Democrats’ bogus accusations against Trump
If the Trump-hating New York Times has an article that’s extremely dismissive of allegations that Trump is somehow in cahoots with Russia, then you know that it’s totally bogus, just a desperate attempt by Democrats to deflect attention from Wikileaks and now HRC’s private email server.
And regarding Paul Manafort, I definitely think he’s part of the corrupt influence-peddling culture of the government elite, but the Clintons have him beat by a wide margin. They made $250 million dollars allegedly giving speeches, but we all know that the people paying for speeches were really buying influence.
But Paul Manafort has very little to do with Trump. Trump never knew the guy until he hired him at a time when he needed an insider-type to make sure he didn’t screw up the possible floor-right at the convention (which never happened). And now Manafort no longer works for Trump. This is another example of how diabolical Democrats are trying to deflect attention away from Huma Abedin who, unlike Manafort, is super-close her boss HRC and has been working for her since 1996.