Lion of the Blogosphere

London terrorism

Sorry, I don’t have anything deep to say about this.

How many terrorism attacks does it take before political leaders finally change their attitude toward massive immigration from Islamic countries? Or their attitudes towards freedom of religion that includes freedom to practice any form of Islam? Probably a lot more than we’ve had.

Written by Lion of the Blogosphere

June 4, 2017 at 11:04 am

105 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Political leaders won’t change their attitudes until the voters do. The voters won’t because the suicidal left controls the culture and media. Until ISIS starts targeting politicians and NBA players and reality TV show hosts, we are screwed.

    DN Poolside

    June 4, 2017 at 11:33 am

    • I say we let ISIS take out Chuck Schumer, Chris Harrison, and the Philadelphia 76ers. That oughtta do it.


      June 4, 2017 at 8:54 pm

      • Political leaders are actively colluding with Islamic terror groups. It’s precisely this collusion between the elite and Islam that you do not see terror attacks against, say, Sidwell Friends.

        This brings out an important lie.

        We keep hearing about terrorism as a response to American policy in the Middle East. Yet, terror attacks are never directed against the political leadership that architects these policies. Why is that? Either the elites are colluding with Islam and offering the citizenry up as sacrificial lambs so the jihadis can perform in fron of their masters, or Muslim manifest tribal warfare. They simply don;t care about the politics and simply the battle as one with an enemy tribe.


        June 5, 2017 at 11:34 am

      • More likely the terrorist are too clueless to have heard of Sidwell Friends.

      • Don’t you mean Sidwell Enemies?


        June 5, 2017 at 4:39 pm

      • Elites are able to insulate themselves from street crime but this idea that they’re not affected by terrorism is nuts. No elites died on 9/11 in the world trade center, the pentagon, and NY-LA flights? Come on.

        If terrorists haven’t attacked as specific a target as Sidwell Friends or some other super high profile person it is because terrorism still kills a tiny number of people in this country.


        June 5, 2017 at 6:49 pm

  2. Muslims can easily conquer Europe without firing a shot. They can just continue what they’ve been doing: waltzing in and breeding like rabbits. In that light, jihadist atrocities are patently ridiculous. It’s as if conquering Europe without slitting the throats of unbelievers is somehow dishonorable. .

    Mark Caplan

    June 4, 2017 at 11:36 am

    • Exactly.


      June 4, 2017 at 3:51 pm

    • Same thing in Israel , the Palestinians in the west bank and Gaza could have just start a none violent campaign for a one state solution and transform Israel to an Arab country de facto. Instead they prefer the Hamas way of terrorism.


      June 4, 2017 at 3:58 pm

    • And they thought Spain was easy back in the day…

      El Hombre

      June 4, 2017 at 9:22 pm

  3. These Legs are for Collusion

    She’s guaranteed herself a second interview with Putin.

    But what will she wear to the rematch?

    Anti-Trump Proves Worthy of Comey’s Contempt

    We interpreted Comey’s actions as FBI Director as most consistent with a strategy to build an obstruction of justice case against Trump by goading him into making a series of borderline statements that, collectively, made up obstruction.

    We also believed the universe of anti-Trump forces were kept in the dark about Comey’s exact plans and that, by keeping anti-Trumpers in the dark, Comey was demonstrating contempt for anti-Trump. Even Comey’s deputy was out of the loop given that his deputy testified publicly to Congress that he had not seen evidence of interference into the investigation by Trump’s administration.

    As it turns out, anti-Trump forces are still deserving of his contempt.

    The reporting on the Russia investigation is still anticipating that an impeachable offense will emerge from it.

    What they don’t realize is that, by firing Comey after just four months, Trump has ruined Comey’s strategy. He left the FBI Directorship too soon for him to accumulate enough private statements by Trump to construe them as anything more than “pressure” or “inappropriate”.

    But anti-Trump has not realized Comey’s gambit is over.

    Comey was the most dangerous actor against Trump because Comey was the only person in the anti-Trump nexus with an attention span greater than a moth.

    With Comey out of the way, anti-Trump would be better off moving to some other strategy instead of clinging in desperation to a strategy that is non-operational in Comey’s absence.

    That anti-Trump still hasn’t figured this out proves Comey’s judgment of them as easily manipulable stooges was right all.

    The Paris Accord Warrants Impeachment

    Obama’s impeachment.

    The Paris accord was clearly a treaty; treaties are mandated by the Constitution to be put to the Senate for ratification.

    Instead of doing his Constitutional duty by sending the Paris accord to the Senate for a vote, Obama tried to give it force of law without Senate approval.

    This blatantly illegal action by Obama clearly warranted impeachment. Fortunately for him the rest of the elite followed the “Comey rule” of law enforcement which mandates that Democrats are not allowed to be legally punished for breaking the law.

    Paris is Burning, Paris will be Burning

    Trump burned the Paris accords.

    Before Trump sent them up in flames, Macron preemptively retaliated against Trump’s withdrawal with an aggressive handshake.

    Macron should worry about Trump. After two recent ISIS terrorist attacks in Britain it won’t be long before another mass-casualty strike is made against France.

    When ISIS comes to shake Macron’s hand we’ll see how well he handles a real enemy on camera. We expect not even the Western media will be able to spin his response to terrorism as a macho staredown won by Macron.

    The Undiscovered Jew

    June 4, 2017 at 11:39 am

  4. People just accept terrorism like they accept car crashes. Sure, car crashes are a tragedy, but our society has decided that cars make our lives better, so we put up stop signs and speed limits and prosecute those who disobey them to mitigate the damage caused by our beloved cars, but nobody is for outlawing cars!

    Similarly, sure, Muslim terrorism is a tragedy, but our society’s elites have decided that Muslims make our lives better, so the police will spy on Muslims and the armed forces will bomb and snipe foreign Muslims to mitigate the damage caused by Muslim terrorism, but nobody is going to advocate actually getting rid of our beloved Muslims!


    June 4, 2017 at 11:50 am

    • Oh, lots of people advocate it. They just are too scared to say it. And rightly so!

      And then there are the white buffoons. SWPLs who think like Katy Perry:

      Perry on vibrant muslims killing little girls: “The Greatest Thing We Can Do is Just Unite and Love on Each Other, And Like No Barriers, No Borders, Like, We All Need to Just Coexist”

      Perry on withdrawl of Paris accords: (to Trump) “”I ask humbly to remember your children, their children & all children will be left to live w/the results of your decision.”

      She doesn’t care about ACTUAL DEAD CHILDREN lying in the street with their limbs blown off RIGHT NOW. She advocates for bringing in MORE MURDERERS that she assumes she will be safe from.

      She faux-cares about children of the future dying while they stand on an ice-berg with a sad polar bear or something!

      People like this are incurable fools and monsters. And they have the power and influence in this so-called country!


      June 4, 2017 at 1:04 pm

    • two points:

      a. it seems like with this case and in France there is an ISIS calculation going on that they want their attacks to be part of the final campaign decision by the public. What their effect is, I am not sure. In the case of Spain, the public certainly turned yellow as a result of an al Queda train bombing in their country.

      b. Prior to Manchester, the Spectator reported the view (I assume generally held in the UK) that since the Westminster attack on March 22 was alone actor with a van and a knife that this mean British security forces had a cap on the situation to such an extent that sophisticated coordinated attacks were no longer possible. Cells were not able to form- hence the lone assailant- and they were being prevented for getting guns and other more powerful weapons.

      After London bridge and Manchester it appears that the estimate was wrong. The lack of guns is interesting, but maybe ISIS planners just feel that it helps keep people off the radar.

      Four Lions is still a funny movie though.

      Lion of the Turambar

      June 4, 2017 at 1:05 pm

    • I don’t know why they allow these Muslim immigrants. Probably because they believe in the religion of diversity and they can’t discriminate because it would violate their “religious” beliefs.

      Our elites are really horrible and they’ve been that way for 50 years at least.

      Cars only make our lives better like elevators make 100 story building workable. Build 3-5 story buildings and you don’t need elevators.


      June 4, 2017 at 2:26 pm

      • “I don’t know why they allow these Muslim immigrants”

        More to the point, I don’t know why WE allow these Muslim immigrants. When the courts and every good thinking person think it’s a moral imperative to import as many as possible, I can’t really criticize the Europeans for doing something incredibly stupid when we’re doing the same thing.

        Mike Street Station

        June 4, 2017 at 9:19 pm

    • I agree with your main point completely, but I don’t think Muslims are invited to our countries because they add value. Rather, they are here to test and prove our virtue.

      Our pro-immigration friends will say that Mexicans bring cheap, unskilled labor, and that Indians and Chinese lower labor costs in STEM fields. They have a point, though we would argue that the externalities those people bring outweigh the benefits. It’s something you can evaluate.

      But when you ask our friends about the value that Muslims in particular bring, they change the subject. In truth, Muslims, especially from the Arab world, don’t work hard, their cooking isn’t all that much different from Greek cuisine, and they bring strife, discord, terror, and an oppressive tension to the countries they come to. There are pros and cons about having Mexicans, Indians, and Chinese in the country. There isn’t any with Muslims in particular.

      Rather, our friends go on and on about “our values.” What they want to prove is that we’re not racists. If we were living in 1930s Germany, we would be organizing a resistance that would either stop Hitler from taking power or overthrow him.

      Ultimately, they want Muslims not because they add value, but because they’re such an odious people that you have to be a saint to not dislike them and wish they’d go somewhere else. If you want more of them to come, then you’re clearly better than those Neo-Nazis who wish Muslims would stay the hell away.


      June 4, 2017 at 2:44 pm

      • >>In truth, Muslims, especially from the Arab world, don’t work hard..

        I’ve said it before, the Arab, Muslim male is the laziest creature in God’s creation. There are none lazier than an Arab. They are only good for running small dry goods stores and then after the “workday”, sitting in a cafe, sipping coffee, smoking, eating cakes, bullshitting the evening away and plotting treachery.


        June 4, 2017 at 10:27 pm

      • Arab men in the Gulf are particularly lazy – they have so much oil that they just hire foreign workers to do the chores for them.


        June 4, 2017 at 10:56 pm

      • I suppose in the desert heat it pays to conserve energy so maybe laziness is an adaption to the environment. But surely they cannot always have been lazy? They built many empires throughout history. There were even some pretty good Arab mathematicians at one time. Maybe there is a cultural problem, or a whole lot of dysgenics.


        June 5, 2017 at 6:01 am

      • “I agree with your main point completely, but I don’t think Muslims are invited to our countries because they add value. Rather, they are here to test and prove our virtue.”

        LOL. They’re prodigious welfare moochers and thus reliable Democratic voters. That’s all.


        June 5, 2017 at 10:09 am

      • Asian immigrants are also reliable Democrats and they are NOT welfare moochers.

      • Asian immigrants are also reliable Democrats and they are NOT welfare moochers.

        Asian immigrants game our systems for their benefit whether tax cheats, licensing frauds, admissions, etc. etc. Their low trust cultural/racial inclinations mooch off of our western european/anglo high trust sense of civic duty and responsibility.

        Andrew E.

        June 5, 2017 at 12:00 pm

      • “I suppose in the desert heat it pays to conserve energy so maybe laziness is an adaption to the environment.”

        In large part, yes, but Arabs are much lazier than, say, Mexicans or Filipinos. (No one is saying that fruit will rot on trees if we don’t accept Syrian refugees, for example.)

        “But surely they cannot always have been lazy? They built many empires throughout history. There were even some pretty good Arab mathematicians at one time. Maybe there is a cultural problem, or a whole lot of dysgenics.”

        My own view is that the ancient Middle Easterners were not the same people we see today. A recent study has shown that ancient Egyptians, for example, were more like modern Sardinians (emerging from a race of ancient Middle Eastern farmers), whereas modern Egyptians have a relatively high amount of African ancestry (roughly 20% of their heritage is now sub-Saharan African).

        Muslims enslaved Africans and bred with them. The average African IQ is now roughly 70, though in my opinion it might be possible to boost it to 80 with an effective public health and education effort. If the ancient Middle Easterners had an IQ potential of around 90-95, it’s now likely significantly lower.

        To add to it, Islam permits cousin marriage, and that has been shown to depress IQ scores and hurt overall health as well.

        “LOL. They’re prodigious welfare moochers and thus reliable Democratic voters. That’s all.”

        I somewhat agree with your point. That immigrants vote Democrat is the overriding reason why Democrats want them here, but Democrats are going out of their way to defend Muslims. If this were merely about votes, the Democrats would focus on Hispanics first and Muslims second. Instead, it’s the opposite: Muslims are getting more public, vocal support than Hispanics are.


        June 5, 2017 at 3:22 pm

      • “Asian immigrants are also reliable Democrats ”

        Are they really reliable Dem’s if you correct for their locations? There are a lot of Asians around San Fransisco and Oakland but are they really more Democratic than the mean in other part of the country?

        What about Indians? By traits of the immigrants I meet they dont seem like natural Dems.

        Lion o' the Turambar

        June 5, 2017 at 3:49 pm

      • “their cooking isn’t all that much different from Greek cuisine”



        June 10, 2017 at 1:16 pm

  5. I keep waiting for more of a Dexter-style response. HBD-woke Europeans must by now realize that leaders like Merkel and May and the new French guy will do nothing to protect them (and everything to protect the SWPL oder), so I’m surprised there aren’t more ordinary citizens correcting the bad guys whom the governments know about, but refuse to put in jail for more than a few months at a time, lest they ruffle the feathers of the various immigrant communities. I think it will start happening, and maybe down the road London Bridge will be seen as the tipping point.


    June 4, 2017 at 12:22 pm

    • Every so often, you hear stories about Swedish gangs getting in a fracas with Muslim migrants. I expect that white working class Europeans will organize around their football/soccer leagues and will become ever more involved in informal intimidation and community protection.


      June 4, 2017 at 3:55 pm

      • Soccer teams are now catering for the middle class, the days of soccer hooliganism in the west are long gone, it still exists in east Europe, but there they don’t have Arabs anyways.


        June 5, 2017 at 10:36 pm

  6. The attacks happen in central london and places where lots of SWPLs like to concentrate (for example, the Bataclan Massacre), so the same people voting to import jihad suffer the consequences of their actions.

    I’m inured to these attacks now. They are the new normal. These people who want diversity, pay the diversity tax.


    June 4, 2017 at 12:40 pm

    • What % of Parisians voted Le-Pen? 5%? Screw em.


      June 4, 2017 at 12:40 pm

    • Tell that to the 1000+ working class white girls in Rotherham that were getting gang raped for years. They never supported this.


      June 5, 2017 at 6:08 am

      • Countless single mothers and absentee fathers are responsible for allowing their daughters to get drug addicted and become prostitutes for muslim gangs.

        No 12 year old girl in a stable family ended up in a Rotherham situation.

        White libs want to die.


        June 5, 2017 at 1:58 pm

      • jjbees wrote:

        “No 12 year old girl in a stable family ended up in a Rotherham situation.”


        Even if this is true, it certainly doesn’t make what the goat fuckers did to these girls any better.
        It *is* probably true that most of the girls came from working class families. The working class suffers the most from Muslim immigration. But addiction can strike people of any class. For example, George McGovern’s daughter was an alcoholic who died of exposure after passing out in a snow bank. The Kennedy family seems to be riddled with addicts. Alcoholism is mainly genetic.

        The elites who are responsible for the mass immigration in Europe can afford to live in leafy suburbs, away from the scum they are importing. Ultimately, though, the entire society will suffer greatly because of mass Muslim immigration. Maria Ladenburge , the daughter of an EU official, was raped and murdered by a Muslim asylum seeker in Germany.


        June 5, 2017 at 11:49 pm

  7. Political leaders will *never* change their minds.

    The govt IS THE ENEMY.

    The govt is one who PAYS illegals/muslims/blacks to invade, have kids, and kill whites.


    June 4, 2017 at 12:55 pm

    • True. No citizens of the UK or America called their rep to ask for Muslim immigration or third world immigration.


      June 4, 2017 at 10:42 pm

  8. Wouldn’t you love to ask the Seattle federal judge that question face to face? But we can’t allow mere citizens to speak to power like that. A bunch of burly types known as the Federal Protective Service will knock your head off if you try.

    Explainer 21

    June 4, 2017 at 12:59 pm

  9. The chance of any individual dying from an act of Muslim terrorism is vanishingly small, even in London or Paris. Even now you are far more likely to be murdered by a NAM criminal for your wallet in DC than be murdered by a Muslim in London.

    Terrorism is a distraction and is not actually the problem with immigration. Focusing on terrorism probably helps the pro-immigration forces because, see above, terrorism is not actually a big problem. The problem with Muslim immigrants are under the surface and slower acting. In Europe, at least, immigrants, and not only Muslim immigrants, but also African and Balkan immigrants, have degraded the schools, undermined trust in government and neighbors, turned parts of cities into dangerous no-go areas and made everyday experiences like shopping downtown or taking public transport noticeably more unpleasant than they were 20-25 years ago. Terrorism is just one of the symptoms of a more dangerous disease that is slowly killing Europe.

    Peter Akuleyev

    June 4, 2017 at 1:07 pm

    • Radicals can’t operate in isolation. They rely on ethnic enclaves to melt away into when they’re in foreign lands. This is another reason why the ‘peaceful’ enclaves have to sent home along with the radicals. This goes for Mexicans, central and South Americans as much as Muslims.

      Andrew E.

      June 4, 2017 at 10:00 pm

    • Yeah exactly. And the people freaking out about terrorism tend to be the same people that don’t want to do anything about much much bigger issues like gun, traffic, and preventable medical deaths, which just makes them look even stupider.


      June 5, 2017 at 1:01 am

      • I’m pretty sure most of the people who oppose terrorism also oppose traffic accidents and preventable medical deaths. Probably not guns, though. Speaking of which, it was men with guns who finally stopped them. Stupid liberal.


        June 5, 2017 at 7:17 pm

    • Well you haven’t even mentioned the end game which is what happens when these high fertility groups make up the majority, you will have an Islamic State, and no more personal freedoms, which the Left claim to love. I guess the Left has always been about deluded themselves, but this time their delusions will destroy them.


      June 5, 2017 at 6:16 am

    • I agree that terrorism is only a small fraction of the problem, but I think it helps our case more than not. Most people aren’t rational enough to do the calculus you’re describing — sure, you’re more likely today to die from falling off your chair than from terrorism, but these attacks are designed to hit you in the hindbrain, that sense that you’re being preyed upon.

      And while figures in the media and academia can say it, politicians can’t say, “The casualties they’re inflicting on us are acceptable at this time.” If terrorism continues to escalate, politicians will have to escalate their response or be outflanked by others who promise to do so.

      And one point that hasn’t been made: while NW Europe is apparently too weak to react (yet), the Eastern Europeans and Asians use terrorism to justify excluding Muslims. Even if they’re smart enough to know that Muslims are terrible for many reasons, it’s much more politically palatable to say “terrorism” than to say “their genetic stock would be a cancer to our fine society”.


      June 5, 2017 at 7:25 am

    • Peter,

      You’re missing the point. The kind of actuarial comparison that you are doing is largely irrelevant. The purpose of terrorism is not to have you die from it. It’s to alter and control your behavior in such a way that you come under the power of an alien ideology. That’s why this question of likelihood is irrelevant, like comparing getting hit in a terror attack to dying in a car accident or getting mugged. It all misses the point.


      June 5, 2017 at 12:00 pm

      • People alter their behavior in very significant ways to avoid getting mugged and being in a car accident. But that doesn’t count because that’s not the intention of muggers?


        June 5, 2017 at 6:52 pm

  10. Political correctness is so entrenched I can’t imagine any amount of terrorism that would make a dent in it.

    Jay Fink

    June 4, 2017 at 1:14 pm

  11. > These Legs are for Collusion

    > She’s guaranteed herself a second interview with Putin.

    So this is what it’s like to be a female? All you have to do is wear a certain piece of cloth and put chemicals in your hair to change its color and people bow down to you?

    Why aren’t there riots in the streets? 🙂

    Fact Checker

    June 4, 2017 at 1:23 pm

    • All you have to do is wear a certain piece of cloth and put chemicals in your hair to change its color and people bow down to you?

      That’s how it’s worked for thousands of years.

      Why aren’t there riots in the streets?

      If men protest, women will go on “strike”.

      The Undiscovered Jew

      June 4, 2017 at 8:20 pm

    • No way to dress to interview a head of state. She disgraces female sex and the whole cointry. Why aren’t the feminists and the conservatives putting her in her place?


      June 4, 2017 at 10:59 pm

      • When has a hot female ever been put in her place.

        JW Bell

        June 5, 2017 at 12:03 am

      • Trump put Megyn Kelly in her place? She de-bimbofied herself after that.

      • Why aren’t the feminists and the conservatives putting her in her place?

        The feminists are dressed like men and Conservative pundettes dress like Kelly.

        She de-bimbofied herself after that.

        That was a shame.

        Megyn’s best when she’s flirtatious. I hope this Putin interview is the start of her reverting to her old form.

        The Undiscovered Jew

        June 5, 2017 at 5:47 pm

  12. Opinion polls already show that majorities in almost all European countries favour a complete ban on Muslim immigration. The trouble is that no major political parties are offering such a ban. Our PM is talking about getting much tougher on extremism communicated on the internet, but many people fear she will start rounding up people who are critical of Muslims. She has not said anything that will actually reduce terrorism. I agree with others that many more terrorism atrocities will occur in the UK before anything serious is done. But we do have precedents for this kind of thing. In the 1970s we introduced imprisonment without trial for Irish terrorists, and our special forces killed many of them. In the end, the terrorists sued for peace. Difficult though to see that happening with Islamists!

    The lioncub

    June 4, 2017 at 2:15 pm

    • Trump’s Muslim ban is stupid, because Islamic terrorists target their respective colonizers as payback. Why is Iran on the ban list? Iran was never subjugated by any Western Power. His ban doesn’t even include South Asian Muslims, who are troublesome in the British Empire, now in the British Isles. The same goes for most North African Muslims who are seeking retribution from France.


      June 4, 2017 at 7:46 pm

      • Indeed, a Muslim ban with teeth needs to include Pakistan.

      • And Bangladesh, and all the former Muslim Soviet republics. Actually, what Muslims should be excluded? I can’t think of any. Why America needs any of them? I dunno. So there should be a total and complete ban on them. People are so stupid! Ufff.


        June 4, 2017 at 11:03 pm

      • Except Huma Abedin…

        Last year I was visiting the Metropolitan Museum of Art, and I heard a few young ladies wearing hijabs staring at the naked Greco-Roman statues, giggling and laughing loud, which was reverberating in a few areas nearby, and it elicited a concern to security. Either these Muslims were making fun of these infidel pagans from antiquity coming from their culture or it’s part of the liberal paradigm to encourage everyone to criticize Western Civilization and its follies — not too different when inner city blacks are made to participate and critique events that are otherwise suited exclusively for White people.


        June 4, 2017 at 11:38 pm

      • Simple Yakov, The Anglo Sphere is strictly about business/money, not culture or national unity. It’s world’s fair or a flea market.


        June 4, 2017 at 11:44 pm

      • Trump should simply stop ALL immigration from everywhere, up to and including Canada. That way no one can accuse him of being racist. Then the US can set criteria and reopen immigration to countries and individuals that meet those criteria. But when push comes to shove Trump has shown he is not willing to alienate his potential business partners in places like Saudi Arabia or China.

        Or, to give the man the benefit of the doubt, maybe he is just simply unable to fight the tremendous vested interests in an quasi imperial state like the United States, and now that he is President he realizes it. The fact that he plays golf so much is not a great sign, he seems to have given up.

        Peter Akuleyev

        June 5, 2017 at 3:00 am

      • You would also need to deport all the homegrown Muslims already living in the Anglo Prole Sphere. Good luck with that!


        June 5, 2017 at 9:46 am

      • Those 7 countries are where the refugees are coming from. By targeting those 7 countries you can cut out 90% of potential legitimate refugee asylum seekers. It makes perfect sense. It is a numbers game, Muslims nowadays rely on their “refugees” to colonize new lands, this ban would thwart their efforts even if a few middle class professionals from other Muslim countries could still get through.


        June 5, 2017 at 6:23 am

      • This is all wrong. The only colonial connection is that the history of colonization is the “original sin” used to justify letting more immigrants in and for “anti-racist” attacks on whites, just as we’ll always have slavery in the U.S. to serve the same function, and the Germans have Nazism.

        The British and French have the unfortunate history of having colonized a lot of terrible places. The Turks still commit terrorist acts in Germany, albeit fewer because they’re Turks and not Arabs.

        The Trump ban was designed to pass legal muster, not to block all the right countries. And the courts are still blocking its current iteration anyway, so getting it through the courts was clearly the correct priority. We’ll just have to see what the S.C. says. If Trump were more powerful, he could ignore the courts, but he doesn’t have the political capital to do so.

        Iran is considered a hostile nation and a state sponsor of terrorism, so it had to be included in the list for plausibility’s sake.


        June 5, 2017 at 7:45 am

      • “because Islamic terrorists target their respective colonizers as payback. “</i?

        Stop blaming the victim. Their "religion" commands them to invade, conquer, rape, enslave and exterminate non-members. It's how Mohammed conquered the middle east and North Africa. More recently, they've used terrorism to overthrow local governments and install radical Islamists. They just keep massacring people until they win concessions. Eventually people give up just to have peace. You can't have peace with Islam. It's in a never-ending war with "non believers".



        June 5, 2017 at 6:16 pm

      • “Trump should simply stop ALL immigration from everywhere, up to and including Canada. That way no one can accuse him of being racist. Then the US can set criteria and reopen immigration to countries and individuals that meet those criteria.”

        Yes, we should stop all immigration, but why do we need to reopen it? We don’t need immigrants.

        This country would have been so much better off had we kept the 1924 Immigration Act and not allowed any immigrants in from south of the border.

        But now this country is a disaster.


        June 5, 2017 at 8:16 pm

    • I find it hard to believe the majority of Europeans want to end Muslim immigration. Look how poorly LePen did for example or how Merkel will win re-election in a landslide.

      Jay Fink

      June 4, 2017 at 9:04 pm

      • I remember the survey from a few months ago where the majority did in fact want to end muslim immigration. The last French election reminds me of a similar survey regarding the BNP from many years ago. The majority of the public supported their policies… as long as they didn’t know it was the their policies. Think about it.


        June 5, 2017 at 11:26 am

    • Opinion polls have shown that Americans want less immigration, and no illegal immigration, for as long as I have been an adult (30 years).



      June 5, 2017 at 8:06 am

  13. labor may actually win the election thursday. this would be another brexit. corbyn is farther left than bernie. he’s not tony blair or gordon brown, aka a puppet.

    silly little man

    June 4, 2017 at 2:36 pm

  14. I remember some EU bureaucrats daughter being raped and killed by a refugee in Austria. Still didn’t change her family’s mind.


    June 4, 2017 at 3:38 pm

  15. In any kind of a sane and decent country the people do not respond to the deliberate slaughter of their children with a fucking Coldplay concert; but then in any kind of a serious country when their own leader responds to the third terrorist atrocity in the space of a few weeks by confessing that there has been “too much tolerance of extremism in our country” (she means by them, not by us, we have been forbidden from challenging it because of the laws they introduced) this would be seen as the national scandal that it is and we would be demanding her head for their years of confessed indifference.

    Only now do they start rounding people up and making arrests for comments and messages that they could easily have discovered a few weeks ago, but didn’t bother, because their level of extremism was considered to be not quite worth bothering with compared to the more serious actually-about-to-kill-people kind. Most of them will probably be released without charge anyway, and they’ll just become a handful more of the 20,000 people that they are saying are of serious concern (and it’s sure to be more than that).

    All we are left with politically is discussions about police numbers from Corbyn as if a few extra police or another couple of billion to their budget would have made the slightest difference, indeed as if it would keep pace with the number we are importing every year through mass immigration, followed by years of Blairite sounding legislation containing words like community, control, intitiative, extremist, partnership, order, strategy, etc, which will achieve nothing other than siphoning off more money to Islamic ‘community outreach’ organisations and probably putting a handful of white racists in prison, and will then be quietly ditched like the latest failed NHS reorganisation.

    More talk of how ‘it won’t change us’ even as they clamp down harder on the Islamophobia that could provoke delicate Muslim sensibilities to further atrocities, and even as, has been seen with the bomb scare stampede in Turin during the Champions League final, they have clearly changed us already and the response of Europeans to this threat is to scurry like sheep at the sound of a bark towards the nearest designated pens to await further instructions about when the Ariana Grande benefit gig will start.

    It takes a special kind of arrogance and ignorance to claim that terrorism ‘won’t change us’ when we have the example of places like Iraq, where people are far less lily-livered and yet years of sectarian violence changed them in spite of similar claims by their government that Iraq would not changed. Are modern Brits really tougher than Iraqis?

    Delusion from beginning to end.

    prolier than thou

    June 4, 2017 at 5:52 pm

    • yes. paul weston is right.

      blair, brown, and may are traitors.

      there’s no better word for them.

      silly little man

      June 4, 2017 at 7:29 pm

    • Ariana Grande is believed to be a guidette (she’s of Italian ancestry). However, she looks Hispanic with Amerindian admixture and she’s into the multicult narrative including race mixing.

      This being said, no one who’s vouching for White Nationalism, is attending her concerts or supporting her. The dysfunction of the Anglo Sphere on the street level, involves low IQ individuals and people of the liberal spectrum fighting among themselves.


      June 4, 2017 at 7:40 pm


      When they attack Shanghai or Beijing, the Chinese will be far less lovey dubby and merciful. If the West thinks Islamophobia is so bad, they have no idea.


      June 4, 2017 at 7:57 pm

      • From the article:

        “Hundreds of people have died in recent years in Xinjiang, home to the Muslim Uighur people, in unrest blamed by Beijing on Islamist militants and separatists, though rights groups say the violence is more a reaction to repressive Chinese policies.”

        What a pile of shite from “rights groups.” And hats off to the Han for eliminating some of these muzzies. A little repressive policies would be good in the US. You know, kinda like Israeli policies…


        June 5, 2017 at 12:37 am

    • “…claim that terrorism ‘won’t change us”

      ROFL. When you’re dead from muzzies with bombs/knives/bullets, you’re changed alright.

      El Hombre

      June 5, 2017 at 5:17 pm

  16. There used to be a lot more Europeans in Algeria. Almost all left.

    howitzer daniel

    June 4, 2017 at 6:17 pm

    • a million pork and cheese left angola.

      what’s happening now might be termed “reverse colonialism”.

      silly little man

      June 4, 2017 at 7:30 pm

  17. lion will like this if he hasn’t already blogged about it. it demonstrates that evil in high places is not theoretical, it’s real. it’s sometimes called “libertarianism”.

    In August 2011, a class-action lawsuit by 12 Cooley graduates was filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan, alleging[65] fraud and misrepresentation about Cooley’s published employment information concerning its graduates. The school responded by filing a motion to dismiss.[66] On July 20, 2012, Judge Gordon Jay Quist granted the motion, concluding: “The bottom line is that the statistics provided by Cooley and other law schools in a format required by the ABA were so vague and incomplete as to be meaningless and could not reasonably be relied upon. But, as put in the phrase we lawyers learn early in law school—caveat emptor.” The judge further noted that “it [was] unreasonable for Plaintiffs to rely on two bare-bones statistics” in deciding to attend Cooley as it is “widely accepted that American law schools, Cooley included, employ all sorts of legerdemain to boost employment rates in a contracting legal market.”

    to summarize: law schools are frauds. but it’s the fault of the defrauded not the fraudsters that they were defrauded, because only dumb people are defrauded, and fraudsters are smarter than the people they defraud, and dumb bad, smart good.

    i found this looking for why a baseball stadium would be named after a law school. so i looked up the “law school” and it was obvious. no wonder none have gone to jail for the 2008 crisis. fraud isn’t against the law in america if you dress well enough.

    this surely is an example of declining IQ.

    silly little man

    June 4, 2017 at 10:07 pm

  18. the elite ended mass immigration around 1920 because of anarchist/socialist bombings…but it started in about 1870 or so…see the ‘red scare’ political cartoons


    June 4, 2017 at 10:28 pm

    • And the assasination of President McKinley by an immigrant anarchist happened in 1901.

      With the thoughts you'd be thinkin

      June 5, 2017 at 12:05 am

  19. Does anyone realize how the liberal narrative has evolved from 9/11 onwards:

    -In the hours following the 2001 attacks, we were informed it was likely an extreme right-wing attack.
    -In the days following when the truth came out, we were told it was a one-off Muslim terror attack.
    -Some months later as it became apparent that ordinary Muslims around the world supported the attacks on the US, we were told that Muslims love the west and its democratic traditions.
    -When more attacks followed in the UK and Europe, we were told that America and the West had brought these on themselves for their support of Israel.
    -Then following more attacks in Europe and the US, we were told that such attacks were a very rare phenomena and you stood a greater chance of dying in a car-crash and anybow the vast majority of Muslims hated Muslim terrorists.
    -Then when results of Pew surveys were published that showed large minorities of Muslims around the world outright supported terrorists and large majorities of Muslims were unwilling to condemn terrorism, we were told that Muslims are basically like us, but it was our racism that blinded us from that basic truth.
    -Then as terrorism accelerated in Europe and the US, we were told that terrorism is a basic part of daily modern life and we should just shut-up and carry on. Or as London mayor Sadie Khan said, “terrorism is part and parcel of modern life”.


    June 4, 2017 at 10:30 pm

    • –Or as London mayor Sadie Khan said, “terrorism is part and parcel of modern life”–

      Indeed. Just like the weather. Sometimes it rains, sometimes it snows, sometimes it is hot out and sometimes wacko muzzies murder people in the name of Allah.


      June 5, 2017 at 12:22 am

      • This is the progressive mindset – all in the natural order of things. They would rather 100,000 died at the hands of barbarians masquerading as human beings, than upset a single Muslim.

        You know the way things stand when Saudi Arabia is appointed to the UN Women’s Rights Commission.

        Welcome to Bizarro World.


        June 5, 2017 at 11:11 am

  20. Nothing will change because the Western immune system has been disabled. Auster explained in his great post on Laws of Majority-Minority Relations in Liberal Society:

    “The worse any designated minority or alien group behaves in a liberal society, the bigger become the lies of Political Correctness in covering up for that group.”

    “The more egregiously any non-Western or non-white group behaves, the more evil whites are made to appear for noticing and drawing rational conclusions about that group’s bad behavior.”

    “Once the equality of all human groups is accepted as a given, any facts that make a minority or foreign group seem worse than the majority native group must be either covered up or blamed on the majority.” This may be the original statement of the First Law.

    “The more illegitimate and dangerous you are, the easier it is for you [to immigrate to the West], and the more legitimate and productive you are, the harder it is for you.” A “variation” on the First Law.


    June 5, 2017 at 12:07 am

  21. A white man in Portland, Oregon told a couple musloids on a train to leave the US and he was jumped by three White knights and then forced to defend himself with a knife he was carrying. The good news is two of the White knights died and the other got his throat slashed for his trouble. See, even Whites prevent Whites from merely telling musloids to get out of our nation.

    These Diversity Enrichment attacks will never end.


    June 5, 2017 at 9:57 am

    • This is not good news. The harasser on the train was white trash.

      • No Lion, the good news is that he was/is a Bernie Sanders and Jill Stein supporter.


        June 5, 2017 at 11:06 am

      • It’s not news if the media isn’t actually reporting it. NPR did a story this morning and described the stabber as a “white supremacist,” with the implication that he was a Trump supporter (NPR thought it would have been in good taste for conservatives to cancel a pro-Trump rally in Portland being held so soon after the incident).

        I doubt more than 5% of people who have heard about the Portland stabbing also know about the stuff Roli mentions.


        June 5, 2017 at 12:33 pm

      • Jeremy Christian who stabbed 3 men, killing 2 of them, plead guilty to robbery and kidnapping charges in 2002 for a robbery of a a convenience store. He was sentenced to 8 years in prison and got out in 2010. Two months after his release he was arrested for being a felon in possession of a stolen gun and spent some more time in jail. He was arrested again for parole violations and spent time in jail.

        From his facebook posts he clearly hated Hillary Clinton and voiced support for Bernie Sanders.

        He also voice support for white supremacist causes. He attended an April “Free Speech” rally draped in an American Flag chanting the N-word and making Nazi salutes.

        Three days after the Trump inauguration he posted:

        “If Donald Trump is the Next Hitler then I am joining his SS to put an end to Monotheist Question. All Zionist Jews, All Christians who do not follow Christ’s teaching of Love, Charity, and Forgiveness And All Jihadi Muslims are going to Madagascar or the Ovens/FEMA Camps!!! Does this make me a fascist!!! #MonotheistHolocaust FinalSolutionToTheMonotheistQuestion”

        It sounds like he had mental issues.


        June 5, 2017 at 3:40 pm

      • Paul Fussell lived in PDX in his last years. I wonder why. PDX is the poorest and the whitest big city on the West Coast. So it’s pretty trashy.

        silly little man

        June 5, 2017 at 4:04 pm

  22. The London attacks have shown the British people at their best. They fought back and threw glasses, bottles, chairs, whatever they could find to beat off the attacks and keep the casualties to the minimum.

    Trump’s tweets about the London attacks show at him at his worst.


    June 5, 2017 at 1:15 pm

    • What a strange and non-sequitur comment. Of course they fought back – it’s instinctive in every living being in those circumstances.

      At their best? Better had they been able to pull out their guns and protect themselves.

      But perhaps you thought that the memorial concert with Katy Perry et al represented the British people at their best. Or that their Cat Lady Prime Minister’s speech represented Britain at their best.

      The British people would have had no need to “be at their best” if their leaders had been at their best in offering them protection from the 23,000 jihadis now roaming around Britain. I wonder if Churchill would have stood for his government inviting 23,000 Nazi infiltrators into Britain during WWII.

      Or perhaps this is just another lame attempt to make Trump (who has been on the cutting edge of alerting the Western – and now Eastern! – world to the need to stop with the ineffectual PC talk and get with the action), look bad?


      June 5, 2017 at 5:00 pm

    • That makes no sense, Yusuf.

      El Hombre

      June 5, 2017 at 5:14 pm

  23. It’s naïve to think political leaders respond to ‘the people’ in any real way. The concept that things work that way is tool of control invented by your Hidden Owners.

    Very low crime rate. Increased police spending. But low crime. Military hardware enriched police. But low crime. Import crime/terrorism to deal with low crime rate. Roll out the police state.

    Government creates trouble to necessitate government control. This is all manufactured.

    From Dr. Bruce Charlton:

    “the ruling Establishment (in all social domains) is actively-hostile to the people; and is pursuing a strategy of total-control, moral inversion and induced permanent chaos.”

    I was never here

    June 5, 2017 at 2:12 pm

  24. No one in Europe should “wonder why” Islamic terrorism is happening – or why the police don’t do anything to the suspects on watch lists until it’s too late – their traitorous governments are importing terrorism on purpose. The NWO wants Europe to fail; they want economic collapse and Islamic terrorism and WWIII to consolidate more money and power in the hands of a small elite. Why else would so many nations simultaneously implement immigration policies equivalent to national suicide?

    Islamic Terrorism will be the new normal as long as Europeans are not willing to fight it. This is a one-sided war. The jihadists know they are at war, but the Christian West, Europe in particular, is unwilling to acknowledge the state of war.

    I think this is what Nostradamus was describing centuries ago when his prophecies warned that “negligence” and “neglect” would leave Western Europe open to an Islamic Invasion. Read – Nostradamus and the Islamic Invasion of Europe –

    David Montaigne

    June 5, 2017 at 5:39 pm

    • Of course, they want more money and power. But there’s a strategic reason for doing this. They fought two devastating world wars in less than 30 years. The leaders were obsessed with preventing a third. So they created the EU. They believe nationalism caused the wars (which is partially true) and that the EU is the reason there hasn’t been another one (which is also partially true as well). So now their goal is to completely destroy national identity and create a single European Union. That’s the real point behind free movement. It’s also one of the reasons they’re flooding the EU with foreign immigrants. To destroy national identity and so there won’t be enough votes to vote their way out of the EU the way the UK did. Canada did the same thing to keep Quebec from seceding. They deliberately kept immigration high enough that Quebec would never reach 50%. The prime minister who did it later admitted it.

      Of course, the political class doing this are fools. Because nationalism isn’t the only threat facing Europe. What they’re doing now is far, far worse. They’re importing large numbers of 3rd world people who 1) will never be able to contribute 2) turn the continent into a 3rd world slum and 3) eventually try to take over. That’s happened repeatedly throughout history whenever a nation invites immigrants in. Even worse, because that provides and opportunity for some global power to incite conflict. That’s how superpowers topple foreign governments. Immigration is always a bad idea. Stupid liberals.


      June 5, 2017 at 10:02 pm

      • Good post.

        The “conservatives” are just as bad as the liberals for the most part.

        You mentioned Canada. Those idiots are just as bad as the US and Europe. They have that huge country but they start to import all these 3rd world people. They seem to have turned Vancouver over to the Chinese.


        June 6, 2017 at 7:00 pm

  25. As Richard Spencer (among others) points out, distressing terrorist events almost always make people double down on what they were already committed to. Specific events don’t change much of anything until our frame changes:

    Greg Pandatshang

    June 5, 2017 at 8:18 pm

    • Oh, so now we’re quoting Richard Spencer as though he’s the fount of all wisdom? That’s despicable.

      BTW, Boy Spencer turns out to be a trust fund kid, an heir to a small real estate fortune, whose job is to destroy the lives of young dummies.


      June 6, 2017 at 2:08 pm

  26. Wrist icicles and dick bicycles. Who really is more destructive.


    June 8, 2017 at 1:04 am

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: