Lion of the Blogosphere

Cute Hillary Clinton


She was not as sexy as Tiffany Trump, for sure, but she was pretty cute for a Wellesley graduate.

Written by Lion of the Blogosphere

July 3, 2016 at 12:39 pm

Posted in Politics

58 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Exactly, young Hillary was pretty. I think it is that she is just such a lezzie shrew that it causes her to appear unattractive to some men, but she really does have a pretty face.

    Greasy William

    July 3, 2016 at 12:54 pm

    • Her Republican father taught her some valuable life lessons before the Wellsley brainwashing kicked in.

      She went hard for her man, locked hm down and gave up better career opportunities so that she could move to Arkansas! With him. And those are precisely the decisions that make her the Presidential frontrunner, certainly not any tangible accomplishments, great charisma, or character.

      Compare her life to the bumbling failure of feminist raised Chelsea Clinton’s life. All of the advantages in the world and she can’t accomplish anything, & her manlet husband practically had to be arranged married for her.


      July 4, 2016 at 6:09 pm

      • Chelsea married the son of a convicted insider trader. Insider traders rule the world.


        July 4, 2016 at 10:49 pm

  2. Can’t agree. Way too much forehead. Attractive mouth.


    July 3, 2016 at 1:13 pm

  3. Both Bill and Hillary looked great when they were young, yet their only child is unattractive.


    July 3, 2016 at 1:22 pm

    • It happens; the child gets facial features/body parts from his/her parents that just doesn’t look great in that configuration. Genes are a wildcard.

      Sorta like the daughter of Christi Brinkley and Billy Joel. She got his looks and her brains. Oy.


      July 3, 2016 at 3:24 pm

      • Alexa Ray Joel is attractive. Comparing her to her mother is unrealistic. Brinkley was a supermodel. Alexa is attractive next to the average woman her age.


        July 3, 2016 at 7:18 pm

      • Yes, sometimes it’s amazing how two people who are related can look so similar and yet so different. In my high school there were several pairs of sisters who looked very, very similar, so much so that a stranger off the street who’d never met them before could have pegged them as sisters immediately upon first glance. Yet very clearly, one was the “hot” one and the other was not. It was hard to put your finger on why, but somehow virtually the same features combined slightly differently in each, and it just “worked” in one and didn’t in the other.


        July 3, 2016 at 9:19 pm

      • “It was hard to put your finger on why, but somehow virtually the same features combined slightly differently in each, and it just “worked” in one and didn’t in the other.”

        Attractiveness is a function of averages, symmetry and proportion. Galton showed that a composite photograph of a large number of people was more attractive than any of the individuals because it’s the most “average”. Similarly, taking a photograph of a person face, cutting it in half and using a mirror image of that half to reproduce the missing half results in a photo noticeably more attractive than the original because it’s the most symmetrical. Composite and mirrored faces would also b more proportional relative to the original(s).


        July 4, 2016 at 12:18 pm

    • Chelsea is the daughter of Hilary Clinton and Webster Hubbell. She has her father’s looks. If you don’t believe me, just compare pictures of Chelsea and Webster.

      Robert the Wise

      July 4, 2016 at 4:23 pm

  4. whoa, impressive. much bettery than tiffany trump. less tacky sexy, but more naturally beautiful.

    jesus, what happened.


    July 3, 2016 at 1:25 pm

    • Riv, I hate to sound like I’m saying “duh” to you, but I think what happened is 48 years passed. Didn’t Hillary graduate college in 1968? You’d be saying worse than this if you saw what I looked like that year. I was a trim 7 year old cutie pie. Now I’m overweight and have a full upper denture (not that I look terrible considering these two factors.). Moral of the story: people get old.


      July 3, 2016 at 4:23 pm

      • for a second, i thought you were saying that in 1968 you were a “7” (on a 1-10 scale) — then i re-read your comment.


        July 3, 2016 at 6:02 pm

      • No, this is not allowed. Especially for women.

        Actually I don’t think there is a old women alive, or middle aged, who could make through the looks gauntlet. If she looked good like Sarah Palin, then of course she’s stupid. If she was smart and attractive, she’s evil.

        Mrs Stitch

        July 3, 2016 at 6:50 pm

      • Being a bitch consistently for 50 years has a damaging effect on appearing attractive and feminine.

        Panther of the Blogocube

        July 3, 2016 at 7:52 pm

      • MaryK — Some of that is genes but a lot of it is lifestyle. One can’t be inactive and eat junk food and expect to look good as they age. This is especially true starting in the mid to late 40’s.


        July 4, 2016 at 12:32 pm

  5. You need to post this line of yours, is it originally yours?, under you blog title:

    “Liberals never apologize for being wrong, they just move on to the next outrage.”

    Excellent line.


    July 3, 2016 at 1:25 pm

  6. Age, DAT voice, demeanor, agenda, her body etc


    July 3, 2016 at 1:26 pm

  7. Hillary being warm and human:

    She’s talking there about a subject of genuine interest to all women: relationships. Specifically how she met Bill. She sounds cold and robotic when talking about politics because, like all women, she’s incapable of being interested in abstract subjects. It’s a boring job to her, like lawyering was before it.


    July 3, 2016 at 1:30 pm

    • “like all women, she’s incapable of being interested in abstract subjects”

      wtf? I love abstract subjects. That’s probably why I love Lion’s blog.


      July 3, 2016 at 4:16 pm

      • Why are women so fucking stupid?

        “I know an exception to what you just said!”

        The exception proves the rule. It doesn’t disprove it.

        Now, go play with your Barbies.

        Robert the Wise

        July 4, 2016 at 4:27 pm

      • The exception proves the rule. It doesn’t disprove it.

        Now, go play with your Barbies.

        Robert, Glossy didn’t say “like most women.” He said “like all women.” If he’d said the former I wouldn’t have reacted the same way. And yes, I know that tendency people have to act as if the exception disproves the rule. It IS an annoying trait, I agree.


        July 4, 2016 at 7:07 pm

    • Some of these HBD guys….sigh…

      Anyway, Hillary looks very pretty and feminine here, body language totally feminine, but this story – which I have heard numerous times – tells all. SHE approached HIM.

      Major wrong step here!

      The man always makes the first move. The relationship got off on the wrong foot and she has always been suspicious and jealous as a result – with good reason.


      July 3, 2016 at 5:56 pm

      • Interesting take.


        July 4, 2016 at 9:04 am

  8. Regardless of how pretty we here think she was, I wonder what she herself thought at the time. Given her background, more than comfortable upper middle class, you have to wonder how she got sucked into political radicalism, I.e. representing the Panthers and such. Was it a feeling of being unattractive, and thus fear of not fitting in to the existing WASP model?

    Tiny Blades

    July 3, 2016 at 1:40 pm

    • As shown in Dinesh D’souza’s documentary, America: Imagine the World Without Her, Hilary was a Goldwater Girl until she was seduced by the Dark Side via (((Saul Alinsky))).

      Robert the Wise

      July 4, 2016 at 4:30 pm

      • At the time Hillary went to college it wasn’t unusual for people to come out of college far more liberal than when they went in. – even if later on they moderated as they got older, married, and had kids. I never viewed Hillary as much of a think or intellectual. She simply saw that there was more power on the left than on the right and her family-instilled Goldwater-style political views shifted accordingly.


        July 4, 2016 at 7:10 pm

  9. Her steadily declined in attractiveness during the 1990s.


    July 3, 2016 at 1:47 pm

  10. Better picture of Hillary. From a website that says Bill was boinking another woman in the bathroom on their wedding day.


    July 3, 2016 at 2:18 pm

    • Bill isn’t so good looking himself in that picture. What a doofy haircut!

      • By the time Bill was gov and running for Pres. he was good looking. Good haircut and a robust dominating frame (over an otherwise flabby physique). Age has withered and shrunk him significantly.


        July 3, 2016 at 3:26 pm

  11. You only think of her as attractive because you are older. I think the vast majority of 20 year olds are attractive because I am older. I don’t seem to remember thinking just about all 20 year olds were attractive when I was 20.

    I though she was decent looking when she was 50 and i was quite a bit younger than her.


    July 3, 2016 at 3:03 pm

    • This is what I came in here to say. Once a man reaches a certain age (and I think I’ve reached that age,) just about any young girl, barring disfigurement or obesity, looks cute just because she’s young. I can look through my old yearbooks and find pictures of girls I saw as plain Janes back then, whom I never gave a moment’s thought to when I was their own age, and go “I’d elope with her tomorrow.”


      July 3, 2016 at 9:23 pm

    • When I was a teenager, I thought Hill was pretty attractive.


      July 4, 2016 at 9:00 am

  12. Glad you agree that HRC is/was pretty- her main problem at Wellesley was that, having fallen in with dyke feminists, she was badly groomed & wore birth control glasses most of the time. That is a great picture because the glasses are gone. Remember, no makeup and no special lighting. Posed, lit, and made up glam shots have ruined young men.

    I don’t believe HRC herself ever was, or is, lesbian, but they began to set the tone for high IQ women in the 1970s. The only way to escape them is by going off the rez entirely. Sad.


    July 3, 2016 at 3:07 pm

    • “I don’t believe HRC herself ever was, or is, lesbian …”

      Are you sure she hasn’t had lesbian sex with Huma Abedin?

      • Not sure of anything but I don’t think so. It’s a mother/daughter thing.

        Here’s another nice pic of young Hill:


        July 3, 2016 at 5:01 pm

    • There is 0 chance that Hil isn’t a lezzie. Everybody knows she is having an affair with Huma.

      Greasy William

      July 3, 2016 at 4:05 pm

  13. The ONLY cute thing about her there is that she looks young. My mind is steered towards “plain”, “not ugly”, “kinda frumpy”, and “boring”. Not “cute’

    not my name

    July 3, 2016 at 3:23 pm

  14. The crazy, drunken witch looked like a more attractive version of Chelsea.

    The Undiscovered Jew

    July 3, 2016 at 4:44 pm

  15. HRC was an average looking young woman for that era. Remember, this is before the obesity epidemic hit, and also a period when America was 85% white, when the ideal was more Grace Kelly or Marilyn Monroe rather than Kim Kardashian. (Slightly OT, but women’s enthusiasm in general for post-1965 immigration may subconsciously be due to the fact that most immigrants come from places where the women are far less attractive than the typical American woman, rather than being comprised of young, attractive women from, let’s say Italy or Sweden.)

    Leaving aside HRC’s average looks, there is the matter of her off-putting personality. A woman of average looks who is well dressed and well made-up can seem more attractive. That same woman, if her personality is bitchy, domineering, or just plain grouchy will seem more like a 3.

    Sgt. Joe Friday

    July 3, 2016 at 5:00 pm

    • Grace Kelly and Monroe were late 50s icons. By the late 60s the icons were more of the hippie type and because of the sexual revolution the “sex symbol” was in remission. There was no one look. But it’s kind of fun to go through memory lane.

      The great rock beauty was Michelle Phillips. Barbara Hershey was young & beautiful then, as was Susan Sarandon. The two women who singlehandedly destroyed 1950s hairspray and teasing, etc., were Mary Travers and Joan Baez.


      July 3, 2016 at 6:01 pm

    • And I should add exudes an agreeable, pleasant, feminine personality.

      Sgt. Joe Friday

      July 3, 2016 at 6:02 pm

  16. Makes me think of The Shining.


    July 3, 2016 at 5:01 pm

  17. She was a student protest…leader. Shes a power mad politician. She is known to be very dominant and abusive to her underlings. She stood by Bill for 20 years and 2000 women.

    She definitely has lesbian tendencies. But they say Chelsea is this man’s daughter:

    The Philosopher

    July 3, 2016 at 6:23 pm

    • Yeah, I’d heard it said that Chelsea is Webster Hubbell’s child. She does sort of look like him. But then I’ve seen a picture of a young teen Hillary and Chelsea sort of looks like her too. So you never know.


      July 3, 2016 at 7:22 pm

  18. I wonder why she always wears those ugly pant suits. Could that be some sort of lesbian thing?


    July 3, 2016 at 6:26 pm

  19. What makes you say Wellesley girls aren’t attractive? One thing to keep in mind is that in the 1960s they used to lock up the female students so women weren’t really expecting to have much more sexual contact with men at coed schools than at single sex ones. Wellesley was also in particular known for being very conservative and existing to prepare women for upper middle and upper class marriages. There was a Julia Roberts movie about that based on Hillary Clinton’s own experiences.

    Even now they’re young and generally from wealthy families and maybe self select in a way that makes them less attractive than other women from their background but I still bet they’re on average very attractive.


    July 4, 2016 at 12:57 am

  20. Adorably dorky. I don’t agree that Chelsea is bad-looking either. She was a mess as a teenager, but has cleaned up her act quite a bit since then.

    All this grudgingly admitted by someone who loathes the Clintons passionately.


    July 4, 2016 at 1:18 am

    • “Adorably dorky” – the new internet word is “adorkable.”

      Chelsea looks exactly like a combination of Mom & Dad – the face is all the wrong parts, much smoothed by plastic surgery. The body OTOH is much better than Mom’s – she has Dad’s body type without his tendency towards gluttony induced plumpness, on a 5’9″ thin frame. Very nice. There were pics of her as a ballet student when she was in the WH that showed lovely legs without Mom’s cankles.


      July 4, 2016 at 12:08 pm

    • Chelsea had cosmetic surgery between then and now.

      Robert the Wise

      July 4, 2016 at 4:50 pm

  21. On a 10 point scale I’d rate her a 4.


    July 4, 2016 at 12:55 pm

    • lol wut? I guess she is no Beyonce, Olivia Wilde, or Julia Roberts, mediocre looking women who you probably love.

      Otis the Sweaty

      July 4, 2016 at 3:01 pm

      • Only a stupid troll like Otis would rate Beyonce as even mediocre. Like most black women, Beyonce looks like a man. Just google Beyonce ugly.

        Robert the Wise

        July 4, 2016 at 4:55 pm

      • In hindsight, I should downgrade Hillary because Roberts is more of a 4. She’s horse-faced. Speaking of…


        July 4, 2016 at 6:31 pm

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: