Lion of the Blogosphere

The rules of racism

Issa Rae at the Emmys: ‘I’m Rooting for Everybody Black’

Or course it would be considered extremely racist if a white actress said she is rooting for everyone white, and there would be a lot of outrage if that happened, but don’t expect anyone in the mainstream media to care if a black actress says she’s rooting for everyone black, because blacks are allowed to have race consciousness on account of the discrimination they are believed to face from whites.

“Blacks are the real racists” is never going to work.

Written by Lion of the Blogosphere

September 18, 2017 at 8:03 am

Posted in Biology

56 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. The Progressives have successfully imposed identitarianism on all of us. Either you are a Black Nationalist, or a Hispanic Nationalist or an Asian Nationalist or a White Nationalist or a Jew. That is not a choice, it is an imposed requirement. The fate of the Weinsteins are Evergreen is the fate of all of us. It will not turn out well.

    bob sykes

    September 18, 2017 at 8:58 am

  2. bob sykes

    September 18, 2017 at 9:01 am

  3. Not gonna lie, Issa Rae is sexy to me. The type of strong black woman I find kind of intimidating (not the fat ones, who are usually just ghetto).

    GondwanaMan

    September 18, 2017 at 10:05 am

    • You’re black, right?

      DdR

      September 18, 2017 at 12:40 pm

    • I think she’s pretty but I’m not into black girls

      Otis the Sweaty

      September 18, 2017 at 12:57 pm

      • She also really rubs me the wrong way. I HATE “strong black women”.

        Whites are the only group where the men are more nationalistic then the women. I find it very easy to get along with black men, latino men and muslim men. However black, latino and muslim women are so nationalistic and annoying.

        Otis the Sweaty

        September 18, 2017 at 1:02 pm

      • Whites are the only group where the men are more nationalistic then the women.

        Asians too.

        snorlaxwp

        September 18, 2017 at 7:35 pm

    • She’s attractive but not TV attractive. More like, around-the-office attractive. I tried to watch that show of her’s but it was a bore. However admittedly I’m not the target audience.

      Mike Street Station

      September 18, 2017 at 10:48 pm

  4. DRRR. It’s stale and we know that there is a double standard, but nobody cares

    Roxborough's Son

    September 18, 2017 at 10:15 am

  5. I’m perfectly okay with Blacks being racist, for a couple of reasons.

    1. The racism as being acknowledged by the media (positively or negatively) or not, permissiveness for it firmly corrupts any defensible argument for a moral condemnation of racism; or it casts the media as entirely politically motivated as thus as irrelevant as a virtuous arbiter of anything.

    In my mind the objective view will likely outlast the emotional one in the very long term (and assuming white survival).

    2. The point of racism is to conserve both genetic and political advantages for a group, and neither will come to pass for Blacks.

    Blacks, by definition of historical racial views, don’t have any observable genetic advantages to preserve that would predictably lead to a better sociopolitical outcome for them.

    In terms of the possibility of genetic improvement through racism: hoping to select for lower T that might exist in one in tens of thousands of black adolescents, or a better shaped brain pan and neural architecture that likely doesn’t exist in the correct form at all, is so improbable across the tens of millions of more or less randomly breeding blacks in this nation that it is impossible. Their breeding habits, at present and as supported by the welfare that takes selective pressure off of the group, are opposite of the type of selection that they would require should such selection even be probably effective in a short enough time-frame (it isn’t if ever).

    Ignoring for a moment that genetic advantages determine the behavioral core of any group political advantages (which makes any further discussion somewhat redundant), blacks lack the demonstrated sociopolitical / cultural ability to capitalize on any racism.

    Without the ability to effectively socially and politically cooperate within the group to a significant degree, as well as across borders, they will remain hapless in spite of any superficial racial discrimination that might otherwise effect exclusion for group political preference and advantage. See Jews, Northeast Asians, some ME groups, and some other white groups for what constitutes effective community functional behavior and political cooperation (to varying degrees both between and within these groups).

    When you witness the black on black murder rate, what you are seeing is the number that most firmly communicates “These people have the opposite sociopolitical behavior of a politically powerful group” as what you are witnessing is the quantity that tells you most clearly that, across the group, they lack the behavior toward one another that facilitates cooperation.

    What you are witnessing is a group with the widespread behavior that is most indicative of a permanent slave race of “individuals” who lack the ability to incubate political power through group coeherence (whether or not a group is a slave class being determined by their relative degree of true political power that is determined by inter-group cultural behavior). Blacks have no true political power apart what they are propped up for by the media and government. Without those props, their political power would soon dissipate against the force of more functional groups.

    So, no sweat, root for black actors. There is zero political effect in doing so that won’t eventually counter their efforts, and there is zero biological effect that is possible.

    Andrew

    September 18, 2017 at 10:24 am

    • typo in second to last paragraph, the phrase should read “intra-group cultural behavior”.

      Andrew

      September 18, 2017 at 10:28 am

    • “Blacks, by definition of historical racial views, don’t have any observable genetic advantages to preserve that would predictably lead to a better sociopolitical outcome for them.”

      Evolution only cares about how many grandchildren you have, so blacks are more genetically fit than whites for the U.S. environment of the present.

      Lion of the Blogosphere

      September 18, 2017 at 10:41 am

      • Yes but–as Andrew said–many of these black grandchildren will end up murdering other black grandchildren, into perpetuity.

        Roli

        September 18, 2017 at 11:56 am

      • Black people are doing great numbers wise. Steve Sailer has been all over the sub saharan population explosion.

        Magnavox

        September 18, 2017 at 8:41 pm

    • I’d say their physical advantages are obvious. Have you ever watched sports?

      I get annoyed at how the media portrays black men in a selective vacuum: as ideal companions for white women, as leaders, doctors, scientists, athletes, great family men etc. I observe the media my wife consumes (be it advertising or Netflix shows) and it always depicts black men as super hip, smooth-talking sexy dynamos who would make loving family men. Even magazines featuring ads for luxury brands feature white women with mixed children (I.e. “The good life includes a mix raced child!”).

      If your only exposure to black men is via this media (and p.c. brainwashing in school), then you have an extremely skewed view of that segment of the population. And most women do!

      Only local news (which no one watches) gives a more accurate picture as they are the only media outlets who really report crime.

      This past weekend we passed a billboard that depicted a “Crime Stoppers” fugitive with a thug’s photo. Now *that* is a powerful counterpoint to the daily media barrage.

      SWPL2

      September 18, 2017 at 2:08 pm

      • Speaking of local news, I’ll never forget a Bay Are newscast around 1990 about some sort of black fraud ring. The reporter interviews a couple brothas in Oakland and one says with a grin, “yeah, if a black guy’s involved, you can be pretty sure it’s some kinda scam.”

        mel belli

        September 18, 2017 at 6:56 pm

  6. Just turn it off, everybody else is.

    Richard

    September 18, 2017 at 10:41 am

    • That didn’t work with the Tony’s, why would it work with the Emmys? Believe it or not, the Tony’s used to have a mainstream viewership. It was never as big as the Oscars but it was mainstream. In the 90s, long before this era, the huge number of open gays in the theater forced it out of the closet, and their audience shrank to about 6-7 million. They’re still on TV. Same with the Oscars. Viewership has plummeted but they are still on.

      Face it, it’s a machine now. They could have zero viewers and it would still be put on TV.

      gothamette

      September 18, 2017 at 2:13 pm

      • Why would I care if it’s put on TV? I don’t watch it and nobody else I know does either.

        Richard

        September 18, 2017 at 8:46 pm

      • What’s the point of trying to communicate with an a****** like you? But for those people who have some comprehension of the world around them, just because you don’t watch the show doesn’t mean they don’t have cultural significance.

        gothamette

        September 19, 2017 at 10:20 am

      • With zero viewers?

        The bottom line is that you, I and everybody are culture. The only control any individual has over this stuff is to just not feed it. You want to tear your hair out about it because it gives you an ego boost (“I have comprehension!”). But it’s people like you, who can’t look away and must talk about it and disseminate its unwatched message, that keep this shit going.

        Richard

        September 19, 2017 at 1:52 pm

      • Why did you bring up the issue in the first place?

        gothamette

        September 19, 2017 at 3:01 pm

      • Wait, sorry, my bad. You didn’t bring it up you responded.

        I usually take your point of view. I always tell people don’t pay attention to any of this s***. Don’t pay attention to it, and it will go away.

        But Richard, that’s wrong. Effectively a 7 million viewership is 0. But even if it went down to actual zero they would still have the show on the tube, and it would still have an effect.

        I just don’t think you realize how much of a poison gas all this is.

        Beyond that, we don’t really disagree so peace out.

        gothamette

        September 19, 2017 at 3:06 pm

      • “The bottom line is that you, I and everybody are culture. The only control any individual has over this stuff is to just not feed it. You want to tear your hair out about it because it gives you an ego boost (“I have comprehension!”). But it’s people like you, who can’t look away and must talk about it and disseminate its unwatched message, that keep this shit going.”

        Richard – what you wrote is so wrong on so many levels. You and I are nothing. We live in a totally top down society, controlled by greedy monsters. We control culture? Black actors and actresses now take white parts. It’s all over Broadway and the West End. And British TV, and our TV, and Hollywood. It’s not just black nuclear physicists, it’s a black woman playing a Russian woman on Broadway, a black woman playing Queen Margaret (do you even know who she was?), Condola Rashad playing Joan of Arc…the list will go on and on.

        Your ideology is like Ted Kacyznski. It’s good for living in a shack in the woods.

        gothamette

        September 20, 2017 at 1:11 pm

  7. Why doesn’t the GOP used a divide-and-conquer strategy? (don’t answer, it’s because they’re stupid). To wit, there are two groups in the US that have legitimate historical grievances: Indians and blacks descended from slaves and/or with a long historical presence (i.e. not recent African immigrants).

    So, the proposal is, to the greatest extent allowable by law, only these two groups would be considered for affirmative action or special government programs. Everyone else gets nothing. The government can say, hey blacks and Indians, this whole big pot of money is now ALL for you, but these other groups are trying to take it away from you. What would happen?

    ASF

    September 18, 2017 at 11:20 am

    • They’re stupid and always comply with their enemies’ framing of issues.

      Some pundit: “(trendy group X) are the voters of the future and must be catered to!”
      Dems: “Heyyyy (trendy group X), here’s some $ and patronage. Republicans won’t give that to you because they despise you.”
      GOP: “No, we don’t…! And we’ll PROVE it! Try our voucher busywork account plan! It’s tax-sheltered so sometimes next year your refund will be somewhat larger!”

      Fiddlesticks

      September 18, 2017 at 12:04 pm

    • Indians are political 0s and that isn’t how blacks think.

      Blacks do not want a better deal for themselves. What they want is a worse deal for whites. Blacks are more pro immigration than Latinos are.

      Sailer is right, the best strategy is to cast the Dems as the black party because no group likes blacks. Not only that, but blacks are terrible about playing nicely with others and it annoys the shit out of Asians, Muslims and Latinos who have to deal with them.

      Currently, however, there is no need to cast the Dems as the black party because everybody knows that they are. The Dems are openly embracing being the party of gentry liberals, blacks, latinos, LGBT and muslims. Such a party might win some elections, but they will never be able to govern.

      Otis the Sweaty

      September 18, 2017 at 1:11 pm

      • I never understood the pro-immigration stance of the majority of blacks. They’re very conservative in other respects.

        If anything, blacks who are the descendants of slaves (non-voluntary immigrants) should be the most hostile to immigration! (most hostile besides Native Americans at least)

        GondwanaMan

        September 18, 2017 at 4:52 pm

      • They used to be. Everything turned upside down with the New Deal.

        gothamette

        September 19, 2017 at 10:23 am

      • Because blacks are anti white racists

        Otis the Sweaty

        September 18, 2017 at 9:17 pm

      • Unfortunately, there will always be wealthy Jews associated with the Democratic party. I can hardly believe it, but I know a couple of Jewish Democratic activists who buy that whole Jews are not white thing and they’re very very serious about pushing that agenda. They want to resuscitate the old black Jewish coalition.

        gothamette

        September 19, 2017 at 10:22 am

      • More unrequited love than a coalition.

        snorlaxwp

        September 19, 2017 at 5:55 pm

      • snorlaxwp

        September 19, 2017 at 11:34 pm

    • “…to the greatest extent allowable by law, only these two groups would be considered for affirmative action or special government programs”

      I absolutely agree with this and I think this has been Anne Coulter’s position for a while. At this point it’s politically impossible to get rid of Affirmative Action, but there is a strong case (at least on TV talking head shows) to make that African Americans were legitimately screwed over, so why are well to do white women enjoying the benefits of affirmative action?

      That might stir the intersectionality pot a bit.

      Mike Street Station

      September 18, 2017 at 10:54 pm

      • No, feeding the “white women benefit from affirmative action” meme (they don’t, except in STEM and military/police/fire) is a very bad idea for our side. White women are the crucial swing demographic so it’s not good for them to think leftist and anti-white policies are good for them.

        The choice unsympathetic AA beneficiaries to highlight are 100% white Spaniards and Portuguese (“Ted / Penelope Cruz’s children get affirmative action”), whites who lie about their ancestry (Fauxcahontas et al), or, if you want to be a little edgy, the Obama children, or white-appearing people with partial black ancestry (e.g. Ronda Rousey).

        snorlaxwp

        September 19, 2017 at 6:11 pm

      • “No, feeding the “white women benefit from affirmative action” meme (they don’t, except in STEM and military/police/fire) is a very bad idea for our side. White women are the crucial swing demographic so it’s not good for them to think leftist and anti-white policies are good for them.”

        I’m not convinced that the group of white women who knowingly are aware of using affirmative action AND thinking is a great thing for white women to use are gettable by the GOP. You are really talking about SJW’s and old cat lady feminists like Hillary. Most centrist white women would deny they have ever benefited from it or that they are just as deserving of it as blacks are.

        Mike Street Station

        September 19, 2017 at 6:57 pm

      • If white women see that everymike from CA to Street Station agrees that they benefit from AA (again, false), then they probably are going to conclude, quite reasonably, that they do in fact benefit.

        In general if leftists think it’s to their advantage to promote a falsehood, it’s to our disadvantage to also be promoting that falsehood.

        snorlaxwp

        September 19, 2017 at 8:54 pm

      • Hispanicism is set to dominate Meriprolestan as another Latin American nation of mongrels.

        Latin American racial dynamics will render Anglo racial categorization as irrelevant, when it comes to its nebulous concept of race and affirmative action.

        I don’t know how non-Hispanic Whites feel when White Hispanics are stealing their privileges. They also get to claim victimhood, simply because of their last names.

        JS

        September 20, 2017 at 11:11 am

  8. I’m convinced that celebrities and wanna-be celebrities say outrageous things simply to generate buzz and get attention for themselves.* The Internet and MSM will be talking about Issa Rae for the next five days. And before this post, I had never heard of her.

    *When straight White males do this, it’s usually a mistake and career-ender.

    E. Rekshun

    September 18, 2017 at 11:27 am

    • You just disproved your own point. If someone really wanted to grab attention they would talk about Jews or whites, and they would never work again.

      gothamette

      September 18, 2017 at 2:14 pm

  9. Here in NorCal, I’m noticing that the Chevy Malibu (which looks a bit like a Tesla) is flying out of showrooms. Anybody else noticing the amazing sales of this car?

    Explainer 21

    September 18, 2017 at 12:24 pm

    • The 1980s Chevy Malibu was one of the worst cars ever made. I don’t know why Chevy would keep the name.

      Lion of the Blogosphere

      September 18, 2017 at 2:12 pm

      • Because Chevy is prole.

        B.T.D.T.

        September 18, 2017 at 3:04 pm

      • Because it still has cachet from the 60s when Malibus were cool?

        Curle

        September 18, 2017 at 4:16 pm

  10. The Lion : the more stupid the more racist the people are. That’s why blacks are so racist alongside white proles.

    Bruno

    September 18, 2017 at 12:59 pm

    • I really don’t believe racism is linked to stupidity.

      SWPL2

      September 18, 2017 at 2:25 pm

      • I think theres actually some correlation between more open-minded type personalities and higher than average intelligence. But its certainly not one to one

        Alex

        September 18, 2017 at 4:24 pm

      • There’s a modest correlation. It’s easier to be racist when you have low empathy, and dummies are more likely to have low empathy.

        GondwanaMan

        September 18, 2017 at 4:43 pm

  11. I have a theory that the only way one can tell the truth in the movies will be animation. Animation is so good that you can produce virtual reality. That way, you don’t have to bother with live actors and their egos. And you can write realistic dialogue, and have the “actors” (really, cattle, as Hitchcock said) do what you want them to do.

    Imagine a move about American crime that tells the truth? It could be done but only with animation.

    gothamette

    September 18, 2017 at 2:20 pm

  12. I don’t know what is the problem. I wouldn’t want an undeserving Jew to receuve an award, but things being unknown, like a comming up boxing match, or a bout with a close outcome, I would always be rooting for a Jew. What Jew wouldn’t? Lion, are you saying you wouldn’t? So what you gonna do? Root again a Jew? Why?

    Yakov

    September 19, 2017 at 9:43 pm

    • There are Jewish boxers?

      Lion of the Blogosphere

      September 19, 2017 at 11:11 pm

      • You think Jews are freaks? There are Jewish everything, for better or worse.

        Amir Khan is a world champion and one of my favorite boxers. I’m not sure how Dmitry even got to fight him. Incidently Dmitry is Orthodox, note the jewish star in his trunks.

        There are no Jewish Sumo wrestlers yet, so I have to take back my earlier words.

        Yakov

        September 19, 2017 at 11:40 pm

      • The subject of this interview is a Jew and the heavyweight champion of the world.

        snorlaxwp

        September 19, 2017 at 11:43 pm

      • Yakov

        September 19, 2017 at 11:44 pm

      • Yakov

        September 19, 2017 at 11:47 pm


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: