Lion of the Blogosphere

Democracy vs. populism

Democracy is when blacks and Hispanics vote for candidates who promise affirmative action, and when poor people in general vote for candidates who promise generous welfare benefits.

Populism is when prole whites vote for candidates who promise to reduce immigration.

Hope that helps.

Written by Lion of the Blogosphere

June 23, 2018 at EST am

Posted in Politics

48 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Actually that IS a pretty good definition! It certainly fits how it’s being used in the media.

    Mike Street Station

    June 23, 2018 at EST am

  2. The MSM loves using “populist’ because they can connect it with Nazis.

    Proles voted Hitler goes the argument. They conveniently forget the substantial numbers voting socialist or Communist. Communism was popular. Populist I’d suggest.

    Frau Katze

    June 23, 2018 at EST am

    • Proles voted Hitler goes the argument. They conveniently forget the substantial numbers voting socialist or Communist. Communism was popular. Populist I’d suggest.

      Although this embarrassing fact has been covered up by Progressive historians, both the Nazis and Communists were campaigning for the same prole vote. Towards the end of the election the KPD leader, Ernst Thallman, adopted some of Hitler’s Nationalist rhetoric in an attempt to stop hemorrhaging prole votes to the Nazis that would have otherwise leaned Socialist or Communist.

      The Undiscovered Jew

      June 23, 2018 at EST pm

      • By the early 1930s, Stalin had ordered the KPD not to seriously oppose the Nazis, nor to ally themselves in a coalition with the center left SPD Social Democrats — the party most identified with the tottering Weimar Republic. The game plan was “first brown, then red.” The Nazis would gain power, paving the way for the seizure if power by the Communists in Germany. It didn’t quite turn out as planned.

        Oswald Spengler

        June 23, 2018 at EST pm

      • Once you clear away the bs, it becomes clear that the purpose of WWII was make the world safe for Soviet Bolshevism.

        After all, the Soviets gained the most from WWII. The war between the fascists and the capitalists secured that.

        map

        June 24, 2018 at EST am

      • By the early 1930s, Stalin had ordered the KPD not to seriously oppose the Nazis, nor to ally themselves in a coalition with the center left SPD Social Democrats — the party most identified with the tottering Weimar Republic.

        Right up to Barbarossa Stalin underestimated how fast Hitler would move. Not only did Hitler abolish the KPD at the first opportunity the Nazis also abolished all unions (no matter if they were Communist or Socialist connected) except for a single union created and directly controlled by the Nazi Party.

        The Undiscovered Jew

        June 24, 2018 at EST pm

      • Once you clear away the bs, it becomes clear that the purpose of WWII was make the world safe for Soviet Bolshevism.

        Hitler unintentionally caused Soviet expansion by provoking an unnecessary war with Britain and France over Central European states that weren’t a threat to Germany when he would have been better off making peace with the West so he could clear the decks for an invasion East.

        Hitler failed because he didn’t restrict his military plans to the Soviets.

        The Undiscovered Jew

        June 24, 2018 at EST pm

    • Welcome to the reality of living in a bourgeois dictatorship but good thing for us is money talks. Through organization, funding, creating new media outlets, and seizing control of a major political party we have changed history and transformed America for the better.The top one percent is also an ally or at the very least neutral because they also hate wannabe super rich types like the upper middle class/upper class.

      redarmyvodka

      June 23, 2018 at EST pm

    • When the productive forces clash with the ruling hierarchy class conflict occurs. Yes communism was the original populism and far more historically powerful/dangerous as well. In Marxism this sort of hysteria to “populism” is what’s called reaction. The forces of reaction want to destroy what we’ve achieved but they will fail because the historical struggle calls for their destruction. Even in ancient China this process was recognized as the mandate of heaven. Rulers who were just, worthy, and served society had the divine right to rule. The opposite also applied rulers who were weak, stupid, lazy, and corrupt would lose the mandate of heaven and a new elite would replace them in the dynastic cycle.

      redarmyvodka

      June 23, 2018 at EST pm

    • Yes communism was the original populism and far more historically powerful/dangerous as well.

      Communism died because it depended on the proletariat having aristocratic traits.

      Progressives are not Communist because they hate the white proletariat and they are overwhelmingly drawn from the bourgeoisie classes, and up. If Marx were alive he would say Progressive immigration policy is a Capitalist plot to destroy the white working class and replace it with a compliant brown and black “lumpenproletariat” that will never achieve the class consciousness needed to bring about Communism.

      The Undiscovered Jew

      June 24, 2018 at EST pm

  3. But Bernie is also a populist.

    Right Populism: anti immigration, anti BLM
    Left Populism: free college, free healthcare, anti Wallstreet, tax the rich

    Trump = Right Populism
    Bernie = Left Populism

    The woke Left, which controls the Dem party establishment and the media, hates both types of populism.

    Otis the Sweaty

    June 23, 2018 at EST am

    • Otis. Bernie is a vermin. That slobbering creepazoid needs to be squashed. Can’t wait for him to die or be irrelevant.

      mpt

      June 23, 2018 at EST am

    • what is the woke left? define sir!

      JS

      June 23, 2018 at EST pm

    • Sure.

      It’s like being a “nativist.”

      Everyone is a nativist.

      The only question is, are you an American nativist or a foreign nativist.

      map

      June 24, 2018 at EST am

  4. This is similar to a thought I had earlier: being white means having to accept every negative motive and characteristic assigned to us by others, whilst at the same time being expected to take the essential goodness and rightness of other races at their own estimation, again without question.

    The whole concept of national elections is surely an anarchronism for globalists anyway: why have expressions of the national will if you don’t believe in nations? I heard a BBC reporter today accuse (more or less) of Fascism, top of the charge sheet was a comment he made about ‘looking after our own people first’. If this is a Fascist sentiment, then really all national elections are fascist almost by design, unless you acre actually voting to dissolve your country, which I guess is what good anti-populists would do.

    prolier than thou

    June 23, 2018 at EST am

    • correction ‘…accuse (more or less) the Italian politician Matteo Salvini of Fascism..’

      prolier than thou

      June 23, 2018 at EST am

    • The elite believe 85% of people are fascist hence their disdain for populism. They support “democracy” only because they found institutional ways of getting around the will of the people.

      CamelCaseRob

      June 23, 2018 at EST pm

  5. We need to admit that the Left did score a partial victory in the family separation thing.

    The full court media press + lib chimpout won public opinion and forced Trump to stop the separations. I said at the time that I didn’t think that the Trump admin had planned it this way in advance, just that I thought it could end up working out for us.

    We can still get a victory out of this tactical redeployment, but only if Trump is willing and able to stand up to the courts. He has a perfect setup: hold the families together and when the courts order the children released, he should just say, “there is nowhere to release these children to, these children need to be with their parents and I will not separate them”. This is a great opportunity to make lemonade from lemons.

    Otis the Sweaty

    June 23, 2018 at EST am

    • We need to admit that the Left did score a partial victory in the family separation thing.

      They win only if they don’t file a lawsuit to release children held with their parents (or held with sex abusing smugglers pretending to be their parents…)

      But since the Left can’t help themselves you know they are going to challenge it in court in the near future. At which point Trump wins.

      The Undiscovered Jew

      June 23, 2018 at EST pm

    • hold the families together and when the courts order the children released, he should just say,

      There is supposedly nowhere to hold them. I lost a lot of respect for Miller and Sessions. They were idiots for lining this up a) seemingly unaware of the backlash they were going to create and b) without increasing jail and court capacity BEFORE dramatically ramping up the prosecutions and jailing.

      I think Miller may be as dumb as Kushner, in his own way. This really is like the muslim ban all over again.

      Magnavox

      June 23, 2018 at EST pm

      • It’s also extraordinarily sadistic and stupid to just randomly institute a zero tolerance policy without warning and threatening potential border crossers. Again, just like the muslim ban.

        Magnavox

        June 23, 2018 at EST pm

      • So basically you are a cuck. You constantly lambast Trump for not taking enough action, but here he is implementing your desired policies, but nope, still not good enough. You are truly the worst kind of subverted scum.

        How much is Soros paying you to post here? Or maybe you are with a three letter agency?

        Paul Ryan's Sickly Old Lap Dog

        June 24, 2018 at EST am

      • He’s not implementing the policy. He has nowhere to put these people. Hes just putting on a show.

        Magnavox

        June 24, 2018 at EST pm

  6. It sucks when you’re not an elite in America, and have to deal with these 2 separate, but equal groups of brutes, who only know of primal urges.

    JS

    June 23, 2018 at EST am

  7. This is Alaska from the last presidential election.

    The red areas are where proles inhabit and the blue areas are where natives live in large numbers.

    Alaska similar to Arizona is where prole whites are the majority and they live in their quasi-cities and non-whites live in the outlying areas. In real cosmopolitan centers, proles are outlying subjects for their SWPL masters.

    JS

    June 23, 2018 at EST am

    • Scottsdale, AZ is not prole. It is a haven for Optimates (Country Club Republicans). Kind of like West Palm Beach. The problem is that conservative elites only hang it out in tax dodging states which already tend to be heavily red and prole, such as Florida and Arizona. They are not represented well in the larger metro areas.

      B.T.D.T.

      June 23, 2018 at EST pm

      • West Palm Beach is far from upscale. I’ve lived here for thirty years, and it’s looking more third world by the week.

        Steve

        June 23, 2018 at EST pm

      • Any tiny elite enclave in a heavily prole state can’t be all that desirable for other elites.

        JS

        June 23, 2018 at EST pm

      • The liberal trifecta of NYC, DC and CA and their prole mecca counterparts, FL AZ and AK.

        JS

        June 23, 2018 at EST pm

      • West Palm Beach is looking worse and worse. I’m there right now. I think you meant Orange County, California.

        GondwanaMan

        June 23, 2018 at EST pm

      • West Palm Beach is far from upscale. I’ve lived here for thirty years, and it’s looking more third world by the week.

        According to census.gov, the City of W. Palm Beach (pop. 110,000) is 33% black and 23% Hispanic. On the other hand, the Town of Palm Beach (pop. 8700) is 97% White).

        E. Rekshun

        June 23, 2018 at EST pm

      • Where did the term Optimates come from again. It sounds familiar. Was it Fussell?

        Paul Ryan's Sickly Old Lap Dog

        June 23, 2018 at EST pm

      • The Town of Palm Beach has a median age of old geezer with a median household income of ~$115K and a median property value of $955K.

        A comparable locale would be Del Mar in San Diego, California with its wealthy retirees. Most of San Diego is pretty nice and on the upscale. You can’t say the same for the entire area of Palm Beach.

        https://datausa.io/profile/geo/palm-beach-fl/?compare=del-mar-ca

        JS

        June 23, 2018 at EST pm

      • You’re right guys…I meant Palm Beach, FL. Not West Palm Beach.

        B.T.D.T.

        June 23, 2018 at EST pm

      • This is true. My parents moved to NV after 50 years in HI and WA. There’s no estate tax in NV.

        Curle

        June 23, 2018 at EST pm

      • The term Optimates comes from Mencius Moldbug.

        B.T.D.T.

        June 23, 2018 at EST pm

  8. A Constutional Republic, which was what this country was meant to be, is when high status whites (Optimates) govern the nation in a manner to protect the prosperity, culture and heritage of both themselves and the prole whites. That is the George Washington style noblesse oblige that should have been preserved. Both democracy and populism are dead ends because these movements unlimited become led by those who are inherently unfit to lead.

    B.T.D.T.

    June 23, 2018 at EST am

    • *Unlimited should be ultimately

      B.T.D.T.

      June 23, 2018 at EST am

      • yeah…i’m not sure about that. BTDT.. the high status whites owned slaves – thus destroying the labor market for prole whites. As soon as farming went away, low class laborers would have no options unless slavery was ended. If slavery existed during the industrial revolution the lower class whites would have revolted !!!

        uman

        June 23, 2018 at EST pm

      • Also remember that the slave holders thought that their slaves were innately inferior. So they were knowingly bringing in a permanent underclass. One that had they been given their way would have been 50% plus of the population of each state. What they wanted is even worse than what our current elites want to do with by importing a hispanic underclass. The slaveholding elite were scum.

        Magnavox

        June 23, 2018 at EST pm

      • Which is why your boy Roy Moore, who thought slavery should be brought back, was an idiot!!!

        GondwanaMan

        June 23, 2018 at EST pm

      • Good point, Magnavox. One wonders what the elite white Southerners were thinking. They must have thought that the blacks would stay cowed forever.
        Which also must be what our current overlords are thinking. That all the immigrants, particularly meso-Americans, will be happy to do the gardening and be the nursemaids forever. That they will be permanently cowed. History is not favorable to this point of view.

        amused observer

        June 23, 2018 at EST pm

      • I get the arguments above and generally consider “jobs Americans won’t do” as bullshit globalist pablum, but aren’t there jobs that people of palor are simply unfit for.

        This is more an HBD argument since the amount of melanin really would help with solar exposure and some peoples who come from more third world background are inherently better socialized/acclimated to do backbreaking labor that kills you by 40? Proles need jobs, but if it kills them by 40 seven heat strokes later, whats the point?

        I’m not arguing in favor of third world immigration here, but it is a point worth considering as we carve a new landscape for ourselves with the reigns of power we now hold.

        Tangent: Lion do you want to write about examples of our value transference economy (really marketing as Sailor writes about it), where the fat middle man was taken out and a product became much cheaper?

        Paul Ryan's Sickly Old Lap Dog

        June 23, 2018 at EST pm

      • A feudalism type farm with tight control isn’t slavery but serfdom. Serfdom brought the negro into the orbit of civilization. Everything worked fine until Abraham Lincoln the first SJW president was elected. Despite the problems that came afterward they were manageable until the 1960s. Even then the USA was massive and prosperous enough to cope with tough on crime laws until the dual cuckservative/SJW presidencies of Bush/Obama who ran the country into the ground.

        With the benefit of hindsight the presidential elections of 1860 and 1960 were major turning points in American history for the worse. The 2000 election was a turning point for the worse as well. The Trump presidency can only realistically undo the Bush/Obama years.

        redarmyvodka

        June 23, 2018 at EST pm

      • “thus destroying the labor market for prole whites”

        The labor market for prole whites at that time was nearly unlimited due to the taming of the West, slavery or no slavery.

        Curle

        June 23, 2018 at EST pm

      • Foreign workers can come on work visas to do the jobs that americans wont do and go back after a few years. They shouldn’t be allowed to bring their families with them, get married to citizens or stay longer than a very limited period of 2-3 years and never to come back again. They should be paid real american wages with full benefits since these are american jobs that americans supposedly wont do. No exploitation or abuse should be allowed.

        Yakov

        June 24, 2018 at EST pm

    • Noblesse oblige is a concept from aristocracy. Muddling everything with republics when aristocracies do just what you describe means that the best system is Monarchism and a restored overt aristocracy.

      Fooling people with talk of constitutional republics may seem necessary at historical junctions but such rich men’s tricks embed false concepts (such as all men are created equal) that end up creating catastrophic downstream effects.

      Artifact

      June 24, 2018 at EST am

  9. what was wrong with my comments?

    icelandic phallological museum

    June 23, 2018 at EST pm


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: