Lion of the Blogosphere

Donald Trump brings PEACE to Korea

And I mean it. Trump speaks a prole language that foreign leaders like Kim Jong-un understand.

This would NOT be happening if Hillary Clinton were president.

Written by Lion of the Blogosphere

April 27, 2018 at EDT am

Posted in International

28 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. So your rescinding Mr Magoo theory ? You can’t have it both way. Say it doesn’t get anything good goose done because he is a Magoo and the he does for the same reason, because then you re theory is never dispeovable. The theory must be refine to allow prediction capacity evaluation

    Bruno

    April 27, 2018 at EDT am

    • There is no reason not to have it both ways when there are at least 4 differing theories on how Trump operates or negotiates:

      Trump is Insane/all Id
      Trump is Mr Magoo
      Trump is putting on a show like a wrestling match
      Trump is a 4D Chess master

      The thing is, they ALL could be correct at various times and situations.

      Mike Street Station

      April 28, 2018 at EDT am

  2. Seems like it’s easier to bring peace to the Korean peninsula than to stop the illegal invasion of the USA. Wrong priorities, Mr. President!

    Yakov

    April 27, 2018 at EDT am

    • The presidential system inevitably gives more scope of authority and room to maneuver in foreign policy than in domestic. A never-trump do-nothing congress + run-wild anti-trump left-wing activist courts can’t stop him abroad like they can at home.

      Thin-Skinned Masta-Beta

      April 27, 2018 at EDT pm

  3. H hasn’t brought peace yet, but he’s gone further since any American President since the Korean War. Truly remarkable.

    Mike Street Station

    April 27, 2018 at EDT am

    • Sure this isn’t some fake news?

      gothamette

      April 27, 2018 at EDT am

      • OK I read some article and IF this is true, then it validates my theory that NK is a Chinese puppet – of sorts. Not an actual sock puppet but a nasty little chihuahua who strains at the leash. But the leash is controlled by China. What China wants, China gets, at least in Asia, and somehow Trump made it clear to the Chicoms that he was tired of this bullshit.

        If so, I commend our glorious alpha male leader! But don’t expect him to get any kavod from the lamestream.

        gothamette

        April 27, 2018 at EDT am

      • If peace in the Korean peninsula is the one wish that Trump chose to get granted by China then he is deeply, truly, irrevocably cucked.

        Magnavox

        April 27, 2018 at EDT pm

      • He won’t get much credit, but he will get some in the MSM. This is too big to ignore for Stormy Daniels.

        Mike Street Station

        April 28, 2018 at EDT am

      • I can see the headlines: “North Korea gives up nukes. In the latest Stormy Daniels news….”

        gothamette

        April 28, 2018 at EDT pm

  4. I can’t figure out what this is supposed to mean. You could interpret it as a signal that NK wants to de-nuclearize, maybe even reduce the military presence on the DMZ (which probably just means pushing the military presence back a few miles) but you could just as easily interpret it as serving momentary NK domestic propaganda purposes. Words are wind.

    Also, people keep saying that the Koreas are technically at war, but the Korean War was undeclared, like most wars in history and all wars after WW2. And there was an armistice; the war ended with ink and paper while it began with none.

    So if your ink and paper is insufficiently official, the war never ends? Is a country ceasing to exist sufficient, or is Rome still at war with Carthage? And for the record, the U.S. does not recognize NK, so in a sense, it doesn’t technically exist per U.S. law.

    Wency

    April 27, 2018 at EDT am

    • “Also, people keep saying that the Koreas are technically at war, but the Korean War was undeclared, like most wars in history and all wars after WW2. And there was an armistice; the war ended with ink and paper while it began with none. So if your ink and paper is insufficiently official, the war never ends? Is a country ceasing to exist sufficient, or is Rome still at war with Carthage? ”

      Are your semantics really useful here? The Norks torpedoed a SK destroyer only a few years ago, 50 sailors killed. Violent border incidents happen regularly.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_border_incidents_involving_North_and_South_Korea

      Richard

      April 27, 2018 at EDT pm

  5. If Trump pulls this off, he’s destined to become the Regan of this century. The validation this will bring Trump, must I suspect be the stuff of nightmares for liberals.

    Roli

    April 27, 2018 at EDT am

    • Yes, this is the most important domestic implication of this. It completely legitimizes Trump, on liberals’ and neverTrumpers’ own terms, as a serious leader and statesman. The top 5 objections to Trump by Trump’s enemies all go away overnight. That’s why Trump’s enemies will deny this is actually happening until long after it’s already happened.

      Andrew E.

      April 27, 2018 at EDT am

    • “I don’t think Trump has the temperament to be President”

      Ends Korean War.

      Lion, do you think Trump would get a Nobel Peace prize for this considering Obama got one for literally doing nothing?

      chris

      April 27, 2018 at EDT am

      • Obama didn’t get a Nobel Peace prize for nothing. He got it for being black.

        destructure

        April 27, 2018 at EDT pm

    • Not really cause people don’t vote based on foreign policy.

      If the economy is good in 2020, Trump wins. If it isn’t, he loses. Everything else is just a distraction.

      Otis the Sweaty

      April 27, 2018 at EDT am

      • Do people vote on economic performance? I think this is part of the old rules that is being overturned by our demography-is-destiny era. What Hillary voter voted on the economy? It was all about getting shout outs for your race/ethnic/gender group.

        Mike Street Station

        April 28, 2018 at EDT am

      • What Hillary voter voted on the economy?

        She decisively won the popular vote in part by running as the continuation of the Obama era during a time of economic prosperity

        Magnavox

        April 28, 2018 at EDT pm

      • “She decisively won the popular vote in part by running as the continuation of the Obama era during a time of economic prosperity”

        Sounds like something a person from the HRC campaign would say.

        She won the popular vote because of California. And California is the most Hispanic of all states. So I’d say she won the popular vote because her allies in the MSM successfully depicted Trump as being RACIST against Hispanics.

        Lion of the Blogosphere

        April 28, 2018 at EDT pm

    • Reagan destroyed the republican party as an intellectually and morally viable entity. Trump being the Reagan of this century would entail destroying it electorally, which is definitely a real possibility. So I agree.

      Magnavox

      April 27, 2018 at EDT pm

  6. I’ll believe it when I see NK dismantle its nuclear weapons and missiles and destroy the 100,000 artillery pieces they have pointed at Seoul.

    CamelCaseRob

    April 27, 2018 at EDT am

  7. Give me a break.

    That S. Korean president is who made peace happen. Once S. Korea ditched their female cult following president things got done.

    Trump too his credit didn’t screw things up.

    Jeff

    April 27, 2018 at EDT am

  8. “This would NOT be happening if Hillary Clinton were president.”

    Very true. And it’s not simply a matter of timing, either. The only other president (or candidate) I could see this possibly happening under was Reagan. So for any of those cucks still claiming Trump can’t negotiate…

    Leftists ad cucks throw hysterical tantrums about Trump’s administration every day. And if you listened to them (I don’t) you’d think his president was a disaster. But, in spite of congressional obstructionism and deep state shenanigans, things are actually going fairly well.

    destructure

    April 27, 2018 at EDT am

  9. Sometimes I wonder if there should be three Chief Executives. One of which would deal with domestic issues, one with foreign affairs, and one to serve as a governor-general like in Canada. If Trump only dealt with foreign affairs, he might be tolerable. Same with Nixon and the Bushes.

    LBJ, on the other hand, should have stuck to domestic.

    njguy73

    April 27, 2018 at EDT pm

    • LBJ’s domestic agenda led to the Democratic Party turning into the White Genocide Party. He established cradle-to-grave welfare at a level perfectly acceptable to Shithole-Americans, who are proud to collect welfare while loitering all day in the ‘hood or the barrio in exchange for voting Democrat. Pesky white people are typically ashamed of welfare payments, so they’re not reliable Democrat voters. Ergo, in two generations the Democratic Party deliriously celebrates and promotes the death of white people because we. just. won’t. vote. correctly.

      hard9bf

      April 27, 2018 at EDT pm

      • LBJ lost two wars…Vietnam and the USWar on Poverty. After multi-trillions of dollars, the same % of the people are still misbehaving and/or poor in both countries.

        cesqy

        April 27, 2018 at EDT pm


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: