Lion of the Blogosphere

I support child sex dolls

http://www.fresnobee.com/news/politics-government/article213126084.html

Looks like Congress is going to pass a law to make sex dolls that look like children illegal.

Congress has it all wrong. Would-be pedophiles would get their sexual release from using the dolls, and then would be less likely to sexually abuse real children.

I am sure that there are already lots of men jacking off to pictures of girls under the age of 18 they found on Instagram (although they may not be nude, but you can find girls in bikinis), so what’s the difference if those same men jack off with the help of a sex doll?

Furthermore, it seems totally inconsistent that homosexual sex is so encouraged that we have given it the seal of approval by allowing homosexuals go get “married,” but now Congress is worried about what adults do in the privacy of their own homes with dolls.

Written by Lion of the Blogosphere

June 14, 2018 at EST pm

84 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Are animated child porn videos legal? They should be, for the same reason as child sex dolls.

    WRB

    June 14, 2018 at EST pm

  2. How do you know the dolls wouldn’t encourage the pedophiles to go after real children? No one really knows, do they? They should be illegal. Way too creepy.

    Rosenmops

    June 14, 2018 at EST pm

    • I remember 30 years ago feminists were claiming that pornography causes rape. That experiment has been done . . . easy access to porn via the internet has not resulted in a wave of sexual assaults. On the contrary, rates of rape have dropped dramatically over the last 20 or 30 years.

      Same thing with violent video games.

      So it’s reasonable to think it will be the same way with childlike sex dolls.

      fortaleza84

      June 14, 2018 at EST pm

  3. I am sure that there are already lots of men jacking off to pictures of girls under the age of 18 they found on Instagram (although they may not be nude, but you can find girls in bikinis), so what’s the difference if those same men jack off with the help of a sex doll?

    Well, I’m sure there are people who would love for Congress to pass a law making it illegal to jack off to bikini photos of teenage girls. Wouldn’t that be great? Sodomy is a constitutional right, but the police will be breaking down people’s doors trying to catch them in the act of masturbating while looking at Instagram. And of course no one will suggest there’s anything wrong with girls under 18 posting bikini photos for all the world to see. That would be blaming the victim! This is like the sexual version of anarcho-tyranny.

    Hermes

    June 14, 2018 at EST pm

    • I’m sure people would love to pass a law that would prevent me from using the prom pictures of my students for this purpose, but thankfully thinking isn’t illegal, yet…

      ScarletNumber

      June 15, 2018 at EST am

  4. At least 95% of adult women make themselves look like prepubescent little girls.

    Peter

    ironrailsironweights

    June 14, 2018 at EST pm

    • I doubt you have seen a woman nude in the last year, so I’m not sure where you are getting your data from.

      ScarletNumber

      June 15, 2018 at EST am

      • This has been his schtick for as long as I can remember, i.e. to complain about how the endless chain of young hotties he is banging have shaved their pubic hair.

        Did I forget to mention that he’s banging an endless chain of young hotties?

        fortaleza84

        June 15, 2018 at EST am

    • destructure

      June 15, 2018 at EST pm

      • Did you actually read your link?

        ScarletNumber

        June 15, 2018 at EST pm

  5. I have to disagree. More degeneracy is the last thing this country needs. Pedo rights will be the next frontier for the left and it doesn’t need any encouragement.

    B.T.D.T.

    June 14, 2018 at EST pm

    • The left is already on it.

      “Minor-attracted person” is the term they now want us to use (rather than the traditional “pedo” or “mexican”)

      driveallnight

      June 14, 2018 at EST pm

      • No, they’re not. As I tire of pointing out, the left is not pro-pedophilia. They see adult-child sex as evil because it exploits an unfair power differential and therefore involves inequality. Nothing that contradicts the ideal of equality will ever gain favor from the left. I just googled the phrase “minor-attracted person” and all that comes up are a bunch of pedo sites, not left-wing sites.

        Hermes

        June 15, 2018 at EST am

      • I live in a college town, just had a huge Pride Week celebration. The term was not used positively, but more to describe an illness or disorder.

        This is a sugar-coating, aka “re-frame”. Go read your roissy dude

        driveallnight

        June 15, 2018 at EST am

      • Absolutely. Look at how the Hollywood left still protects Roman Polanski after raping an underage girl. They will have no interest in protecting underage boys. Gay pedo rings have been known for years. For the left, homosexual degeneracy will always take precedence over protecting the weak.

        B.T.D.T.

        June 15, 2018 at EST pm

      • driveallnight

        June 15, 2018 at EST pm

      • The fact that there is an organization of psychotherapists promoting psychotherapy for pedophiles as a means to prevent them from actually molesting children does not constitute evidence that “the left” is “promoting” pedophilia.

        Hermes

        June 15, 2018 at EST pm

      • “They see adult-child sex as evil because it exploits an unfair power differential and therefore involves inequality. Nothing that contradicts the ideal of equality will ever gain favor from the left.”

        Hermes, you’re assuming that the Left of today will be the same as the Left of the future. While I don’t believe there’s any significant pro-pedophile movement on the Left today, there’s every reason to believe there will be one eventually. And the Left supports a lot of things that constitutes inequality. Affirmative action involves unequal treatment. A single woman deciding to have a baby on her own with a sperm donor involves inequality – some children are deliberately created to have a father (a married couple) and some are deliberately created to be fatherless. But the Left doesn’t care. Illegitimacy strikes them as acceptable because it is an attack on conventional morality. Notice how the effects on the child are rarely mentioned. Also, the Left has shown that it puts sexual gratification so high on its priority list that only outright assault can be banned in the quest for sexual pleasure.This is what leaves them defenseless against gay marriage and transgenderism.

        I think you’re assuming most Leftists will be capable of or interested in making the fine distinctions needed to keep child-adult sex stigmatized.

        maryk

        June 16, 2018 at EST am

  6. lol

    IHTG

    June 14, 2018 at EST pm

  7. It’s a bill that everyone looks good passing ahead of the mid terms. Pretty stupid. Does jacking off to a barbie violate this law? I would think so. What is barbie’s age?

    NotWesley

    June 14, 2018 at EST pm

  8. Do you believe in gateway drugs?

    Baron

    June 14, 2018 at EST pm

    • No. Pure shit. But suppose there was such a thing. What does it matter? I say legalize all drugs and let people decide what to do with their own lives and bodies.

      Clay

      June 14, 2018 at EST pm

  9. Congress does not care at all about the actual effects of the legislation nor about managing pedophiles. Congress critters want to pander to the soccer-mom vote by outlawing something soccer moms think is icky, very icky. There is no possibility of principled opposition to the bill because any opponent would be accused of being a pedophile and soccer moms– who emote, not reason– would believe it instantly– who, the moms will ask, would allow childlike sex dolls to exist if he didn’t want one for himself?

    Hideous

    June 14, 2018 at EST pm

    • Yeah, in fact there is an example of this kind of thinking (as you say, it’s emoting not thinking) in this very thread by poster “rosenmops.” According to this poster, childlike sex dolls are “way too creepy” and therefore need to be banned.

      I wouldn’t be surprised if this rosenmops is female.

      fortaleza84

      June 15, 2018 at EST am

      • The bill is actually called the CREEPER (Curbing Realistic Exploitative Electronic PEdophilic Robots) Act. You can’t make this stuff up, folks.

        Hermes

        June 15, 2018 at EST am

      • Hermes – I’d be shocked if the bill didn’t have a catchy acronym.

        njguy73

        June 15, 2018 at EST pm

    • Pretty good analysis, which makes the subject line of this post all the more courageous.

      Mike Street Station

      June 15, 2018 at EST am

    • One of the many reasons I miss Lawrence Auster is that that was one of his recurring themes: Congress’s pandering to the soccer mom vote.

      Hermes

      June 15, 2018 at EST am

  10. Ridiculous. Hentai vids are legal in this country, as are x-rated pics of Bart and Lisa Simpson. Why is a doll a bridge too far?

    Lee

    June 14, 2018 at EST pm

  11. I think it’s the influence of Christian heritage. Christianity traditionally values chastity and thinks that indulging in your vices merely reinforces them instead of weakening them.

    Thomas

    June 14, 2018 at EST pm

    • Pornography is not a substitute for real women. Sex dolls will not be a substitute for real children.

      map

      June 14, 2018 at EST pm

  12. You try explaining that to a room full of voters at the senior center.

    JA

    June 14, 2018 at EST pm

  13. Feels distasteful to say so, but I agree with you Lion, these dolls should be made available, so the proportion of men out there that are into this stuff can satisfy the desire without harming actual children. It seems pigheaded to block these from the men who wish to use them. Also agree with your assessment about homosexuals, I don’t wish harm upon any gay man or woman, but the constant veneration of this group has reached maddening levels. Every small town in city in Canada (never mind the big cities which went gay crazy years ago) now has its own designated rainbow crosswalk. It’s derigeur, you have to love the gays and accept every last of their demands or you’re a neo-nazi.

    Roli

    June 14, 2018 at EST pm

    • What’s Sikh approach to homosexuality?

      Yakov

      June 14, 2018 at EST pm

      • The contemporary Sikh stand on homosexuality would be to the right of where Genghis Khan might have stood on the matter back in the day.

        Roli

        June 14, 2018 at EST pm

      • But that’s in India, not in Canada, right?

        Yakov

        June 14, 2018 at EST pm

      • Canadian Sikhs and Greater Vancouver Sikhs in particular are some of the most parole Sikhs in the world, I’m not sure whiy or how this happened but it is what it is. Sikhs in India by comparison are renowned for being financially successful and half a general liberal outlook, Sikhs in Britain are renowned for being a thoroughly integrated and successful minority, Sikhs in Vancouver are famous for hard drinking, hard fighting and gay bashing on Saturday nights, and they’re also renowned for being a very socially conservative p

        Roli

        June 15, 2018 at EST am

      • Roli — I’ve noticed that a lot of 3rd world immigrants who are very nice in their home countries become punks when they move to another. For example, I’ve noticed that a lot of hispanic immigrants are really nice, hard working folks. Obviously not all of them. They definitely have some rotten applies. But generally quite friendly and hardworking. However, their children and grandchildren are frequently terrible; joining gangs and living off welfare.

        In fact, the problems in El Salvador with MS13 is largely the result of immigrants who came to America, fell into very bad behavior; then, took their bad habits back home where it metastasized. I’ve read that Turks in germany are similarly much worse than Turks in Turkey. I suspect the guidos of Staten Island are probably worse than most of the Italians in Italy, as well.

        My hypothesis is that tthe least successful demographic in an area fills that underclass niche. So, for example, if hispanics are the lowest demographic then it will be them. In areas with lots of blacks it will be the blacks. A hundred years ago, in areas of America without blacks or hispanics it was the irish and italian immigrants. Even today, in areas of America that are nearly all white, a few whites will degenerate to fill that niche. Generally not as many or as bad as the blacks and hispanics. But still more and worse than I was used to whites behaving in the majority black city where I grew up.

        I’m not saying blacks would be great if they weren’t the least successful demographic or that others would be as bad if they were. I’m simply saying that being one of the least successful demographics means that group will sink into a niche that behaves badly.

        My guess is that Sikhs didn’t behave that way in India because there were other groups who occupied that lower class niche. But Vancouver is a very competitive city. So it’s much harder not to fill that lower class niche there.

        *No offense intended.

        destructure

        June 15, 2018 at EST pm

      • @destructure
        I agree with you, I reached much the same conclusion myself sometime ago that ethnic groups that fall into the lowest rungs of society, often start morphing into douchebaggery. An important element in this change of behaviour is western liberalism which holds that we’re all equal and which allow a relinquishment of personal responsibility. There’s also the related and counteracting trend of ethnic groups improving their behaviour when they no longer occupy the lowest rungs of society, ie working class whites in the US. This becomes obvious when you compare this cohort to their European counterparts, ie the soccer hooligans and white welfare bums in places like Britain. From everything I’ve seen, the white American underclass behaves much better than both their European and even Canadian counterparts, in large part because the black and Latinos in the US define the underclass there.

        Roli

        June 16, 2018 at EST pm

  14. Agree 100%. Also, you can bet feminists will try to use this as a first step towards banning sexbots.

    fortaleza84

    June 14, 2018 at EST pm

    • Also, you can bet feminists will try to use this as a first step towards banning sexbots.

      Great point.

      The feminists are probably holding back in wait for child sexbots to go into production. Then when outrage from mommy voters breaks loose and politicians scramble to ban child sexbots the feminists will use the legislative momentum to attach a ban on all adult sexbots.

      The Undiscovered Jew

      June 14, 2018 at EST pm

      • Well also they will use confusion over the definition of a child sexbot to advance their agenda.

        For example, it’s common for adult sex dolls to be short in stature and lighter than real humans. This makes them less expensive and easier to transport. But you can bet that feminists will use this to argue that such sex dolls are actually representing children.

        See what’s really at stake here is that the male sex drive and male need for female validation are the main reason our society showers women with special privileges. If those urges can be satisfied in some other way, it’s a huge threat to women’s meal ticket.

        fortaleza84

        June 15, 2018 at EST am

    • Feminists will also use child sexbots as a way to intimidate vendors like Amazon with boycott threats into not selling adult sexbots.

      The Undiscovered Jew

      June 14, 2018 at EST pm

    • “Agree 100%. Also, you can bet feminists will try to use this as a first step towards banning sexbots.”

      I wish people would get it through their heads that a corrupt government does not need an elaborate system of “precedent” to do something dastardly. Feminists, for example, will banned sexbots because they want to ban sexbots. They do not need some elaborate system of precedent to be established before they act.

      map

      June 14, 2018 at EST pm

      • When you look at history, it seems that Leftists push their agenda step by step. E.g. gun control; gay rights etc.

        fortaleza84

        June 14, 2018 at EST pm

  15. Idiotic. The dolls should be legal, but men who purchase them should be tracked and eliminated. That will clean the swamp in Washington.

    Yakov

    June 14, 2018 at EST pm

    • Not a bad idea.

      Rosenmops

      June 14, 2018 at EST pm

    • Don’t be silly, there’s no way the law enforcement agencies would go after the Clintons that hard.

      Panther of the Blogocube

      June 14, 2018 at EST pm

  16. I support throwing perverts into peat bogs. This is the traditional solution to the problem.

    bobbybobbob

    June 14, 2018 at EST pm

  17. This is basically making certain types of statues illegal. There are probably guys that jack off to cherubs.

    Clay

    June 14, 2018 at EST pm

    • For maximum lulz somebody should sell Confederate General bots.

      Lionel of the Richiesphere

      June 14, 2018 at EST pm

    • I wonder if anyone jacks off to Lions – and I’m referring to both the real kind or the figurative kind!

      maryk

      June 14, 2018 at EST pm

  18. A SWPL tragedy:

    Richard

    June 14, 2018 at EST pm

    • Never trust a dragon lady?

      I think she’s an Eastern Asiatic judging from her picture.

      McGill — another puffed up Anglo Prole, multicult, institution in the French Speaking Province!

      JS

      June 15, 2018 at EST am

  19. Lion i’m surprised at your naivete on this issue. All legalizing the dolls does is legitimize the very idea of adult-child sex. We all know that pedo rights are the next logical move for the sexual revolution. Why should we assume that some innate sense of decency will stop this nation from legitimizing it? We lived to see gay marriage and transgender-ism. What we need to do is stop managing perversion and start stigmatizing it. I don’t care what good intentions pedophiles may have. Sex with children is wrong. If that means pedophiles have to have miserable lives, so be it. No system can make everyone happy. This is the price we pay for civilization. It’s time we stop apologizing for it.

    maryk

    June 14, 2018 at EST pm

    • A robot is not a child. Banning them will have unforeseen consequences. Would you support the ban if you new that someone was going to be killed by the police for owning one? I remember several years ago that there was a Los Alamos PhD chemist that went to prison for trying to meet an underage boy in Tulsa. Perhaps that would not have happened if he had a realistic sex robot.

      Clay

      June 15, 2018 at EST am

      • I never claimed that a robot was a child. But making these child sex dolls legal legitimizes the idea of child-adult sex and this legitimization is a bad idea overall, even if it would be better for particular people who might otherwise molest children. As for being killed by the police, there will always be injustices of some kind. No system can ever change that. Although I don’t really see why these dolls should have to be made illegal. If there is enough stigma, no company would want to put out such a product. Ideally, we shouldn’t need state power for this.

        maryk

        June 15, 2018 at EST pm

  20. ResetEra saying that with the camps for migrant kids, the only solution is civil war.

    Otis the Sweaty

    June 14, 2018 at EST pm

    • With whose Army?

      Curle

      June 15, 2018 at EST am

    • Bring it on.

      Oswald Spengler

      June 15, 2018 at EST am

  21. This is the most degenerate Lolbertarian thing ive ever seen on this blog. For Gods sake Lion, people need guidance, you can just allow people to do whatever the hell they want, or society will crumble to nothing.

    DataExplorer

    June 14, 2018 at EST pm

    • *can’t

      DataExplorer

      June 14, 2018 at EST pm

    • That’s true in general, but in this specific situation there is good reason to believe that child-like sex dolls reduce the incidence of actual sexual predation against children.

      The bigger problem is that there are a lot of people who want to prevent even normal men from getting sexual satisfaction from alternate sources. They know that men are a lot less likely to put up with unfair marriage and family relations laws if they can get sexual release from some other source than a woman. So the danger here is that laws against childlike sex dolls will be twisted and used as a tool for this end.

      fortaleza84

      June 14, 2018 at EST pm

  22. from ResetEra: “Republicans not reigning Trump in before midterms on this is fucking suicidal. You know where’s going to be campaign ads of crying children torn from their parents arms.”

    The Left actually thinks that this shit is going to hurt the Republicans at the ballot box. They just don’t learn.

    Otis the Sweaty

    June 14, 2018 at EST pm

  23. Lion, why do you believe that giving pedos child dolls to have sex with would lower sexual abuse of children? They can already watch animated videos and read child pornography and get their rocks off that way.

    Judging by the number of people who commit suicide after they are caught with child pornography, stigmatization and shaming absolutely work. They indulge in their sexual perversion online and hope nobody finds out.

    I believe that allowing them a child sex doll would lead to pedos legitimizing their perversion inside their own mind and forming a sort of identity.

    What once was a fantasy indulged in secrecy now gets a physical form of a doll. And it’s not like browser history that he can delete out of shame.

    The doll is always there. A man who actually buys a child sex doll and does things to her has crossed a mental line I think. He has essentially decided to abandon even an attempt of forming a sexual relationship with a woman and accepts his identity as a pedophile.

    Rona

    June 15, 2018 at EST am

    • Stigmatization and shaming absolutely work to cause people to commit suicide is my take away. You have interesting psychological theories but they are probably pure horse shit. I would want more evidence than your speculations before I criminalized someone’s behavior.

      Clay

      June 15, 2018 at EST pm

    • He has essentially decided to abandon even an attempt of forming a sexual relationship with a woman and accepts his identity as a pedophile.

      Would you really want a man with pedophilic tendencies to attempt to form a sexual relationship with a woman who was your family or your friend?

      MEH 0910

      June 15, 2018 at EST pm

  24. If legal, which model would get higher Amazon sexbot sales rank: little-girl or little-boy? If lawmakers were to suspect it’s actually little-boy, would that make them more likely or less likely to just ban the things?

    Justin Time

    June 15, 2018 at EST am

  25. The first recent guy to propose this restriction was some ISIS-loving Imam in I think Malaysia. Figures.

    This whole thing started as a 1962 Communist tactic to weaken/sissy male autonomy in youth in non-Communist nations, and effectively nationalize the family. Figures right-wing Christians parrot Communist talking points.

    Mark my words: They will try and make sex under 21 illegal.

    Robert

    June 15, 2018 at EST am

  26. The argument is kind of pointless without data on how effective sex dolls are in mitigating sexual desire. For example, if masturbation quells the desire for sexual intimacy why are so many men still looking for sex? And while yes incidents of rape may have gone down do you know for a fact this is due to widespread availability of porn? Particularly when you consider many sexual assaults go unreported it’s virtually impossible to pinpoint the reciprocity between porn and rape (either positive or negative).

    Again looking at men in general and not just pedophiles, how many would even want to regularly engage with a sex doll in lieu of sex? I’m sure many would want to try it but few would want to relegate himself to a sex doll permanently. Very few men own sex dolls as it is.

    I highly doubt handing the more predacious pedos an inanimate object, no matter how well crafted, would do much to stem their inclinations since many are fueled by the psychological aspect of domination, control and inciting fear.

    [slight spolier] in season 2 of humans, child androids are introduced. Strangely, the moral question of them being sexually assaulted is never seriously examined (andoids in this show are capable of consciousness).

    Funny story, I was once on a chess site and apparently it was not widely known that in-game chats are publicly viewable. I once stumbled upon a game where a woman was trying to convince a man to come have sex with her instead of his sex doll. He claimed to be too tired to drive over. They went back and forth for pages on the matter and ultimately he chose the sex doll but promised to see her the next day. Their pictures were on their respective profiles, they were both not exactly attractive 50 somethings from england.

    toomanymice

    June 15, 2018 at EST am

    • “The argument is kind of pointless without data on how effective sex dolls are in mitigating sexual desire.”

      There might not be data on this specific issue, but it can be analogized to pornography in general as well as to violent video games. The easy availability of these things has not resulted in a wave of rapes or robberies, on the contrary rates of sexual assault and violent crime have dropped dramatically.

      “if masturbation quells the desire for sexual intimacy why are so many men still looking for sex?”

      (1) sex is often more fun than masturbation; (2) sex is higher status than masturbation; and (3) men are programmed to seek female validation, something which masturbation does not provide.

      But perhaps most importantly, the male sex drive is quite strong. But if masturbation were somehow prevented, you would see a lot more men looking for sex with women.

      “Again looking at men in general and not just pedophiles, how many would even want to regularly engage with a sex doll in lieu of sex?”

      I would say it depends on how realistic the sex doll is and how easy it is for the man to obtain sex elsewhere. Sexbots get better and better every year.

      fortaleza84

      June 15, 2018 at EST am

      • Give me a Dolores! That is, before she became a murderous human-hating robobitch.

        Lion of the Blogosphere

        June 15, 2018 at EST am

      • Just because porn and violent video games haven’t been linked to an increase in crime doesn’t mean either can be credited with its attenuation. My personal view is obesity has decreased violent crime; it’s difficult to cause mayhem when you can barely walk much less run. And for a very non PC twist, with 70%+ of women overweight to obese there are fewer attractive women for rapists to target. I wonder what the average bmi of rape victims is.

        toomanymice

        June 15, 2018 at EST am

      • “And for a very non PC twist, with 70%+ of women overweight to obese there are fewer attractive women for rapists to target. I wonder what the average bmi of rape victims is.”

        I bet it’s higher than you think it is. All the time I see fat women with children, so obviously men wanted to have sex with them.

        Lion of the Blogosphere

        June 15, 2018 at EST am

      • “Just because porn and violent video games haven’t been linked to an increase in crime doesn’t mean either can be credited with its attenuation”

        Sure, but at this point the reasonable assumption — in the absence of definitive studies — is that childlike sex dolls don’t have a negative effect. So the burden of proof is on you at this point.

        fortaleza84

        June 15, 2018 at EST pm

      • Burden of proof for what exactly? My points were 1) this conversation is pointless without data and 2) given that sex dolls, as they currently exist, are not a satiating alternate for most men, child sex dolls probably wouldn’t be a satiating substitute for pedos, particularly those of the predacious variety.

        As for whether they should be illegal or not is beyond my pay grade. I don’t know enough about the law. Could creating a child sex doll fall under freedom of speech? Like with questionable art? Maybe the aclu can take up the cause.

        Lion I see a lot of fat mothers and wives too. Women tend to gain weight after marriage or settling down. Anyway, consensual sex requires much less effort than forcing someone.

        toomanymice

        June 15, 2018 at EST pm

      • “Could creating a child sex doll fall under freedom of speech? Like with questionable art? Maybe the aclu can take up the cause.”

        Regular porn falls under free speech. The Supremes said child porn does not because it harms children, but that was before we could create computer-generated porn that does not harm children or depict any real-life individual children.

        Lion of the Blogosphere

        June 15, 2018 at EST pm

      • “I wonder what the average bmi of rape victims is.”

        Well there is a study that will never be funded.

        Mike Street Station

        June 16, 2018 at EST am

  27. Lion, while we’re on the subject of sex dolls, you should watch and review the movie Lars and the Real Girl.

    Hermes

    June 15, 2018 at EST am

  28. I remember taking one of those online tests that measures how politically conservative or liberal you are by asking you whether you agree with various moral and economic propositions. The question of whether child sex dolls (or possibly sex dolls made to look like family members) should be illegal. I thought then it was a pretty good question for such a test, because for a liberal the ‘disgust’ factor ought not to be an argument, whereas conservatives are very much prone to slippery-slope thinking about behaviour they regard as immoral.

    Maybe in the future with 3D printers and stuff you will be able to take a sneaky 3-D picture of your favourite work colleague (for example) on your iphone 4000 and then print off a sex doll of them. If a male work colleague told you that they’d printed off a LOTB sex doll and had wantonly ravaging your likeness every evening for a month, would it bother you or make you more worried around them, Lion?

    prolier than thou

    June 15, 2018 at EST pm

  29. Sex harming children argument is very artificial. If you throw it out, it solves many other problems it otherwise causes.

    My 2¢

    June 15, 2018 at EST pm

  30. You’re just determined to ruin sexbots aren’t you Lion? Why would anyone pay for sexbots that look like little children? They can get real children already by volunteering to aid at risk youth. Do you really want to encourage charity and poverty? Its only those creepy dudes that abuse small children that make these things unpopular. If guys like Fagin or Daddy Warbucks start playing with sexbots, those orphans might have people helping them out and soon there will be thousands of young kids without parents living in state funded facilities getting free food and a roof over their head.

    Joshua Sinistar

    June 17, 2018 at EST pm


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: