Lion of the Blogosphere

Pat Buchanan says to vote for Roy Moore.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2017/11/28/why_roy_moore_matters_135629.html

Three reasons:

1. Judges.
2. Judges.
3. Judges.

While I think it would be a bad thing if conservative justices on the Supreme Court were to overturn Roe v. Wade as Buchanan still hopes will happen one day, there is no doubt that we need conservative judges, because liberal judges will find that people in other countries have a constitutional right to immigrate here, and transgenderism is a constitutional right, and other crazy nonsense.

And just as scary, liberal judges will stop protecting free-speech rights of what they consider to be “racist” speech. That’s already the case in Europe, and liberals would love to bring that to America.

Written by Lion of the Blogosphere

November 29, 2017 at EDT am

Posted in Politics

26 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. If somebody asked Buchanan directly, “do you think it would be good for America if more black and Hispanic babies were born?” What do you think his answer would be?

    Otis the Sweaty

    November 29, 2017 at EDT am

    • He would say it’s good because God would reward us for doing the right thing.

      Lion of the Blogosphere

      November 29, 2017 at EDT am

      • He might say it, but he wouldn’t mean it.

        maryk

        November 29, 2017 at EDT pm

  2. Well, when Trump’s SCOTUS overturns Roe v. Wade it will also overturn Obergfell as well as AA.

    Andrew E.

    November 29, 2017 at EDT pm

    • I don’t think any of that will happen. AA might be weakened throughout the Trump administration, but that’s it. Even if Trump were to get two more SCOTUS appointments, they aren’t going to be as aggressive as you want.

      Lowe

      November 29, 2017 at EDT pm

  3. I was genuinely surprised and peeved by the comments on this article at The American Conservative. Roy Moore has a job to do, which is to represent the people of Alabama in Washington. Doug Jones can’t do that job well because he’s a Democrat. Observing that Moore is accused but not convicted of crimes 40 years ago doesn’t magically get the job done. But the TAC commenters respond with what might as well be “But muh values!” typed over and over.

    Greg Pandatshang

    November 29, 2017 at EDT pm

    • TAC has been a “we win by losing” organ for a long time.

      Richard

      November 29, 2017 at EDT pm

    • Roy Moore also has a job to do: to be a public face for the Republican party and its non-cucked wing, and he would do an absolutely horrible job of it. “Muh values?” For some it was just politics, but others of us meant it. If you sacrifice morality for political victory you will get neither. TAC has a history of cuckoldry, but this time there really is a wolf.

      Hwite

      November 29, 2017 at EDT pm

      • Nice evidence-free assertion.

        I agree with Nancy Pelosi on one thing: “Let’s hear it for the power, yeah!” Whites need fierce, unapologetic advocacy for their needs and desires, which are often in diametric opposition to NAMs. President Trump and Roy Moore will represent Their People much better than a Republicuck or especially a member of the White Genocide Party (Democrats), so I don’t care about their un-evidenced sexual stuff.

        Let’s hear it for the power, yeah!

        hard9bf

        November 29, 2017 at EDT pm

      • Hwite, I completely agree that Moore is a terrible candidate. Either that, or he’s been the victim of one of the all-time great largely undetected smear campaigns. Really, I never thought he was going to be a good public face for the Republican Party or the Trumpian wing, but, hey, Alabamians liked him. So, I hope he does resign after winning the election (although I’m not holding my breath, since he’s got no reason to want to do that). But the time to complain about his quality as a candidate was up until the day of the primary and then again the day after the general election.

        The point of the expression “but muh values” is not that values are worthless and you shouldn’t have them. It’s that the specific value you’re bringing up is not relevant at this particular moment.

        Greg Pandatshang

        November 29, 2017 at EDT pm

      • …largely undetected smear campaigns.

        By now, largely detected by the public.

        Andrew E.

        November 29, 2017 at EDT pm

      • Andrew E., I haven’t been paying that much attention, because it doesn’t matter to me. I support his election, and, beyond that, I never liked him in the first place.

        Greg Pandatshang

        November 29, 2017 at EDT pm

      • “Whites need fierce, unapologetic advocacy for their needs and desires”

        We’ve had that for a while. To name a few, Tom Metzger, William Luther Pierce, David Duke…. What White advocates need is smart, well-spoken people who can make the moral case for our interests. It does not matter if we have truth on our side, if our leaders are a bunch of scoundrels we will lose. Really, if given a choice between a creationist who’s moral and a believer in evolution who is always looking to grab your wallet, who do you choose to lead you?

        Hwite

        November 30, 2017 at EDT am

  4. Even if Roe v Wade were overturned, it would just go to the states. Some states would allow abortion, others would not. QED.

    Half Canadian

    November 29, 2017 at EDT pm

    • “Even if Roe v Wade were overturned, it would just go to the states.”

      Would be very temporary. When does Congress ever leave anything really important up to the states?

      Conservatives in Congress can’t wait to outlaw abortion everywhere.

      Lion of the Blogosphere

      November 29, 2017 at EDT pm

      • Divorce, probate and real property are very important – especially to wealthy people.

        Yet Congress leaves those issues to the States.

        JA

        November 29, 2017 at EDT pm

      • @ JA

        That’s because there’s a general consensus on those topics already, among the States.

        Lowe

        November 29, 2017 at EDT pm

  5. >>While I think it would be a bad thing if conservative justices on the Supreme Court were to overturn Roe v. Wade

    Lion, if Roe v. Wade were overturned the worst that could happen for your interest in the matter is the issue would be thrown back to the states, as was the status quo before 1973. New York State legalized abortion in 1972, California in the 1960s. Every liberal state (the majority would legalize abortion). It would be made illegal in conservative/ Christian influenced states such as the Dakotas, Idaho, Iowa, some in the south, etc. What’s wrong with that. You would still have your abortion in New York, New Jersey, Connecticut. The difference: obnoxious, liberal easterners wouldn’t be able to force their world view and “morals” onto every nook and cranny of the nation. Is that so bad? If you live in South Dakota, and you really want that abortion, book a flight to San Francisco (God help your soul). Oh, it cost money, took fucking bad. My rotten teeth cost money to fix too. I don’t give a shit about this Stare Decisis, liberals don’t respect it when it goes against their interests, why should I?

    Daniel

    November 29, 2017 at EDT pm

  6. If Roe v. Wade gets overturned, it will matter little — most states will still permit abortion.

    And states controlled by the White Genocide Party are the most ardent champions of abortion, so we will have fewer WGP voters in the future.

    hard9bf

    November 29, 2017 at EDT pm

    • “If Roe v. Wade gets overturned, it will matter little — most states will still permit abortion.”

      Wrong, it matters a lot, congress if controlled by Republicans would make abortion illegal everywhere. That’s what they really want.

      Lion of the Blogosphere

      November 29, 2017 at EDT pm

    • No, an abortion ban could not get more than 100 votes in the House. Even if it passed, the courts would strike it down. Even if the courts allowed it, abortion would become like marijuana — inconvenient to get in some places, but not too difficult if really want it. Furthermore, there will be mail-order abortion pills that are impossible to stop. You are getting worried over nothing.

      Schlafly

      November 29, 2017 at EDT pm

  7. pb is a notorious butt boy.

    i was there!

    i was there with Evel Knievel…

    we laughed at steve sailer.

    that was good steam.

    the baths have been ruined by butt boys.

    K2 steam

    November 29, 2017 at EDT pm

  8. It’s no big deal if Roe v. Wade is overturned. The blue states will promptly legalize abortion rates in their legislatures.

    Sid

    November 30, 2017 at EDT am

  9. Lion…

    You don’t seem to grasp the reality that with the “right to privacy” being aborted on January 22, 1973 that the “right” to immigrate anywhere and publicly “transgender” on the spot was “born.”

    thordaddy

    November 30, 2017 at EDT am

  10. I always skip thordaddy comments but this one actually seems right-on.

    Pete

    November 30, 2017 at EDT pm


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: