Lion of the Blogosphere

Ivanka Trump’s viral Instagram photo

View this post on Instagram

My ♥️

A post shared by Ivanka Trump (@ivankatrump) on

Written by Lion of the Blogosphere

May 29, 2018 at 8:16 AM

Posted in Politics

96 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. I ballpark her at BMI 19.

    toomanymice

    May 29, 2018 at 8:45 AM

  2. Interesting use of perspective, how when photographed from a particular angle a toddler looks to be a big percentage of the height of a woman who’s almost six feet tall.

    Peter

    ironrailsironweights

    May 29, 2018 at 9:20 AM

  3. Yeah, so?

    njguy73

    May 29, 2018 at 9:35 AM

    • Liberals think Ivanka has no right to post such a picture because illegal aliens are trafficking their children.

      Richard

      May 29, 2018 at 11:52 AM

      • Yes, the comments are out of order, though they aren’t liberals but the latest far-left silliness.

        Robert

        May 29, 2018 at 2:58 PM

      • >> Liberals think Ivanka has no right to post such a picture because illegal aliens are trafficking their children.

        Ha, ha. True, non sequitur reasoning patterns. Welcome to the liberal mind. A confusing, creaky house of trap doors, false exits, and bewildering mazes.

        Daniel

        May 29, 2018 at 3:43 PM

      • Will someone please answer my question? Why am I supposed to care about this?

        njguy73

        May 29, 2018 at 7:27 PM

  4. Seems like an ad promoting motherhood.

    Mike Street Station

    May 29, 2018 at 11:45 AM

    • That’s a definite no-no…encouraging fertility among whites. White people are supposed to hurry up and die already (especially those deplorable badwhites) and make way for their virtuous and blameless swarthy successors.

      Oswald Spengler

      May 29, 2018 at 12:32 PM

  5. So, does anybody understand why this is viral? It can’t really be the migrants thing, can it.

    Greg Pandatshang

    May 29, 2018 at 12:48 PM

    • People like the photo. This outraged SJWs who hate the Trumps who believe that it “normalizes” Trump if people look to his family the way people used to look to the Kennedies.

      • I notice that People Magazine avoids all things Trump as much as possible. One article was required when he was elected, but not much since.

        Are readers of this magazine all elites? I’m surprised that they don’t get more feedback. Of course, maybe they do. Who would know?

        Frau Katze

        May 29, 2018 at 7:00 PM

      • Controversial due to Trump Derangement Syndrome, got it. I’m sure there’s also a harder core of people who resent that the image appears to promote motherhood and yet there’s nothing “alternative” about it: not a minority, not LGBT, not disabled, not a single mother, not even an overabundance of tattoos. Ivanka has 0 pokémon points, so why does she get to appear promoting her lifestyle as if having 0 pokémon points was okay? Of course, this shades into the larger number of people who are just plain old jealous. Perhaps Ivanka Trump happens to be prettier than you are; or perhaps she has reproduced while you are barren.

        The real hardcore are the ones who just don’t like white people having babies at all. Ironically, if they talked to an alt-right anti-semite or flight-from-white leftwing Jew, they’d be told that the kid is in fact mixed race after all. Fear of a black planet!

        Greg Pandatshang

        May 29, 2018 at 11:18 PM

    • I see no evidence of it being viral. The only recent viral ivanka instagram pic is the ‘fake scientist’ one of her in a lab.

      Maybe lion got mixed up or this is a weird google experiment. If you google ‘Ivanka viral instagram’ lion is one of the top hits.

      toomanymice

      May 29, 2018 at 5:01 PM

      • The post got more likes than anything else she has posted recently, and was a big news story because crazy SJWs were complaining about it.

    • I’ve heard she is really popular in China. You can see why an attractive blonde American president’s daughter would have a lot of glamour and mystique to women in other parts of the world. She is someone they would want to emulate.

      So maybe they are partly resonsible for the pictures virality.

      prolier than thou

      May 29, 2018 at 5:40 PM

      • Ivanka Trump and Tricia Nixon are much more attractive than Chelsea Clinton and Amy Carter.

        ScarletNumber

        May 30, 2018 at 12:41 AM

  6. She is almost as beautiful as Michelle Obama.

    Clay

    May 29, 2018 at 1:13 PM

    • She’s not a natural blonde as one can see during her prime, where she is also less polished as a person.

      Her wealth has been enhanced significantly by her marriage with the Kushners, who are real tycoons in the Manhattan real estate business. Trump only does branding and his buildings are ugly and gaudy.

      JS

      May 29, 2018 at 1:33 PM

      • But she was more polished than any other rich kid in the documentary.

      • She’s had a ton of plastic surgery. Good raw material but she’s as fake as hell.

        gothamette

        May 29, 2018 at 2:46 PM

      • I thought the Kushners were going hat-in-hand to Middle East potentates for money?

        Dave Pinsen

        May 29, 2018 at 2:50 PM

      • Forbes says the Kushner family including parents and brother altogether are worth 1.8B and Trump by himself is worth 3.1B. Moreover, Trump has about a half billion more in NY real estate.

        https://www.forbes.com/sites/chloesorvino/2016/12/18/jared-josh-kushner-fortune-donald-trump-real-estate/#3a4f48342f42

        https://www.forbes.com/donald-trump/#32e028952899

        destructure

        May 29, 2018 at 4:28 PM

      • It doesn’t say the Kushners are worth that much. They are worth at least 1.8B.

        Look at Trump’s non-NYC investments, it makes them worthless or non-sequitur.

        JS

        May 29, 2018 at 8:26 PM

      • She was by far the most articulate and sane rich kid in that docu. That being said, were I her I’d keep a somewhat mute social media presence. Privacy is the currency of the future.

        toomanymice

        May 29, 2018 at 8:54 PM

      • She has vocal fry in this video.

        Curle

        May 29, 2018 at 10:12 PM

      • She was by far the most articulate and sane rich kid in that docu.

        Sanity is always genetically passed on from the father’s side.

        The Undiscovered Jew

        May 29, 2018 at 10:17 PM

      • People who have worked on the Apprentice have stated publicly that she is one of the most together people they’ve ever encountered. So, no.

        marck

        May 29, 2018 at 11:10 PM

      • “She’s had a ton of plastic surgery. Good raw material but she’s as fake as hell.”

        When she was young like that, she looked rather unremarkable like any of the dozens of ordinary Jewish / Italian / whatever other spoiled recent former prole cum Nouveau-Riche girls with whom I shared my public school in suburban New Jersey.

        Don’t know much about plastic surgery, but she did at least grew into her chubby face that previously lacked much delicate refinement into quite a pleasant looking woman. Could it be possible that simply losing weight & maturity has given her face the new definition? Whether she had plastic surgery or not, I respect her sense of restraint for not making the mistake of overdoing it so that it looks as unnaturally hideous as it does with so many other victims of the surgeon’s scalpel.

        Thin-Skinned Masta-Beta

        May 29, 2018 at 11:53 PM

      • It’s notable she prefers legos and erector sets to barbie dolls. Her digit ratio probably skews toward a left brained individual, which explains her overall sanity.

        She’s beautiful like a girl, but she thinks with the justice inclined rationality of a hard nosed man.

        Paul Ryan's Sickly Old Lap Dog

        May 31, 2018 at 2:55 PM

    • Every time someone mentions Michelle Obama’s appearance, all I can think of is the late Lawrence Auster (RIP) and his constant diatribes against her musculature.

      Hermes

      May 29, 2018 at 4:52 PM

      • I don’t understand why people on the alt-right go all crazy whenever they see a black woman with muscles. It’s just HBD.

      • I agree with you. Auster’s frequent picking at unchosen aspects of people’s appearances (as opposed to chosen things like attire and tattoos) was one of the few things I didn’t care for about him.

        Hermes

        May 29, 2018 at 5:18 PM

      • “I don’t understand why people on the alt-right go all crazy whenever they see a black woman with muscles. It’s just HBD.”

        Black women aren’t naturally any more muscular than women of other races. Just as black men aren’t naturally any more muscular than men of other races.

        Peter

        ironrailsironweights

        May 29, 2018 at 5:28 PM

      • Don’t deny the truth of HBD. Don’t be a science-denier.

      • “I don’t understand why people on the alt-right go all crazy whenever they see a black woman with muscles. It’s just HBD”.

        Do you really not get it?

        They don’t like seeing someone, of a differing race and culture, who wasn’t “made” for Jackie K style dresses attempt to appropriate her appearance. Following that, her class, grace, role, etc.

        Pointing out her muscles is the white version of protesting cultural appropriation.

        Sam

        May 29, 2018 at 6:30 PM

      • Nope, don’t see why it’s a big deal if black women have muscles. It’s a consolation prize for having lower IQ.

      • “Black women aren’t naturally any more muscular than women of other races. Just as black men aren’t naturally any more muscular than men of other races”.

        They absolutely are more naturally muscular and strong. Denying that is a denial of reality.

        Go and date an average young, slim black girl for a while and find out.

        Sam

        May 29, 2018 at 6:33 PM

      • Re: my comment on cultural appropriation.

        And they’d be correct. MO looks awful in those dresses, which were made for women with a more delicate frame. She looks completely out of place in them. For one, if that style of dress was made for MO, it would never show off her muscular arms the way that those tend to.

        Its a similar concept to how traditional men’s tailoring is much more complimentary to men with soft bodies. Men who worked in offices. When a muscular guy would slip into a traditional suit, he’d look like a monkey in a suit. He’d look worse. Whereas the soft body would look better than he did out of it.

        The tailoring trend now veering toward complimenting muscular men, who traditionally were mostly low class laborers.

        Sam

        May 29, 2018 at 6:39 PM

      • “Nope, don’t see why it’s a big deal if black women have muscles. It’s a consolation prize for having lower IQ”.

        Its only a big deal to Americans who see her as a cultural threat. That may be you, it may not be. It is some.

        Sam

        May 29, 2018 at 6:42 PM

      • Michelle clearly has something weird going on with her chromosomes. Normally, I’d say it was uncool to ridicule someone for that. But she’s not just a regular, neutral person. She sat in Jerry’s little house of hate for 20 years while he and Farrakahn gave each other hand jobs. She deserves all the contempt and scorn she gets. Even if it’s for something she had no control over. And so does Valerie Jarret.

        destructure

        May 29, 2018 at 7:50 PM

      • “When a muscular guy would slip into a traditional suit, he’d look like a monkey in a suit.“

        Right. There’s a superior court judge in my building who is tall and clearly a weightlifter. I have a hard time imagining him in the role of judge. He nearly bursts out of his shirts.

        Curle

        May 29, 2018 at 10:18 PM

      • If black women were naturally more muscular than white women, you would expect that the world’s top female javelin throwers, discus throwers, and shot putters, would be black. Because a small natural advantage would translate to a huge discrepancy at the top.

        But you don’t see that.

        fortaleza84

        May 30, 2018 at 10:46 AM

      • They probably just have no exposure to those sports. All the evidence is that blacks can excel at any sport they put effort into excelling at.

      • Blacks in America get plenty of exposure to track and field. And in fact they produce a lot of great sprinters.

        American blacks get the same exposure to discus throwing as whites, i.e. very little.

        There are plenty of NCAA track coaches who would be eager to exploit a huge untapped pool of great black throwers. They don’t do it because it doesn’t exist. Just like there is no pool of great female engineers willing to work for 70% of what men are paid.

        fortaleza84

        May 30, 2018 at 5:39 PM

      • I found a black discus and shot-put thrower: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shanice_Craft

        Black people probably see competition in this sport to be pointless. Where’s the money? They’d rather play basketball.

      • Lots of black people do track (successfully) at the high school and college level, despite there being little or no money in it. They dominate sprinting because they have a natural advantage. They don’t dominate throwing events.

        It’s funny to hear you make excuses for the lack of black success. You sound just like a liberal.

        Track and field is a sport which mainly consists of running, jumping, and throwing. Blacks are great at running (short distances); they are decent at jumping; and they are mediocre at throwing.

        fortaleza84

        May 30, 2018 at 11:10 PM

      • forteleza is right. Blacks have an advantage in some sports but a disadvantage in others. In particular, blacks with west african ancestry have advantages in sports that rely heavily on speed and running and disadvantages in sports that rely on strength and endurance. Furthermore, asians would have an advantage in sports that require quickness like ping pong and fencing. Someone would have to be stupid to think that one demographic has an advantage in every sport.

        destructure

        June 1, 2018 at 5:14 PM

  7. The hate directed at Ivanka tells you everything you need to know about the left.

    They embrace that which is ugly: ugly art, ugly religion, ugly people, ugly sexuality, and so on. True beauty in any of these realms offends them.

    Ivanka hurts leftists every time she works out at the gym or hugs her children.

    Dan

    May 29, 2018 at 1:20 PM

    • The GOP should do everything within reason to brand the Democrats as “The Ugly Party.”

      Oswald Spengler

      May 29, 2018 at 1:33 PM

      • You can’t say that, at least on an individual basis. Calling a Democrat ugly is the most serious kind of hate speech that there is. Milo got banned from Twitter because he called Leslie Jones ugly. Roseanne just lost her massive hit TV show today because she basically called Valerie Jarrett ugly.

        You can only hope that people see.

        You can do it obliquely, as in, “there is something very seriously wrong with Hillary Clinton’s health. That is one …. unhealthy…. woman”

        Dan

        May 29, 2018 at 4:23 PM

    • I’m not left wing but I don’t think that Ivanka Trump is close to beautiful.

      Liz Taylor and Hedy Lamarr were beautiful, and they were beautiful before the advent of modern plastic surgery. A scourge.

      gothamette

      May 29, 2018 at 2:47 PM

      • Liz Tailor was beautiful. Ivanka Trump is extremely pretty if we are only using Taylor’s level of beauty to qualify. In the real world, Ivanka is beautiful.

        The symmetrical difference between Ivanka’s face an that of Liz Taylor is so small that its virtually a difference of no difference. Of course, there is a difference in the way the finest diamond grade is different from the very next diamond grade. People who have a motivation to make the distinction can. However, the second finest diamond grade is still an immensely fine jewel.

        Sam

        May 29, 2018 at 6:15 PM

      • Compared to Taylor, Ivana is costume jewelry.

        gothamette

        May 29, 2018 at 6:23 PM

      • On second thought, I don’t see a much of a distinction and could even give the edge to Ivanka.

        Liz Taylor was a pretty but not an overly attractive child, and as an adult actress, from her era, there aren’t any readily discoverable photographs of her in even a mildly natural state. Its very difficult to get a sense of what is under he makeup and hair. Some photographs of her profile, from certain angles, are not complimentary. Her face is somewhat overly elongated.

        The same can’t be said of Ivanka, who is constantly on video and photographed in every manner of daily situation. And she holds up very well. She has no bad angles in my opinion as a heterosexual white male who isn’t shy to be critical.

        Any previous generation celebrity will seem to have more class and grace than the current generation. For one, that was always the primary persona that was intentionally prioritized by the studios and media. Whether it was true or not. In contrast, the gatekeeping filter is much more lax today. I get nostalgia for those earlier actresses, and how it could be conflated with an exceptional level of beauty that isn’t had today. I just don’t think that that is true.

        Sam

        May 29, 2018 at 6:25 PM

      • In male mathematics beautiful = anyone too pretty to go out with me. I’m guessing Ivanka easily meets that test for 99% of guys here.

        Curle

        May 29, 2018 at 10:22 PM

      • “I’m not left wing but I don’t think that Ivanka Trump is close to beautiful.”

        Gothamette, you are not within your realm of competency here. Defer to straight men on this one.

        Dan

        May 30, 2018 at 5:42 AM

      • I can say whatever the hell I want to say here. If you don’t like it, tough.

        Ivanka Trump isn’t even a fake beauty, she’s a well-turned out mediocrity. She has a weak chin, built up by plastic surgery, a cosmetically enhanced nose, and mediocre eyes. Bone structure OK. Figure terrific.

        You are no judge of beauty. Defer to the older straight woman here.

        True Nordic beauty: Grace Kelly, Ursula Andress, Virna Lisi.

        Fake: Ivanka.

        gothamette

        May 30, 2018 at 10:46 AM

      • Ivanka is beautiful. I say so.

      • Ivanka is a mediocrity who photographs well. I say so.

        gothamette

        May 30, 2018 at 12:38 PM

      • “Ivanka is a mediocrity who photographs well”.

        That isn’t really a thing. If it is, she’d be the first person that I’ve ever seen in my life who photographs well in every single photo but is then magically less attractive in real life. One or two good photos, sure. But not most. A beautiful person can have a couple of bad photos (ahem…Liz Taylor) and an ugly person can have a couple of good, but I’d offer that the average photo of a person is a fine account of their symmetry and youth.

        Of course, we are all entitled to our opinions.

        Sam

        May 30, 2018 at 2:33 PM

      • I’ve seen a lot of bad pics of Ivanka.

        https://beautyeditor.ca/2014/02/07/ivanka-trump-before-and-after

        gothamette

        May 30, 2018 at 2:53 PM

      • Even pre-cosmetic-surgery she was way cute.

      • Way cute – that’s about it. Not beautiful. Way cute.

        gothamette

        May 30, 2018 at 6:44 PM

      • “Defer to the older straight woman here.”

        Too hilarious! The lady doth protest too much, methinks!

        Gothamette, do post a selfie!

        I am way too kind. Heartiste would weld the shiv with ego crushing accuracy, but I am merely laughing gently.

        Dan

        May 30, 2018 at 3:10 PM

      • “Gothamette, do post a selfie!”

        You do the same. Nude, please.

        gothamette

        May 30, 2018 at 6:44 PM

      • Please do NOT post NSFW photos, thank you.

    • The left believes in equality above all else. Since not everyone can aspire to ideal standards, it’s better to reduce everything to the lowest common denominator in their eyes.

      Red pill aspie

      May 29, 2018 at 4:07 PM

    • Pales in comparison with the hate directed at Michelle Obama.

      leopard

      May 30, 2018 at 2:32 AM

  8. Trump made a very aggressive tweet attacking the Mueller investigation today. ResetEra says that this is because Mueller is finally closing in and Trump is panicking.

    Otis the Sweaty

    May 29, 2018 at 2:08 PM

  9. Comment from instagram:

    ‘beverlyjenae If only every child was so lucky to have a white mother and family of privilege. You and you’re family are disgusting.’

    Lolz.

    Yakov

    May 29, 2018 at 2:18 PM

    • If only every child was so lucky to have a white mother

      Stopped clocks? 😏

      snorlaxwp

      May 29, 2018 at 2:37 PM

    • Yup, confirms why the ctrl-Left hates President Trump: because he’s a White man of unapologetically normal sexuality blessed with a genuinely beautiful wife and family.

      hard9bf

      May 29, 2018 at 2:41 PM

    • Luck has nothing to do with who is born white, or anything else, and who is not. Ancestral choice is a large part of destiny.

      Sam

      May 29, 2018 at 6:10 PM

    • “If only every child was so lucky to have a white mother and family of privilege.“

      Can’t argue with that sentiment.

      Curle

      May 29, 2018 at 10:24 PM

  10. Roseanne got canceled because the star herself tweeted something forbidden, i.e., racist. What did she think she was, a writer? That she had total freedom of expression? Philip Roth? That putting a black woman in charge of her show (Wanda Sykes, who was the death of it, IMO) would make her immune to the PC police?

    I think this is it for her. She came back after the anthem debacle and showed ’em all, and shot herself in the foot for the momentary pleasure of making a mean-spirited tweet.

    The most important quality of success is not IQ but SCQ – self-control quotient!

    gothamette

    May 29, 2018 at 3:13 PM

    • Very few people do social media well. And a low percentage of those are women.

      Sam

      May 29, 2018 at 6:07 PM

  11. The anti-white hatred is so BALLS OUT that’s it mind-blowing. If leftists had their way, they would outlaw whites marrying each other because that is self-evidently racist.

    These are total lunatics and it’s good that more people will to start seeing it clearly.

    fakeemail

    May 29, 2018 at 3:37 PM

  12. She apparently is Trump’s favorite as she bonded with him early in life. That’s why she basically is almost a senior partner in Trump’s organization.

    Don Jr. on the other hand is supposedly closer to Ivana. He bonded with her father and even learned Czech from him!

    Red pill aspie

    May 29, 2018 at 4:04 PM

  13. This is what Ivanka should have been doing from the very beginning. Drop the politics routine and become a champion of motherhood and the American family.

    PerezHBD

    May 29, 2018 at 5:38 PM

  14. They hate her because she is white. Even more so because she is rich, beautiful and white. The only thing the left hates more than truth is beauty.

    B.T.D.T.

    May 29, 2018 at 6:18 PM

    • Also, they hate Ivanka that much more imtensely because she is the daughter of the badwhites’ leader.

      Oswald Spengler

      May 29, 2018 at 7:44 PM

    • Well put.

      Sam

      May 30, 2018 at 2:34 PM

  15. A quick tell if you are psychotic – when you see a mother smiling at her child you feel angry.

    howitzer daniel

    May 29, 2018 at 11:08 PM

  16. Is there anything more obviously signaling how pathetic and abnormal one is than bursts of outrage at a mother smiling with her child? I’m not surprised that SJWs descent into fits of rage at seeing normal people but what exactly are they objecting to here? How do they argument their resentment? Is she being shamed for giving birth instead of adopting niglets or something?

    Rona

    May 30, 2018 at 2:56 AM

    • I think what offends them is the perceived underlying message. By analogy, imagine you are living in Soviet Russia and every storefront has a little hammer and sickle flag in the window. If such a flag were conspicuously absent from one store, the local party officials would naturally be upset, because it would be perceived as a message of defiance.

      So too with a picture of an attractive white woman smiling with her white child. It’s the photographic equivalent of saying “It’s okay to be white.” Which is literally true, but is perceived as a message of defiance to the SJW dogma.

      fortaleza84

      May 30, 2018 at 10:53 AM

      • “So too with a picture of an attractive white woman smiling with her white child.”

        According to anti-Semites, the child isn’t white.

        We should also point out that the hatred caused by this picture proves that Jews don’t get any sort of pass by the SJWs.

      • The child has a racially Jewish Father and a racially Aryan Jewish convert mother.

        Opinions on what constitutes “white” would vary across the spectrum.

        If we were to ask them, a lot of people on both sides would have a conflicting and strong opinion as to the ethno-race of the child beyond “white” status.

        “Not Jew” and “White”

        A lot of Orthodox Jews would not hold the mother to be fully Jewish, in secret or possibly otherwise. Thus, to them the baby would be “White” and not “Jewish” or “Semitic”. Some would probably stop at distinguishing between “Jew” and “not Jew”. Are they as at fault as the anti-semites?

        “Jew” / “Semitic” and “Not white”

        A lot of non-Jews, anti-semitic and not, would hold the child to be Jewish / Semitic and not “White” because of the (very Aryan looking) Jewish Father and/or the convert mother.

        A lot of Orthodox and other Jews would hold the baby to be “not white” but “Jewish”.

        “Jew” and “White” or “Not White”

        A lot of liberal whites would hold the baby to be “Jewish” and variously white and not-white depending on how much they detested “White” as a class and didn’t wish to lump Jews in with that distaste.

        “Jew” and “White”

        Probably the smallest minority of people would fall here. Most of the are probably on this forum right now 😉

        The baby looks White to me, and is obviously of the Jewish faith.

        Sam

        May 30, 2018 at 2:53 PM

      • The categories could have been better organized. You get the gist.

        Sam

        May 30, 2018 at 2:56 PM

      • “Aryan” is a word that the Indo-Europeans who invaded prehistoric India and Persia called themselves. There’s no evidence that it was ever used that way by other Indo-European speakers, so it sounds weird to describe white Europeans such as the Drumpf clan as Aryan.

        Greg Pandatshang

        May 30, 2018 at 5:13 PM

      • “According to anti-Semites, the child isn’t white.”

        Perhaps, but the underlying reality is not what matters here, it’s the perceived message.

        fortaleza84

        May 30, 2018 at 11:12 PM

    • SJW’s are like cartoon villians. You can defeat them with displays of affection.

      It’s like pouring water over the wicked witch. Welcome to clown world 2018.

      We live in a Japanese techno dystopia film.

      Paul Ryan's Sickly Old Lap Dog

      May 31, 2018 at 3:14 PM

  17. Here’s an idea of how much they hate the picture:

    Link below is Samantha Bee from Full Frontal going postal on Ivanka, even using the c-word on her.

    BTW, why the hell would someone want to tune in to a “comedy” show that berates people half the time for having “male” and “white” privilege.

    Red pill aspie

    May 31, 2018 at 12:25 PM


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: