Lion of the Blogosphere

White terrorists vs Muslim terrorists

White terrorists, like the guy from New Zealand, are always lone wolfs and unmarried losers.

In contrast, Muslim terrorists are part of a network, and they are neither loners nor losers. We see from this article that the Sri Lanken terrorists were well educated and financially well off. They were married. There were two husband-wife suicide bombing teams.

* * *

Rosenmop writes in a comment:

White terrorists are probably mostly mentally ill. Being a terrorist is not socially acceptable in white culture so it is unlikely a white person who wants to be a terrorist will find anyone else who also wants to be a terrorist.

In some Muslim cultures apparently it IS socially acceptable to be a terrorist. Terrorists are seen as heroes and martyrs by some factions of Muslims. So groups of them get together.

Written by Lion of the Blogosphere

April 24, 2019 at EDT am

Posted in International

70 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. “Saddam Hussein was reduced to the Unabomber — Ted Kaczynski — a nutcase hiding in the sticks. Sure, the terrorism by his supporters is frightening. Hence, its name, ‘terrorism.’ Killing innocent people by surprise is not called ‘a thousand points of light.’ But, as frightening as terrorism is, it’s the weapon of losers. The minute somebody sets off a suicide bomb, you can be sure that person doesn’t have ‘career prospects.’ And no matter how horrendous a terrorist attack is, it’s still conducted by losers. Winners don’t need to hijack airplanes. Winners have an Air Force.” – P. J. O’Rourke, 2004

    njguy73

    April 24, 2019 at EDT pm

    • Without the intervention of the United States, the Islamic State would have become a powerful real state.

      Lion of the Blogosphere

      April 24, 2019 at EDT pm

      • Whatever happens
        We have got
        ICBMs
        And they have not

        njguy73

        April 24, 2019 at EDT pm

      • If you choose to call someone a terrorist, you forfeit the right to use logic as your argument.

        My 2¢

        April 24, 2019 at EDT pm

      • Without the intervention of the United States, there wouldn’t have been an Islamic State to start with.

        destructure

        April 24, 2019 at EDT pm

      • Without the intervention of Russia I think you mean. Without US/Israeli/Saudi support there wouldn’t have been an ISIS in the first place.

        Peter Akuleyev

        April 25, 2019 at EDT am

      • I think ISIS legitimately hit upon a good formula that has worked in the past and will probably sooner or later work again:

        1. Take disaffected young men and offer them women, status, and purpose in exchange for joining the fight. And assure them a good afterlife and honorable death should they die.

        2. Go to battle against demoralized armies of careerists and conscripts, who do not want to die and are likely to flee, if not desert and join your side, should you have any whiff of success.

        This formula famously leads to events like the ISIS capture of Mosul, where 1,500 lightly-armed ISIS fighters easily drove out 30,000 heavily-armed Iraqi Army regulars. A lot of the collapses of Chinese dynasties also look like this. If you have access to money, you can hire a whole lot of young men and give them weapons and uniforms, and you can even make them bully around weak groups and atomized individuals in your name. But a paycheck won’t make men die for you. And cowardice is infectious.

        ISIS was defeated partly because their enemies had much better support from outside powers than they did, and also some of their enemies (Kurds, Alawites) had tribal feeling, perceived ISIS as Sunni Arab invaders, and thus were motivated to protect their homes and families.

        Wency

        April 25, 2019 at EDT am

      • But it would be like a Taliban or Nazi state where everyone is dominated by fear of the terrorist types at the top. Even those who might have agreed with some Taliban or Nazi utopian propaganda about Muslim or German supremacy, even they would notice that a bunch of creepy terrorists are running everything and running it off a cliff because those at the top only trust the others like themselves. Not much of a place for the butcher, baker and candlestick maker. I mean, had the Nazis run out of Jews etc., as scapegoats to exterminate, would they have shut down the gas chambers? Once something like that gets so big and entrenched, it takes on a life of its own. What does the SS do when it runs out of folks to intimidate because everyone is already cowed and their heads firmly down. They don’t become the new shiny happy SS. They just expand their sadism to ever more benign folk. Their appetite is not sated. The islamic state could be powerful only in the sense of being terrible. Smart capable people wanting a bright happy future aren’t going to want to work in concentration camps. The Taliban only ever succeeded at being sadistic and the Nazis started going down when they shifted from quality of life “making the trains run on time” to depraved schemes of eliminating perceived enemies and the unfit.

        not too late

        April 25, 2019 at EDT pm

      • What does the SS do when it runs out of folks to intimidate because everyone is already cowed and their heads firmly down.

        It starts infighting, and purging (see, e.g., Bolsheviks). Once the Democrats are through with Trump and deplorables (whether it be 2020 or 2024), they will turn on each other – the Pelosis vs the AOCs. Stock up on popcorn.

        c matt

        April 25, 2019 at EDT pm

    • Before there can be a state then there needs to be terrorists. So there’s something facile and impermanent about this quote.

      Olaf

      April 24, 2019 at EDT pm

  2. It suggests that there is something more genetically deviant with white terrorists vs. Muslim/brown ones.

    GondwanaMan

    April 24, 2019 at EDT pm

    • Incel white terrorist vs Chad muslim tertorist

      Gm

      April 24, 2019 at EDT pm

    • The Muslims get 72 virgins out of the deal. The white guys get 0 virgins. What does that tell you? Most white guys, even married ones, will never know what it feels like to have even one virgin! Someone needs to write an academic paper.

      Curle

      April 24, 2019 at EDT pm

      • They are Houri, not virgins.

        Lion of the Blogosphere

        April 24, 2019 at EDT pm

      • OK, how many white guys ever get a Houri?

        Curle

        April 25, 2019 at EDT am

      • As long as you’re a good Muslim, you get Houris when you die. Race doesn’t matter!

        Lion of the Blogosphere

        April 25, 2019 at EDT am

      • Muslim terrorists will actually be blowing goats in hell after they die.

        Rosenmop

        April 26, 2019 at EDT pm

  3. Look. It seems that they got some engineering tallent for a change. Most suicide bombers use only 4 kg of TNT equivalent which rly kills people only to a distance of 3.5 m – hence 10 people.
    These guys must have used 20 kg or so per person and this is where those 350 dead came from.
    Could have been 500 if they got another 7 kg of powdered aluminium per person (thermobaric).

    Bombexpert

    April 24, 2019 at EDT pm

    • 20kg is kind of large and heavy to carry without arousing suspicion.

      destructure

      April 24, 2019 at EDT pm

      • absolutely not, 20 kg of plastic explosive is 14 l, that is 68 by 68 cm by 3 cm plate of explosive – this can easily fit onto your torso and weight carried in this way is easy on you due to the load distribution
        also, 14 l bags are not that big
        of course, wasting C4 on suicide bombers is not ideal, 20 kg could destroy 3 large columns in a skyscraper
        and Lion had a 47 story building with an average of 4000 occupants collapse just due to two such columns being lost…. in his city. Of course,I’m talking about WTC 7. And most comparable skyscrapers wouldn’t fare that much better (5 – 8 columns)
        oh, and properly done thermobarics have a density of 1.9 so your 14 l back pack could carry 25 kg of TBX with a 9 m kill radius

        bscly, I’m pointing out how low-IQ these muslims are- HBD is a thing + terrorism will select against IQ, albeit slightly…. but ur not starting from a high average
        also, the death toll has been lowered to some 250+ or 30 per bomber… not that good

        bombexpert

        April 25, 2019 at EDT pm

  4. By the way – did you forget about that 32 or 33 year old virgin that piloted a plane that killed 1900 or so people in your own city?

    And he was dumb, too. Despite having architecture training. They should have flown UA 175 into the North Tower, too. 7 500 dead in an instant – for all the world to see in real time.

    Bombexpert

    April 24, 2019 at EDT pm

  5. White terrorists are probably mostly mentally ill. Being a terrorist is not socially acceptable in white culture so it is unlikely a white person who wants to be a terrorist will find anyone else who also wants to be a terrorist.

    In some Muslim cultures apparently it IS socially acceptable to be a terrorist. Terrorists are seen as heroes and martyrs by some factions of Muslims. So groups pf them get together.

    I have noticed that gang rape seems to be a mostly non-white activity. White rapists usually act alone. In some factions of some other cultures apparently rape is considered socially acceptable enough that a bunch of guys can get together and decide to go out and rape someone.

    Rosenmop

    April 24, 2019 at EDT pm

    • I have noticed that gang rape seems to be a mostly non-white activity. White rapists usually act alone. In some factions of some other cultures apparently rape is considered socially acceptable enough that a bunch of guys can get together and decide to go out and rape someone.

      Gang rape happens when Muslims come to the West because in their countries women are not guaranteed the right of safety unless accompanied by a male relative or husband. It’s understood and accepted that men will try to deflower or ravage them if they can – and Islam says that the burden of preventing rape is on the woman.

      Thus, Islamic countries typically don’t allow women behind closed doors interacting with men not their husband.

      The concept of “consent” simply dosn’t exist within Islam or within Islamic countries.

      The USA doesn’t have Western Europe’s grooming and gang rape problem for a few reasons – the USA has typically received a much higher quality of Muslim (education and income) than Western Europe, lower-class whites in the USA aren’t urban (so they can’t be groomed off street corners like in Rotherham, UK) and the USA already has a large black criminal underclass (so Muslims don’t come here and dominate low-level street crime like they do in softer places like Germany or Sweden, for instance).

      Camlost

      April 24, 2019 at EDT pm

    • Yes, I think there’s a lot of truth to this.

      Antipodean Coward

      April 24, 2019 at EDT pm

    • Gang rape is common enough historically among whites as well, don’t kid yourself. Gang rape is a male bonding activity, sick as that might sound, and has always been a problem with groups that seek to forge strong male bonds – frats, sports teams, military units, etc.

      Peter Akuleyev

      April 25, 2019 at EDT am

    • Good observation on gang rape.

      There were a handful of high profile white-on-black gang rapes in the later days of the Jim Crow South. The media would like to portray these as the tip of the iceberg, notable only in that they were reported. This could be true, I suppose, but I’ve never heard any real evidence.

      The closest thing I can think of to a white gang rape is the Brandon Vandenburg case. He drugs his girlfriend and leads his black teammates to gang rape her while she’s incapacitated. And of course they take the ever-brilliant “record the evidence on video” approach to evading justice. I guess you could say he made the decision to conform with his black peer group, and he got a 17-year sentence for his trouble.

      The only other cases seem to be those of high schoolers taking advantage of incapacitated girls, though this doesn’t generally lead to full intercourse.

      Wency

      April 25, 2019 at EDT am

  6. The percentage of Muslims who believe terrorism is (at least partially) justified is significantly larger than the percentage of whites who believe that terrorist acts are justifiable acts of violence.

    Oswald Spengler

    April 24, 2019 at EDT pm

  7. Hillary Clinton is very well connected.

    anonymous

    April 24, 2019 at EDT pm

  8. White terrorists don’t have an immensely wealthy country providing covert support.

    Peter

    ironrailsironweights

    April 24, 2019 at EDT pm

    • This is very true. Trump’s support for SA is probably the most shameful part of his po

      Peter Akuleyev

      April 25, 2019 at EDT am

  9. Again: religion _is_ a mental illness. So the Muslim terrorists are mentally ill, too.

    Anthony

    April 24, 2019 at EDT pm

    • I disagree. The purpose of religion, nay the purpose of organized society generally, is to keep the losers away from the women. Religion sure as sh*t does this better than any other cultural institution with the possible exception of lesbianism.

      Curle

      April 24, 2019 at EDT pm

      • It is sheer ignorance to treat all “religions” (which is simply a belief system utilized to interpret/make sense of existence) as though they are all the same thing. The closer a belief system corresponds with reality, the less “mentally ill” it will be.

        c matt

        April 25, 2019 at EDT pm

    • Religion is mainstream, so it is normal. Mental illness is actually the opposite of religion. I am not claiming that I am not mentally ill.

      My 2¢

      April 26, 2019 at EDT am

  10. Worthwhile to note that the way liberals (and thus the MSM) see it is just the opposite: they think white terrorists are part of networks, and Muslim terrorists are lone wolves. Every time there’s some beta male rage shooting, they start taking about how he must have been a “member of incel groups” and the need to crack down on the “MRA movement” and things like that.

    Hermes

    April 24, 2019 at EDT pm

    • interesting observation

      alice

      April 25, 2019 at EDT pm

  11. It’s ironic you would say that.

    In modern times, terrorism was invented by Jewish people, Irgun, in Palestine, when they bombed King D vid hotel.

    Then the terrorism technique went to Japanese red army, who learned it imitating the Jewish, Nihon Sekigun, and taught it to the Muslims, because they were anti-Jewish (hard to believe …).

    So the two most intelligent people were the ones to invent terrorism in modern times.

    Bruno

    April 24, 2019 at EDT pm

    • ‘In modern times, terrorism was invented by Jewish people, Irgun, in Palestine, when they bombed King D vid hotel.’

      Great insight!

      Yakov

      April 24, 2019 at EDT pm

    • No, no, no. There were plenty of bombings before 1945-47 Palestine. Soviet partisans used IEDs extensively in Nazi occupied territory. There were anarchist bombings in the USA from the 1880s through 1919.

      The first “vehicular IED” was an attempt to assassinate Napoleon.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plot_of_the_rue_Saint-Nicaise

      Tarl

      April 24, 2019 at EDT pm

      • Terrorism is killing random people. If you attack government, policemen, top civil servants, military, judges, and even CEO or prominent journalists, it’s not really terrorism.
        It’s guerilla or anarchy.

        It’s killing people from civil society to put pressure on the authorities that is the idea. And that was invented by the Jews . In the war against the Roman, the Jews invented many strategies but not terror. And I don’t know about another example. It’s quite sophisticated technique.

        Bruno

        April 25, 2019 at EDT am

      • You mix attack from civil society (that can take form of some guerilla, anarchy, partisan, putsch by civilian) and to civil society.

        Terrorism in Berlin would have been killing German in a market, or attending church or going to work in a non military job (like clerks in a big city shop). Or kill civilian german going to swim in the lake in the summer. Or poisoning food in kindergarten. That would have been terrorism. And there was none. Because the idea of the goal didn’t pop up in peoples mind.

        The only first step was authority organizing mass suicide of their population to avoir defeat. And I believe that was also a Jewish premiere (not sure) in Masada in the war between Jews and Roman.

        Bruno

        April 25, 2019 at EDT am

      • Bruno, you contradict yourself. You say that terrorism is killing random people, and then you give the example of the King David hotel.

        The King David hotel was a specific military operation. the irgun didn’t go to England and kill English children. Palestinian terrorists specifically sought out to kill Israeli children on many occasions, most notoriously Maalot.

        the Tamil tigers were the innovators of the suicide bomber.

        Yaakov, u r a dope.

        gothamette

        April 25, 2019 at EDT am

      • Cat, your repeated failures to descearn sarcasm are bewildering. And then you take thus nonsense seriously. Really, cat……

        Yakov

        April 25, 2019 at EDT pm

      • Gothamette, Jewish were the first, even if I agree King David could count as not a main civil target, even if many civils died in this hotel. Irgun targeted beaches and markets before :

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Irgun_operations

        Except if someone comes with another historical fact, I give the inventor of terrorism prize to the Jewish people, followed by Japanese and Iranian. Maybe Gandhi was also quite high on terrorism education too. So merchant Indian cast (jairit vanya) would be 4th.

        There is a bizarre correlation between math aptitude and terrorism invention 😊

        Bruno

        April 25, 2019 at EDT pm

      • Bruno, you are on the right track, but your historical research doesn’t drill deep enough. Fugget about Kind David hotel, the begining of the terrorism was with the 10 plagues of Egypt, which indiscriminately attacked the Egyptian people. Blood, frogs, lice, wild animals, pestilence, books, hail, locusts, darkness, death of the first born. Nothing like this has been seen either before or after. This was truly the worst terror attack known in human history. By celebrating Passover and joyfully recounting these plagues every year the Jews demonstrate their terrorist essence. Case closed, mate.

        Yakov

        April 25, 2019 at EDT pm

      • God “hardened Pharaoh’s heart” so that God would have an excuse for all of the plauges. God must have really hated the Egyptians.

        Lion of the Blogosphere

        April 25, 2019 at EDT pm

      • This language appears only after the 5th plague and signifies that the continuing stubborness of Paroah was so irrational in the face of the plagues that it was as if the Almighty had hardened his heart.😉

        Yakov

        April 25, 2019 at EDT pm

      • Bruno, even if one accepts the premise that “terrorism is killing random people”, there were many examples of that before Palestine in 1947 (which is a bad example of it). Anarchist bombings in the USA from the 1880s through 1920 killed lots of “random people”. Fenian dynamite bombs in Britain in the 1880s were planted in railroad and underground stations, with the obvious intent of killing random civilians.

        Tarl

        May 1, 2019 at EDT pm

    • You forgot the Anarchists and the murder of Czar Alexander.

      Curle

      April 24, 2019 at EDT pm

    • From Wikipedia: The [King David] hotel was the site of the central offices of the British Mandatory authorities of Palestine, principally the Secretariat of the Government of Palestine and the Headquarters of the British Armed Forces in Palestine and Transjordan.[14][15] When planned, the attack had the approval of the Haganah, the principal Jewish paramilitary group in Palestine, though, unbeknownst to the Irgun, this had been cancelled by the time the operation was carried out. It was conceived as part of a response to Operation Agatha (a series of widespread raids, including one on the Jewish Agency, conducted by the British authorities) and was the deadliest directed at the British during the Mandate era (1920–1948).[14][15]

      I think the US would consider this to be a perfectly legitimate military ‘command and control’ target.

      Nedd Ludd

      April 25, 2019 at EDT pm

  12. Kill non-europeans in order to save the White race vs kill to serve God’s dominion under Islam

    The 1st option seems inhumane while the 2nd option seems plausible for theological and cultural dominance.

    Ok, what, who's this again?

    April 24, 2019 at EDT pm

    • In the evolutionary terms both are morally equivalent. Your attitude should depend on what side you are on. This poor country can only be saved by a revolution and a reign of terror. Nothing, absolutely nothing else can save it. I say that all means are kosher to save this poor country. Every patriot should be a tererrorist. This is very simple.

      Yakov

      April 24, 2019 at EDT pm

      • I generally agree that all means are acceptable in self-defense, fighting off an invasion, etc.

        destructure

        April 25, 2019 at EDT am

  13. I’m fine with analysis as long as lion is not saying that one group is just “ill” and another is “evil”. As long as both are considered horrible people without any redeeming qualities and belong in a dark hole in prison I’m fine with the nuance.

    mpt

    April 24, 2019 at EDT pm

  14. “There were two husband-wife suicide bombing teams.”

    No, the article says to were a husband and wife duo.

    Elsewhere I read that the Sri Lankan president said that one was the son of a very prominent businessman.

    Continuing my question from the other post, which destructure answered satisfactorily, I have a further question.

    Why Catholic churches? Why not Hindu temples? I think probably because they are legitimately concerned about Hindu nationalist reprisal, whereas Christian’s never fight back.

    gothamette

    April 24, 2019 at EDT pm

    • Well we’re still waiting for clarity on who exactly these people who worship Easter are. And how they managed to cajole Christians into lending them their Church(s) on the holiest day of the Christian calendar.

      But, seriously……the global war, as far as ISIS/Al Queda et al are concerned, is Islam vs. Christianity.

      To them, the USA is the last bastion of Christianity.

      Who did Bin Laden declare War on?

      Not the Hindu nation of America.

      The fact that Christianity didn’t fight back during the Obama years just reinforced their belief that they were “the Strong Horse” and encouraged thousands of new recruits.

      Now they’ve discovered that Christians DO fight back (see US vs. ISIS Caliphate for details), they’re picking on easier targets, trying to get that strong horse feeling back.

      gda53

      April 24, 2019 at EDT pm

      • You lost that strong horse feelin’
        Whoa, that strong horse feelin’
        You lost that strong horse feelin’
        Now it’s gone, gone, gone, woh

        I heard about that “easter worshipers” nonsense. They just couldn’t bring themselves to say christians. Because they hate christians and don’t want them to be seen as sympathetic victims. That’s how devious and manipulative those mf’ers are.

        destructure

        April 25, 2019 at EDT am

      • they hate Hindus too. Buddhists. And yazidis. And Jews. In fact they hate anybody who isn’t them. Look up their history of terrorist violence against any other group.

        Yet, in a society that is majority Buddhist, they picked out a tiny minority. Why? Because they knew damn well that this minority would not fight back.

        other countries have learned how to deal with them. Look at Israel. There have not been major terrorist attacks since 2005. Look at India. The Indians have learned to deal with them.

        the authorities in Sri Lanka we’re incompetent. They got warnings they didn’t listen. And I think they’re helpless now. That’s not how you deal with Muslims. They need the iron fist. And not in a velvet glove either!!

        gothamette

        April 25, 2019 at EDT am

      • Shree Lankah has seen extremist Buddhists go berserk on Christians on its soil. No religious group is righteous.

        Religion is for proles.

        Proles will be proles.

        Ok, what, who's this again?

        April 25, 2019 at EDT pm

    • Well if the attack was in reprisal for Christchurch (as has been reported) it makes since to bomb the Christians.

      Mike Street Station

      April 24, 2019 at EDT pm

      • I think that’s total b*******.

        if it was a revenge attack it would have made much more sense to attack Australian targets, don’t you think?

        gothamette

        April 25, 2019 at EDT am

      • Eh…we’re talking about terrorists and terrorist thinking.

        Mike Street Station

        April 25, 2019 at EDT pm

  15. And during the war with Rome, the Jews invented the sicarii – a branch of zealots – killing people either for money or for a political goal. They preceded Persian ashashin and japonese ninjas.

    It looks that Jews, Iranian and Japonese have had a special creativity for the social aspect of fighting.

    Bruno

    April 25, 2019 at EDT am

  16. Terrorist, good guy, bad guy. . .it’s all bullshit.

    Look Lion, if you really want to go through the looking glass, you have to acknowledge; 1) The universe is amoral when it comes to human affairs; 2) Humans nature is animal/warlike bent on survival, sex, and killing; 3) peace is a lull of Hobbesian-violence enforced by the necessary lie of civilization. Once the lie of civilization isn’t shared by a common people and the lie is too far divorced from natural and brutal truths, then it is ripe to be conquered.

    You read the manifestos of Tarrant, Kacysnski, Sodini, Rogers. . .if anything they are TOO smart. They are only “mentally ill” by the fact that they are alone, and with opinions contrary to the interests of the rulers that are not shared or even capable of being understood by the brainwashed and mostly stupid masses.

    fakeemail

    April 25, 2019 at EDT pm

    • Only the Una bomber was/is smart… most of his prison works are pretty lucid and quite good even for a 138 VIQ schiz? guy. His manifesto (at least in isolation) is sub-par.
      Lion, you should read those works.
      Tarrant, Sodini, Rogers(?)… Rodger couldn’t figure out how to open a door in a country overflowing with bump keys, hydraulic door openers, explosives and shotguns. Oh, and he had a car. Not to mention non-violent entry.

      Bombexpert

      April 25, 2019 at EDT pm

    • oh, an his mail bombs were pathetic – however that was influenced by his financial means.. eh, life-style

      Bombexpert

      April 25, 2019 at EDT pm

  17. White terrorists, like the guy from New Zealand, are always lone wolfs and unmarried losers.

    In contrast, Muslim terrorists are part of a network, and they are neither loners nor losers.

    IOW, white terrorists are a bug, Muslim terrorists are a feature. I would agree on average. There are exceptions – the IRA comes to mind. But then again, terrorism is a tactic for those with less political power, and for now, the ones who wield most political power globally are white. If, for example, the roles were reversed and Muslims effectively ruled the world and whites were pretty much under their subjugation, I would not rule out whites using terrorism, although more likely they would use guerrilla tactics (i.e. terrorism directed at military targets rather than civilians). Muslims, in or out of power, would use terrorism – they have to, otherwise who in their right mind would follow such system?

    c matt

    April 25, 2019 at EDT pm

    • Ruthless barbarians who have a median IQ at least 100 is what propels mankind to evolve and civilizations to compete for ascendancy and greatness.

      Meriprolestan’s coddling of low IQ savages (whom we call NAMs) is what you called a loser’s game.

      Ok, what, who's this again?

      April 25, 2019 at EDT pm

    • Most of you heard of the insidious, secret weapon “Greek Fire” used by the Byzantines (Eastern Romans) to repel the Muslim naval fleet from invading its stronghold in Constantinople on the Mediterranean sea during the Middle Ages.

      Well, it turns out that the Muslims later discovered that by using seaweed to cover their ships, this would be the magic bulletproof vest that would absorb the fire unscathed, which would allow them to take parts of Christendom.

      NAMs and other low IQ barbarians aren’t suited for intellectual warfare.

      Ok, what, who's this again?

      April 25, 2019 at EDT pm

  18. Attacking Lubavitcher Orthodox synagogues attended by working class Israeli expats to own the ZOG

    IHTG

    April 28, 2019 at EDT am


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: