Lion of the Blogosphere

The “Pride Shake” at Shake Shack

When I was a kid in the 1970s, the worst thing you could say about someone is that they were a faggot. (Although apparently it’s still a bad thing to say because the word is banned.)

But today, at kid-friendly corporate venues like Shake Shack, we see the gay agenda being promoted in the form of a sugary drink especially appealing to children. I suppose that kids today want to be gay because it’s so much cooler than being straight. Straight is boring, and there’s no pride in being straight.

Written by Lion of the Blogosphere

June 18, 2019 at EDT pm

Posted in Males and Females

93 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. In just five decades, buggery went from the sin that dare not speak its name to the sin that won’t shut up, under any circumstances.

    Oswald Spengler

    June 18, 2019 at EDT pm

  2. If you really want to experience someone going emotionally ballistic on you, ask a rainbow person what it is they have “pride” about. They’ll say something about everything they’ve “overcome.” When you point out that they’ve experienced nothing but social approval, ass-kissing and institutional favoritism, the sparks really fly. To me, nothing’s more fun than saying to a 40-plus queer, “name one person you know who was ever arrested for licking another man’s ass.”

    Marty

    June 18, 2019 at EDT pm

    • Always makes me think of this.

      Half Canadian

      June 18, 2019 at EDT pm

      • Could. Not. Do. Today.

        gothamette

        June 18, 2019 at EDT pm

      • On homosexuality:

        “I always check out the guys in the locker room and take note of the small guys just in case they make it mandatory”.

        Norm MacDonald

        Curle

        June 19, 2019 at EDT pm

    • This is just retarded. It’s like saying fat chicks have it easy because they’re celebrated in television commercials. Everyone knows the angle.

      Gays have to deal with bigoted family members in private as well as disrespect and discrimination in public. Who has gone to jail for saying Blacks have lower average IQs? Being gay today is than twenty years ago, but they still have to deal with unnecessary bullshit.

      Vince

      June 18, 2019 at EDT pm

      • Vince,

        Gays have to deal with other gays. That’s the worst part of being gay. They have a very small dating pool, and they’re not too crazy about effeminacy. (I’m talking about the men). As for bigoted family members, give it a rest. Most family members accept other family members’ oddities. The real world isn’t a tear-jerking New York Times article.

        They just don’t I think being gay is normal.

        gothamette

        June 18, 2019 at EDT pm

      • Gays can rack up huge partner counts because men, regardless of orientation, tend to be sluts. As for family members accepting “oddities,” you’ve just reverted to your normal levels of cluelessness. Family members are often embarrassed to have gay children and siblings. Things have been changing, but it’s still not easy, especially in religious households and communities where homosexuality is treated as an abomination. And that’s not a New York Times article. It’s real-life. I had a childhood friend who had girlfriends, and later came out as gay after high school even though everyone in his social circle was relatively progressive and accepting.

        Vince

        June 18, 2019 at EDT pm

      • “Gays have to deal with bigoted family members in private as well as disrespect and discrimination in public.”

        Heterosexuals have to deal with bigoted gays shoving it in everyone’s faces in both public and private. If you want to suck a dick in your own home that’s your business. But you don’t need to make it ours by riding a float down main street wearing a thong and simulating fellatio. Those people are not victims. Any problems people like that have were caused by themselves.

        Here’s how non-victim homos are. Back when it was illegal, it was so rare for anyone to be arrested that radicals had to engineer an arrest. So they staged a crime in which a “robber” being chased by a police officer ran into a house where two men were going at it in hopes that the officer would arrest them. You know why? Because no one was ever arrested for what they did in their own homes. It was only for doing it in public venues like public restrooms, parks, clubs, etc.

        The Matthew Shepherd hate crime law was even more of a fraud. If you’ll remember, Shepherd was a homo from rural Wyoming who was tied to a fence post and tortured to death. That’s terrible. But do you know why it’s a fraud? Because the guy who did it was not a “homophobe” but his gay lover who killed him in an argument over drugs. If people were doing terrible things to homos then they wouldn’t have had to fabricate an incident.

        Homos have concocted these false narratives of persecution just like leftists do with everything else. And people believe them because that’s what they see in msm, movies, etc. But that’s certainly not what happens in the real world. It’s not my fault that you can’t tell the difference between fiction and reality.

        destructure

        June 18, 2019 at EDT pm

      • I can not take anyone seriously who uses the word slut to refer to men. That is a gender specific word. The correct term for promiscuous men is cads or rakes. If you want a gender neutral term then use the word promiscuous. (*Although perhaps it is an apt word for gay men who tend to embrace femininity.)

        chris

        June 19, 2019 at EDT am

      • “Homos have concocted these false narratives of persecution just like leftists do with everything else.”

        I should correct myself and say “LEFTISTS have concocted these false narratives of persecution.” Because, left to themselves, most people wouldn’t. Why do you leftists have to turn everything into some “oppression narrative”?

        destructure

        June 19, 2019 at EDT am

      • Is it possible for people like Vince to argue without being abusive?

        Is it possible for Lena Dunham to go into a bakeshop and not comeout five pounds heavier?

        I think of myself as pretty clued in. Actually, wise about the human condition. And IDGAF what a dope like you thinks. I am writing this for the benefit of people who might learn from my pearls of wisdom, not to convince you, because I think u r one DUMB FUCK.

        “Gays can rack up huge partner counts because men, regardless of orientation, tend to be sluts.”

        That had nothing to do with what I was talking about, but what happens is this: because the dating pool is small (2% of the male population) they end up meeting the same guy after this round is over. They don’t have an infinite amount of anuses to ram or get rammed by. I know this; sadder but wiser eldergays have told me this.

        Most gays hate other gays because of effeminacy. They are searching for the Ideal Man, who more often than not ain’t into them. “He opened his mouth and a purse fell out.”

        I never said gays don’t have problems with family acceptance but newsflash, this isn’t their real problem. Their real problem is that they are an aberrant minority. They can’t by def have kids, so their method is to change the operating system of their society. They can’t do that either because homosexuality is maladaptive, so they resort to manipulation and economic coercion. Right now we are beginning a final stage of Big Capital coercion against the normal.

        You had a friend… so did I. Working class Mexican who came to NYC to work in a glam industry. Totally out to family. I’m sure they wish he was straight but otherwise, they were accepting.

        Yang’s War Against Normal People is more true than he wrote about.

        gothamette

        June 19, 2019 at EDT pm

      • “Men are sluts”

        You know, I want to say something about this.

        I don’t believe it’s true.

        I think men are showoffs and bullshit artists. They love to brag about their conquests but how much of this is real?

        If our toxic Hollywoodized commodified society didn’t shove 24/7 all you can get fucking onto men, how many of them would spend so much energy on it?

        I think men are more picky than the “men are promiscuous” (prefer this phrase) gang would like to admit. They like a type of woman, find her, settle down, and moan about the ball and chain but secretly are quite relieved to be done with all that bullshit.

        Men become fixated on that woman (or type of woman) and become very jealous & territorial if anyone horns in on their territory. Men can go nuts with jealousy. They murder a cherished object if she strays. “If I can’t have her, no one can….”

        Gay men strike me as being more like adolescent females: they are TRULY fickle and flighty.

        Gay male promiscuity is real. Straight male promiscuity is more apparent than real.

        gothamette

        June 19, 2019 at EDT pm

      • men are less ‘sluts’ as they are willing to have sex a lot more than women, that doesn’t mean they get to because most men are heterosexual and thus want to have sex with women, and most women won’t have sex willy nilly with most men. gays indeed have a lot of sexual partners relative to heterosexual men because they’re guys dating other guys, which means they don’t have to deal with the relatively lower sex-drive of women in the way of them getting sex.

        from what i’ve been told form gay dudes getting casual sex as a gay man is ridiculously easy but finding a real long term relationship is extremely hard. it makes sense; you have a tiny dating pool, a lot of gay guys are closeted, you don’t often immediately know who’s gay, a lot of gay guys don’t want long term monogamy, etc.

        james n.s.w

        June 19, 2019 at EDT pm

      • [I can not take anyone seriously who uses the word slut to refer to men.]

        This kind of semantic gate keeping is generally unproductive. I recently tried reasoning with a vegan who said no one could call himself vegan unless vegan for ethical reasons. So a person eating a vegan diet for taste or health reasons cannot say he is vegan. Very annoying.

        I have occasionally used the term slut to refer to men. Some men are so promiscuous that a better term is needed and slut fits the bill.

        toomanymice

        June 19, 2019 at EDT pm

      • If heterosexual, you can call them a Lothario. And if gay, you can just call them gay.

        Lion of the Blogosphere

        June 19, 2019 at EDT pm

      • destructure wrote:

        Heterosexuals have to deal with bigoted gays shoving it in everyone’s faces in both public and private.

        This has been addressed millions of times, and it’s one of the reasons homophobic bigots have lost the public debate. Gays are criticized for displays of affection that are innocuous in heterosexual couples. I’m not going to draw stares or elbow nudges for holding hands with my girlfriend. If you don’t want to see more explicit behavior at a gay pride parade, the solution is simple: Don’t watch gay pride parades. That’s just a long-standing form of trolling to infuriate aging bigots, and I’m happy to see that it still works beautifully.

        As for victimization — it’s equal opportunity. Your posts here are drenched in the victimization of an allegedly oppressive gay autocracy.

        gothamette on the high partner counts of gay men:

        That had nothing to do with what I was talking about, but what happens is this: because the dating pool is small (2% of the male population) they end up meeting the same guy after this round is over. They don’t have an infinite amount of anuses to ram or get rammed by. I know this; sadder but wiser eldergays have told me this.

        So you’re going to double-down on your substantial ignorance? Fine. What was Roissy’s preferred phrase? Options = Instability. The problem with being an aging Queen is you rapidly lose sexual value. Again, this is not primarily a function of being gay, but being a man. Males, regardless of orientation, tend to desire young, naked bodies. Gay men are a fraction of the general population, but made up nearly half of subscribers to Playgirl. It’s a Peter Pan lifestyle.

        Rich, famous, good-looking, heterosexual men can more comfortably refuse to grow up because there will always be a steady supply of young, desirable women willing to love them, fuck them, and get cheated on.

        Their real problem is that they are an aberrant minority. They can’t by def have kids, so their method is to change the operating system of their society. They can’t do that either because homosexuality is maladaptive, so they resort to manipulation and economic coercion.

        I’m afraid too far gone from the rational world. You’re like an obese Black woman who thinks people are out to get you because you’re too hot. No, gays do not generally give a shit that heterosexuals can have babies. If anything I’m jealous that gays do not face as much pressure to breed.

        Right now we are beginning a final stage of Big Capital coercion against the normal.

        Uh-huh.

        Vince

        June 19, 2019 at EDT pm

      • “This has been addressed millions of times, and it’s one of the reasons homophobic bigots have lost the public debate.”

        Cute propaganda trick labeling anyone who doesn’t agree with your idiocy as a “homophobic bigot”.

        “Gays are criticized for displays of affection that are innocuous in heterosexual couples. I’m not going to draw stares or elbow nudges for holding hands with my girlfriend.”

        Yeah, yeah. Double standard blah blah blah. I don’t want to see anyone making out in public. And I think a lot of other people don’t either. I would personally feel uncomfortable making out in public. So you’re trying to play something off as a double standard when I don’t even do it myself.

        “If you don’t want to see more explicit behavior at a gay pride parade, the solution is simple: Don’t watch gay pride parades. That’s just a long-standing form of trolling to infuriate aging bigots, and I’m happy to see that it still works beautifully.”

        You can’t engage in lewd public behavior and then blame others for it. That doesn’t fly. Especially when you admit the whole purpose is to provoke and antagonize others. Why do you feel the need to antagonize the general public anyway? You’re just getting off on being an ahole.

        “As for victimization — it’s equal opportunity. Your posts here are drenched in the victimization of an allegedly oppressive gay autocracy.”

        Naah. It isn’t the “gay autocracy” any more than it’s the black, feminist, vegan or any other autocracy. Psychopaths realized they can push false narratives to radicalize various groups and causes. Then they leverage them for their own political power. They don’t care about the consequences for others and neither do you. As long as you get to feel smug and self-righteous. That’s what being a leftist is all about. Getting a dopamine hit by pretending to care. If you really cared then you wouldn’t be promoting unhealthy behavior under the guise of “tolerance”.

        destructure

        June 20, 2019 at EDT am

  3. Proof that opponents of gay marriage were correct. It’s called precedent and it leads to more demands, shifts, changes, and goals until there is massive pushback. Since 2012 this agenda has been accelerated it appears the American elite agreed around that time to normalize it at one of their conferences like Bilderberg.

    redarmyvodka

    June 18, 2019 at EDT pm

    • It is incredible that once homosexuality was legalized, our kids’ breakfast cereal was eventually going to be gay. Spoken some decades ago, it sounds like the ravings of an absolute lunatic. By which I mean a literal, institutionalized paranoid schizophrenic.

      So while it may seem incompatible with a free society for sodomy to be criminalized, there’s apparently no alternative besides gay breakfast cereal (and whatever insanity is coming next).

      Sadly, the take-away for us seems to be to resist all of their demands on everything, always. Give an inch, they’ll take 10,000 miles.

      Wency

      June 18, 2019 at EDT pm

      • In Russia it is not illegal to be gay but LGBT propaganda is illegal. Although I don’t know who that could work in the US with your 1st amendment.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_rights_in_Russia#National_laws

        chris

        June 19, 2019 at EDT am

      • Yes, every time conservatives use the slippery slope argument to resist some proposed liberal change to society, the liberals denounce the slippery slope argument as a fallacy and say the conservatives are just crazy. Then the liberal change is implemented, the result the conservatives were worried about happens… but by then, it’s become the new accepted “normal” (with conservatives filling their role of conserving yesterday’s liberalism) and the liberals have moved on to the next outrage, still claiming the slippery slope is a fallacy.

        Hermes

        June 19, 2019 at EDT am

      • The US is providing an example for all future civilizations on why past social norms, once thought arbitrary, were actually required. Same thing with women in the political process.

        Panther of the Blogocube

        June 19, 2019 at EDT am

      • @Chris:

        That’s fair (though my understanding is in parts of Russia, especially Chechnya, homosexuality is de facto illegal). I also think that LGBT propaganda could be banned here despite the 1st Amendment, for the same reason you can ban content containing bad language. No judge today would interpret Pride advertisements as obscene, but that’s because of our cultural degeneracy, not the Constitution.

        But to Panther’s astute point, no one would even think to have an anti-LGBT propaganda law if not for observing our society. In the past, they just banned sodomy itself.

        We’ll see how long Russia’s law holds, but I wish them the best.

        Wency

        June 19, 2019 at EDT am

  4. This sounds like hyperbole but it’s absolutely true.

    I have an acquaintance a little younger than me, I think he’s just now turning 30, so solidly Millennial. Leftist, but otherwise seems pretty normal, not a raging SJW or anything, and he’s married to a woman, pretty gal but also leftist. A year or two ago he decided to start saying he’s “somewhat genderqueer”. I think “genderqueer” means that he doesn’t identify as strictly male or female, but that adjective “somewhat” seems to imply that he regards himself as something like 50% male, 0% female. In any case, he acts and dresses like a man, his hobbies are stereotypically male, and I don’t think he has sex with anyone but his wife.

    So, it’s as clear a sign as I’ve seen that there is now a class of otherwise sexually normal people seeking to fit under the rainbow flag for status points.

    Wency

    June 18, 2019 at EDT pm

    • One wonders what the L, G, B, and T components of the LGBTQ rainbow coalition think of Qs like your self-professed “genderqueer” acquaintance. He seems like a more or less straight man who has glommed onto a sociopolitical movement for SJW victim status points.

      Oswald Spengler

      June 18, 2019 at EDT pm

      • Right now, the signs are that the rainbow is in the process of expanding, and I haven’t heard about anyone getting in the way of it. See Budweiser’s latest gay ads, for example. I haven’t heard anything about LGBT people who are against this expansion. This is unlike feminists, some of whom oppose expanding the definition of “woman” to include Bruce Jenner — I think they call them TERFs.

        Wency

        June 19, 2019 at EDT am

  5. I can’t imagine what it’s like to be a traditionalist who has kids, with this stuff so out in the open. I mean, we know that unfortunately children are more influenced by their peers than their parents. But you used to be able to control what your kids saw and heard at least to some degree. Today, you take your young kids in to Shake Shack for lunch and that poster is right there, staring them in the face.

    Hermes

    June 18, 2019 at EDT pm

  6. Shake Shack is such SWPL crap; expensive and not very good. Even their shakes!

    fakeemail

    June 18, 2019 at EDT pm

    • This is true.

      I always wonder about people claiming “this place has great burgers!” when the burger is just a thin gray/black patty or two. If you don’t see any red or even pink in your “red meat”, then it’s dog food.

      Wency

      June 18, 2019 at EDT pm

      • Your are far less likely to get e coli from eating a well-done burger.

        On Saturday, I had a delicious thick pink-red burger, but I worried about e coli.

        Lion of the Blogosphere

        June 18, 2019 at EDT pm

      • You can choose not to worry about that. E. coli food poisoning affects 0.01% of Americans annually. Granted, a lot of them are incinerating their burgers, but it’s still a smallish risk, especially if you’re going for medium and not rare/medium-rare.

        Alternatively, you can sous vide your burger (killing vastly more pathogens relative to its doneness than grilling it), then sear it for a few seconds on the grill or a frying pan.

        Wency

        June 18, 2019 at EDT pm

      • There is a place for a thin, well-done burger. Maillard reaction is one thing that makes hamburgers taste good, and a smashed burger has that in spades. Put two of those with sharp cheddar in between, slather on grilled mushrooms, tomatoes, and mayo, and that’s an awesome burger.

        Half Canadian

        June 18, 2019 at EDT pm

      • I like my patties well done, which is prole. But how prole is it, when you cook organic patties made from grass fed beef?

        Ok, what, who's this again?

        June 18, 2019 at EDT pm

      • I advise a regular (2 oz daily) consumption of kefir so you can have your rare meat and eat it too. Plus, it’s SWPL 💩

        A Dilettante

        June 19, 2019 at EDT am

      • The ubiquitous burger consumption of Meriproles should be a disgust to SWPLs as much as fossil fuels are to the planet’s atmosphere. But it’s not.

        Shake Shack is just a SWPL version of the beefy burger for proles.

        Shame on them!

        Ok, what, who's this again?

        June 19, 2019 at EDT am

      • “The ubiquitous burger consumption of Meriproles should be a disgust to SWPLs”

        Plenty of millionaires regularly eat hamburgers. Did you imagine their wives wouldn’t cook hamburgers or something? Although I don’t recall eating one in quite some time. I don’t have anything against them. I just don’t eat much fast food. And if we cook ground beef it’s more likely to be chili or meatloaf than hamburgers.

        destructure

        June 19, 2019 at EDT am

      • Burgers cut across all social classes, much like the NFL and raw oysters. https://lionoftheblogosphere.wordpress.com/2017/06/22/oysters-and-social-class-mystery-solved/

        Lion of the Blogosphere

        June 19, 2019 at EDT am

      • My comments wasn’t about what class of people are eating burgers, but the environmental and moral ramifications with overconsumption of beef. There are burger joints everywhere in America, as prevalent as bars in every street block when it comes to cities. Shake Shack is just another addition to the millions of burger frenzy that are catered to proles. Beef consumption of Americans has been ticking up.

        Ok, what, who's this again?

        June 19, 2019 at EDT pm

      • Any of you tried the Beyond Burger? Their plant based “beef” patties are sold in Whole Foods, and it should be the burger of choice for SWPLs who virtue signal.

        Ok, what, who's this again?

        June 19, 2019 at EDT pm

      • No, and I have also not tried Beyond Sushi.

        Lion of the Blogosphere

        June 19, 2019 at EDT pm

    • I have to agree about the shakes at Shake Shack—totally boring and ordinary, a disappointment after hearing the hype for years. Maybe they were good when the place first opened?

      Gozo

      June 18, 2019 at EDT pm

      • No matter how disappointing Shake Shack was after hearing the hype, nothing can match the overratedness of In-N-Out.

        Hermes

        June 19, 2019 at EDT am

      • @Hermes

        Too true. I ate there for the first time in my life, maybe a year ago. I didn’t understand what was supposed to make it better than, say, Wendy’s. Shake Shack, while also overrated, is a cut above those places.

        Wency

        June 19, 2019 at EDT am

      • I thought the burgers at the Las Vegas Strip Fatburger were glorious.

        Plus I had my first chili-dog there.

        O.
        M.
        G.

        Don’t fight me on this. Best Thanksgiving dinner ever.

        gothamette

        June 19, 2019 at EDT pm

      • I think Five Guys is highly overrated.

        Oswald Spengler

        June 19, 2019 at EDT pm

      • I enjoyed Five Guys when I was first introduced in 2001 when I was living and working in Northern Virginia.

        Lion of the Blogosphere

        June 19, 2019 at EDT pm

      • Five Guys isn’t overrated per se, it’s just too expensive. A burger, fries, and a drink comes to $15. There are plenty of places you can get a made-to-order burger with fries and a drink in a sit-down, full-service pub for the same price.

        Hermes

        June 19, 2019 at EDT pm

      • I don’t remember it costing that much 18 years ago.

        Lion of the Blogosphere

        June 19, 2019 at EDT pm

      • Five Guys is the same tier as Shake Shack I think, maybe even a bit better. So maybe overrated, but nothing like the overratedness of In-and-Out.

        I actually think Five Guys’ French fries are excellent, as good as any I’ve had in my life, but the burgers are still thin and gray. And yes, expensive.

        Wency

        June 20, 2019 at EDT pm

      • “when I was living and working in Northern Virginia.”

        McLean?

        Curle

        June 21, 2019 at EDT am

      • No, luckily. I worked in Old Town Alexandria (really nice), an office park near a highway interchange (not so nice) and Fort Belvoir (yuck).

        Lion of the Blogosphere

        June 21, 2019 at EDT am

  7. Okay I get that the worlds of publishing and media and Hollywood and the corporate sector are all pushing the idea that gay is cool, and they’re working to target young people with their messaging. But it’s hard to fathom the impact they are having/ have had on the mindset of boys in their teens and early twenties. The culture of young men is defiant to all things gay, and pushing too hard to mold their values on such a sensitive issue is like trying to bend glass, it can’t end well. I expect large amounts of social havoc depending on how far the powers that be go at targeting this demographic.

    Armando

    June 18, 2019 at EDT pm

    • I wonder too.

      I used to think that there was a limit as to how propaganda works. I mean, you can’t convince people to drink Clorox, can you?

      I now think you can.

      They will brainwash an entire generation of kids into thinking so-called “anal sex” is normal. It doesn’t hurt – that’s just in your mind. It’s because you are an uptight middle-class Christian and you have been brainwashed into thinking this is icky. Just relax and enjoy it.

      I think this is possible.

      gothamette

      June 19, 2019 at EDT pm

  8. https://www.glaad.org/blog/kelloggs-and-glaad-launch-special-edition-all-together-cereal-spirit-day

    By GLAAD | October 18, 2018

    To support Spirit Day, the most visible anti-LGBTQ bullying campaign and united show of support for LGBTQ youth, Kellogg Company today launched a special edition ‘All Together’ cereal in collaboration with GLAAD supporting inclusion and to stand up against bullying. ‘All Together’ will be available today at Kellogg’s NYC café. Visitors will receive an ‘All Together’ special edition box and can make their own ‘All Together’ cereal by mixing a diverse combination of Kellogg’s cereals.

    MEH 0910

    June 18, 2019 at EDT pm

  9. In a benighted era, like say the early 1990s, this was known as grooming.

    But in The Current Year the sodomizing of children can NEVER begin too early.

    The “Pride Shake” fits snugly like a fist in a rectum along with other grooming activities like drag queen story hour at your local libary.

    NWS4EVR

    June 18, 2019 at EDT pm

  10. If you are gay you can say the word, it is like the n-work with black folks.

    Gay men do call each other the f word from time to time as a joke for a man that is super “gay”.

    GrassMudHorse

    June 18, 2019 at EDT pm

  11. I think that’s exactly why a lot of children claim they’re transgender – but don’t later have the courage to back down. Once they transgender their probability of suicide rockets apparently.

    lioncub

    June 18, 2019 at EDT pm

    • It is exceedingly fashionable these days for otherwise unremarkable children to claim gender dysphoria (AKA trans). It gives you instant victim cred and a boost in social status.

      It is a fad and will burn itself out inside five years, to be replaced by who-knows-what, maybe light self-mutilation. Anybody remember anorexia? Anorexia was oh so fashionable among girls back in the mid 1990s, but it disappeared and you never hear of it anymore. One major difference is that teachers and parents DISCOURAGED anorexia, whereas they are required at gunpoint to CELEBRATE gender dysphoria — you could probably lose your children to Uncle Samantha if you don’t CELEBRATE gender dysphoria with the fullest of throat and every other orifice you possess.

      Remember: Almost all expressions of sodomy begin with childhood sexual abuse. So, when you CELEBRATE sodomy, you are also celebrating the sexual abuse of children. The only exception is fugly women who take a female partner rather than settle for a disgusting, shameful omega male.

      NWS4EVR

      June 18, 2019 at EDT pm

      • These crackpot theories about homosexuality aren’t helpful. And the idea that it’s caused by childhood sexual abuse is one of them.

        Hermes

        June 18, 2019 at EDT pm

      • Anorexia still happens all the time, it’s just the media fad that faded.

        Hermes

        June 18, 2019 at EDT pm

      • Alternate hypothesis: gays are not converted by being abused but simply born-this-way sexual predators on the male child population. Like the priest-gay or the hollywood-gay or hell, the rest of them.

        Piscataway

        June 19, 2019 at EDT am

      • “It gives you instant victim cred and a boost in social status. ”

        It gives you attention, which is what most kids crave.

        gothamette

        June 19, 2019 at EDT pm

  12. The Pride Shake…now available with complimentary side order of amyl nitrite poppers.

    Oswald Spengler

    June 18, 2019 at EDT pm

    • When AIDS first began spreading among gay men in the early 1980’s, some researchers thought that the use of poppers was somehow responsible. As it turned out, not only were poppers not responsible, they actually helped prevent the spread of HIV. By relaxing the walls of the Hershey Highway during corn holing they made tearing and blood exposure less likely.

      Peter

      ironrailsironweights

      June 18, 2019 at EDT pm

      • Peter – if that’s true then it also increased the incidence of “anal sex” and so increased the incidence of AIDS.

        gothamette

        June 19, 2019 at EDT pm

    • You also get an odd straw and a curious taste with your shake. Every fifth shake comes with a sprinkling of HIV. Pride!

      Piscataway

      June 19, 2019 at EDT am

  13. OT but I’m at a road house opposite the Stanford campus, and a busload of Brazilians just came in, all wearing corporate shirts reading “Sicredi.” Everyone’s pale white (i.e. German) and several blondes, but not a good-looker in the bunch. I think I’m gonna cancel my planned Brazilian whoremongering trip.

    Marty

    June 18, 2019 at EDT pm

    • My experience of Brazilians, which admittedly is mostly immigrants to New England or television, is that the women are not particularly attractive. Tend to be dumpy, don’t dress well, bad skin, etc. Maybe the poverty is the problem. In the modern world poor women quickly become very unattractive due to bad diet, the ubiquity of cheap crappy clothing, and love of tattoos.

      Otoh, Brazilian Portuguese is one of the sexiest languages on earth in the mouth of an attractive woman.

      Peter Akuleyev

      June 19, 2019 at EDT am

  14. Shaking n Shacking isn’t branded as a prole eating place, so gays are welcome there. This is no surprise.

    Ok, what, who's this again?

    June 18, 2019 at EDT pm

  15. so do a chic filet style boycott

    gm

    June 18, 2019 at EDT pm

  16. In France, now that junkies have free needles, HIV is found almost exlusively among gay males, black male and black prostitutes.

    I don’t know if it’s becausf of a higher level of general promiscuity because I ve known some white straight guys who were extremely promiscuous (more than a girl a day) and without ever using a console were never contaminated.

    In south France, there is a beach were couples go for free sex – Cap d’Agde – and a guy – a professor of physics – I know who has a house there told me he used to have around 500 women intercourse each summer during more than 30 years and never caught aids (he had syphilis once that is easily treated) .

    So it must not be one person promiscuity but the average promiscuity of the group wich one fornicate that has a potentiator effect. Maybe black straight are more anal than whites. That also could factor in.

    I m quite happy to be very restrained in matters of sex when I contemplate all STD (give a premium to guys staying a virgin in their mother’s house)

    Bruno

    June 19, 2019 at EDT am

    • There’s waaay less tearing / abrasion of the penis in vaginal sex than anal sex, which makes HIV transmission to the man via vaginal sex a lot harder and almost impossible.

      It’s relatively easy to transmit from man to woman, however.

      Aperson

      June 19, 2019 at EDT pm

      • It’s my understanding that the back-door method ruptures blood vessels in the anus leading to transmission of blood-borne disease in both direction.

        So I think that the prohibition against this sort of “sodomy” (regardless of which sex was on the receiving end) made perfect logical sense, if you agree that activities that are bad for the health of those involved should be made illegal by government and/or shunned by society. Like drug use.

        Lion of the Blogosphere

        June 19, 2019 at EDT pm

    • There’s black straight guys that whites wouldn’t consider straight.
      https://www.verywellmind.com/the-lowdown-on-the-down-low-3133188

      everybodyhatesscott

      June 19, 2019 at EDT pm

  17. Has anyone even bothered to mention that putting gay pride symbols on food products makes them extremely unappetizing? I mean, especially a shake(!).

    When I see gay pride symbols I immediately think of what differentiates them from us (their sex lives). Seriously, this is a poorly conceived campaign. If I see a rainbow — a symbol which has been ruined, by the way — on a sandwich, am I more or less likely to buy it?

    SWPL2

    June 19, 2019 at EDT pm

    • I had the same thought: how many people are actually going to order the pride shake? You’d have to be in the 0.1% of flamers or SJWs. I’d be interested to see their sales figures. Still, we must remember that it’s not all about sales, as these companies have drunk the Kool-Aid and really believe in these causes.

      Hermes

      June 19, 2019 at EDT pm

      • Children will see rainbow sprinkles and want it. And where SWPL parents would refuse to buy a plain vanilla shake because it’s unhealthy, they will buy the Pride Shake to show that they are not homophobic. Being homophobic is far worse than drinking a lot of fatty and sugary calories.

        Lion of the Blogosphere

        June 19, 2019 at EDT pm

  18. i went there in 2011, it was okay? i don’t get what was supposed to be so good about it, no better than any burger i can get at a fish and chip shop here, probably worse.

    james n.s.w

    June 19, 2019 at EDT pm

  19. I feel like it’s gotten to a point where vegetarianism has become prole, I’ve met fat nurses and black septa drivers who are vegetarian. A meat based low carb diet is more elite. Proles see what the goodwhites are doing and try to copy them but by that time, swpls have moved onto the next thing.

    Gm

    June 19, 2019 at EDT pm

    • “I feel like it’s gotten to a point where vegetarianism has become prole,”

      No, it hasn’t gotten to that point.

      Lion of the Blogosphere

      June 19, 2019 at EDT pm

      • I think GM has a point. Veganism is still elite, but vegetarianism allows lots of fatty carbs with cheese and butter, so it’s doable with prole tastes. Recently, I had this homeless hoarder female friend I was trying to help out. She was obese, but a vegetarian. I’d offer to buy her meals from anywhere she wanted, and she’d want fried Taco Bell stuff like chalupas, just with the meat taken out.

        Sheila Tone

        June 24, 2019 at EDT pm

    • never met a prole veggie ever

      james n.s.w

      June 20, 2019 at EDT am

  20. “They’ll say something about everything they’ve “overcome.”

    They’ve likely overcome quite a few STDs. And, have you ever tried to get Bette Midler tickets in San Francisco? Oh, the humanity!

    Curle

    June 19, 2019 at EDT pm

  21. “Just relax and enjoy it.”

    Curle

    June 21, 2019 at EDT am

  22. MEH 0910

    June 22, 2019 at EDT pm

  23. Nope, uh-uh, still really, really uncool among middle-school boys to be thought gay.

    Sheila Tone

    June 24, 2019 at EDT pm

  24. MEH 0910

    July 3, 2019 at EDT pm

    • I’m never buying an Oreo cookie again. Not that I’ve bought those things in a decades anyway.


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: