Black separatism: exclusive to conservative media and likely to stay there
Babu Omowale, the so-called national minister of defense for the People’s New Black Panther Party, says his group and allied organizations have their sights set on establishing “our own government in a nation within a nation.”
. . .
Omowale used the interview to claim five states as belonging to the “Black Nation”: Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, Alabama, and Georgia.The revolutionary stated: “We just need to start migrating back to those states and taking control of the economics in those states. If black people move in, most definitely white people will move out. So it’s not a hard process for us to have our own country within a country.”
Sounds just like the libertarian Free State Project.
None of the regular mainstream media is going to report on this, because liberals consider the idea of separating the races to be evil and racist. On the other hand, maybe there’s the possibility of an alliance between White Nationalists and Black Power groups.
Lion of the Blogosphere 
“On the other hand, maybe there’s the possibility of an alliance between White Nationalists and Black Power groups.”
this actually makes sense. they both want the same thing.
dsgntd_plyr
July 11, 2016 at 9:26 AM
Black separatism is a figment of the freakazoid imagination. In reality, blacks have zero interest in living in a black separatist state. Deep down they realize that whitey is their meal ticket.
gothamette
July 12, 2016 at 1:54 PM
Correct, and America is doomed for this specific reason.
JS
July 12, 2016 at 9:39 PM
at my college in the ’90s, there was a quasi WN newsletter published by an older undergrad who was a C-list celebrity in that movement. It promoted Farrakhan’s separatist statements even then. But everyday blacks know better than to sever themselves from white America’s comforts and largesse.
Fiddlesticks
July 11, 2016 at 9:46 AM
For all of the lip service that blacks pay to Farrakhan in the media, the NOI only has a paltry 7k to 8k actual orthodox followers Nationally.
Camlost
July 11, 2016 at 10:29 AM
Liberia was founded by Americans in the 1840s as a black separatist nation. Even then most blacks had the sense not to get involved, and that was when white America was a lot rougher.
Richard
July 11, 2016 at 11:03 AM
the majority of blacks are dependent of welfare subsidies for their livelihood. their overrepresentation of .gov jobs and the postal service, are a testament to this.
JS
July 11, 2016 at 11:32 AM
True Reactionaries (I don’t think that this includes you, Otis, but maybe I’m mistaken) sad-wisely recognize that there’s no humane alternative to a fairly rigid feudal system structured along ethnic lines.
Garr
July 11, 2016 at 10:32 AM
I think this could work. Perhaps carve a large portion of the Black Belt and give them multiple states within it. I’m curious to speak with some Southern Nationalists and get their opinions on this. Seems like it cold be a win-win for both sides.
JerseyGuy
July 11, 2016 at 11:00 AM
There’s already vast areas of the South that somewhat fit this profile from SC to Louisiana, with entire counties (or blocks of 2-3 counties) which are majority black, with black run government and school boards.
The entire suburban Southside of Atlanta – Clayton, Fulton and Dekalb counties – are run and inhabited by blacks (probably 1+ million blacks there). Great areas for producing athletes and rappers, but not high schools with high average SAT scores.
These are the types of areas that Northern Blacks move to when they relocate back to the South.
Camlost
July 11, 2016 at 2:07 PM
The only difference is that black separatists demand welfare in order to be separated.
JS
July 11, 2016 at 11:29 AM
As a commenter at Sailer’s put it, “okay, but they ALL have to move there. Then you got a deal.”
Gary Glass
July 11, 2016 at 11:44 AM
As if they would stay there. It wouldn’t take long before either a dictatorship emerged or it descended into total disorder and poverty. Then they’d all try to emigrate back to America as “refugees”.
destructure
July 11, 2016 at 5:13 PM
If people wanted to do this, it could work. The USA could agree to pay them massive subsidies to prop up their failed economy, and they could promise not to allow Chinese or Russian military bases to be built. But They should only be given territory comparable to current population levels. FL, GA and AL have about 10% of the current US population, so give them that, then a few counties in SC or MS to get them up to 12 or 13%. The land in FL is so valuable that maybe we would be justified in only giving them GA and FL. We’d also need to make some provisions about wildlife protection, FL having lots of interesting species that would be at risk of extinction.
Economic Sophisms
July 11, 2016 at 12:14 PM
I’ve got an idea. How about you give them your damn state.
destructure
July 11, 2016 at 8:05 PM
Grow up. Eminent domain is a thing.
Economic Sophisms
July 11, 2016 at 10:55 PM
To entertain the idea of sceeding any part of the country to Negros or Indians is insane. They should lose their special privileges and be treated like everyone else. This should automatically cause their numbers to diminish to a sustainable level.
Yakov
July 11, 2016 at 12:52 PM
To entertain the idea of sceeding any part of the country to Negros or Indians is insane.
The Indians are already on reservations which are technically considered independent of the American government.
The Undiscovered Jew
July 11, 2016 at 7:37 PM
If reservations are so independent then we should stop giving them our tax dollars.
destructure
July 11, 2016 at 10:43 PM
Their independence is a polite fiction.
gothamette
July 12, 2016 at 1:55 PM
I did write ‘technically’ independent…
The Undiscovered Jew
July 12, 2016 at 5:15 PM
If that were to happen Republicans would lose five solid red states
Jay Fink
July 11, 2016 at 12:58 PM
Abraham Lincoln was, of course, an ardent opponent of slavery, but his views on race would not be considered politically correct by modern standards. He doubted that freed blacks could live harmoniously with whites and favored voluntary resettlement of emancipated slaves to Africa or Central America.
Blacks were treated horribly following the Civil War, but why they would want to leave to travel to some African or Central American hellhole is a question Lincoln never addressed. BTW, Liberia was settled mostly by emancipated American slaves. Its current per capita GDP is less than $1000.
Black Death
July 11, 2016 at 1:14 PM
Blacks were treated horribly following the Civil War, but why they would want to leave to travel to some African or Central American hellhole is a question Lincoln never addressed.
After the war a third of all freed slaves died of starvation because they were too dumb to feed themselves without the guidance of a plantation master.
The Undiscovered Jew
July 11, 2016 at 7:39 PM
To be fair to the freed slaves, they were completely unaccustomed to dealing with life outside of the plantation slavery environment.
Lion of the Blogosphere
July 11, 2016 at 7:42 PM
To be fair to the freed slaves, they were completely unaccustomed to dealing with life outside of the plantation slavery environment.
A different race would have been able to retain some modest agricultural skills. Russian serfs didn’t starve at times of reform when they were freed from serving their aristocratic overlords.
The Undiscovered Jew
July 11, 2016 at 7:46 PM
Where are you getting that one third figure from?
Magnavox
July 11, 2016 at 9:57 PM
Historians have known about the large scale starvation of freed blacks for some time, with the exact number of deaths varying depending on what source is used. Whatever the true number was it was a sizable fraction of the pre-war slave population:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/jun/16/slavery-starvation-civil-war
The Undiscovered Jew
July 12, 2016 at 5:20 PM
Spain learned early on the black slaves were poor workers in the colonies, once they realized Amerindians were far more diligent and efficient.
Meriprolestan is a slow learner. Our elites recently realized that Mexicans are better laborers than blacks.
JS
July 13, 2016 at 8:57 AM
You don’t have a flood of Blacks moving to predominately Black areas now, so I don’t see this happening in the future. Blacks, like most other Americans, want to live in nice suburban white areas.
Mike Street Station
July 11, 2016 at 4:40 PM
I think he could be successful with this strategy if he reduced the area to one state, probably Mississippi. That’s not to say it would work very well economically, but taking over one state is probably doable without using any force. Five not so much.
J1
July 11, 2016 at 5:24 PM
He’s got a point. Blackonomics is like a hack that makes libertarian societies give away their communities and homes to black people very cheaply.
1. A bunch of black people move to a neighborhood
2. Said people act as trashy as they can
3. White people sell out as fast as possible. They still want to sell out and move even though nobody wants to buy.
4. Black people buy up neighborhoods at prices that welfare recipients can afford.
Think about Compton, CA. It’s famous for being a black ghetto, but it’s actually a neighborhood of 1500-2500 sq ft 2-3br homes (on 3-5k sq ft lots) located only 4 blocks from the beach, 6 miles from downtown, 7 miles from the port, on nice & flat land.
Blackonomics has allowed black people to snatch up neighborhoods in Manhattan, lakefront real estate in Chicago, & end amp next to Cononut Grove in Miami.
Could Blacknomics be used to take over entire states? My guess is it could, but my intuition is that they are choosing the wrong states. (although maybe Southerners are more cucked these days)
Rotten
July 11, 2016 at 5:27 PM
That would never work because people don’t move to an area with the intention of ruining it and living in squalor. That certainly ends up happening but it’s not what motivated them to get up and move in the first place.
Magnavox
July 11, 2016 at 9:39 PM
Compton, CA is no longer black. It’s a El Barrio – Cartel America.
JS
July 12, 2016 at 9:38 PM
You’ve greatly underestimated the distances. Compton is a good 14 miles from either the Staples Center in downtown LA or due West to Manhattan Beach. The port of San Pedro is about the same distance as well.
Ripple Earthdevil
July 13, 2016 at 12:31 AM
“Omowale used the interview to claim five states as belonging to the “Black Nation”: Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, Alabama, and Georgia.”
Only problem with this plan, Omowale, is that about 25 Million extremely racist and well armed whites live in these states and have no intention to leave.
Sagi Is My Guru
July 11, 2016 at 7:21 PM
Theoretically, BNs and WNs could abide a mutual respect in opposition to internationalism. It would never be an alliance, but potentially closer to “mutually assured existence” in recognition of a shared principle that their mutual continued existence works to preserve. Theoretically.
As a practical matter, I don’t see the potential in BNs for surviving, let alone transcending the want to be technologically and economically equal with an all-White state. Assuming that their state didn’t descend into an African style basket-case, their movement would likely move again toward communism once they realized it would be the only way to extract wealth and assistance from White states.
Whites would not need them aside from assuring that they exist to keep Blacks out of their state.
T
July 12, 2016 at 6:30 PM
Give blacks reparations but condition it on moving to the Caribbean or Africa and revoking their citizenship. 40 million blacks given 100 000 to leave the US = 4 trillion. In the long run, would that not cost less than what you pay in welfare and crime already?
chris
July 13, 2016 at 6:08 AM