having one big star makes the design much simpler and cleaner. I’ve heard from flag designers that the hallmark of a great flag is that a child should be able to draw it from memory. Children can somewhat draw the American flag, but they’re probably going to screw up the number of stripes, be unable to fit the 50 stars in correctly, or both.

        Aristippus

        June 19, 2016 at 11:36 am

      • It was designed by a talented minor. The type of drawings one sees, when touring a K-12 institution.

        JS

        June 19, 2016 at 1:42 pm

      • I don’t embrace Islam. I admire it, because it’s full of passion. It identifies its enemies and acts on them.

        Agnostics and Buddhists = The metrosexual betas of religion.

        JS

        June 19, 2016 at 2:57 pm

      • The Nazi Flag is nice looking, but of course, it didn’t turned out well at the end.

        The Spanish Flag under Francisco Franco was cooler than the one of Democratic Spain.

        JS

        June 19, 2016 at 10:44 pm

      • The best flag was the Soviet red flag with the hammer and sickle. Angolan flag is also great. These flags represent the highest value which is productive labor and stand for the rights and dignity of the working people. The reality of these societies contradicted everything that the flags symbolized. Still, these are the conceptually most beautiful and noble flags. American flag stands for completely different ideas and America has lived up to those ideas for hard working people, so American flag is the best in a practical and real way. America is real and it has delivered freedom and endless opportunity by empowering people to control their life and destiny. I would say American flag is the best in the world.

        Yakov

        June 19, 2016 at 10:56 pm

      • The American flag stands for 13 original colonies plus additional states, the concept that although united, they are still individual states. That concept, of states’ rights and independence, is ignored today.

      • The best flag was the Soviet red flag with the red star and hammer and sickle. Angolan flag is also great. These flags represent the highest value which is productive labor and stand for the rights and dignity of the working people. The reality of these societies contradicted everything that the flags symbolized. Still, these are conceptually the most beautiful and noble flags. American flag stands for completely different ideas and America has lived up to those ideas for hard working people, so American flag is the best in a practical and real way. America is real and it has delivered freedom and endless opportunity by empowering people to control their life and destiny. I would say American flag is the best in the world as far as keeping it real.

        Yakov

        June 20, 2016 at 12:01 am

      • Lion, I know what American flag stands for historically. However in the minds of the masses that look up to America it stands for ultimate freedom and opportunity.

        Yakov

        June 20, 2016 at 12:19 am

      • ‘I’ve heard from flag designers that the hallmark of a great flag is that a child should be able to draw it from memory.’

        This is silly. When I wad a kid the flags that stood out the most in my memory were Ceylon’s with it’s lion holding a sword and Thailand’s with elephants. Cool flags for a kindergarten kid, but what’s the message? Angolan flag has a good message. A flag has to express deep and true ideas, then we respect it, even if the ideas were utopian and were never implemented because at the end of the day the society should be structured to benefit the proles, because we are the people.

        Yakov

        June 20, 2016 at 1:50 pm

  7. A sort of related (genuinely non-hostile) question for Otis, whom I take to be identical with “Otis the Sweaty”, and who wrote in the comments-page a couple of posts back, “It might be time for us reactionaries to consider adopting Islam. Look at how brutally Muslims crush liberals in their own countries and communities.” Otis, if you’re Otis the Sweaty, well, you’ve been very enthusiastically pro-Trump because you’ve seen the Trump-movement as “destroying the Tru-Cons” (not an exact quote, but pretty close, I think). And, you’ve closely identified “Tru-Con”-ism with American Puritan-style Christianity. So, you kind of like Islam but you hate American Christianity. I’m sure you’re aware that Islam is just as explicitly anti-ethnocentric (hence the Black converts) as Christianity is. So do you prefer Islam because it seems to offer ordinary men a higher social status than Christianity does, by providing them with nice, helpful wives and by presenting heterosexual marriage as an ideal through its suppression of homosexual activity? (If you’re not Otis the Sweaty, I apologize, but am still interested in what would motivate you to look at Islam in a friendly way.)

    Garr

    June 18, 2016 at 2:24 pm

    • I’m Jewish. The future would not be bright for me, personally, in an Islamic theocracy. But Muslims are the only force in the world that seems serious about destroying Liberals. Destroying Liberals is priority number 1 for me, as it should be for all who walk the path of Righteousness.

      I hate TruCon’s because they are a rhinestone around our necks in the battle against Liberals. No group has done more to divide non liberal whites (over 70% of the white population) than have TruCons. They are vermin and are unworthy of life.

      I don’t hate Christianity. I hate the stupid Christian cucks who are destroying America.

      Also, Islam is not as anti racist as people make it out to be. Most Muslims are extremely racist.

      Otis the Sweaty

      June 18, 2016 at 3:39 pm

      • “they are a rhinestone around our necks in the battle against Liberals”

        They are fake diamonds used by country singers?

        I don’t agree TruCons have divided non-liberal whites. Or at any rate, why blame them for the division more than the “moderate” Republicans? Both moderate and TruCon Republicans accept liberal premises and accept (and even facilitate) the country moving in a liberal direction – and of the two, the moderate Republicans cave in to liberalism faster than do the TruCons. So if you truly hate liberalism, why hate the TruCons more than the moderates?

        Tarl

        June 18, 2016 at 6:14 pm

      • “I hate TruCon’s because they are a rhinestone around our necks in the battle against Liberals.”

        Don’t you mean millstone?

        The notion of Islam being against Trucons (or classical liberalism, same thing) was explored in a book called “Jihad v. McWorld.”

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jihad_vs._McWorld

        It was written before 9-11, so the book went down the memory hole, but the idea resurfaces, most notably in Houellebecq’s Submission. The idea that Islam is the only force powerful enough to resist liberal capitalism is not original. But is it true?

        gothamette

        June 18, 2016 at 6:18 pm

      • Most Muslims are extremely racist.

        In a sense muslims are a self created race in that they see themselves as a “people”.

        That’s why they say anti-Islam is racism. Which technically it can’t be but it is to them and their regressive left allies because they see themselves as a kind of race or collective people.

        So yes muslims of many traditions are racist against many racial types as well as being “islamoracist” in a sense.

        Rifleman

        June 18, 2016 at 8:05 pm

      • How is Islam racist, when its members encompass every ethnic group, you can imagine? What’s wrong with being part of a collective? Something Meriprole WNs have a hard time achieving.

        JS

        June 18, 2016 at 9:06 pm

      • TruCons with their culture war bullshit have done a billion times more to divide whites than anything establishment R’s do. TruCon’s focus on “muh abortions” is both counterproductive (more blacks and hispanics) as well as extremely damaging to building a pan white front against liberalism.

        It was the TruCons, not the GOPe that threatened to steal the nomination from Trump. The TruCons explicitly took the side of the Sanderista’s and BLM during the Chicago riots against Trump’s speech.

        Greasy William

        June 18, 2016 at 10:17 pm

      • JS, jews are the real racists. Over half don’t convert and assimilate here in the christian west.

        bobbybobbob

        June 18, 2016 at 11:37 pm

      • Greasy William, “culture war” sounds to me like an appropriate way to describe the fight that the Right has been losing. It’s about much more than abortion, although that is a worthy aspect of the “war” – it is about reproduction in general, marriage and gender roles, morals, celebration of excellence rather than the lowest common denominator, the civilizational brashness which brought the West to dominance, and so on. If the Right isn’t waging a “culture war,” the Left certainly is. All of these things are part of the character of America, and America needs them in order to be great. If Trump deports a lot of illegals and puts a moratorium on Muslim immigration that would be great, but if the Right loses the culture war, America will still be on track to have its greatness snuffed out and we will “dwindle to a rustic folk of dell and cave, slowly to forget and to be forgotten.”

        Perturabo

        June 18, 2016 at 11:37 pm

      • I’m Jewish too. As Mark Steyn put it, If America did become part of the New Caliphate, we’d just submit to Allah, grow out our beards, and continue as normal. It’s the gays and the women who should be soiling their pants over the possibility.

        Njguy73

        June 19, 2016 at 12:35 am

      • JS, while the Muslim religion encompass (by the threat of the sword) any ethnic group, the Muslims themselves are very race aware and have strict hierarchy of race within Muslims and towards non Muslims. In general whiter skin is better and darker is worst, not so different from the rest of the world, but because they are backward in general it is much more explicit. That’s why Sudanese Muslim refugees will rather cross the Sinai to Israel than stay in the overtly racist towards blacks Egypt.

        Hashed

        June 19, 2016 at 1:26 am

      • “Greasy William” or “Otis the Sweaty”? Make up your mind.

        I prefer you go with Irving the Clean.

        But on the TruCons check out Mormons on one end and the Southern Baptist Convention on the other. Whatever theological disputes they have is trivial compared to the deep Beta male White submissiveness they embody.

        That’s why they hate Trump personally – he’s an Alpha male/bad boy affront to all of their neutered, good boy must protect “muh values/muh bible/muh constitution/muh wife and daughters” White male wuss-bag identity.

        Notice how many have come out of the woodwork calling Trump “racist”. It’s like listening to SJW/leftist creeps talk. When have Republicans EVER talked like this? And they aren’t even saying he’s anti-black!!!

        Trump is one of the least anti-black, anti Jewish, anti gay Republicans EVER. Fact.

        So why are the Republican White guy establishment types playing the race card on him? Because he’s critical of Mexican illegals and Muslim bigots and terrorists??

        Think about that!

        Rifleman

        June 19, 2016 at 1:58 am

      • “I’m Jewish too. As Mark Steyn put it, If America did become part of the New Caliphate, we’d just submit to Allah, grow out our beards, and continue as normal. It’s the gays and the women who should be soiling their pants over the possibility.”

        Great comment from Steyn. I actually remembered that one. It’s odd that the people who would suffer most seem to be the ones who are the most disengaged on radical Islam. But yeah, as a guy, I’ll can just accept the new caliphate world order and get on with my life, plus maybe one or two more wives.

        Mike Street Station

        June 19, 2016 at 10:57 am

      • Only alphas get more than one wife.

        gothamette

        June 19, 2016 at 1:41 pm

      • TruCons with their culture war bullshit have done a billion times more to divide whites than anything establishment R’s do. TruCon’s focus on “muh abortions” is both counterproductive (more blacks and hispanics) as well as extremely damaging to building a pan white front against liberalism.

        Facepalm. Abortion is a basic sacrament of liberalism. Support for abortion is one of the things, if not THE thing, that defines “being a liberal”. Thus, the “moderate” Republicans who are OK with abortion have already surrendered to liberalism – i.e., they ARE liberals, albeit slightly less left-wing than the Democrat version. How are you going to join with liberals (i.e., these pro-choice Republicans) to form a “front against liberalism”? This idea is doomed by definition. People who have surrendered to liberalism on “choice” are not going to fight the liberals too hard on anything else. And that’s exactly what we see in practice; the moderate Republicans who are willing to compromise on abortion are also willing to compromise on everything else.

        Can you even name an issue for which moderate/establishment Republicans are absolutely unwilling to compromise? I can’t. They are certainly not “pro white” – they are fine with immigration and affirmative action – so what is the basis for your delusion that they will form the basis for a “pan white front against liberalism”? Moderate/establishment Republicans would recoil in horror, and shriek “racism!”, at this idea.

        It was the TruCons, not the GOPe that threatened to steal the nomination from Trump. The TruCons explicitly took the side of the Sanderista’s and BLM during the Chicago riots against Trump’s speech.

        The GOPe was using the stupid TruCons as their catspaw to derail Trump. GOPe could not get their own loser candidates nominated, and the next best thing, from their perspective, was to have TruCons derail Trump and then either substitute a GOPe candidate at the convention or accept a loss to Hillary. The main point is that moderate Republicans (GOPe) are your real enemy, not the TruCons.

        And this leaves aside the large number of non-TruCon Nevertrumpers who want to steal the nomination from Trump or make sure he doesn’t get elected. Neocons like Kristol are not TruCons in my book.

        Tarl

        June 19, 2016 at 12:49 pm

      • Muslims hate everyone, including other Muslims.

        silberstreak

        June 19, 2016 at 2:20 pm

      • jews are the real racists. Over half don’t convert and assimilate here in the christian west.

        The majority of them live in multicult New York City and Los Angeles. What’s there to assimilate?

        JS

        June 19, 2016 at 4:45 pm

      • “Only alphas get more than one wife.”

        Who says I’m not? And even if I’m not, I’m really cute, so there.

        Mike Street Station

        June 19, 2016 at 5:40 pm

      • I totally take your word for it, Mike.

        just pointing out that all those guys who think that the Caliphate will make life easy for them may end up as sad little incels. oh sorry they already are…

        gothamette

        June 20, 2016 at 10:25 am

      • Jews are forbidden to intermarry. It has nothing to do with racism.

        Yakov

        June 20, 2016 at 8:40 am

      • “I totally take your word for it, Mike.

        just pointing out that all those guys who think that the Caliphate will make life easy for them may end up as sad little incels. oh sorry they already are…”

        Well the problem of guys with out chicks are much, much worse in Muslim countries. If you are incel in the US now, well that’s not going to be helped by any Islamic Caliphate. But I think most of the comments about life under the caliphate for guys are facetious. My comment included. But the basic point remains that it’s better to be a man than a woman in an Islamic society. As the New York Times might opine, Women and minorities hardest hit.

        Mike Street Station

        June 20, 2016 at 12:24 pm

      • @Mike,

        Well the problem of guys with out chicks are much, much worse in Muslim countries. If you are incel in the US now, well that’s not going to be helped by any Islamic Caliphate. But I think most of the comments about life under the caliphate for guys are facetious. My comment included. But the basic point remains that it’s better to be a man than a woman in an Islamic society. As the New York Times might opine, Women and minorities hardest hit.

        Spot the contradiction Mike. I’ve helped you by bolding the contradictory statements. The NY Times doesn’t make my values for me. It’s only better to be a man if you are a woman who values man things over woman things, which most women don’t. Most women are fine with patriarchy, so called, as long as it’s benevolent.

        So, I think that a woman is much better of in Islam than a low status incel type guy.

        gothamette

        June 21, 2016 at 3:39 pm

    • “Look at how brutally Muslims crush liberals in their own countries and communities…”

      Bah.

      The Muslim fanatics have been being slowly destroyed by the Libertarians and libertarian/their center-Liberal allies since the Arab Spring. The Libertarians aren’t brutal, but surgical. They’re doing the same they did to the commies and petty fascists back in the eighties, but not as smoothly as the US Government has no Reagan backing them up so insists on sending in its military and ineptly pretending to do something.

      Only a matter of time before the Islamic Conference nations start adopting the equivalent of the 1st Amendment and US common law. In the end Islam’ll all become like Episcopalians and U-U’s IMHO with 0.9 kids and their top 1% IQ invited to become US nationals. Just like what’s happening to the Chinese commies in Libertarian School.

      ricardo

      June 19, 2016 at 2:38 am

  8. Notice how, after the Orlando massacre, Obama got more angry at Donald Trump than he did at the terrorist. It’s too bad that Giuliani lacked the courage to endorse Trump before the New York primary.

    Of course he did. He identifies with Islamic terrorism and he proves it through his foreign policy which consists of endangering or overthrowing our allies and supporting our enemies.

    And then when the consequences of him deliberately helping ISIS take over the Middle East result in Orlando, Paris, Brussels – and who knows where next – he demands we give up our second amendment rights.

    The Undiscovered Jew

    June 18, 2016 at 4:04 pm

      • I’ve gotten tired of reading McCarthy. He’s great, but he’s screaming into the wind. Let’s face it: whatever the sensible course of action is, Obama will do the opposite. Living under Obama is like being in the bus in that old Keanu Reeves move, Speed. Remember that? When a terrorist takes over a bus? I keep saying to myself, “what next?” I think that’s why the response to the weekly outrage is so muted. Why freak out, there will be another soon enough.

        gothamette

        June 21, 2016 at 3:42 pm

    • Very good. But I object to this:

      Oh, I believe Obama is betraying our national security, but I do not think he is doing so intentionally.

      It’s clear from his actions he is intentionally assisting Muslim terrorists by helping in the overthrow of formerly allied governments of Gadhafi and Mubarak, his assisting in the development Iran’s nuclear program, and by his hamstringing national intelligence forces from cracking down on Western terrorist cells.

      The Undiscovered Jew

      June 19, 2016 at 5:33 pm

  9. Lion saying something nice about proles! I guess there IS hope for the future. Interestingly, he doesn’t say whether this particular Staten Island prole is a “guido.” And this omission is odd, considering that Lion tends to suspect that all whites in Staten Island are Italian-American unless their last names state otherwise – and the fact that (as I once wrote on this site) Lion could spot a guido in Tanzania.

    Maryk

    June 18, 2016 at 7:45 pm

    • Now what happens if Donald Trump loses? SI becomes another comedy central session about suckas!

      JS

      June 18, 2016 at 9:24 pm

      • “Now what happens if Donald Trump loses? SI becomes another comedy central session about suckas!”

        Not necessarily. I think there are plenty on the Right who are circumspect about his chances of winning, but see value in his running. Trump has raised issues about immigration and identity that no-one who mattered has asked for a long time. And when he asked those questions he revealed the seemingly impregnable fortress of Political Correctness to be something of a paper tiger. Look at the way Hillary was forced to call the Orlando shootings Islamic terrorism because of his goading. That was a significant concession, and it would not have happened without Trump. He has also demonstrated to other potential politicians that there are voters out there on the Right waiting to be harvested, even in the teeth of an extremely hostile media, political establishment and financial elite and Mexican lynch mobs. In the way that the Republican establishment conspired against him he has shown that the party has contempt for its own voters and has its own agenda of which its supporters know nothing and are not involved. Perhaps the Republicans will not now be able to go back to the way things were before.

        The Scottish Nationalists lost their independence referendum, yet afterwards their cause was energised and they went on to wipe the once-dominant Scottish Labour Party off the map at the last election. Sometimes it takes time to build a constituency and a consciousness,and losing is part of the process.

        But if you could save ‘prole’ America from the ravages of immigration and globalisation would you even want to? Judging by your comments here you seem to have the same view of poor whites as our elites do–Untermenschen without taste or value to be discarded as soon as is possible for anything and anyone that will do the job cheaper.

        millstone cowboy aka prolier than thou

        June 19, 2016 at 2:33 pm

      • Many proles in America deserve what they get, the same way NAMs in America deserve what they get. The only difference, is that the second group of losers get protection and certain privileges, not afforded to the 1st group.

        Here’s a reason why America needs to officiate its balkanization.

        I see a Mexican flag and a large Puerto Rican flag, in memory of those shot dead in the Orlando Shooting. You know where the hearts are with these people. They’re Hispanics 1st, Americans 2nd.

        JS

        June 19, 2016 at 11:23 pm

  10. Oh the racism and White Privilege. All the Lefties must be triggered and either crying to their small dog or calling their therapist cause they’re eating another gallon of Ben and Jerry’s Heart Valve Spackle Ice Cream. Look at those Imperialist Flags, and supporting pigs wearing badges that oppress poor criminals whose only crimes are felonies. And that Green Lawn! Mother Gaea goddess of dried up ovaries! Doesn’t he know that crabgrass and dandelions are native species and that grass is a GMO Frankenplant from some hideous Multinational Capitalist Herbalist like Scotts?
    Fortunately Hilldogs supporters drive electric cars made by slaves in the Third World that run on clean Coal Burning Electrical Powerplants. And the only appliances they have at home is a big screen TV, four iphones, an ipod, three ipads, a washer/drier and a tasteful 1500 watt microwave to reheat food bought at upscale restaurants that don’t pay their illegal employees a living wage. They’re not racists, they’re just old, lazy and clueless, and that’s different emotionally if not materially.

    Joshua Sinistar

    June 18, 2016 at 8:46 pm

  11. Taking pictures at noon, when the sun is at its harshest, is kinda prole. You should get a good shot at magic hour. Maybe do an HDR or something. On second thought, HDR is kinda prole.

    Dave

    June 18, 2016 at 10:00 pm

    • The picture tells you it’s a prole home.

      JS

      June 19, 2016 at 12:32 am

  12. As MG, the Libertarian leader, says, the only problem with the US Flag is it needs another 200 stars on it.

    BTW, 31% of the US public now says it will consider voting for the Libertarian Prez candidate. Encouraging, though a long way to go IMHO.

    ricardo

    June 19, 2016 at 2:45 am

  13. Vinyl siding is prole. But I bet that house is worth at least $500K!

    E. Rekshun

    June 19, 2016 at 5:31 am

    • I agree with both.

    • Many SWPL liberals around here have McMansions with brick fronts and vinyl siding on the sides.

      Tarl

      June 19, 2016 at 12:52 pm

      • Again, Americans of all classes have poor taste. Prole!

        This is your typical Anglo-Prole-Sphere-SWPL setting, with no taste or refinement.

        JS

        June 19, 2016 at 2:50 pm

      • Brick veneers are the height of the garish postmodern anti-architecture.

        Sagi Is My Guru

        June 19, 2016 at 6:17 pm

      • That’s just what I’ve got. Vinyl siding on the 3 sides is awesome. Low maintenance. Never needs paint. Wood grain texture looks real enough. Brick facade and stone in front give curb appeal. When it’s lit up at night with under-eave lighting it looks great. Love my newish house. I’ve lived in older homes, and the upkeep is expensive and a real pain in the ass.

        steve@steve.com

        June 19, 2016 at 8:30 pm

  14. it’s people like this who are the backbone of America.

    Agreed. That’s why I don’t bash the working class or have much respect for those who do.

    destructure

    June 19, 2016 at 8:12 am

    • …though obviously it’s fine to criticize bad behavior.

      destructure

      June 19, 2016 at 10:33 am

      • Often prole behavior is bad behavior.

        E. Rekshun

        June 19, 2016 at 2:24 pm

      • Proles aka working class aka blue collar may not be sophisticated but they’re not particularly badly behaved. For the most part they work and don’t break the law. The bad behavior comes from lumpenprole aka bottom out of sight aka “trash”. There’s a big difference.

        destructure

        June 19, 2016 at 5:02 pm

      • The bad behavior comes from lumpenprole

        Yes. Proles usually have jobs and spend their free time enjoying (non-criminal) prole activities.

        E. Rekshun

        June 19, 2016 at 8:37 pm

  15. @Rifleman, it’s all about immigration and trade. And power. Their power structure was revealed as a rotting pier, so they hate him. They disagree fundamentally about immigration and trade. And the best weapon to use against your enemy is RACISMSEXISMHOMOPHOBIATRANSPHOBIA. The language changes, the shiv never does. They are scum.

    gothamette

    June 19, 2016 at 1:46 pm

    • Yes, I agree.

      Rifleman

      June 20, 2016 at 11:02 am

  16. Lion, did you hear about these Trump supporters in Suffolk County who were recently arrested? Their guido neighbors were terrified of them.

    http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/06/18/the-nazi-family-hiding-in-new-york.html

    Still, neighbors have long complained over dustups with the Perkowskis and alleged drug activity at their home.

    One resident, Brian Saltzer, told News 12 he was allegedly attacked by the brothers in March after a dispute about a couch on their lawn.

    “They think I’m Jewish, they actually threatened to burn me in the oven,” Saltzer told the TV station. “I just wish something was done sooner because we’ve felt threatened for the last three years.”

    All In The Family

    The Perkowski clan seemed to openly declare their white pride.

    A review of Edward Perkowski Jr.’s Facebook profile—under the pseudonym Dale Reinecke—reveals hate-filled and sexist rants in between snaps of his beloved golden retriever. (Perkowski goes by “Dale,” his middle name, or “DJ,” short for Dale Jr., neighbors told The Daily Beast.)

    On Facebook he’s known as “Übermensch.”

    Under “Work,” Perkowski lists Germany’s radical right-wing National Democratic Party (NPD). He also quotes Hitler and describes himself as an “independent” and “PROUD NATIONALIST.”

    Meanwhile, he also appears to back Donald Trump. In May, Perkowski posted a photo of the GOP presidential contender with the words, “Make America White Again!” His father, Edward Perkowski Sr., responded emphatically with, “BUILD THE WALL.”

    Living next to the Perkowski brothers, Larry Bilello felt “like a prisoner” in his home.

    His parents did, too.

    Aurelio Bilello, Larry’s 84-year-old father, was too afraid to set foot outside without son by his side and concerned about his stroke-riddled 80-year-old wife Marie, who snails around with a walker.

    “Everything that was going on across the street at all hours was too much,” Aurelio Bilello told us. “I was scared for the actions that was going on and for my wife.”

    For over a year, though, Bilello has remained holed up in his house—not out of fear, but because a court order states he can’t be 500 feet near Edward Perkowski Sr.’s other son, Michael, who used to live in the house with his brothers and who returned from time to time.

    “When he comes I’ve got to leave,” Bilello said. “He’s got a hunk of shit yellow van—and when he pulls up I’ve got to go to my house.

    “If I’m mowing the lawn I’ve got to go in.”

    Bilello was hit with a harassment charge during a Jan. 26 dustup with the Perkowski brothers in the middle of the street.

    It was three days after a torrential blizzard and Bilello says he’d shoveled his parents’ snow on the driveway and sidewalk for three hours.

    He claims Michael Perkowski, then 26, took a snow blower and aimed it at Bilello.

    “The asshole comes home and starts blowing snow in my driveway,” he recalled. “I had to go out there and tell him ‘Don’t do that.’

    “Next thing you know I had to get him down.”

    The bout between Bilello, a former wrestler, and the 6-foot tall, 220-pound younger Michael Perkowski—“who was in bad shape,” Bilello says—lasted a few minutes.

    “I first got him in a headlock and I threw an overbar on him and I had him pinned on the ground and he tried to get up.”

    Bilello says he pinned Perkowski down and he claims he had the upper hand before he showed some mercy. Perkowski saw an opportunity and turned the tables. “He flipped me over and got on top of me. He was so winded he laid on top of me.”

    When they stood up, Michael Perkowski allegedly told Bilello,“Fuck you, I shoot to kill.”

    Bilello had no reason to doubt him.

    A few years earlier, Michael Perkowski had escaped 25 years hard time after standing trial in 2009 for firing a rifle whose pellets apparently ricocheted and struck a 19-year-old black man named Raymond Kaine, who had squared off with Perkowski over his use of racial epithets. Kaine survived the shooting standoff with minor injuries. Perkowski, who pled not guilty, was not convicted of any crime.

    When he said he’s going to shoot to kill me I think that’s pretty threatening,” Bilello told us.

    It wasn’t before a city snow plow operator drove by that cops were called to stop the snowy fight between Bilello and the younger Perkowski.

    Tom

    June 19, 2016 at 3:47 pm

  17. “Hillary supporters and liberals don’t love America the way Trump supporters do.”

    i believe this is true. i used to be a SJW and i saw all the flaws with america and i campaigned for and voted for obama. then i discovered the red pill, then the political red pill, and also i moved to europe, and now i love american much more, and i love trump.

    rivelino

    June 19, 2016 at 7:02 pm

    • America is much easier to love from far away. That goes for anybody or any place.

      I’m often pretty negative about America, but the hunger and striving to rise to the top is what is both best and worst about America. It’s a restlessness that causes people to leave everything and everybody behind for that life with a 4000 sq ft house in the exurbs filled with stuff but a life devoid of time and deep relationships to make it all truly satisfying. America is the opposite of serfdom. Serfdom is knowing your place and finding contentment with it. America is wanting (and often getting) more but never knowing contentment.

      Thin-Skinned Masta-Beta

      June 20, 2016 at 1:51 pm

      • George Carlin’s spiel about the American Dream. He’s always funny and right to the point.

        He sums everything up in one session, that readers here regurgitate on an annual basis.

        JS

        June 23, 2016 at 11:32 am

    • English Speaking, Mano-prole-sphere types don’t belong in Europe and Montreal.

      JS

      June 23, 2016 at 10:40 am

  18. Why should country be ruled like a family and Not like a firm or a co-op ?

    Bruno from Paris

    June 20, 2016 at 1:03 am

  19. OT, but interesting map:

    Camlost

    June 20, 2016 at 3:36 pm

    • I love maps like that. But does it correct for per capita GDP?

      gothamette

      June 21, 2016 at 3:48 pm

  20. “The real lesson here is everyone is expendable except for the kids. It’s tribal.” When the country is ruled as a family, it’s what happen. It’s sad that the biggest democracy in the world select it’s former president among a former president’s wife and a billionnaire. It shows how democracy is flawed and legitimate thirld word leaders ….

    Bruno from Paris

    June 23, 2016 at 8:28 am

    • Les bonnes réponses!

      The bottom line is that America is a flea market of bartering and trading. What unites the country, besides money? Nothing.

      JS

      June 23, 2016 at 10:38 am


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: