Lion of the Blogosphere

Where hipsters send their kids to school

“2 Minute Alpha” wrote in a comment:

In my vibrant neighborhood the latino kids waiting for the school bus outnumber the black kids 8-2 I would wager, 4 years ago that was reversed. No white kids, white people live in my neighborhood but all fruitless hipsters.

It’s not that hipsters have no children, it’s that they wouldn’t send their kids to a public school that’s 80% Hispanic and 20% black. (Exception: there are a very tiny number of hipsters who are such extreme SJWs that they would subject their kids to the horror of such a school. At least for a short time until the obvious problems emerge.)

Either they move away from that neighborhood when they have kids, they send their kids to a private school, or they forgo having them because children are too expensive. That is, they are too expensive given the current social and political situation. Before school desegregation and modern super-high-investment parenting, family formation was much more affordable for white parents

Written by Lion of the Blogosphere

October 3, 2016 at 2:34 pm

Posted in Politics

141 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. I live in F-train Brooklyn now — the most striking thing about my neighborhood is that there are so few children older than ~1st or 2nd grade, likely because so many people move out to the suburbs by that time. I’ll probably end up doing the same thing.

    We’ve had a number of block parties over the last few weeks, and they were basically just children’s parties. Weird.

    Renault

    October 3, 2016 at 2:56 pm

    • I just love the vicious cycle of the SWPL types who come from the suburbs, then spent their entire 20s and 30s in NYC, segregated from NAMs, and when they get married and have kids, they move back to square one. The schools in the local vicinity have a NAM majority, who come from neighboring areas, and private schools are too pricey, so they pack their bags and move back where they literally come from.

      This goes to show you the stupidity of this process. A waste of time and a waste of resources. America is effing lost cause, because of this reason of trying to be a 1st world civilization among 3rd world undesirables.

      Telecommuting would solve these issues overnight, which is the reason why I’m in French Canada, taking advantage of the few opportunities which allows me to work remotely in a cosmopolitan area away from this nonsense they call the United States.

      JS

      October 3, 2016 at 6:05 pm

      • Canada sucks and you talk like a fag.

        The Ape Man

        October 4, 2016 at 1:10 pm

      • And while we’re on the subject:

        Name a decent place in America that is cosmopolitan and doesn’t cost a fortune to reside. This is my criteria.

        JS

        October 4, 2016 at 2:40 pm

      • True story: my GF and I have talked (not too seriously) about trying to move to Montreal for at least a few years.

        Renault

        October 4, 2016 at 8:59 pm

      • My constant rant on this blog about Québec, being the most livable region of North America, makes a lot of sense to people with higher IQs.

        Montréal is the only other city in the New World, that has any semblance to Manhattan, in terms of its international feel, but Whiter and French.

        JS

        October 5, 2016 at 12:39 am

      • I would definitely be down to try, but it’d be pretty difficult for me to get a job there without being fluent in French. We’ll see.

        Renault

        October 5, 2016 at 12:55 am

      • Montréal is not known to be a money oriented city like NYC. Most jobs in the city pay less than the other parts of Canada, and certainly they pay less with what you find in the states. You might have to resort to jobs that are deemed lower status in the states, if you want to live there, because many White collar jobs require French fluency.

        Someone offered me a position to be a part time chef assistant at a restaurant for $12/hr in Canadian dollars, not requiring French — if I decide to work there. This only pays the rent and I get to eat at the restaurant, or make my own food, so I have few hundred saved up/month.

        The upside to lower salaries is that you get to enjoy the city with its unbridled creativity with access to a lot of social capital for those who like “culture”.

        At first it might be hard to adjust, because Wall St finance types tend to be very one dimensional with their approach to life. Maybe you can get a telecommuting job with a NY based company and that would allow you to live like a king.

        Some readers here advocate a basic income. Imagine a basic income was doled out to people living in “cool cities”. I think people elsewhere would be up in arms, because they live in a boring town with basic income, and others are living in an exciting city with basic income, so there is inequality with this arrangement.

        JS

        October 7, 2016 at 11:33 am

  2. One of my college frat brothers and his wife are a couple of far left liberals. They lived in a, shall we say, “vibrant” part of the San Fernando Valley, and the wife told that they were going to send their kids to the local public school because they were big believers in diversity.

    Strangely enough, it was right around the time that their oldest was about to start kindergarten that they moved to a northern LA county suburb known for being home to lots of cops and fire fighters, and also known for being a white enclave.

    Sgt. Joe Friday

    October 3, 2016 at 2:57 pm

    • No means yes?

      My Two Cents

      October 3, 2016 at 8:35 pm

  3. There are a few emergent alternatives to public schools that savvy hipsters use. The first is charter schools that use esoteric curriculum. There’s a growing number of Latin schools soaking up SWPL kids because NAMs don’t care about Latin and parents get to claim the kids are receiving a humanistic education. The second is collective home schooling. There are a few Bay Area startups working on adding a tech component to this, but the idea is to spread the labor of teaching across multiple parents, have lots of field trips, and supplement it with computer courses. The third option is Catholic schools. I haven’t heard much about this trend, but Catholic schools are surprisingly affordable, so I think they could be a growing option in the next decade.

    Aristippus

    October 3, 2016 at 3:22 pm

    • My impression is that hipsters abhor Catholic schools along the lines of “bitter clingers”

      roxboroughson

      October 3, 2016 at 4:59 pm

      • I’ve told this story here before, but some years ago our new across the street neighbors were hipsters who emigrated from brooklyn, lured by the beautiful homes and– at least then– affordable prices (fyi, SI real estate has skyrocketed). They had two young boys around ages 3 and 6.

        The mother was in sheer PANIC over where to send the kids to school. A fellow hipster friend of theirs (whom I also knew) tried a local charter school but was so disgusted by the NAMs/ prole whites/ junk food/ tacky parties that they fled to NJ where they enrolled their children in an environmental charter school.

        Anyway, during one conversation with the panicking mother we covered the possibilities (she begged me to start a homeschool coop with her, I declined). I politely put forth the possibility of catholic school, recommending a school that, at the time, was 99% white.

        The look of sheer disgust on her face went undisguised while she stammered out some excuse over why that just wouldn’t work.

        The funny thing is, the Catholic church is insanely liberal except on abortion. I routinely refer to them as pro life communists.

        That catholic school I recommended has rapidly turned from mostly white to 70% NAM in the lower grades. Why, I don’t know; it’s possible the school began accepting vouchers (not all catholic schools do). The white families are moving to the schools that don’t accept vouchers.

        Those neighbors eventually moved to an all white community in Florida.

        slithy_toves

        October 3, 2016 at 6:50 pm

      • I think more and more SWPLs are going to come around to Catholic schools because the proportion of working class Irish and Italian students is decreasing. I’ve known a few Jews and Asians who went to Catholic schools because they were the best local options. My understanding is that the religious component of Catholic schools is slowly getting phased out and replaced with more social justice and they’re getting the “right” type of diversity (smarter or at least superbly athletic blacks, middle class white Hispanics, Jews, and Asians). In 2nd and 3rd tier cities at least, it’s also ridiculously cheap to send kids to a mostly white Catholic school when the price is compared to a traditional day school.

        Aristippus

        October 3, 2016 at 8:35 pm

      • The funny thing is, the Catholic church is insanely liberal except on abortion. I routinely refer to them as pro life communists.

        You bet. Walk through the halls of any Catholic school and you’ll see the same pro-environment, pro-diversity crap you’ll see in a public school. But it is all put in a Bible context.

        My understanding is that the religious component of Catholic schools is slowly getting phased out

        Not where I am. The local Catholic elementary school has a strong emphasis on Catholicism, as it should. (But also on muh planet and muh diversity, as it should not.) Daily prayer, crucifix and saints in every classroom, kids are doing some form of Bible study every day.

        Tarl

        October 4, 2016 at 9:57 am

    • In Canada SWPL parents will often send their kids to French immersion school because it is considered to be a bit more upscale. It is also free, and is public school. In the small city I live in I think all the schools are majority white. There aren’t many minorities here, and certainly not enough to form neighbourhoods (unless you are talking about the Indian Reserve across the river).

      A coworker and her family moved here from New York city and they have their little girl in French immersion. I think schools were one of the major reasons they came here (her husband is Canadian).

      Rosenmop

      October 3, 2016 at 5:12 pm

      • Why don’t you encourage Yakov to move up there and be your neighbor?

        JS

        October 3, 2016 at 6:54 pm

      • Moreover, French immersion classes are free for everyone regardless of age in French Canada.

        I can’t fathom any Canadian city or province that is racially diverse as those south of them, with the exception of Vancouver/British Columbia and Toronto/Ontario. The former is an extension of East Asia and the latter is a “51st state”. And Québec has tried very hard to remain majority White, at least in culture, while Anglo provinces like Ontario are doing exactly what the Anglo Sphere like to do — become a capitalistic, multiculti empire, where a few at the top are screwing anyone below them for a buck.

        JS

        October 4, 2016 at 12:16 pm

      • I wanna take a free French immersion class. What do you need to qualify?

        Yakov

        October 4, 2016 at 7:55 pm

      • JS, you’d told me you would pay taxes on cash income, hadn’t you? But then you told me that you pay no US taxes by living in Canada and no Canadian taxes by hiding your income? So you are worse than me! You rip off TWO countries while pontificating on the virtue of being an upright citizen! You are a cheat and a hypocrit, monsieur!

        Lion, JS needs to be suspended until he repents and admits the outrage the he’s committed. Also, he should be required to donate $100 to the Trump campaign. So here is the program:

        1. Suspension till after Yom Kippur.
        2. Repentance to be allowed back in. Repentance doesn’t mean he has to pay taxes, only to admit that he is a hypocrite and a phony.
        3. $100 contribution. If he doesn’t want to give it to Trump, let him contribute to a museum or a park. I’m flexible on this point.

        Yakov

        October 5, 2016 at 1:30 am

      • I did not cheat at all. I legally avoided US taxes, because I earned my income while living in Canada, and I avoided Canadian taxes, because I do not work for a Canadian company or deal with Canadian clients. I telecommute with a US company which is currently a “gray area”. I said I will declare some of my income with the Canadian tax authorities just to be nice. The wonders of technology has rendered many of our societal laws as irrelevant, and thus, I’m taking advantage of the situation.

        JS

        October 5, 2016 at 1:42 pm

      • Furthermore, I need to research if I need to pay taxes to Canada, because I’m on a tourist visa. I don’t even have a Social Identity Number as of yet (Canada’s equivalent of our SS#).

        JS

        October 5, 2016 at 1:44 pm

      • Yakov, I just answered my own question:

        http://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/filing-tax-as-a-visitor-t268863.0.html

        Visitors to Canada do not have to get a Social Identity Number or pay taxes. Again, I only telecommute and did not work on for a company or anyone located in Canada.

        JS

        October 5, 2016 at 1:55 pm

      • This is absolutely brilliant! Wow! OK, I take my words back. Your reputation as an upright tax paying citizen remains untarnished.

        Yakov

        October 5, 2016 at 5:38 pm

      • A tourist visa in Canada can last as long as 2 years. You will be considered a non-resident (visitor) and will not be paying any Canadian taxes. Technically, you are not even allowed to work or generate income in Canada, because of your visa status. You need a work visa for that. But telecommuting is this “gray area”, which allows me to generate money in Canada with an American company remotely, which is not based in Canada.

        Yes, it’s brilliant!

        JS

        October 6, 2016 at 12:02 pm

    • Yep. My friend and his French Canadian wife are contemplating home schooling.

      Dain

      October 3, 2016 at 5:42 pm

    • Yes, and Latin schools aren’t the interest of East Asian families, and thus, SWPL parents don’t have to worry about their kids associating with their children. It’s a great idea, both NAMs and Asians don’t care about studying dead languages.

      JS

      October 3, 2016 at 6:17 pm

      • I agree that Asians (with the exception of Japanese) don’t understand the point of liberal arts.

        Lion of the Blogosphere

        October 3, 2016 at 9:08 pm

      • When you go from a democracy to oligarchy, exactly what is the point of a liberal arts education?

        Curle

        October 4, 2016 at 3:03 am

      • You missed the point.

        Most East Asians don’t care for the liberal arts, and Latin schools are a good method SWPL parents to shield their kids away from East Asians, who only care about vocational endeavors.

        JS

        October 4, 2016 at 11:38 am

      • I agree that Asians (with the exception of Japanese) don’t understand the point of liberal arts.

        Maybe you got the idea from my comments on Pumpkin Person’s blog.

        When Japan was westernizing in the 18th century, they developed an interest for Western literature, besides the usual scientific/technical manuals which they were translating into Japanese. Japan managed to produce a few exceptional scholars in Classical Studies, a tradition which was never developed by the Chinese to this day

        JS

        October 4, 2016 at 3:17 pm

      • “When you go from a democracy to oligarchy, exactly what is the point of a liberal arts education?”

        I laughed…at first.

        Mike Street Station

        October 4, 2016 at 6:56 pm

      • it’s not that the liberal arts, or whatever the “useless” subject, has no value.

        (it does…they do…even though their value cannot be “accounted for”.)

        it’s that no one should pay for a degree in such subjects. and the number of faculty/professionals in these fields is 10x what it should be…at least.

        MBAs have ruined america. i know that.

        the liberal arts have value…still. i know that.

        but at the same time i know that…one should never pay for a credential in the liberal arts, and any who accept payment for such credentials are bad people…bad people.

        I WON! YOU LOST! GET OVER IT!

        October 5, 2016 at 11:27 pm

      • Asians have ruined America’s STEM curriculum. The majority of them have no intellectual inclinations in regards to the subject matter. There is no point for universities to encourage this demographic to embark on STEM, because it costs too much. Instead, vocational programs should be tailored for them, which would cost significantly less.

        JS

        October 6, 2016 at 11:48 am

    • Yes, collective home schooling is a big thing among SWPLs in the Boston area as well. It has a very left wing bent to it, unlike home schooling down South.

      Peter Akuleyev

      October 4, 2016 at 5:10 am

      • “left wing” but not multi culti of the real sort. multi culti of the hypothetical sort.

        So gays and blacks and diversity are “good” for rednecks but not so “good” for the white Bostonian children.

        not too late

        October 5, 2016 at 10:06 pm

  4. Describes my gentrifying Oakland neighborhood exactly. Plenty of white people around – drinking at the microbrewery or eating at the gastro pub – but almost zero white kids in the elementary school across from me.

    Dain

    October 3, 2016 at 3:23 pm

  5. Because of immigration and globalism, white people can’t have nice things. Like children.

    peterike

    October 3, 2016 at 3:33 pm

    • I can’t get around the fact that Russia’s TFR is even lower. And TFR is plunging practically worldwide.

      Fiddlesticks

      October 3, 2016 at 4:54 pm

      • Except for Africa. In the 21st century, the rest of the world will be overwhelmed by a black tidal wave.

        Tarl

        October 4, 2016 at 9:59 am

      • It’s not that difficult to understand why. Humans are increasing unnecessary. This is especially true if you’re a prole married to another prole, you can either enjoy your meager extra income and time or create prole children who will have to compete against machines for children. Stop lamenting proles for their low TFR.

        prolesgonnaprole

        October 4, 2016 at 11:31 am

    • Or live in decent neighborhoods without breaking the bank.

      Remember, affordability in America signifies NAM friendly!

      JS

      October 3, 2016 at 6:13 pm

  6. There wouldn’t be hipsters in the first place if they could have kids, because then the men would have to have real jobs and the women would have to do housework and take care of the kids.

    Tom

    October 3, 2016 at 3:55 pm

    • There’s also the power-couple option–both parents work and hire a nanny.

      SFG

      October 3, 2016 at 7:03 pm

  7. Hadn’t White people stopped having children before that Immigration Act of 1965 or whenever it was changed everything? Wasn’t the pop-hipsterism of the ’60s basically a decision to stay childish instead of having children? Southling immigration was an importation of pseudo-children, maybe. The hipster-ladies could take care of these children instead of their own. So although Peterike’s right that because of massive Southling immigration and welfarism we can’t have children I think that our decision not to have any more children preceded the social agenda that made it impossible to have children. But why did we decide not to have any more children? Maybe because we no longer believed there was an Eternal Pattern that we could conform ourselves to by producing another generation. That is — we Lost Our Religion. Yesterday I was passing nice Mexican families in my neighborhood coming home from church (mainly Pentecostal storefront churches here) — Dad, Mom, and three little kids in their Sunday outfits — and first thought, “Why can’t I have this?” and next thought, “Maybe it’s a good thing that they’re replacing us.” They’re more human than we are, because they live in families and worship together. But then I remembered that there’s no way they can survive on their own. Most of them would starve without the Machine We Maintain. The survivors would, in Jim’s words, return to running through the woods with sharpened sticks … but they’d live in families and worship together.

    Garr

    October 3, 2016 at 4:13 pm

    • Garr,

      Birth rates around the world have dropped precipitously except in Africa.

      Look up Vietnam’s birthrate. South Korea’s.

      Get a clue.

      gothamette

      October 3, 2016 at 5:42 pm

      • Because they also Lost Their Religion. Why do you say things like “Get a clue”? Why can’t you just be sweet? Women are supposed to be sweet. They’re not supposed to say things like “Get a clue”.

        Garr

        October 3, 2016 at 7:53 pm

      • Haha. I like you, Garr.

        Jason Liu

        October 4, 2016 at 11:40 am

      • “Why can’t you just be sweet? Women are supposed to be sweet. They’re not supposed to say things like “Get a clue”.”

        Now days you’re supposed to tell them to smile. According to twitter, that really pisses them off.

        Mike Street Station

        October 4, 2016 at 6:59 pm

      • Garr, you are a sensitive crazy giant. This is also a reason that people don’t marry and have kids. Imagine, like you come home from work and you hear your wife going like ‘eff this…’ and ‘eff that… ‘ like a whore. You wanna come home to a her? Not me, no way! When I hear a woman effing away, she becomes asexual in my mind.

        Read ‘The White Company’ and ‘The Black Arrow’ to see how a woman should behave. Those were the days…. I make sure my grandkids read them. Good books. Classics. Instead they push disgusting books like ‘Catcher in the Rye’. Society is gone crazy, mate.

        Yakov

        October 4, 2016 at 7:38 pm

      • This is also a reason that people don’t marry and have kids. Imagine, like you come home from work and you hear your wife going like ‘eff this…’ and ‘eff that… ‘ like a whore. You wanna come home to a her?

        Nothing a good wife beating can’t solve.

        The Undiscovered Jew

        October 4, 2016 at 10:21 pm

      • Our religion doesn’t allow beating women.

        Yakov

        October 4, 2016 at 10:53 pm

      • Our religion doesn’t allow beating women.

        Surely it ranks wife beating as a lesser offense than eating pork?

        The Undiscovered Jew

        October 5, 2016 at 8:14 pm

      • Both are a לאו דאוריתא, so technically they are equal in severity. The punishment and attonment are different though. Neither one is a good idea. I would think that given a choice between eating pork and striking an innocent man, eating pork is preferable as it is a transgression between man and G-d and G-d understands, so to speak. On the other hand, pork becomes part of your body in a way and that’s not so easy to purge, whereas if you hit a man, he’ll heal like nothing happened. So it’s not so simple what’s better. I would still think eating pork is better for the above mentioned reason.

        A lot of Jews have this obsession with pork. I wonder why? It’s just an animal and there is plenty of them to eat. This is weird. Like why does everybody think that they need to eat pork?

        Yakov

        October 5, 2016 at 9:10 pm

      • It’s just an animal and there is plenty of them to eat. This is weird. Like why does everybody think that they need to eat pork?

        It’s hard to stop eating after the first piece of bacon or slice of NY style pepperoni pizza “becomes part of your body”.

        The Undiscovered Jew

        October 5, 2016 at 10:06 pm

      • But is it a good thing? Who are more likely to have offspring and survive the Jews that NY pepperoni pizza ‘part of their bodies’ or the ones that don’t?

        Yakov

        October 5, 2016 at 10:48 pm

      • i’m not a jew…obviously.

        but i refuse to eat pork.

        why?

        because even if the pig had been treated humanely (very unlikely)…

        pigs are smart.

        i knew a pig. he was smart.

        eating a pig is like eating a dog or a cat or a dolphin or a killer whale or a whale or a monkey or a chimp or a…

        no horse for me either thank you.

        but then again…

        if i were stranded on a desert island full of feral pigs and feral dogs…

        i’d go for the pigs.

        I WON! YOU LOST! GET OVER IT!

        October 5, 2016 at 11:10 pm

      • But is it a good thing? Who are more likely to have offspring and survive the Jews that NY pepperoni pizza ‘part of their bodies’ or the ones that don’t?

        You sound confidant the Lion isn’t a Hasidic Jew with 12 children. Don’t be so sure…

        The Undiscovered Jew

        October 6, 2016 at 9:11 pm

      • For all you know the Lion is a pork eating Hasidic Jew.

        The Undiscovered Jew

        October 6, 2016 at 9:12 pm

      • Yum, pork.

        Lion of the Blogosphere

        October 6, 2016 at 9:23 pm

      • i knew a pig. he was smart.

        eating a pig is like eating a dog or a cat or a dolphin or a killer whale or a whale or a monkey or a chimp or a…

        Not nearly smart enough to justify NOT turning it into bacon.

        The Undiscovered Jew

        October 6, 2016 at 9:14 pm

      • You are what eat, in a certain sense. So a porky may be smart, but eating it – not so much. No matter how smart you and your swine are, you ain’t smarter than the Bible. Nobody is. Case closed.

        Yakov

        October 6, 2016 at 10:22 pm

      • Nobody is. Case closed.

        Yakov is not taking the porky bait Lion put in front of him.

        The Undiscovered Jew

        October 7, 2016 at 5:15 pm

    • There is nothing wrong with having fewer children. White nations were already over populated with whites. Decreasing the population is a good idea for many reasons.

      However, when you have a declining white population at the same time as exploding non-white populations, then what you have is race replacement, which is the apocalypse (no exaggeration).

      If Germany, Sweden, UK, etc. were still 99% white, declining populations would hold little challenge to them. It would keep wages up and housing prices down. But the current situation is a disaster. Same thing if America was still 90% white, 9.5% black and 0.5% “other.” Overall population reduction would be beneficial, no matter what the globalist Orcs at The Economist say.

      peterike

      October 3, 2016 at 5:43 pm

      • Im glad I was born in the 70s. I’ll be dead before the NAM takeover.

        Bobo

        October 4, 2016 at 12:36 am

      • Declining population would also be a huge boon to the environment. If you believe in global warming the last thing you should want is billions of new people being born chewing up resources and causing more methane and CO2 to be belched into the atmosphere.

        Peter Akuleyev

        October 4, 2016 at 5:13 am

      • I’ve just read the penultimate chapter of Evola’s Men Among the Ruins (1972); this chapter makes a reactionary case for non-breeding sex by the monk-like reactionary elite and is very pro-birth control and opposed to the Catholic Church on this point. He thought that European overpopulation was a huge problem. (I guess he didn’t realize that the baby-boom, if it occurred there also [?] was over.) He thinks that to see sex as “for children” is animalistic, and that using birth control is a kind of control of one’s animal passions. (Maybe because it’s annoying to put on a condom right before entry, and this act symbolizes the intelligent containment of the urge that made the organ stiff?) But his indifference to children and to the beauty of moments of domestic friendship is a big blindspot, and perhaps explains why he’s able to be so contemptuous of “bourgeois” life — unable to appreciate its quiet depth. You may be right, Peterike, that White nations would be perfectly functional at sub-replacement birthrates were it not for Southling immigration; but they would be missing something beautiful and important.

        Garr

        October 4, 2016 at 6:31 am

      • Declining population would also be a huge boon to the environment.

        It is the TYPE of people, not the NUMBER, that harms the environment.

        A large and growing population of environmentally friendly Whites will not harm the environment much. They have high future time orientation, they care about the environment, and they’re smart enough to fix any problems they create. On the other hand even a relatively small population of NAMs will fuck the environment up royally. Low future time orientation, low IQ, and they don’t care.

        Tarl

        October 4, 2016 at 10:03 am

      • There is nothing wrong with having fewer children. White nations were already over populated with whites. Decreasing the population is a good idea for many reasons.

        This is what I call another “dire problem”, just like the economic dire problem. In fact it’s true that there are Too Many People – North America would be better with about a tenth of its current population, and one of the things I love about Canada is that there is a lot of unspoiled outdoor space here.

        But anyway the Dire Problem is that despite overpopulation, fertility is such a marker of a healthy society. As Charlton has pointed out with his “mouse utopia” posts, the spookiest thing in the world is to see a population that has EVERYTHING somehow begin to become depressed, anxious and stop reproducing.

        Healthy, desirable cultures want to reproduce themselves, and ergo have high fertility, but what to do when the population limit is reached? Branch out into space, I say!

        Samson J.

        October 4, 2016 at 11:35 am

      • Im glad I was born in the 70s. I’ll be dead before the NAM takeover.

        Here’s a comparison of Canada vs America – apple to apple, in terms of demographics:

        And why does Canada suck because of this reason?

        JS

        October 4, 2016 at 2:50 pm

      • Here’s a comparison of Canada vs America – apple to apple, in terms of demographics:

        Wiki says:

        “Statistics Canada projects that, by 2031, almost one-half of the population over the age of 15 will be foreign-born or have at least one foreign-born parent. The number of visible minorities will double and make up the majority of the population of cities in Canada.”

        That means that Canada does not now suck. But Canada will suck.

        Tarl

        October 4, 2016 at 4:59 pm

      • …which is the apocalypse (no exaggeration)…

        as it was foretold in the eddas.

        Surtr moves from the south
        with the scathe of branches:
        there shines from his sword
        the sun of Gods of the Slain.

    • That was around the time the birth control pill came out. But lots of white people were still having kids in the 60’s. By the late 70’s, when I had my first baby, having babies had certainly gone out of style, especially having kids young. She was born in Vancouver, and I (and my relatives) had our very first multicultural shock when we saw the babies in the nursery: over half of them were non-white–mostly East Indian I think. We knew there was immigration in Vancouver, but we had never seen so many non-whites at one time. It was quite a shock. One morning I did a double take when they brought me the wrong baby–an East Indian baby (I had dark brown hair and was sleeping on my stomach). That was not my baby!

      Rosenmop

      October 3, 2016 at 6:19 pm

    • Garr, no reason you can’t go to church. I have recently become a practicing Catholic, and it feels great to feel connected wih the “eternal pattern” you mention.

      Two in the Bush

      October 3, 2016 at 8:12 pm

      • Ugh, is this what it means to be a REAL conservative, succumbing to anti-intellectual hocus pocus and Vatican worship because it means more babies being popped out of pink and brown cunts, as opposed to just brown ones?

        No thanks.

        Dain

        October 4, 2016 at 11:36 am

      • Dain – in my experience, it beats going through life a cynical “intellectual” running away.

        Two in the Bush

        October 4, 2016 at 2:15 pm

    • Hadn’t White people stopped having children before that Immigration Act of 1965 or whenever it was changed everything?

      White TFR was 2.5 in 1965. At the time the act was passed demographers were predicting Western birth rates would rise again when baby boomers produced a new baby boom. Of course this never materialized; American white TFR fell to 2.1 in 1972 and has remained at 1.8 for four decades.

      The Undiscovered Jew

      October 3, 2016 at 9:45 pm

    • “But why did we decide not to have any more children? Maybe because we no longer believed there was an Eternal Pattern that we could conform ourselves to by producing another generation.”

      Nonsense; most white men still want to marry young and pump out lots of kids; simple male biological/psychological desire that cannot be changed. The problem is white WOMEN. Feminism and hypergamy have inflated their value in inverse proportion to their behavior and appearance. And their immutable and irreplacable value will *always* be that they are the*only* vessel in which a white man can have white children. They are sluts and careerists; unless you are in the top 15% of white men in some way YOU ARE LIKELY SCREWED in terms of having your own family and fulfilling your evolutionary purpose. Metadeath! White women have been weaponized against white men; they don’t have children, they compete against men in the workplace, AND they vote against the interests of white men.

      “Yesterday I was passing nice Mexican families in my neighborhood coming home from church (mainly Pentecostal storefront churches here) — Dad, Mom, and three little kids in their Sunday outfits — and first thought, ‘Why can’t I have this?'”

      THIS IS THE ISSUE. You absolutely *should* have this.

      Many time have I seen a Mexican man with his wife and several kids in tow. They are peasants. How can he possibly afford this? Moreover, why don’t I see middle class white guys who are honest educate workers with wife and 5 kids? Answer in two parts: 1) R-selected peoples are being subsidized. They have dozen kids even if your tax dollars aren’t subsidizing them. They don’t care if they’re dirt poor. It’s their way. 2) There aint enough white women around for marriage/breeding unless you’re in the top 15% of white male SMV. White women have become feminized monsters of ice. What considerable amount decent middle class white men have to offer is apparently not worth squat these days.

      Feminism + multiculturalism = the neutering and death of the White Man.

      If an intelligent young white man does NOT get himself on a prestigious career track (per Lion), he could be utterly screwed in reproducing himself. Meanwhile, the absolute WORST of society have endless kids all paid for by the government.

      fakeemail

      October 4, 2016 at 12:12 am

      • One of my big problems with family formation was the risk of divorce and getting hit with a huge alimony bill indefinitely. Not to mention child support if there are any.

        It is true that female hypergamy plus careerism means there are more women not willing to settle for any man they can have. But then they get old and get desperate.

        SFG

        October 4, 2016 at 6:36 am

      • Nonsense; most white men still want to marry young and pump out lots of kids; simple male biological/psychological desire that cannot be changed.

        What’s your evidence for this? No offense, but I think a lot of us Aspie types who comment on blogs project our thoughts and feelings onto the larger population. What you say is true of me as well, but I see no evidence that it’s true of most young men. I’ve never heard a non-devoutly religious young man speak of a desire to marry young and have lots of kids. ISTM that most want to spend their twenties partying and playing the field just like the girls do.

        Unfortunately, being in the top 15% of men is no guarantee either. I’m presumably there because I’m a doctor, but I’ve been unable to find a suitable wife. Though that might be because I just turned 40 and have not let go of the desire for a cute, nubile, young one.

        Hermes

        October 4, 2016 at 8:55 am

      • “Many time have I seen a Mexican man with his wife and several kids in tow. They are peasants. How can he possibly afford this?”

        Descartes: I think, therefore I am.

        Mexican peasant: I am, therefore I breed.

        Lewis Medlock

        October 4, 2016 at 2:54 pm

      • I’m presumably there because I’m a doctor

        Dude, you’re a psychiatrist – I bet you wear a bow tie.

        I kid, I kid! Kinda.

        Anyway, listen, women are nubile well into their 30s, man! I know you have other mandatory criteria too, and believe me my heart does break for this society full of people who can’t form quality marriages, but one thing I ain’t sympathetic to is this idea that only 22-year-olds are worth anything.

        Samson J.

        October 4, 2016 at 2:54 pm

      • My 36 yr old white engineer son followed me down to South America and married what I think of as an “off-white” young woman, a former beauty queen with a degree in biochemistry who is now a stay-at-home mom of two small and very fair boys while running a small photography biz. She has no tats, no piercings, doesn’t smoke, drink, drug or cuss, is very feminine, a great mom and dutiful homemaker… South America is the Promised Land for white guys wanting to find old-fashioned wives and opportunities. And we could use more NW European descended folks down here.

        Montefrío

        October 5, 2016 at 11:13 am

    • Rosenmop and TUJ — okay, so I was wrong in thinking that people had stopped having kids by 1965. I was born in 1966, and I think I read somewhere that this is considered the last year of the baby-boom. According to TUJ the birthrate began swooping downwards at about that point, though. So I might still be right in thinking that the same shift in overall attitude (a shift that I call Losing Our Religion) that resulted dropping White birthrates also produced the Immigration Act.
      Two in the Bush — thanks; I’ll bet it does feel great. Historical factors rule out that option for me as a deep role-playing-game, though, which is all that it could be given that I don’t believe the Nicene Creed to be true. It seems to me that Trump, when he becomes president, ought to declare himself the High Priest of Zeus (or maybe Hermes, since Trump’s a trickster-businessman) and bring back the Ancient Greek religion in some form.
      Fakeemail — it seems to me that there can’t be a simple “biological” desire to have kids, since animals don’t even know they’re going to produce offspring when they have sex. I think you’re right that religion-less men want kids, but I think that their desire for kids is part of an overall desire to have a place within an enduring scheme of things — a scheme that would be have to be religiously informed (since otherwise there is no scheme).
      A sidenote for Fakeemail — it seems to me that your application of the R vs. K distinction (I can never remember which is which) to Mexican vs. White reproduction leaves out an important distinction between people who are monogamous and have lots of kids (Sunset Park Mexicans) and people who aren’t monogamous and have lots of kids (Blacks). Anyway, Mexicans in Mexico don’t have as many kids as those here, and Whites here used to have as many kids as the Mexicans here do now. Plus, the Chinese up the hill also have lots of kids, and nobody ever says that the Chinese are “R-selected” (taking it from you that “R-selected” means a lots-of-kids as a opposed to lots-of-effort-on-a-few reproductive strategy).

      Garr

      October 4, 2016 at 7:00 am

      • It’s lower case r and capital K. The r stands for reproduction rate, and the K for carrying capacity. They’re terms in the logistic growth equation.

        rob

        October 4, 2016 at 12:31 pm

      • According to TUJ the birthrate began swooping downwards at about that point, though. So I might still be right in thinking that the same shift in overall attitude (a shift that I call Losing Our Religion) that resulted dropping White birthrates also produced the Immigration Act.

        Not if they were expecting the boomers to have their own baby boom and drive the birth rate back then, which they were.

        The early 1960s, btw, were culturally very similar to the 1950s. It’s unlikely that the shift in religious attitudes was enough to have influenced the 1965 act.

        The Undiscovered Jew

        October 4, 2016 at 10:18 pm

    • “They’re more human than we are, because they live in families and worship together. But then I remembered that there’s no way they can survive on their own.”

      In many ways 90 IQ Mexicans have a better understanding of human nature than white elites whose minds are hopelessly warped about a whole host of issues.

      Lewis Medlock

      October 4, 2016 at 11:57 am

      • I’m able to discuss the Compton killings of blacks by Hispanics, with a Mexican pizzeria worker much more comfortably, than the SWPL patron whom he serves.

        JS

        October 4, 2016 at 4:19 pm

    • I understand your problem and I want to say there is hope but perhaps in the long run. The immediate future is very dark. If you click on my name you (and I hope Lion and peterike too) can read my updated post on this. I will shortly post a second one.

      vdorta

      October 4, 2016 at 12:17 pm

      • I disagree with your assessment of modernity, and how it devours Western Civilization. It doesn’t. America is dying, because of its non-White demographic who are incapable of civilization. This leads to apathy among Whites who want to maintain it, and causes roadblocks for those who want to take it to the next level. You’re from Latin America, and it’s bad already with nations like Honduras and Nicaragua run by Mestizos. It will be worse for America, when you have 41 million blacks and growing.

        JS

        October 5, 2016 at 1:18 pm

      • Since I can’t reply to a reply, this is for JS: Demography doesn’t lie. All the developed countries are dying simply because they don’t bring enough children to the world. Until a few years ago America and Israel were the only exceptions; now it’s only Israel. Immigration has nothing to do with it and in any case it’s only a temporary relief because the TFR of most countries is going down fast, including Muslim countries.

        vdorta

        October 5, 2016 at 3:46 pm

      • A high IQ country like Japan, which is not very fertile and almost 100% homogeneous in terms of race, will take a long time to disappear vs a country that has 25% or more of a low IQ population, as this demographic will continue to populate. This is the future of the United States.

        JS

        October 5, 2016 at 4:31 pm

      • And when I say disappear, I’m referring to either no civilization or anarchy.

        JS

        October 5, 2016 at 4:32 pm

      • Vista, interesting posts. Mates, check it out.

        Yakov

        October 5, 2016 at 5:55 pm

      • Thanks, Yakov

        vdorta

        October 6, 2016 at 11:27 am

  8. “Before school desegregation and modern super-high-investment parenting, family formation was much more affordable for white parents”

    All by design, of course. Progressivism has always been about destroying the white middle class worldwide by any means necessary.

    Two in the Bush

    October 3, 2016 at 4:22 pm

  9. Some Jewish religious music for anyone who’s feeling bad on the Head of the Year:

    Garr

    October 3, 2016 at 4:46 pm

    • Lou Reed had electro-shock ‘therapy’.

      Curle

      October 4, 2016 at 3:11 am

      • Hunh. I always assumed that “the waves” directly and literally refers to a heroin high but this only as a stand-in for a pantheistic mystical experience. The literal reference is to EST experience? But in any case the ultimate reference is to a pantheistic mystical experience. (“The Earth is a hollow head inside of a larger head.”) Similarly, I take it that Rolling Stones songs such as “Moonlight Mile”, “Sweet Virginia”, “Torn and Frayed”, and “Sister Morphine”, are really about the depression and screwed-up-ness that anyone can feel, with drug stuff just as the literal reference serving as a kind of anchor-point. Otherwise, why would non-junkies get into the Velvet Underground, Stones, Stooges, etc.? It’s not as though we’re fantasizing about being junkies. We think they represent our generally human (not specifically junkie) experience.

        Garr

        October 4, 2016 at 2:49 pm

      • Sorry – obviously “the waves” literally refers to waves. But I mean that while the waves immediately represent a heroin high or an EST experience or whatever, they ultimately represent something cosmic. So there’s a triple reference — first to physical waves, then beyond that to a heroin/EST experience, then beyond THAT to a pantheistic-mystical experience. And the middle-referent, the heroin/EST experience, almost doesn’t matter; it’s just a passageway to the ultimate referent, the pantheistic-mystical experience. Just as when Jagger says that he’s got “a head full of snow” and that his “dreams are fading down the railway line” he’s ultimately talking about something that anyone of us might have often felt.

        Garr

        October 4, 2016 at 7:50 pm

  10. A while ago I promised to write something about this and here it is. I believe that Lion’s instincts are wrong on this. Modernity is like Janus, what makes us happy also makes us lonely: the more we embrace modernity and the more we reject religion the less children we will have. And it’s not a rational choice between having a more or less crowded world as some people (including Lion, I believe) think. Women react to modernity’s temptations by having less children and no government program will make them think otherwise. Once it starts, the TFR downward slide keeps going incrementally and without end and therefore we have Japan and Singapore right now, Europe in the immediate future, and the USA a bit farther away. Please read Ben Wattenberg’s Fewer, Phillip Longman’s The Empty Cradle, Eric Kaufmann’s Shall the Religious Inherit The World, David P. Goldman’s How Civilizations Die, and several articles by Nicholas Eberstadt. Many great civilizations have died and there is no reason why Western civilization has to be eternal.

    vdorta

    October 3, 2016 at 5:42 pm

    • I’m not sure that the loss of religion was the flip-side of succumbing to “modernity’s temptations,” those temptations being the primary causal factor. Perhaps the loss of religion came first, and then there was nothing to fill the void except the entertainments offered by modernity. If the process that ended in the loss of religion began with the Protestant Reformation (of course the Reformers themselves were intensely religious), then certainly this process began before many modern entertainments were available.

      Garr

      October 4, 2016 at 7:11 am

      • “Modernity” in political philosophy means the progressive change that began with the Enlightenment and the Industrial Revolution. TFR has been going down in the developed world for centuries but it has accelerated in the last hundred years or so and it is only now that we begin to see the whole results.

        vdorta

        October 4, 2016 at 12:04 pm

  11. This elementary school is next to a bunch of public housing projects in Alphabet City/East Village close to a friend of mines:

    http://insideschools.org/component/schools/school/17

    55% White, ~ 9% black and 21% Hispanic. A really strange demographic percentage mix.

    Puerto Ricans and Dominicanos are the lesser of the evils among NAMs, hence the substantial White demographic at the school, which also reflects the neighborhood, where Manhattan as I said before is increasingly Hispanic and decreasingly black in the inner city that borders SWPL areas. However, we are talking about Caribbean Hispanos and not the Mexican Mestizo types.

    And the White parents who send their kids to these schools are mostly the obnoxious SJW crowd.

    JS

    October 3, 2016 at 5:55 pm

  12. de jure segregation has become de facto segregation.

    the hipsters think one thing and do another.

    it’s “doublethink”.

    the heart knows what the mind cannot understand.

    1492 – 2016.

    the new world is an abject failure south of the rio grande.

    do facts matter?

    the soviet union had a very flat wage structure. this, rather than central planning, may have been it’s biggest problem, but it’s not as if 25 years later the former SSRs and eastern bloc countries have joined the first world. slovenia, estonia, and the czech republic are close. no they’re pretty much exactly where they were in 1991, relative to the rest of the world.

    blood is thicker than…

    ideology.

    • Comming from CZ, I don’t understand your point, as the living standards did increase immensely (even relative to the rest of the world, esp. in the 1990-2008 timeframe) and we are genetically almost the same as Austrians, Germans…and the same goes for culture.

      Bombexpert

      October 4, 2016 at 12:23 pm

      • since 1990, as i said, CZ, SK, and EE have done the best. and this because they are small border countries, colonies of germany, austria and italy, and sweden respectively.

        compare this to russia.

        looks like “the free market” has done much less than continue the trend under soviet socialism.

        america’s biggest export now is ideology. the world’s buying, at the same time that america is failing.

      • the soviet economy in 1990 was not failing any more than the global capitalist economy is failing today or japan’s economy has failed for 20 years running.

        a lot less in fact.

        but who needs truth when they’ve got truthiness.

      • this chart for russia specifically, rather than the whole former soviet union, makes “the free market” look even worse. click on “max”. http://www.tradingeconomics.com/russia/gdp-per-capita-ppp. and inequality is a lot worse in russia today. so the median annual income (ppp) may have declined since 1990 for all i know.

        once a chekist always a chekist.

    • Russians, Estonians, Czechs, etc. are not uncivilized as a group. If they have economic problems or suffer droughts, or plagues or floods or wars, they don’t turn into losers. They continue to be civilized and live in reasonable relationships with their neighbors. They solve problems, self organize, create, etc. They don’t just prey upon one another.

      not too late

      October 5, 2016 at 10:27 pm

  13. What about the “Lead Crime Hypothesis”?

    TerryB

    October 3, 2016 at 6:52 pm

    • memory holed

      not too late

      October 5, 2016 at 10:40 pm

  14. Hey Lion, check out this article. More evidence the economy is based on value transference and not value creation — returns to cognitive ability are DECLINING!

    “This study examines changes in returns to formal education and cog-
    nitive skills over the past 20 years using the 1979 and 1997 waves of
    the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. ***We show that cognitive
    skills had a 30%–50% larger effect on wages in the 1980s than in the
    2000s.*** Returns to education were higher in the 2000s. These devel-
    opments are not explained by changing distributions of workers’ ob-
    servable characteristics or by changing labor market structure. We
    show that the decline in returns to ability can be attributed to differ-
    ences in the growth rate of technology between the 1980s and 2000s.”
    http://faculty.smu.edu/millimet/classes/eco7321/papers/castex%20dechter%202014.pdf

    chairman

    October 3, 2016 at 8:08 pm

  15. The hipster parents won’t send their kids to schools with too many minorities yet they are the first to say how great diversity is. What hypocrites.

    Jay Fink

    October 3, 2016 at 8:14 pm

  16. Since this blog has become very gloomy, I thought I’d add something really really funny:

    I think it’s true. Everytime Clinton denied something, it turned out to be true. The dress fit.

    gothamette

    October 3, 2016 at 8:59 pm

    • I remember the movie ‘Primary Colors’ suggested Bill had a child with an African-American lady. Wouldn’t be at all surprised if it were true. He should just acknowledge his son, I think people would be more accepting of that than a lot of his other misdemeanours.

      Julian

      October 4, 2016 at 11:03 pm

  17. Speaking of schools, I recently got a fund raising letter from NYU. It begins thusly:

    “Growing up in Plano, Texas, I didn’t often see people who looked like me. I’m the proud daughter of Pakistani immigrants. I wear a hijab. My family was the only real connection I had to my own culture. That why my decision to attend NYU was so fraught. I was torn between the known comforts of family, and an unknowable adventure that would occur thousands of miles from home.”

    And on it goes. Sob story of the poor, poor Paki invader, and then how much she LOVES LOVES LOVES going to NYU, and can’t you send us some money, sahib? In the included brochure, they PROUDLY state: “NYU’s student body has No Ethnic Majority.” Yee hah!

    Well, they can F themselves good and hard. They have gone overtly anti-white. Meanwhile, NYU is largely a hot bed of globalist rich kids who want to have fun in the heart of Manhattan. It’s Globalism University now, not “New York University.”

    peterike

    October 3, 2016 at 10:29 pm

    • Tell the president to fund them. He gives out slush money to his beloved professors so they can buy vacation homes. He certainly could subsidized these poor kids at his school.

      JS

      October 4, 2016 at 11:35 am

    • A bible college in Buzzards Gulch, Kentucky turns out more perceptive graduates than NYU (or any Ivy League school for that matter).

      Lewis Medlock

      October 4, 2016 at 12:14 pm

    • peterike:

      And this NYU’s John Sexton with Slick Willy.

      The same guy who takes tuition $$$ from the school and give it to his buddies so they can buy vacation homes, interest free. The same guy who puts his non-student son in one of the NYU dormitories, because it’s cheaper to rent an actual apt in Manhattan.

      Elites Whites don’t give a F..k about you!

      JS

      October 12, 2016 at 11:45 am

      • * than to rent an actual apt in Manhattan.

        JS

        October 12, 2016 at 11:46 am

  18. The one thing everyone in America can agree on is that they don’t want to send their kids to NAM-dominated schools. This is, of course, true of the NAM parents just as much as anybody else. They have a range of wherewithal levels about pursuing that goal: some make it their life’s mission to find someplace else for their kids to go, while I’m sure a lot just accept that it is what it is whaddaya whaddaya – but I’m sure they’d still send their kids to a different school if someone went out of their way to offer it.

    Last year’s This American Life episode about the mystical power of being near white kids to make NAMs learn in high school, and the bad white parents who want to hoard all the white kid sauce for themselves: http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/562/the-problem-we-all-live-with

    Greg Pandatshang

    October 3, 2016 at 11:29 pm

    • While the presence of whites won’t make low IQ minorities smarter, their good behavior will rub off on them in a majority-white school.

      THe opposite probably happens when whites are a minority int he school.

      Lion of the Blogosphere

      October 4, 2016 at 1:49 am

      • their good behavior will rub off on them in a majority-white school.

        Right, but at, say, 20% NAM, the White good-behavior gets over ridden and its benefit to the NAM students dissolves.

        E. Rekshun

        October 4, 2016 at 11:41 am

      • Lion, the NAM parents aren’t wrong to want their kids in school with white kids, of course. The problem is the mindset that feels the need to come up with some other explanation for this phenomenon than the obvious, to avoid the cognitive dissonance of realising that doing what’s best for their kids means helping to kill the golden goose.

        Greg Pandatshang

        October 5, 2016 at 12:01 am

    • I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. It is NOT my kids job to improve NAMs by his presence. I couldn’t care less whether NAMs benefit from being around him. He does not benefit from being around them (just the opposite, he suffers).

      Though right now he mainly suffers from the presence of some Special Needs freak. The kid is white but from what I can tell from my son’s complaints, the goddamn kid creates as much daily class disruption as any NAM. The policy of “mainstreaming” Special Needs kids is by putting them in with the well-behaved white kids is as destructive as the policy of “mainstreaming” NAMs by putting them in with the well-behaved white kids. Also, the ‘tard has his own personal attendant in the classroom. God knows how much it costs to have an extra teacher in every classroom just to act as a ‘tard wrangler.

      Tarl

      October 4, 2016 at 10:11 am

    • Did the NAMs have an effect on white performance?

      prolesgonnaprole

      October 4, 2016 at 11:43 am

      • No comment about that from This American Life as far as I recall. You’d have to violate a bunch of unwritten anti-noticing rules to address that question. In the specific case they profiled in that episode, the white parents successfully made an end run around the laws and got rid of the NAM students before much time had passed.

        Greg Pandatshang

        October 5, 2016 at 12:05 am

      • Yes. See La Griffe du Lion

        NAM’s harm others more than others help NAM’s.

        There are nice NAM’s but maybe only about 10-20% are nice, whereas white and Asian kids are more like 70-90% nice.

        not too late

        October 5, 2016 at 10:34 pm

  19. Hopefully Bill Gates ramps up his plan to reduce Africa’s birth rate and prevents the African apocalypse!

    Bobo

    October 4, 2016 at 12:38 am

  20. Slightly o/t — I checked my Facebook feed and a white mom of two just posted this article on Facebook:

    “Don’t Compare Donald Trump to Adolf Hitler – It Belittles Hitler”

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/09/13/dont-compare-donald-trump-to-adolf-hitler-it-belittles-hitler/?utm_term=.57c8705cc0ff

    SPWL2

    October 4, 2016 at 9:06 am

    • The writer of that article, Shalom Auslander, thinks with his glands. That piece was pure emotional drivel.

      Lewis Medlock

      October 4, 2016 at 3:39 pm

  21. Recently I drove through Capitol Hill in Washington DC on Saturday morning. I was AMAZED (in a good way) at how many Hipster couples with babies there were. Didn’t see ANY blacks (must have still been asleep in their crack dens heh heh). I have no idea where those people send their kids to school, because the DC public school system is legendarily bad.

    Tarl

    October 4, 2016 at 10:14 am

  22. The cognitive dissonance and utter hypocrisy of liberals is staggering. I’ve never opposed voluntary integration. If that’s what someone wants to do then have at it. But that’s not what they want to do. Instead, they want to force it on others. But when faced with it themselves they run like hell. Liberals are shit.

    Simmon’s Law The desire for racial integration increases with the square of the distance from the actual event.

    destructure

    October 4, 2016 at 10:46 am

    • It’s the same thing when you hear virtue-signalling SWPL’s talking about leaving the US if Trump wins. It’s always to majority European countries (Canada, New Zealand, Australia etc) they never say they’ll move to Mexico or Nigeria.

      Julian

      October 4, 2016 at 11:05 pm

      • “It’s the same thing when you hear virtue-signalling SWPL’s talking about leaving the US if Trump wins. It’s always to majority European countries (Canada, New Zealand, Australia etc) they never say they’ll move to Mexico or Nigeria.”

        LOL

        so true!

        I am going to throw in that Nigeria suggestion when people talk about Trump.

        “If Trump wins, she is moving to…

        Nigeria!”

        or Egypt

        or any other awful place.

        not too late

        October 5, 2016 at 10:39 pm

      • Counterexample:

        One of my friends said she was going to move to South Korea if Trump wins. She’s 100% Caucasian, of mostly Polish ancestry.

        SC

        October 7, 2016 at 9:32 am

  23. As for schooling, if there’s one thing I know, it’s that Canadians don’t understand the US school system. It’s almost harder to understand than US healthcare…

    Samson J.

    October 4, 2016 at 11:36 am

  24. If Donald Trump carries California, his votes will be invalidated…all votes cast in that one space for Trump are overvotes, because they are casting a vote for 108 elector candidates. No California voter is permitted to vote for more than 55 candidates for presidential elector. When a voter casts a vote for more candidates than are to be elected, that is an “overvote” and the vote is invalid. >> http://ballot-access.org/2016/10/04/california-secretary-of-state-accepts-108-presidential-elector-candidates-pledged-to-donald-trump/

    Robert

    October 4, 2016 at 2:11 pm


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: